Shear bond strength of Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, glass ionomer cement and composite resin on human dentine ex vivo

Head & Face Medicine

Till Dammaschke¹  Edgar Schäfer²  Christoph Heinrich Dammann¹  Markus Kaup¹ 

[1] Department of Operative Dentistry, Westphalian Wilhelms-University, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building W 30, Münster, 48149, Germany;Central Interdisciplinary Ambulance in the School of Dentistry, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building W 30, Münster, 48149, Germany

关键词: Shear bond strength;    ProRoot MTA;    Glass ionomer cement;    Composite resin;    Biodentine;   

Others  :  1209186
DOI  :  10.1186/s13005-015-0071-z

 received in 2015-02-03, accepted in 2015-04-08,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Introduction

The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of Biodentine, ProRoot MTA (MTA), glass ionomer cement (GIC) and composite resin (CR) on dentine.

Methods

120 extracted human third molars were embedded in cold-cured-resin and grinned down to the dentine. For each material 30 specimens were produced in standardised height and width and the materials were applied according to manufacturers´ instructions on the dentine samples. Only in the CR group a self-etching dentine-adhesive was used. In all other groups the dentine was not pre-treated. All specimens were stored at 37.5 °C and 100% humidity for 2d, 7d and 14d. With a testing device the shear bond strength was determined (separation of the specimens from the dentine surface). The statistical evaluation was performed using ANOVA and Tukey-test (p < 0.05).

Results

At all observation periods the CR showed the significant highest shear bond strength (p < 0.05). After 2d significant differences in the shear bond strength were detectable between all tested materials, whereby CR had the highest and MTA the lowest values (p < 0.05). After 7d and 14d the shear bond strengths of MTA and Biodentine increased significantly compared to the 2d investigation period (p < 0.05). Biodentine showed a significantly higher shear bond strength than MTA (p < 0.05), while the difference between Biodentine and GIC was not significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

