期刊论文详细信息
Trials
Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study)
Stefano Milani1  Mario Mascalchi3  Marco Zappa2  Daniele Regge4  Leonardo Ventura2  Paola Mantellini2  Beatrice Mallardi2  Massimo Falchini3  Guido Castiglione2  Francesca Carozzi2  Grazia Grazzini2  Lapo Sali3 
[1] Gastroenterology Section, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Viale G. Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy;Cancer Research and Prevention Institute (ISPO), Via Cosimo il Vecchio 2, 50139 Florence, Italy;Radiodiagnostic Section, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Viale G. Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy;Radiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Strada Provinciale 142, Km 3,95, Candiolo, Turin, 10060, Italy
关键词: Biological bank;    CAD;    Virtual colonoscopy;    CT colonography;    Colonoscopy;    FOBT;    Screening;    Colorectal cancer;   
Others  :  1094541
DOI  :  10.1186/1745-6215-14-74
 received in 2012-07-31, accepted in 2013-01-08,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most frequent cancer in Europe. Randomized clinical trials demonstrated that screening with fecal occult blood test (FOBT) reduces mortality from CRC. Accordingly, the European Community currently recommends population-based screening with FOBT. Other screening tests, such as computed tomography colonography (CTC) and optical colonoscopy (OC), are highly accurate for examining the entire colon for adenomas and CRC. Acceptability represents a critical determinant of the impact of a screening program. We designed a randomized controlled trial to compare participation rate and diagnostic yield of FOBT, CTC with computer-aided diagnosis, and OC as primary tests for population-based screening.

Methods/Design

A total of 14,000 subjects aged 55 to 64 years, living in the Florence district and never screened for CRC, will be randomized in three arms: group 1 (5,000 persons) invited to undergo CTC (divided into: subgroup 1A with reduced cathartic preparation and subgroup 1B with standard bowel preparation); group 2 (8,000 persons) invited to undergo a biannual FOBT for three rounds; and group 3 (1,000 persons) invited to undergo OC. Subjects of each group will be invited by mail to undergo the selected test. All subjects with a positive FOBT or CTC test (that is, mass or at least one polyp ≥6 mm) will be invited to undergo a second-level OC. Primary objectives of the study are to compare the participation rate to FOBT, CTC and OC; to compare the detection rate for cancer or advanced adenomas of CTC versus three rounds of biannual FOBT; to evaluate referral rate for OC induced by primary CTC versus three rounds of FOBT; and to estimate costs of the three screening strategies. A secondary objective of the study is to create a biological bank of blood and stool specimens from subjects undergoing CTC and OC.

Discussion

This study will provide information about participation/acceptability, diagnostic yield and costs of screening with CTC in comparison with the recommended test (FOBT) and OC.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01651624.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Sali et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150130174208802.pdf 350KB PDF download
Figure 1. 40KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Steliarova-Foucher E: Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. EJC 2010, 46:765-781.
  • [2]Crocetti E, Buzzoni C, AIRTUM Working Group: New incidence and mortality data. 2003–2005. Epidemiol Prev 2009, Suppl 2:e1-e3. e5-e26
  • [3]Gondos A, Bray F, Hakulinen T, Brenner H: Trends in cancer survival in 11 European populations from 1990 to 2009: a model-based analysis. Ann Oncol 2009, 20:564-573.
  • [4]Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, Ackroyd F, Shike M, Kurtz RC, Hornsby-Lewis L, Gerdes H, Stewart ET, The National Polyp Study Workgroup: Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The national polyp study workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993, 329:1977-1981.
  • [5]Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman LM, Ederer F: Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota colon cancer control study. N Engl J Med 1993, 328:1365-1371.
  • [6]Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, Moss SM, Amar SS, Balfour TW, James PD, Mangham CM: Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996, 348:1472-1477.
  • [7]Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O: Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 1996, 348:1467-1471.
  • [8]Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, Wooldrage K, Hart AR, Northover JM, Parkin DM, Wardle J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J, UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Trial Investigators: Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010, 375:1624-1633.
