Walking for transportation in Hong Kong Chinese urban elders: a cross-sectional study on what destinations matter and when

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Janice M Johnston⁶  Wai-man Chan¹  Man-chin Cheung¹  Cindy HP Sit³  Anthony Barnett²  Ka-yiu Lee⁴  Ester Cerin⁵ 

[1] Department of Health, Elderly Health Service, 35/F Hopewell Centre, 183 Queens Road West, Wan Chai, Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong;School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, Australia;Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T, Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong;School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Sassoon Road, Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong;Institute of Human Performance, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong;School of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Sassoon Road, Hong Kong, SAR, Hong Kong

关键词: Destinations;    Neighborhood;    Environmental audit;    China;    Elders;    Utilitarian walking;   

Others  :  806849
DOI  :  10.1186/1479-5868-10-78

 received in 2013-03-21, accepted in 2013-06-17,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Walking for transport can contribute to the accrual of health-enhancing levels of physical activity in elders. Identifying destinations and environmental conditions that facilitate this type of walking has public health significance. However, most findings are limited to Western, low-density locations, while a larger proportion of the global population resides in ultra-dense Asian metropolises. We investigated relationships of within-neighborhood objectively-measured destination categories and environmental attributes with walking for transport in 484 elders from an ultra-dense metropolis (Hong Kong).

Methods

We estimated relationships of diversity (number of different types) and prevalence of within-neighborhood destination categories (environmental audits of 400 m buffers surrounding residential addresses) with transport-related walking (interviewer–administered questionnaire) in 484 Chinese-speaking elders able to walk unassisted and living in 32 neighborhoods stratified by socio-economic status and transport-related walkability. We examined the moderating effects of safety and pedestrian infrastructure-related neighborhood attributes on destination-walking associations.

Results

Participants reported on average 569 and 254 min/week of overall and within-neighborhood walking for transport, respectively. The prevalence of public transit points and diversity of recreational destinations were positively related to overall walking for transport. The presence of a health clinic/service and place of worship, higher diversity in recreational destinations, and greater prevalence of non-food retails and services, food/grocery stores, and restaurants in the neighborhood were predictive of more within-neighborhood walking for transport. Neighborhood safety-related aspects moderated the relationship of overall walking for transport with the prevalence of public transit points, this being positive only in safe locations. Similar moderating effects of safety-related attributes were observed for the relationships of within-neighborhood walking for transport with diversity of recreational and entertainment destinations. Pedestrian-infrastructure attributes acted as moderators of associations of within-neighborhood walking for transport with prevalence of commercial destination categories. Composite destinations indices consisting of destination categories related to the specific measures of walking were positively associated with walking for transport.