After 7d Biodentine showed comparable shear bond values than GIC, whereas the shear bond values for MTA were significantly lower even after 14d. The adhesion of Biodentine to dentine surface seams to be superior compared to that of MTA.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Kaup et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review - Part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod. 2010; 36:16-27.
• [2]Torabinejad M, Parirokh M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review - Part II: leakage and biocompatibility investigations. J Endod. 2010; 36:190-202.
• [3]Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review - Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod. 2010; 36:400-413.
• [4]Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Curtis RV, Pitt Ford TR. Characterization of Portland cement for use as a dental restorative material. Dent Mater. 2006; 22:569-575.
• [5]Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Juszczyk AS, Papaioannou S, Curtis RV, McDonald F et al.. The constitution, physical properties and biocompatibility of modified accelerated cement. Dent Mater. 2008; 24:341-350.
• [6]Camilleri J, Sorrentino F, Damidot D. Investigation of the hydration and bioactivity of radiopacified tricalcium silicate cement, Biodentine and MTA Angelus. Dent Mater. 2013; 29:580-593.
• [7]Pradelle-Plasse N, Tran XV, Colon P. Physico-chemical properties. In: Biocompatibility or cytotoxic effects of dental composites. Goldberg M, editor. Coxmoor, Oxford; 2009: p.184-194.
• [8]Bortoluzzi EA, Broon NJ, Bramante CM, Felippe WT, Tanomaru Filho M, Esberard RM. The influence of calcium chloride on the setting time, solubility, disintegration, and pH of mineral trioxide aggregate and white Portland cement with a radiopacifier. J Endod. 2009; 35:550-554.
• [9]Laurent P, Camps J, De Méo M, Déjou J, About I. Induction of specific cell responses to a Ca3SiO5-based posterior restorative material. Dent Mater. 2008; 24:1486-1494.
• [10]Laurent P, Aubut V, About I. Development of a bioactive Ca3SiO5 based posterior restorative material (Biodentine™). In: Biocompatibility or cytotoxic effects of dental composites. Goldberg M, editor. Coxmoor, Oxford; 2009: p.195-200.
• [11]Koubi G, Colon P, Franquin JC, Hartmann A, Richard G, Faure MO et al.. Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, Biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth – a prospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17:243-249.
• [12]Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin systems. J Esthet Dent. 1994; 6:227-244.
• [13]Ewoldsen N, Covey D, Lavin M. The physical and adhesive properties of dental cements used for atraumatic restorative treatment. Spec Care Dent. 1997; 17:19-24.
• [14]Elnaghy AM. Influence of acidic environment on properties of Biodentine and white mineral trioxide aggregate: a comparative study. J Endod. 2014; 40:953-957.
• [15]Guneser MB, Akbulut MB, Eldeniz AU. Effect of various endodontic irrigants on the push-out bond strength of Biodentine and conventional root perforation repair materials. J Endod. 2013; 39:380-384.
• [16]Atmeh AR, Chong EZ, Richard G, Festy F, Watson TF. Dentin-cement interfacial interaction: calcium silicates and polyalkenoates. J Dent Res. 2012; 91:454-459.
• [17]Han L, Okiji T. Uptake of calcium and silicon release from calcium silicate-based endodontic materials into root canal dentine. Int Endod J. 2011; 44:1081-1087.
• [18]Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe MCS, Felippe WT. The biomineralization ability and interaction of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Portland cement with dentin in a phosphate-containing fluid. J Endod. 2009; 35:731-736.
• [19]Sarkar NK, Caicedo R, Ritwik P, Moiseyeva R, Kawashima I. Physicochemical basis of the biologic properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2005; 31:97-100.
• [20]Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe MS, Felippe WT. The biomineralization ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement on dentine enhances the push-out strength. J Endod. 2010; 36:286-291.
• [21]Gjorgievska ES, Nicholson JW, Apostolska SM, Coleman NJ, Booth SE, Slipper IJ et al.. Interfacial properties of three different bioactive dentine substitutes. Microsc Microanal. 2013; 19:1450-1457.
• [22]Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S, Kohli S. Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and MTA Plus in furcation perforation repair. J Conserv Dent. 2013; 16:462-465.
• [23]El-Ma´aita AM, Qualtrough AJE, Watts DC. The effect of smear layer on the push-out bond strength of root canal calcium silicate cements. Dent Mater. 2013; 29:797-803.
• [24]Elnaghy AM. Influence of QMix irrigant on the micropush-out bond strength of Biodentine and white mineral trioxide aggregate. J Adhes Dent. 2014; 16:277-283.
• [25]Chedella SCV, Berzins QW. A differential scanning calorimetry study of the setting reaction of MTA. Int Endod J. 2010; 43:509-518.
• [26]Gancedo-Caravia L, Garcia-Barbero E. Influence of humidity and setting time on the push-out strength of mineral trioxide aggregate obturations. J Endod. 2006; 32:894-896.
• [27]Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J. 1972; 132:133-135.
• [28]Smith DC. Development of glass-ionomer cement systems. Biomater. 1998; 19:467-478.
• [29]Naasan MA, Watson TF. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. 1998; 11:36-45.
• [30]Wilson AD, McLean JW. Glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence, Chicago; 1988.
• [31]Akinmade A. The adhesion of glass polyalkenoate cements to collagen. J Dent Res. 1994; 73(Spec Iss):181.
• [32]Ellis J, Jackson AM, Scott RP, Wilson AD. Adhesion of carboxylate cements to hydroxyapatite. III. Adsorption of poly(alkenoic acids). Biomater. 1990; 11:379-84.
• [33]Misra DN. Adsorption of low molecular weight polyacrylic acid on hydroxyapatite: role of molecular association and apatite dissolution. Langmuir. 1991; 7:2422-2424.
• [34]Ngo HC, Mount G, Mc Intyre J, Tuisuva J, von Doussa RJ. Chemical exchange between glass-ionomer restorations and residual carious dentine in permanent molars: An in vivo study. J Dent. 2006; 34:608-613.
• [35]ten Cate JM, van Duinen RNB. Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Dent Res. 1995; 76:1266-1271.
• [36]Wilson AD, Prosser HJ, Powis DM. Mechanism of adhesion of polyelectrolye cements to hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res. 1983; 62:590-592.
• [37]Yip HK, Tay FR, Ngo HC, Smales RJ, Pashley DH. Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to dentin. Dent Mater. 2001; 17:456-470.
• [38]Hosoya Y, García-Godoy F. Bonding mechanism of Ketac-molar aplicap and Fuji IX GP to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 1998; 11:235-239.
• [39]Hewlett ER, Caputo AA, Wrobet DC. Glass ionomer bond strength and treatment of dentin with polyacrylic acid. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 66:767-772.
• [40]ChemFil rock – advanced glass ionomer restorative. Scientific compendium. Dentsply Caulk, Milford; 2011.
• [41]Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014; 42:800-807.
• [42]Abdalla AI. Bond strength of a total-etch and two self-etch adhesives to dentin with and without intermediate flowable liner. Am J Dent. 2010; 23:157-160.
• [43]Hong ST, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Shon WJ, Lee W. Effects of root canal irrigants on the push-out strength and hydration behaviour of accelerated mineral trioxide aggregate in its early setting phase. J Endod. 2010; 36:1995-1999.
• [44]Saghiri MA, Shokouhinejad N, Lotfi M, Aminsobhani M, Saghiri AM. Push-out bond strength mineral trioxide aggregate in the presence of alkaline pH. J Endod. 2010; 36:1856-1859.
• [45]Shokouhinejad N, Nekoofar MH, Iravani A, Kharrazifarad MJ, Dummer PMH. Effect of acidic environment on the push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2010; 36:871-874.
• [46]McCarthy MF, Hondrum SO. Mechanical and bond strength properties of light-cured and chemically cured glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994; 105:135-141.
• [47]Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strength of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements to dentine using four conditioners. J Dent. 2000; 28:361-366.
• [48]Triana R, Prado C, Garro J, García-Godoy F. Dentin bond strength of fluoride releasing materials. Am J Dent. 1994; 7:252-254.