| International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity | |
| Are independent mobility and territorial range associated with park visitation among youth? | |
| Jo Salmon1  Kylie Ball1  Anna Timperio1  David Crawford1  Clare Hume1  Alison Carver1  Jenny Veitch1  | |
| [1] Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia | |
| 关键词: Territorial range; Independent mobility; Active transport; Youth; Adolescents; Park visitation; | |
| Others : 803417 DOI : 10.1186/1479-5868-11-73 |
|
| received in 2013-12-09, accepted in 2014-06-04, 发布年份 2014 | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background
Parks are important for providing opportunities for physical activity among youth. Apart from engaging in physical activity whilst visiting a park, active transportation (e.g. walking or cycling) to parks is potentially an additional source of physical activity. Previous research has shown that a major barrier to young people visiting parks is their inability to visit parks unaccompanied by an adult. It is not known; however, whether young people who have greater independent mobility and territorial range (ability to move around their neighbourhood alone or with friends, unaccompanied by an adult) are more likely to visit parks. This study examined park visitation and travel mode to parks and whether independent mobility and territorial range were associated with park visitation among youth living in disadvantaged areas of Victoria, Australia.
Methods
In 2010–11, 311 youth aged 8–16 years self-reported their park use, active transport, independent mobility to parks, and territorial range. Logistic regression models determined the odds of park visitation (once per week or more) according to independent mobility and territorial range, adjusting for key covariates.
Results
Overall, 75% of participants reported visiting parks, and 37% visited their ‘usual’ park at least once per week. Of those who reported visiting parks, 87% travelled to the park they usually visited using active transport: 57% walked, 22% cycled, and 8% used a scooter/skateboard. Just 15% and 13% of youth regularly walked or cycled alone to parks/playgrounds respectively, and 25% and 19% regularly walked or cycled with friends or siblings (no adults) respectively. For the 84% who reported having parks/playgrounds within walking distance from home, those who regularly walked alone to parks (OR 3.61; CI=1.67, 7.80), and regularly walked (OR 2.27; CI=1.14, 4.55) or cycled (OR 3.38; CI=1.73, 6.62) with friends to parks, were significantly more likely to visit a park at least once per week, compared to others.
Conclusions
This study showed that active transport is frequently used by this sample of young people to travel to parks. Findings also highlight the potential importance of providing opportunities for youth aged 8–16 years to visit local parks independent of an adult.
【 授权许可】
2014 Veitch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140708041254155.pdf | 187KB |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Floyd MF, Bocarro JN, Smith WR, Baran PK, Moore RC, Cosco NG, Edwards MB, Suau LJ, Fang K: Park-based physical activity among children and adolescents. Am J Prev Med 2011, 41:258-265.
- [2]Alexander DS, Huber LR, Piper CR, Tanner AE: The association between recreational parks, facilities and childhood obesity: a cross-sectional study of the 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007, 2013(17):427-431.
- [3]Potwarka LR, Kaczynski AT, Flack AL: Places to play: association of park space and facilities with healthy weight status among children. J Community Health 2008, 33:344-350.
- [4]Bell JF, Wilson JS, Liu GC: Neighborhood greenness and 2-year changes in body mass index of children and youth. Am J Prev Med 2008, 35:547-553.
- [5]Cohen DA, Ashwood S, Scott M, Overton A, Evenson KR, Staten L, Porter DE, McKenzie TL, Catellier D: Public parks and physical activity among adolescent girls. Pediatrics 2006, 118:1381-1389.
- [6]Roemmich JN, Epstein L, Rama S, Yin L, Robinson J, Winiewicz D: Association of access to parks and recreational facilities with the physical activity of young children. Prev Med 2006, 43:437-441.
- [7]Grow HM, Saelens BE, Kerr J, Durant NH, Norman GJ, Sallis JF: Where are youth active? Roles of proximity, active transport, and built environment. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40:2071-2079.
