Social cohesion matters in health

International Journal for Equity in Health

Tzu-Hsuan Yang¹  Kun-Yang Chuang¹  Ying-Chih Chuang¹ 

[1] School of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wu-Hsing St., Taipei City 110, Taiwan

关键词: Social capital;    Solidarity;    Equality;    Liberty;    Self-rated health;    Social cohesion;   

Others  :  811154
DOI  :  10.1186/1475-9276-12-87

 received in 2013-05-28, accepted in 2013-10-21,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Introduction

The concept of social cohesion has invoked debate due to the vagueness of its definition and the limitations of current measurements. This paper attempts to examine the concept of social cohesion, develop measurements, and investigate the relationship between social cohesion and individual health.

Methods

This study used a multilevel study design. The individual-level samples from 29 high-income countries were obtained from the 2000 World Value Survey (WVS) and the 2002 European Value Survey. National-level social cohesion statistics were obtained from Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development datasets, World Development Indicators, and Asian Development Bank key indicators for the year 2000, and from aggregating responses from the WVS. In total 47,923 individuals were included in this study. The factor analysis was applied to identify dimensions of social cohesion, which were used as entities in the cluster analysis to generate a regime typology of social cohesion. Then, multilevel regression models were applied to assess the influences of social cohesion on an individual’s self-rated health.

Results and discussion

Factor analysis identified five dimensions of social cohesion: social equality, social inclusion, social development, social capital, and social diversity. Then, the cluster analysis revealed five regimes of social cohesion. A multi-level analysis showed that respondents in countries with higher social inclusion, social capital, and social diversity were more likely to report good health above and beyond individual-level characteristics.

