The quest for equity in Latin America: a comparative analysis of the health care reforms in Brazil and Colombia

International Journal for Equity in Health

Roberto JF Esteves¹ 

[1] Secretariat of Labor and Education Management for Health (SGTES), Ministry of Health of Brazil, Esplanada dos Ministérios, Bloco G, Ed. Sede, Sala 704, Brasília, DF, 70680-350, Brazil

关键词: health policy;    comparative analysis;    health inequities;    equity;    health care system;    health care reform;    Colombia;    Brazil;   

Others  :  829340
DOI  :  10.1186/1475-9276-11-6

 received in 2011-12-02, accepted in 2012-02-02,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Introduction

Brazil and Colombia have pursued extensive reforms of their health care systems in the last couple of decades. The purported goals of such reforms were to improve access, increase efficiency and reduce health inequities. Notwithstanding their common goals, each country sought a very different pathway to achieve them. While Brazil attempted to reestablish a greater level of State control through a public national health system, Colombia embraced market competition under an employer-based social insurance scheme. This work thus aims to shed some light onto why they pursued divergent strategies and what that has meant in terms of health outcomes.

Methods

A critical review of the literature concerning equity frameworks, as well as the health care reforms in Brazil and Colombia was conducted. Then, the shortfall inequality values of crude mortality rate, infant mortality rate, under-five mortality rate, and life expectancy for the period 1960-2005 were calculated for both countries. Subsequently, bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed and controlled for possibly confounding factors.

Results

When controlling for the underlying historical time trend, both countries appear to have experienced a deceleration of the pace of improvements in the years following the reforms, for all the variables analyzed. In the case of Colombia, some of the previous gains in under-five mortality rate and crude mortality rate were, in fact, reversed.