- [8]Ries AV, Voorhees CC, Roche KM, Gittelsohn J, Yan AF, Astone NM: A quantitative examination of park characteristics related to park use and physical activity among urban youth. J Adolesc Health 2009, 45:S64-70.
- [9]Ball K, Crawford D: Socio-economic factors in obesity: a case of slim chance in a fat world? Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2006, 15(Suppl):15-20.
- [10]Hillman M, Adams J, Whitelegg J: One False Move: A Study of Children’s Independent Mobility. London: PSI Publishing; 1990.
- [11]Mackett R, Brown B, Gong Y, Kitazawa K, Paskins J: Children’s independent movement in the local environment. Built Environ 2007, 33:454-468.
- [12]Veitch J, Bagley S, Ball K, Salmon J: Where do children usually play? A qualitative study of parents’ perceptions of influences on children’s active free-play. Health Place 2006, 12:383-393.
- [13]Veitch J, Salmon J, Ball K: Children’s perceptions of the use of public open spaces for active free-play. Children’s Geographies 2007, 5:409-422.
- [14]Veitch J, Salmon J, Ball K: Children’s active free play in local neighborhoods: a behavioral mapping study. Health Educ Res 2008, 23:870-879.
- [15]Ball K, Cleland V, Salmon J, Timperio AF, McNaughton S, Thornton L, Campbell K, Jackson M, Baur LA, Mishra G, Brug J, Jeffery RW, King A, Kawachi I, Crawford DA: Cohort profile: the resilience for eating and activity despite inequality (READI) study. Int J Epidemiol 2012, 42(6):1629-1639.
- [16]Australian Bureau of Statistics: Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA). Australia; 2006. (http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/allprimarymainfeatures/356A4186CCDDC4D1CA257B3B001AC22C?opendocument webcite). Accessed on 5 June 2014
- [17]Smith L, Sahlqvist S, Ogilvie D, Jones A, Griffin SJ, van Sluijs E: Is active travel to non-school destinations associated with physical activity in primary school children? Prev Med 2012, 54:224-228.
- [18]Schoeppe S, Duncan MJ, Badland H, Oliver M, Curtis C: Associations of children’s independent mobility and active travel with physical activity, sedentary behaviour and weight status: a systematic review. J Sci Med in Sport 2013, 16:312-319.
- [19]Hart R: Children’s Experience of Place. New York: Irvington; 1979.
- [20]Matthews H: Making Sense Of Place: Children’s Understanding Of Large Scale Environments. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1992.
- [21]Wen L, Kite J, Merom D, Rissel C: Time spent playing outdoors after school and its relationship with independent mobility: A cross-sectional survey of children aged 10–12 years in Sydney, Australia. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009, 6:15. BioMed Central Full Text
- [22]Page AS, Cooper AR, Griew P, Jago R: Independent mobility, perceptions of the built environment and children’s participation in play, active travel and structured exercise and sport: the peach project. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010, 7:17-26. BioMed Central Full Text
- [23]Carver A, Timperio A, Crawford D: Playing it safe: the influence of neighbourhood safety on children’s physical activity - a review. Health Place 2008, 14:217-227.
- [24]Kaczynski AT, Koohsari MJ, Stanis SA, Bergstrom R, Sugiyama T: Association of street connectivity and road traffic speed with park usage and park-based physical activity. Am J Health Prom 2014, 28:197-203.
- [25]Alparone FR, Pacilli MG: On children’s independent mobility: the interplay of demographic, environmental, and psychosocial factors. Children’s Geographies 2012, 10:109-122.
- [26]Carver A, Timperio AF, Crawford DA: Young and free? A study of independent mobility among urban and rural dwelling australian children. J Sci Med In Sport 2012, 15:505-510.
- [27]Broberg A, Salminen S, Kytta M: Physical environmental characteristics promoting independent and active transport to children’s meaningful places. Appl Geogr 2013, 38:43-52.
PDF