Is level of neighbourhood green space associated with physical activity in green space?

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Jamie Pearce²  Richard Mitchell¹  Katherine Ord¹ 

[1] Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G128RZ, UK;School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh EHE9XP, UK

关键词: Health inequalities;    Physical activity;    Green space;   

Others  :  806016
DOI  :  10.1186/1479-5868-10-127

 received in 2013-04-09, accepted in 2013-11-11,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

There is accumulating evidence that greater availability of green space in a neighbourhood is associated with health benefits for the local population. One mechanism proposed for this association is that green space provides a venue for, and therefore encourages, physical activity. It has also been suggested that socio-economic health inequalities may be narrower in greener areas because of the equalised opportunity for physical activity green spaces provide. However, research exploring associations between the availability of green space and physical activity has produced mixed results. Limits to the assessment of the type and amount of physical activity which occurs specifically in green space may account for these mixed findings. This observational study was therefore concerned with the extent to which green space is a venue for physical activity and whether this could account for narrower socio-economic health inequalities in greener neighbourhoods.

Method

Secondary analysis of cross sectional data on 3679 adults (16+) living in urban areas across Scotland matched with a neighbourhood level measure of green space availability. Associations between green space availability and both total physical activity, and activity specifically within green space, were explored using logistic regression models. Interactions between socio-economic position and physical activity were assessed. All models adjusted for age, sex and household income.

Results

The availability of green space in a neighbourhood was not associated with total physical activity or that specifically in green space. There was no evidence that income-related inequalities in physical activity within green space were narrower in greener areas of Scotland.

Conclusion

Physical activity may not be the main mechanism explaining the association between green space and health in Scotland. The direct effect of perceiving a natural environment on physiological and psychological health may offer an alternative explanation.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Ord et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Health Council of the Netherlands and RMNO: Nature and health: the influence of nature on social, psychological and physical well-being. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands/RMNO; 2004.
• [2]Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, de Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P: Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Community Health 2006, 60:587-592.
• [3]Mitchell R, Popham F: Greenspace, urbanity and health: relationships in England. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007, 61:681-683.
• [4]Takano T, Nakamura K, Watanabe M: Urban residential environments and senior citizens longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable green spaces. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002, 56:913-918.
• [5]Grahn P, Stigsdotter UA: Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2003, 2:1-18.
• [6]Nielsen TS, Hansen KB: Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators. Health Place 2007, 13:839-850.
• [7]van Dillen SME, de Vries S, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuwenberg P: Greenspace in urban neighbourhoods and residents’ health: adding quality to quantity. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012, 66:e8.
• [8]Hartig T, Evans GW, Jamner LD, Davis DS, Garling T: Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J Environ Psychol 2003, 23:109-123.
• [9]Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M: Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 1991, 11:201-230.
• [10]van den Berg AE, Koole SL, van der Wulp NY: Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? J Environ Psychol 2003, 23:135-146.
• [11]Kweon BS, Sullivan WC, Wiley AR: Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environ Behav 1998, 30:832-858.
• [12]Maas J, van Dillen SME, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP: Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health and Place 2009, 15:586-595.
• [13]Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E: Environmental factors associated with adults participation in physical activity: A review. Am J Prev Med 2002, 22:188-199.
• [14]Kaczynski AT, Henderson KA: Environmental correlates of physical activity: a review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leisure Sci 2007, 29:315-354.
• [15]Lachowycz K, Jones AP: Greenspace and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence. Obes Rev 2011, 12:e183-e189.
• [16]Coombes E, Jones AP, Hillsdon M: The relationship of physical activity and overweight to objectively measured green space accessibility and use. Soc Sci Med 2010, 70:816-822.
• [17]Hillsdon M, Panter J, Foster C, Jones A: The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity. Public health 2006, 120:1127-1132.
• [18]Mytton OT, Townsend N, Rutter H, Foster C: Green space and physical activity: an observational study using health survey for England data. Health Place 2012, 18:1034-1041.
• [19]Maas J, Verheij R, Spreeuwenberg P, Groenewegen P: Physical activity as a possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: a multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health 2008, 8:206. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Jones A, Hillsdon M, Coombes E: Greenspace access, use, and physical activity: understanding the effects of area deprivation. Prev Med 2009, 49:500-505.
• [21]Sugiyama T, Leslie E, Giles-Corti B, Owen N: Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships? J Epidemiol Community Health 2008, 62:e9.
• [22]Jones A, Coombes E, Griffin S, van Sluijs E: Environmental supportiveness for physical activity in English schoolchildren: a study using global positioning systems. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009, 6:42. BioMed Central Full Text
• [23]Krenn PJ, Titze S, Oja P, Jones A, Ogilvie D: Use of global positioning systems to study physical activity and the environment: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2011, 41:508-515.
• [24]Troped PJ, Wilson JS, Matthews CE, Cromley EK, Melly SJ: The built environment and location-based physical activity. Am J Prev Med 2010, 38:429-438.
• [25]Lachowycz K, Jones AP, Page AS, Wheeler BW, Cooper AR: What can global positioning systems tell us about the contribution of different types of urban greenspace to children’s physical activity? Health Place 2012, 18:586-594.
• [26]Mitchell R, Popham F: Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet 2008, 372:1655-1660.
• [27]Scottish Government: The 2008 Scottish Health Survey, Volume 1. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2009. [Main Report]
• [28]Mitchell R: Is physical activity in natural environments better for mental health than physical activity in other environments? Soc Sci Med 2013, 91:130-134.
• [29]Richardson EA, Mitchell R: Gender differences in relationships between urban green space and health in the United Kingdom. Soc Sci Med 2010, 71:568-575.
• [30]Centre for Research on Environment Society and Health: Predicting green space coverage at the small area level for the UK. http://www.cresh.org.uk/cresh-themes/green-spaces-and-health/ward-level-green-space-estimates webcite
• [31]Mitchell R, Astell-Burt T, Richardson EA: A comparison of green space indicators for epidemiological research. J Epidemiol Community Health 2011, 65:853-858.
• [32]Government S: Scottish Government Urban/Rural Classification 2009–2010. Edinburgh: Office of the Chief Statisician; 2010.
• [33]Witten K, Hiscock R, Pearce J, Blakely T: Neighbourhood access to open spaces and the physical activity of residents: a national study. Prev Med 2008, 47:299-303.
• [34]Giles-Corti B, Broomhall MH, Knuiman M, Collins C, Douglas K, Ng K, et al.: Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? Am J Prev Med 2005, 28:169-176.
• [35]Sugiyama T, Francis J, Middleton NJ, Owen N, Giles-Corti B: Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces. Am J Public Health 2010, 100:1752-1757.
• [36]Giles-Corti B, Donovan R: Relative influences of individual, social environmental, and physical environment correlates of walking. Am J Public Health 2003, 93:1583-1589.
• [37]Sugiyama T, Ward Thompson C: Associations between characteristics of neighbourhood open space and older people’s walking. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2008, 7:41-51.
• [38]Green Space Scotland: Urban greenspace mapping and characterisation handbook. http://www.greenspacescotland.org.uk/SharedFiles/Download.aspx?pageid=133&mid=129&fileid=124 webcite
• [39]Bowler D, Buyung-Ali L, Knight T, Pullin A: A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:456. BioMed Central Full Text
• [40]Hartig T, Berg AE, Hagerhall M, et al.: Health benefits of nature experience: psychological, social and cultural processes. In Forests, Trees and Human Health, Part 2. Edited by Nilsson K, Sangster M, Gallis C, Hartig T, Vries S, Seeland K. Netherlands: Springer Science+ Business Media B.V; 2011:127-168.