  • [9]Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L, Risio M, Sciallero S, Zappa M, Andreoni B, Arrigoni A, Bisanti L, Casella C, Crosta C, Falcini F, Ferrero F, Giacomin A, Giuliani O, Santarelli A, Visioli CB, Zanetti R, Atkin WS, Senore C, SCORE Working Group: Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian randomized controlled trial – SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011, 103:1310-1322.
  • [10]Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, Church T, Laiyemo AO, Bresalier R, Andriole GL, Buys SS, Crawford ED, Fouad MN, Isaacs C, Johnson CC, Reding DJ, O'Brien B, Carrick DM, Wright P, Riley TL, Purdue MP, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS, Miller AB, Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Berg CD, the PLCO Project Team: Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med 2012, 366:2345-2357.
  • [11]Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Bond J, Dash C, Giardiello FM, Glick S, Johnson D, Johnson CD, Levin TR, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK, Smith RA, Thorson A, Winawer SJ, American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group: Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008, 134:1570-1595.
  • [12]Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, Schoenfeld PS, Burke CA, Inadomi JN: American college of gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2008. Am J Gastroenterol 2009, 104:739-750.
  • [13]Castiglione G, Zappa M, Grazzini G, Rubeca T, Turco P, Sani C, Ciatto S: Screening for colorectal cancer by faecal occult blood test: comparison of immunochemical tests. J Med Screen 2000, 7:35-37.
  • [14]Morikawa T, Kato J, Yamaji Y, Wada R, Mitsushima T, Shiratori Y: A comparison of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test and total colonoscopy in the asymptomatic population. Gastroenterology 2005, 129:422-428.
  • [15]van Rossum LG, van Rijn AF, Laheij RJ, van Oijen MG, Fockens P, van Krieken HH, Verbeek AL, Jansen JB, Dekker E: Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2008, 135:82-90.
  • [16]Zorzi M, Falcini F, Fedato C, Grazzini G, de’ Bianchi PS, Senore C, Vettorazzi M, Visioli C, Zappa M: Screening for colorectal cancer in Italy: 2006 survey. Epidemiol Prev 2008, 32:55-68.
  • [17]Grazzini G, Castiglione G, Ciabattoni C, Franceschini F, Giorgi D, Gozzi S, Mantellini P, Lopane P, Perco M, Rubeca T, Salvadori P, Visioli CB, Zappa M: Colorectal cancer screening programme by faecal occult blood test in Tuscany: first round results. Eur J Cancer Prev 2004, 13:19-26.
  • [18]Istituto per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica (ISPO). http://www.cspo.it/ webcite
  • [19]Singh H, Turner D, Xue L, Targownik LE, Bernstein CN: Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA 2006, 295:2366-2373.
  • [20]Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Hoffmeister M: Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy. J Clin Onco 2011, 29:3761-3767.
  • [21]Nelson DB, McQuaid KR, Bond JH, Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Johnston TK: Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 55:307-314.
  • [22]Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B, Azzoni A, Bisanti L, Cardelli A, Castiglione G, Crosta C, Ederle A, Fantin A, Ferrari A, Fracchia M, Ferrero F, Gasperoni S, Recchia S, Risio M, Rubeca T, Saracco G, Zappa M, SCORE3 Working Group-Italy: Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology 2007, 132:2304-2312.
  • [23]Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, Marmo R: Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection–systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2011, 259:393-405.
  • [24]Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Schindler WR: Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003, 349:2191-2200.
  • [25]Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, Heiken JP, Dachman A, Kuo MD, Menias CO, Siewert B, Cheema JI, Obregon RG, Fidler JL, Zimmerman P, Horton KM, Coakley K, Iyer RB, Hara AK, Jr Halvorsen RA, Casola G, Yee J, Herman BA, Burgart LJ, Limburg PJ: Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:1207-1217.
  • [26]Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Leung WK, Winter TC, Hinshaw JL, Gopal DV, Reichelderfer M, Hsu RH, Pfau PR: CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:1403-1412.
  • [27]Burling D, Halligan S, Slater A, Noakes MJ, Taylor SA: Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom. Radiology 2006, 239:464-471.