Conclusions

Neither reform seems to have had a decisive positive impact on the health outcomes analyzed for the defined time period of this research. This, in turn, may be a consequence of both internal characteristics of the respective reforms and external factors beyond the direct control of health reformers. Among the internal characteristics: underfunding, unbridled decentralization and inequitable access to care seem to have been the main constraints. Conversely, international economic adversities, high levels of rural and urban violence, along with entrenched income inequalities seem to have accounted for the highest burden among external factors.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Esteves; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]World Bank: World Development Indicators. World Bank; 2011. [Cited: December 14, 2011.] [http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators webcite]
• [2]Ruger JP: Toward a Theory of a Right to Health: Capability and Incompletely Theorized Agreements. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2006, 18:273-326.
• [3]Ruger JP: Health and Social Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press of Oxford University Press; 2009.
• [4]Whitehead M: The Concepts and Principles of Equity and Health. International Journal of Health Services 1992, 22:429-45.
• [5]Daniels N, Kennedy B, Kawachi I: Health and Inequality, or, Why Justice is Good for Our Health. In Public Health, Ethics and Equity. Edited by Sudhir A, Fabienne P, Amartya S.. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004:63-91.
• [6]Marmot M: Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet 2005, 365:1099-1104.
• [7]U.N. General Assembly: International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights New York. 1966.
• [8]Commission on Social Determinants of Health: Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
• [9]Sen A: Why Health Equity? Edited by Sudhir A, Fabienne P, Amartya S. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004:21-33.
• [10]Ruger JP: Health, Capability, and Justice: Toward a New Paradigm of Health Ethics, Policy and Law. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 2006, 15:403-482.
• [11]Sen A: Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1992.
• [12]Bertolhi Filho C: História da Saúde Pública no Brasil. 4th edition edition. São Paulo: Editora Ática; 2001.
• [13]Escorel S, Nascimento DR, Edler FC: As Origens da Reforma Sanitária. In Saúde e Democracia: História e Perspectivas do SUS. Edited by Lima NT et al. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz; 2005:59-81.
• [14]Mercadante OA: Evolução das Políticas e do Sistema de Saúde no Brasil. In Caminhos da Saúde Pública no Brasil. Edited by Jacobo Finkelman. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz; 2002:235-313.
• [15]Rodriguez Neto E: Saúde: Promessas e Limites da Constituição. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz; 2003.
• [16]Wilken PRC: Política de Saúde no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora H.P. Comunicação;; 2005.
• [17]Pan American Health Organization: Health Systems and Services Profile: Brazil. In Health Systems and Services. Brasília, D.F.: PAHO; 2008.
• [18]Salud Colombia: La Reforma de la Seguridad Social en Salud Colombia. Salud Colombia. [Cited: April 12, 2009] [http://www.saludcolombia.com/actual/lareform.htm webcite]
• [19]Gómez-Camelo D: Análisis Comparado de los Sistemas de Salud de la Región Andina y El Caribe. Rev salud pública 2005, 7(3):305-316.
• [20]González-Rossetti A, Bossert TJ: Enhancing the Political Feasibility of Health Reform: A Comparative Analysis of Chile, Colombia, and Mexico. Washington, D.C.: USAID;; 2000.
• [21]Pinto D, Hsiao WC: Colombia: SHI with Managed Competition to Improve Health Care Delivery. In Social Health Insurance for Developing Nations. Edited by Hsiao WC, Fraker A. Washington, D.C. WorldBank; 2007:105-132.
• [22]Jaramillo I: Evaluación de la descentralización de la salud y la reforma de la Seguridad Social en Colombia. Gaceta Sanitaria 2002, 16:48-53.
• [23]Hernández M: Reforma sanitaria, equidad y derecho a la salud en Colombia. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2002, 18:991-1001.
• [24]Murray C, Frenk J: A framework for assessing the performance of health systems. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2000, 78:717-731.
• [25]Anand S, Diderichsen F, Evans T, Shkolnikov VM, Wirth M: Measuring disparities in health: methods and indicators. In Challenging Inequities in Health: From Ethics to Action. Edited by Evans T et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001:49-65.
• [26]Ruger JP: Global health inequalities: an international comparison. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006, 60:928-936.
• [27]Daniels N, Bryant J, Castano RA, Dantes OG, Khan KS, Pannarunothai S: Benchmarks of fairness for health care reform: a policy tool for developing countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2000, 78:740-750.
• [28]Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean: CEPALSTAT. Santiago de Chile: ECLAC; 2008. [Cited: December 15, 2008.] [http://www.cepal.cl/estadisticas/bases/default.asp?idioma = IN webcite]
• [29]Pan American Health Organization: Analysis of Health Sector Reforms: Region of the Americas. Washington, D.C.: PAHO;; 2004.
• [30]Almeida C: Eqüidade e reforma setorial na América Latina: um debate necessário. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2002, 18(Suppl):23-36.
• [31]Céspedes-Londoño JE, Jaramillo-Pérez I, Castaño-Yepes RA: Impacto de la reforma del sistema de seguridad social sobre la equidad en los servicios de salud en Colombia Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2002, 18(4):1003-1024.
• [32]Almeida C, Travassos C, Porto S, Labra ME: Health sector reform in Brazil: a case study of inequity. International Journal of Health Services 2000, 30(1):129-162.
• [33]Ministry of Health of Brazil: Caminhos do direito à saúde no Brasil. Brasília: Editora do Ministério da Saúde;; 2007.
• [34]Silva SF: Sistema Único de Saúde 20 anos: avanços e dilemas de um processo em construção. Saúde em Debate 2009, 33:38-46.
• [35]Pan American Health Organization: Analysis of Health Sector Reforms in the Andean Countries. Washington, D.C.: PAHO;; 2002.
• [36]Ministry of Health of Brazil: PAC Saúde - Mais Saúde - Direito de Todos. [Cited: April 18, 2009.] [http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/pacsaude/programa.php webcite]
• [37]Sousa A, Hill K, Dal Poz MR: Sub-national assessment of inequality trends in neonatal and child mortality in Brazil. International Journal for Equity in Health 2010, 9:21. BioMed Central Full Text
• [38]Instituto de Ciencia Política: Observatorio Legislativo. Instituto de Ciencia Politica. [Cited: April 12, 2009.] [http://www.icpcolombia.org/archivos/observatorio/boletin_112 webcite]
• [39]Frenk J: Bridging the divide: global lessons from evidence-based health policy in Mexico. Lancet 2006, 368:954-961.