Conclusions

The availability of both non-commercial and commercial destinations may promote within-neighborhood walking for transport, while recreational facilities and public transit points may facilitate overall walking for transport. However, destination-rich areas need to also provide adequate levels of personal safety and a physically-unchallenging pedestrian network.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Cerin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Vogel T, Brechat PH, Lepretre PM, Kaltenbach G, Berthel M, Lonsdorfer J: Health benefits of physical activity in older patients: a review. Int J Clin Prac 2009, 63:303-320.
• [2]Simonsick EM, Guralnick JM, Volpato S, Balfour J, Fried LP: Just get out of the door! Importance of walking outside the home for maintaining mobility: findings from the women’s health and aging study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999, 53:198-203.
• [3]Cerin E, Sit CHP, Barnett A, Johnston JM, Cheung MC, Chan WM: Aging in an ultra-dense metropolis: perceived neighbourhood characteristics and utalitarian walking in Hong Kong elders. Public Health Nutrin press
• [4]Inoue S, Ohya Y, Odagiri Y, Takamiya T, Kamada M, Okada S, Oka K, Kitabatake Y, Nakaya T, Sallis JF, Shimomitsu T: Perceived neighborhood environment and walking for specific purposes among elderly Japanese. J Epidemiol 2011, 21:481-490.
• [5]Van Cauwenberg J, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Meester F, Van Dyck D, Salmon J, Clarys P, Deforche B: Relationship between the physical environment and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review. Health Place 2011, 17:458-469.
• [6]Van Cauwenberg J, Clarys P, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Van Holle V, Verté D, De Witte N, De Donder L, Buffel T, Dury S, Deforche B: Physical environmental factors related to walking and cycling in older adults: the Belgian aging studies. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:142. BioMed Central Full Text
• [7]Borst HC, de Vries SI, Graham JMA, van Dongen JEF, Bakker I, Miedema HME: Influence of environmental street characteristics on walking route choice in elderly people. J Environ Psychol 2009, 29:477-484.
• [8]de Leon CF M, Cagney KA, Bienias JL, Barnes LL, Skarupski KA, Scherr PA, Evans DA: Neighborhood social cohesion and disorder in relation to walking in community-dwelling older adults: a multilevel analysis. J Aging Health 2009, 21:155-171.
• [9]Shigematsu R, Sallis JF, Conway TL, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Cain KL, Chapman JE, King AC: Age differences in the relation of perceived neighborhood environment to walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009, 41:314-321.
• [10]Cerin E, Macfarlane DJ, Ko HH, Chan KCA: Measuring perceived neighbourhood walkability in Hong Kong. Cities 2007, 24:209-217.
• [11]Census and Statistics Department, Government of Hong Kong SAR: 2006 Population By-Census. Summary Results. Hong Kong SAR: Census and Statistics Department; 2007.
• [12]Cerin E, Chan KW, Macfarlane DJ, Lee KY, Lai PC: Objective assessment of walking environments in ultra-dense cities: development and reliability of the Environment in Asia Scan Tool - Hong Kong version (EAST-HK). Health Place 2011, 17:937-945.
• [13]Cerin E, Sit CHP, Cheung MC, Ho SY, Lee LC, Chan WM: Reliable and valid NEWS for Chinese seniors: measuring perceived neighborhood attributes related to walking. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010, 7:84. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]Frank LD, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Leary L, Cain K, Conway TL, Hess PM: The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. Br J Sports Med 2010, 44:924-933.
• [15]Schooling CM, Lam TH, Li ZB, Ho SY, Chan WM, Ho KS, Tham MK, Cowling BJ, Leung GM: Obesity, physical activity, and mortality in a prospective chinese elderly cohort. Arch Intern Med 2006, 166:1498-1504.
• [16]Macfarlane D, Chan A, Cerin E: Examining the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, long form (IPAQ-LC). Public Health Nutr 2011, 14:443-450.
• [17]Cerin E, Barnett A, Cheung MC, Sit CHP, Macfarlane DJ, Chan WM: Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire - long form in a sample of Hong Kong urban elders: does neighborhood of residence matter? J Aging Phys Act 2012, 20:402-420.
• [18]Cerin E, Barnett A, Sit CHP, Cheung MC, Lee LCJ, Ho SY, Chan WM: Measuring walking within and outside the neighborhood in Chinese elders: reliability and validity. BMC Public Health 2011, 11:851. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Giles-Corti B, Timperio A, Cutt H, Pikora TJ, Bull FC, Knuiman M, Bulsara M, Van Niel K, Shilton T: Development of a reliable measure of walking within and outside the local neighborhood: RESIDE's Neighborhood Physical Activity Questionnaire. Prev Med 2006, 42:455-459.
• [20]Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D: Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health 2003, 93:1552-1558.
• [21]Nagel CL, Carlson NE, Bosworth M, Micheael YL: The relation between the neighborhood built environment and walking activity among older adults. Am J Epidemiol 2008, 168:461-468.
• [22]Hardin JW, Hilbe J: Generalized Linear Models and Extensions. 2nd edition. Colle Station, TX: Stata Press; 2007.
• [23]Aiken LS, West SG: Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1991.
• [24]Deng HB, Macfarlane DJ, Thomas GN, Lao XQ, Jiang CQ, Cheng KK, Lam TH: Reliability and validity of the IPAQ-Chinese: the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40:303-307.
• [25]Chen YC: Chinese values, health and nursing. J Adv Nurs 2001, 36:270-273.
• [26]Cunningham GO, Michael YL: Concepts guiding the study of the impact of the built environment on physical activity for older adults: a review of the literature. Am J Health Prom 2004, 18:435-443.
• [27]Cerin E, Leslie E, Owen N: Explaining socio-economic status differences in walking for transport: an ecological analysis of individual, social and environmental factors. Soc Sci Med 2009, 68:1013-1020.