期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Environmental Health Science Engineering
Efficiency of non-ionic surfactants - EDTA for treating TPH and heavy metals from contaminated soil
Fooad Rahimi3  Mohammad Maroosi1  Mehran Mohammadian Fazli3  Ali Assadi3  Mohammad Reza Mehrasebi3  Mansour Baziar2 
[1] Department of Health, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran;Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran;Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
关键词: Heavy metals;    Total petroleum hydrocarbons;    Chelating agent;    Non-ionic surfactants;    Soil;   
Others  :  811366
DOI  :  10.1186/2052-336X-11-41
 received in 2012-07-18, accepted in 2013-09-29,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Introduction of fuel hydrocarbons and inorganic compounds (heavy metals) into the soil, resulting in a change of the soil quality, which is likely to affect use of the soil or endangering public health and ground water. This study aimed to determine a series of parameters to remediation of TPH and heavy metals contaminated soil by non-ionic surfactants- chelating agents washing process. In this experimental study, the effects of soil washing time, agitation speed, concentration of surfactant, chelating agent and pH on the removal efficiency were studied. The results showed that TPH removal by nonionic surfactants (Tween 80, Brij 35) in optimal condition were 70–80% and 60–65%, respectively. Addition of chelating agent (EDTA) significantly increases Cd and Pb removal. The washing of soil by non- ionic surfactants and EDTA was effective in remediation of TPH and heavy metals from contaminated soil, thus it can be recommended for remediation of contaminated soil.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Baziar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140709063503436.pdf 604KB PDF download
Figure 7. 28KB Image download
Figure 6. 16KB Image download
Figure 5. 20KB Image download
Figure 4. 25KB Image download
Figure 3. 27KB Image download
Figure 2. 29KB Image download
Figure 1. 21KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Khalladia R, Benhabilesa O, Bentahara F, Mostefa N: Surfactant remediation of diesel fuel polluted soil. J Hazard Mater 2009, 164:1179-1184.
  • [2]Solano-Serena F, Marchal R, Vandecasteele JP: Biodegradation of gasoline in the environment: from overall assessment to the case of recalcitrant hydrocarbons. Revue de l'Institut Français du Pétrole 2001, 56:479-498.
  • [3]Collins C, Laturnus F, Nepovim A: Remediation of BTEX and trichloroethene - current knowledge with special emphasis on phytoremediation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2002, 9:86-94.
  • [4]ATSDR: Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). US department of health and human services, public health service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1999. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts123.pdf webcite
  • [5]Lizhong Z, Baoliang C, Jing W, Hongxin S: Pollution survey of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface water of Hangzhou, china. Chemosphere 2004, 56:1085-1095.
  • [6]Haigh S: Review of the interaction of surfactants with organic contaminants in soil. Sci Total Environ 1996, 185:161-170.
  • [7]Iturbe R, Flores-Serrano RM, Castro A, Flores C, Torres LG: Subsoil TPH contamination in two oil pipeline pumping stations and one pipeline right-of-way in north Mexico. J Environ Manage 2010, 91:2396-2402.
  • [8]Mahvi AH, Mesdaghinia AR, Naghipoor D: Comparison of heavy metals extraction in contaminated soils by various concentrations of EDTA. J Biol Sci 2005, 8(8):1081-1085.
  • [9]Cameron RE: Guide to site and soil description for hazardous waste site characterization volume 1: metals. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 1992. http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=200097F6.txt webcite
  • [10]Ramamurthy AS, Vo D, Li XJ, Qu J: Surfactant.enhanced removal of Cu(II) and Zn(II) from a contaminated sandy soil. Water Air Soil Poll 2008, 190:197-207.
  • [11]Scullion J: Remediating polluted soils. Naturwissenschaften 2006, 93:51-65.
  • [12]Zhou QX, Hua T: Bioremediation: a review of applications and problems to be resolved. Prog Nat Sci 2004, 14:937-944.
  • [13]Ahn CK, Park D, Woo SH, Park JM: Removal of cationic heavy metal from aqueous solution by activated carbon impregnated with anionic surfactants. J Hazard Mater 2009, 164:1130-1136.
  • [14]Villa RD, Trovo AG, Pupo Nogueira RF: Soil remediation using a coupled process: soil washing with surfactant followed by photo-Fenton oxidation. J Hazard Mater 2010, 174:770-775.
  • [15]Doong RA, Wu YW, Lei WG: Surfactant enhanced remediation of cadmium contaminated soils. Water Sci Technol 1998, 37:65-71.
  • [16]Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF: Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: a review. Eng Geol 2001, 60:371-380.
  • [17]Mann MJ: Full-scale and pilot-scale soil washing. J Hazard Mater 1999, 66:119-136.
  • [18]Mouton J, Mercier G, Blais JF: Amphoteric surfactants for PAH and lead polluted- soil treatment using flotation. Water Air Soil Poll 2009, 197:381-393.
  • [19]Laha S, Tansel B, Ussawarujikulchai A: Surfactant–soil interactions during surfactant-amended remediation of contaminated soils by hydrophobic organic compounds. J Environ Manage 2009, 90:95-100.
  • [20]Fountain JC, Klimek A, Beikirch MG, Middleton TM: The use of surfactants for in situ extraction of organic pollutants from a contaminated aquifer. J Hazard Mater 1991, 28:295-311.
  • [21]Liu Z, Laha S, Luthy RG: Surfactant solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds in soil-water suspensions. Water Sci Technol 1991, 23:475-485.
  • [22]Ussawarujikulchai A, Laha S, Tansel B: Synergistic effects of organic contaminants and soil organic matter on the soil–water partitioning and effectiveness of a nonionic surfactant (Triton X-100). Bioremed J 2008, 12(2):88-97.
  • [23]Peng S, Wu W, Chen J: Removal of PAHs with surfactant-enhanced soil washing: influencing factors and removal effectiveness. Chemosphere 2011, 82(8):11173-11177.
  • [24]Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons TNRCC Method 1005. 2000. http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/assets/public/compliance/compliance_support/qa/1005_final.pdf webcite
  • [25]Aldrich: Detergents properties and applications. 2008. http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/img/assets/15402/Detergent-Selection - Table.pdf webcite
  • [26]Moutsatsou A, Gregou M, Matsas D, Protonotarios V: Washing as a remediation technology applicable in soils heavily polluted by mining-metallurgical activities. Chemosphere 2006, 63:1632-1640.
  • [27]Zheng Z, Obbard JP: Oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) by the white rot fungus, Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Enzyme Microb Technol 2002, 31(1):3-9.
  • [28]Djedidi Z, Drogui P, Ben Cheikh R, Mercier G, Blais JF: Laboratory study of successive soil saline leaching and electrochemical lead recovery. J Environ Eng 2005, 131:305-314.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:75次 浏览次数:17次