Conclusions

This study is an innovative effort to incorporate different aspects of social cohesion. This study suggests that social cohesion was associated with individual self-rated after controlling individual characteristics. To achieve further advancement in population health, developed countries should consider policies that would foster a society with a high level of social inclusion, social capital, and social diversity. Future research could focus on identifying possible pathways by which social cohesion influences various health outcomes.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Chuang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Chan J, To H-P, Chan E: Reconsidering social cohesion: developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Soc Indic Res 2006, 75:273-302.
• [2]Fone D, Dunstan F, Lloyd K, Williams G, Watkins J, Palmer S: Does social cohesion modify the association between area income deprivation and mental health? a multilevel analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2007, 36:338-345.
• [3]Bernard P: Social cohesion: a critique, CPRN Discussion Paper No. F09. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks; 1999.
• [4]Green A, Janmaat JG, Cheng H: Regimes of social cohesion-LLAKES Research Paper No. 1. London: Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies, Institute of Education; 2009.
• [5]Islam MK, Merlo J, Kawachi I, Lindstrom M, Gerdtham U: Social capital and health: does egalitarianism matter? A literature review. Int J of Equity Health 2006, 5:1-28. BioMed Central Full Text
• [6]Phillips D: Quality of life: concept, policy and practice. New York: Routledge; 2006.
• [7]Wilkinson R, Pickett K: The spirit level: why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York: New York Bloomsbury Press; 2009.
• [8]Bourdieu P: The forms of capital. In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology and education. Edited by Richardson JG. New York: Greenwood; 1986:241-258.
• [9]Coleman JS: Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Soc 1988, 94:S95-S120.
• [10]Putnam R: Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2000.
• [11]Chuang Y-C, Chuang K-Y: Gender differences in the relationship between social capital and smoking and drinking behavior in Taiwan. Soc Sci Med 2008, 67:1321-1330.
• [12]Janmaat JG: Social cohesion as a real-life phenomenon: assessing the explanatory power of the universalist and particularist perspectives. Soc Ind Res 2011, 100:61-83.
• [13]Feldman TR, Assaf S: Social capital: conceptual frameworks and empirical evidence - an annotated bibliography. Washington, DC: World Bank; 1999.
• [14]Woolcock M, Narayan D: Social capital: implications for development theory, research and policy. World Bank Res Obs 2000, 15:225-249.
• [15]Szreter S, Woolcock M: Health by association? social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. Int J Epidemiol 2004, 33:650-667.
• [16]Saint-Arnaud S: A hierarchical cluster analysis of the welfare regimes in advanced countries. Curr Soc 2003, 51:499-527.
• [17]Berger-Schmitt R: Social cohesion as an aspect of the quality of societies: concept and measurement. In Euroreporting Working Paper #14. Mannheim: Centre for Survey Research and Methodology; 2000:1-31.
• [18]Berger-Schmitt R, Noll H-H: Conceptual framework and structure of a European system of social indicators. In Euroreporting Working Paper #9. Mannheim: Center for Survey Research and Methodology; 2000.
• [19]Phillips D: Social cohesion, social exclusion, and social quality. Copenhagen: ESPAnet Conference; 2003.
• [20]Canovan M: Nationalism and Political Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 1996.
• [21]Green A, Janmaat JG, Cheng H: Social cohesion: converging and diverging trends. Natl Inst Econ Rev 2011, 215:R6-R22.
• [22]Esping-Andersen G: The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1990.
• [23]Boxall A-M, Short SD: Political economy and population health: is Australia exceptional? Aust N Z Health Policy 2006, 3:6. BioMed Central Full Text
• [24]Jen MH, Sund ER, Johnston R, Jones K: Trustful societies, trustful individuals, and health: an analysis of self-rated health and social trust using the World Value Survey. Health Place 2010, 16:1022-1029.
• [25]Pearce N, Smith GD: Is social capital the key to inequalities in health? Am J Public Health 2003, 93:122-129.
• [26]Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Lochner K, Prothrow-Stith D: Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. Am J Public Health 1997, 87:1491-1498.
• [27]Kennelly B, O’Shea E, Garvey E: Social capital, life expectancy and mortality: a cross-national examination. Soc Sci Med 2003, 56:2367-2377.
• [28]Ram R: Further examination of the cross-country association between income inequality and population health. Soc Sci Med 2006, 62:779-791.
• [29]Mansyur C, Amick BC, Harrist RB, Franzini L: Social capital, income inequality, and self-rated health in 45 countries. Soc Sci Med 2008, 66:43-56.
• [30]Poortinga W: Social capital: an individual or collective resource for health? Soc Sci Med 2006, 62:292-302.
• [31]Bambra C: Going beyond the three worlds of welfare capitalism: regime theory and public health research. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007, 61:1098-1102.
• [32]Eikemo TA, Bambra C, Judge K, Ringdal K: Welfare state regimes and differences in self-perceived health in Europe: a multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med 2008, 66:2281-2295.
• [33]Chung H, Muntaner C: Welfare state matters: a typological multilevel analysis of wealthy countries. Health Policy 2007, 80:328-339.
• [34]Chuang Y-C, Chuang K-Y, Chen Y-R, Shi B-W, Yang T-H: Welfare state regimes, infant mortality, and life expectancy: integrating evidence from East Asia. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012, 66:e23.
• [35]Karima SA, Eikemo TA, Bambra C: Welfare state regimes and population health: integrating the East Asian welfare states. Health Policy 2010, 94:45-53.
• [36]Shandra JM, Nobles J, London B, Williamson JB: Dependency, democracy, and infant mortality: a quantitative, cross-national analysis of less developed countries. Soc Sci Med 2004, 59:321-333.
• [37]Welzel C, Inglehart R: Liberalism, postmaterialism, and the growth of freedom. Int Rev of Soc 2005, 15:81-108.
• [38]Welzel C, Inglehart R, Klingemann H-D: Human development as a theory of social change: a cross-cultural perspective. Euro J of Pol Sci 2003, 42:341-379.
• [39]Uslaner E, Conley R: Civic engagement and particularized trust: the ties that bind people to ther ethnic communities. Am Polit Res 2003, 31:331-360.
• [40]Ivanov A, Peleah M: From centrally planned development to human development. In Human Development Research Paper HDRP-2010-38. New York: United Nations: United Nations Development Programme; 2010:1-39.
• [41]Dowley KM, Silver BD: Social capital, ethnicity and support for democracy in the post-communist states. Euro-Asia Stu 2002, 54:505-527.
• [42]Li Y-S, Chuang Y-C: Neighborhood effects on an individual’s health using neighbrohood measurements developed by factor analysis and cluster analysis. J Urban Health 2009, 85:5-18.
• [43]Aldenderfer MS, Blashfield RK: Cluster analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication; 1984.
• [44]SAS/STAT(R): 9.2 User’s Guide. 2nd edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2009.
• [45]Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ: Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. 2nd edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication; 2012.
• [46]Castles FG: What welfare states do: a disaggregated expenditure approach. J Soc Policy 2008, 38:45-62.
• [47]Mathieson J, Popay J, Enoch E, Escorel S, Hernandez M, Johnston H, Rispel L: Social exclusion: meaning, measurement and experience, and links to health inequalities - a review of literature. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
• [48]Tienda M: Poor people and poor places: deciphering neighborhood effects on poverty outcomes. In Macro–micro linkages in sociology. Edited by Huber J. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication; 1991:204-212.
• [49]Hanibuchi T, Nakaya T, Murata C: Socio-economic status and self-rated health in East Asia: a comparison of China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Euro J Public Health 2010, 22:1-6.
• [50]Barford A, Dorling D, Pickett K: A commentary on Jen, Jones, and Johnston (68:4, 2009). Soc Sci Med 2010, 70:496-497.
• [51]Idler EL, Benyamini Y: Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 1997, 38:21-37.
• [52]Johnston RJ, Jen M-H, Jones K: On inequality and health, again: a response to Bernburg, and Barford, Dorling and Pickett. Soc Sci Med 2010, 70:498-500.
• [53]Acock AC: Working with missing values. J Marr Fam 2005, 67:1012-1028.