  • [28]Sosna J, Blachar A, Amitai M, Barmeir E, Peled N, Goldberg SN, Bar-Ziv J: Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort. Radiology 2006, 239:457-463.
  • [29]Pickhardt PJ: Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults. Radiology 2006, 239:313-316.
  • [30]Jensch S, Bipat S, Peringa J, de Vries AH, Heutinck A, Dekker E, Baak LC, Montauban van Swijndregt AD, Stoker J: CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation. Eur Radiol 2010, 20:146-156.
  • [31]Liedenboum MH, Thenema HW, Stoker J: Radiation dose in CT colonography-trends in time and differences between daily practice and screening protocols. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:2222-2230.
  • [32]Pickhardt PJ, Hanson ME, Vanness DJ, Lo JY, Kim DH, Taylor AJ, Winter TC, Hinshaw JL: Unsuspected extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: clinical and economic impact. Radiology 2008, 249:151-159.
  • [33]Summers , Jerebko AK, Franaszek M, Malley JD, Johnson CD: Colonic Polyp: complementary role of computer aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology 2002, 255:391-399.
  • [34]Mani A, Napel S, Paik DS, Jr Jeffrey RB, Yee J, Olcott EW, Prokesch R, Davila M, Schraedley-Desmond P, Beaulieu CF: Computed tomography colonography: feasibility of computer-aided polyp detection in a first-reader paradigm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004, 28:318-332.
  • [35]Edwards JT, Mendelson RM, Fritschi L, Foster NM, Wood C, Murray D, Forbes GM: Colorectal Neoplasia Screening with CTC colonography in average-risk asymptomatic subjects: community based study. Radiology 2004, 230:459-464.
  • [36]Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, Bossuyt PM, van Ballegooijen M, Nio CY, van de Vijver MJ, Biermann K, Thomeer M, van Leerdam ME, Fockens P, Stoker J, Kuipers EJ, Dekker E: Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2012, 13:55-64.
  • [37]Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, Dachman AH, Fenlon HM, Ferrucci JT, Glick SN, Laghi A, Macari M, McFarland EG, Morrin MM, Pickhardt PJ, Soto J, Yee J, Working Group on Virtual Colonoscopy: CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005, 236:3-9.
  • [38]Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, Borchard F, Cooper HS, Dawsey SM, Dixon MF, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Fléjou JF, Geboes K, Hattori T, Hirota T, Itabashi M, Iwafuchi M, Iwashita A, Kim YI, Kirchner T, Klimpfinger M, Koike M, Lauwers GY, Lewin KJ, Oberhuber G, Offner F, Price AB, Rubio CA, Shimizu M, Shimoda T, Sipponen P, Solcia E, Stolte M, Watanabe H, Yamabe H: The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000, 47:251-255.
  • [39]Trouet C: New European guidelines for the use of stored human biological materials in biomedical research. J Med Ethics 2004, 30:99-103.
  • [40]Senore C, Ederle A, Fantin A, Andreoni B, Bisanti L, Grazzini G, Zappa M, Ferrero F, Marutti A, Giuliani O, Armaroli P, Segnan N: Acceptability and side-effects of colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in a screening setting. J Med Screen 2011, 18:128-134.
  • [41]Halloran S, Launoy G, Zappa M: Faecal occult blood testing. In European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. 1st edition. Edited by Segnan N, Patnick J, von Karsa L. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union; 2010:103-144.
  • [42]Taylor SA, Slater A, Burling DN, Tam E, Greenhalgh R, Gartner L, Scarth J, Pearce R, Bassett P, Halligan S: CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:32-42.
  • [43]Campanella D, Morra L, Delsanto S, Tartaglia V, Asnaghi R, Bert A, Neri E, Regge D: Comparison of three different iodine-based bowel regimens for CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2010, 20:348-358.
  • [44]Zalis ME, Blake MA, Cai W, Hahn PF, Halpern EF, Kazam IG, Keroack M, Magee C, Näppi JJ, Perez-Johnston R, Saltzman JR, Vij A, Yee J, Yoshida H: Diagnostic accuracy of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography for detection of adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults: a prospective evaluation. Ann Intern Med 2011, 156:692-702.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:26次