Head & Face Medicine | |
Hearing assessment in dental practitioners and other academic professionals from an urban setting | |
Stephan Letzel1  Dominik Wolf2  Lukas Scholz2  Vicky Ehlers2  Thomas G Wolf2  Angelika Callaway2  Brita Willershausen2  | |
[1] Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Kupferbergterrasse 17-19, 55116 Mainz, Germany;Department of Operative Dentistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany | |
关键词: Urban setting; Audiometric determination; Dental practitioners; Hearing assessment; | |
Others : 813561 DOI : 10.1186/1746-160X-10-1 |
|
received in 2013-10-31, accepted in 2014-01-08, 发布年份 2014 | |
【 摘 要 】
Introduction
Extended exposure to high-speed handpieces and other noise-intensive devices might put dentists at risk for possible hearing impairment. The aim of this study was to determine the hearing ability of dentists and other scientists for comparison.
Methods
After approval by the ethics committee, 115 subjects (dentists and other academic professionals as controls) of both genders were enrolled in the study. Exclusion criteria were colds, ear-blockages or abnormal hearing-thresholds. An audiometric determination (Oscilla USB audiometer, AudioConsole 3, Inmedico A/S, Denmark) was performed in the frequency range of 125Hz to 8 kHz for both ears. Anamnestic data and number of years in the profession were assessed using a questionnaire. Differences between groups were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney-U-test.
Results
Data from 53 dentists and 55 other academic professionals (69.4% male, 30.6% female) with a mean age of 51.7 ± 9.6 years and similar gender distributions in both groups were analyzed. The audiometric tests for the right and left air conduction showed that the hearing of dentists tended to be slightly more impaired than in the control subjects. For the frequencies 3 kHz and 4 kHz these differences were statistically significant for both ears. In contrast, no significant differences were found in this range for bone conduction.
Conclusions
Hearing impairment in dentists was slightly higher than in controls. Although other factors like environmental noise exposure were comparable for both groups, occupational exposure to high-speed handpieces and other noisy devices can be an additional burden for the hearing.
【 授权许可】
2014 Willershausen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20140710005259769.pdf | 345KB | download | |
Figure 2. | 46KB | Image | download |
Figure 1. | 48KB | Image | download |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Fox MS: Industrial noise exposure and hearing loss. In Diseases of the nose, throat and ear. Edited by Balleger JJ. London: Henry Kimpton; 1977:963-987.
- [2]Sampaio Fernandes JC, Carvalho APO, Gallas M, Vaz P, Matos PA: Noise levels in dental schools. Eur J Dent Educ 2006, 10(1):32-37.
- [3]Jones CM: ABC of work related disorders. Occupational hearing loss and vibration induced disorders. BMJ 1996, 313:223-226.
- [4]Setcos JC, Mahyuddin A: Noise levels encountered in dental clinical and laboratory practice. Int J Prosthodont 1998, 11(2):150-157.
- [5]Bahannan S, el-Hamid A, Bahnassy A: Noise level of dental handpieces and laboratory engines. J Prosthet Dent 1993, 70(4):356-360.
- [6]Mueller HJ, Sabri ZI, Suchak AJ, McGill S, Stanford JW: Noise level evaluation of dental handpieces. J Oral Rehabil 1986, 13(3):279-292.
- [7]Kuckartz U, Grunenberg H: Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2002: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit; 2002.
- [8]Rückert-John J, Bohrmann I, John R: Repräsentativumfrage zu Umweltbewusstsein und Umweltverhalten im Jahr 2012. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. Referat Öffentlichkeitsarbeit; 2013.
- [9]Lewis RC, Gershon RR, Neitzel RL: Estimation of permanent noise-induced hearing loss in an urban setting. Environ Sci Technol 2013, 47:6393-6399.
- [10]Mojarad F, Massum T, Samavat H: Noise levels in dental offices and laboratories in Hamedan, Iran. J Dent (Tehran) 2009, 6(4):181-186.
- [11]Bali N, Acharya S, Anup N: An assessment of the effect of sound produced in a dental clinic on the hearing of dentists. Oral Health Prev Dent 2007, 5:187-191.
- [12]Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Princen K, Nackaerts O, Debruyne F: Potential occupational health problems for dentists in Flanders, Belgium. Clin Oral Investig 2006, 10(1):8-16.
- [13]Hyson JM Jr: The air turbine and hearing loss: are dentists at risk? J Am Dent Assoc 2002, 133(12):1639-1642.
- [14]Akbarkhanzadeh F: Effect of high-speed drill noise on dentists’ hearing. Iranian J Publ Hlth 1978, 7:168-179.
- [15]Wilson CE, Vaidyanathan TK, Cinotti WR, Cohen SM, Wang SJ: Hearing-damage risk and communication interference in dental practice. J Dent Res 1990, 69(2):489-493.
- [16]Scheid RC, Pagniano RP, Kos DE: Noise assessment and reduction in a preclinical dental laboratory. J Dent Ed 1985, 49:820-823.
- [17]Garner GD, Federman J, Johnson A: Noise induced hearing loss in the dental environment: an audiologist’s perspective. GDA Action: J Georgia Dent Assoc 2002, 22(12):17-19.
- [18]Feuerstein JF: Occupational hearing conservation. In Handbook of clinical audiology. 5th edition. Edited by Katz J. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002:569.
- [19]Mittelmann JS: The dental practitioner and hearing. J Am Dent Assoc 1959, 58:158.
- [20]Hopp ES: Acoustic trauma in high-speed dental drills. Laryngoscope 1962, 72:821-827.
- [21]Von Krammer R: High speed equipment and dentists’ health. J Prosthet Dent 1968, 19(1):46-50.
- [22]Weatherton MA, Melton RE, Burns WW: The effects of dental drill noise on the hearing of dentists. J Tenn State Dent Assoc 1972, 52(4):305-308.
- [23]Merrell HB, Clagett K: Noise pollution and hearing loss in the dental office. Dent Assist J 1992, 61(3):6-9.
- [24]Lehto TU, Laurikainen ET, Aitasalo KJ, Pietilä TJ, Helenius HY, Johansson R: Hearing of dentists in the long run: a 15-year follow-up study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989, 17:207-211.
- [25]Kierklo A, Kobus A, Jaworska M, Botulinski B: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among dentists - a questionnaire survey. Ann Agric Environ Med 2011, 18(1):79-84.
- [26]Hayes M, Cockrell D, Smith DR: A systematic review of musculoskeletal disorders among dental professionals. Int J Dent Hyg 2009, 7(3):159-165.
- [27]Kadanakuppe S, Bhat PK, Jyothi C, Ramegowda C: Assessment of noise levels of the equipments used in the dental teaching institution, Bangalore. Indian J Dent Res 2011, 22(3):424-431.
- [28]Lehto T: Dentists’ hearing and exposure to high speed turbine dental drill noise. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1990, 86(3–4):115-125.
- [29]Forman-Franco B, Abramson AL, Stein T: High-speed drill noise and hearing: audiometric survey of 70 dentists. J Am Dent Assoc 1978, 97(3):479-482.
- [30]Messano GA, Petti S: General dental practitioners and hearing impairment. J Dent 2012, 40(10):821-828.
- [31]Rösler G: Progression of hearing loss caused by occupational noise. Scand Audiol 1994, 23(1):13-37.