Engagement of patients in religious and spiritual practices: Confirmatory results with the SpREUK-P 1.1 questionnaire as a tool of quality of life research

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Thomas Ostermann¹  Peter F Matthiessen¹  Arndt Büssing² 

[1] Department of Medical Theory and Complementary Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Gerhard-Kienle-Weg 4, 58313 Herdecke, Germany;Krebsforschung Herdecke, Department of Applied Immunology, Heinrichstraße 67, 44805 Bochum, Germany

关键词: multiple sclerosis;    chronic disease, cancer;    coping;    religious practices;    Spirituality and Religion;    Religion and Medicine;    Questionnaires;   

Others  :  1219280
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7525-3-53

 received in 2005-07-20, accepted in 2005-09-06,  发布年份 2005

【 摘 要 】

Background

Quality of life is a multidimensional construct composed of functional, physical, emotional, social and spiritual well-being. In order to examine how patients with severe diseases view the impact of spirituality and religiosity on their health and how they cope with illness, we have developed the SpREUK questionnaire. We deliberately avoided the intermingling of attitudes, convictions and practices, and thus addressed the distinct forms and frequencies of spiritual/religious practices in an additional manual, the SpREUK-P questionnaire.

Methods

The SpREUK-P was designed to differentiate spiritual, religious, existentialistic and philosophical practices. It was tested in a sample of 354 German subjects (71% women; 49.0 ± 12.5 years). Half of them were healthy controls, while among the patients cancer was diagnosed in 54%, multiple sclerosis in 22%, and other chronic diseases in 23%. Reliability and factor analysis of the inventory were performed according to the standard procedures.

Results

We confirmed the structure and consistency of the previously described 18-item SpREUK-P manual and improved the quality of the current construct by adding several new items. The new 25-item SpREUK-P 1.1 (Cronbach's alpha = 0.8517) has the following scales: (1) conventional religious practice (CRP), (2) existentialistic practice (ExP), (3) unconventional spiritual practice (USP), (4) nature/environment-oriented practice (NoP), and (5) humanistic practice (HuP). Among the tested individuals, the highest engagement scores were found for HuP and NoP, while the lowest were found for the USP. Women had significantly higher scores for ExP than male patients. With respect to age, the engagement in CRP increases with increasing age, while the engagement in a HuP decreased. Individuals with a Christian orientation and with a religious and spiritual attitude had the highest engagement scores for CRP, while the engagement in an USP was high with respect to a spiritual attitude. Variance analyses confirmed that the SpR attitude and religious affiliation are the main relevant covariates for CRP and ExP, while for the USP the SpR attitude and the educational level are of significance, but not religious affiliation. Patients with multiple sclerosis overall had the lowest engagement scores for all five forms of SpR practice, while it is remarkable that cancer patients had lower scores for HuP and USP than healthy subjects.

Conclusion

The current re-evaluation of the SpREUK-P questionnaire (Version 1.1) indicates that it is a reliable, valid measure of five distinct forms of spiritual, religious and philosophical practice that may be especially useful for assessing the role of spirituality and religiosity in health related research. An advantage of our instruments is the clear-cut differentiation between convictions and attitudes on the one hand, and the expression of these attitudes in a concrete engagement on the other hand.

【 授权许可】

   
2005 Büssing et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Brady MJ, Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Mo M, Cella D: A case for including spirituality in quality of life measurement in oncology. Psychooncology 1999, 8:417-428.
• [2]Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Brady MJ, Hernandez L, Cella D: Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy–Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp). Ann Behav Med 2002, 24:49-58.
• [3]Levine EG, Targ E: Spiritual correlates of functional well-being in women with breast cancer. Integr Cancer Ther 2002, 1:166-174.
• [4]Murray SA, Kendall M, Boyd K, Worth A, Benton TF: Exploring the spiritual needs of people dying of lung cancer or heart failure: a prospective qualitative interview study of patients and their carers. Palliat Med 2004, 18:39-45.
• [5]Mueller PS, Plevak DJ, Rummans TA: Religious involvement, spirituality, and medicine: implications for clinical practice. Mayo Clin Proc 2001, 76:1225-1235.
• [6]Sloan RP, Bagiella E, Powell T: Religion, spirituality, and medicine. Lancet 1999, 353:664-667.
• [7]Sloan RP, Bagiella E: Claims about religious involvement and health outcomes. Ann Behav Med 2002, 24:14-21.
• [8]McCullough ME, Hoyt WT, Larson DB, Koenig HG, Thoresen C: Religious involvement and mortality: a meta-analytic review. Health Psychol 2000, 19:211-222.
• [9]Luskin F: Review of the effect of spiritual and religious factors on mortality and morbidity with a focus on cardiovascular and pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2000, 20:8-15.
• [10]Levine EG, Targ E: Spiritual correlates of functional well-being in women with breast cancer. Integr Cancer Ther 2002, 1:166-174.
• [11]Seeman TE, Dubin LF, Seeman M: Religiosity/spirituality and health. A critical review of the evidence for biological pathways. Am Psychol 2003, 58:53-63.
• [12]Koenig HG: Religion, spirituality, and medicine: research findings and implications for clinical practice. South Med J 2004, 97:1194-1200.
• [13]Allport GW, Ross JM: Personal religious orientation and prejudice. J Pers Soc Psychol 1967, 5:432-443.
• [14]Batson CD, Schoenrade PA: Measuring religion as Quest: Validity concerns. J Scien Study Religion 1991, 30:416-429.
• [15]Maltby J, Lewis CA: Measuring Intrinsic and Extrinsic Orientation Toward Religion: Amendments for its use among religious and non-religious samples. Personal Indiv Differences 1996, 21:937-946.
• [16]Maltby J, Day L: Amending a measure of the Quest Religious Orientation: Applicability of the scale's use among religious and non-religious persons. Personal Indiv Differences 1998, 25:517-522.
• [17]Bufford RK, Paloutzian RF, Ellison CW: Norms for the spiritual well-being scale. J Psychol Theol 1991, 19:56-70.
• [18]Paloutzian RF, Ellison CW: Loneliness, spiritual well-being and the quality of life. In Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. Edited by Peplau LA, Perlman D. Wiley-Interscience; 1982:224-237.
• [19]Holland JC, Kash KM, Passik S, Gronert MK, Sison A, Lederberg M, et al.: A brief spiritual beliefs inventory for use in quality of life research in life-threatening illness. Psychooncology 1998, 7:460-469.
• [20]Underwood LG, Teresi JA: The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale: Development, Theoretical Description, Reliability, Exploratory Factor Analysis, and Preliminary Construct Validity Using Health-Related Data. Ann Behav Med 2002, 24:22-33.
• [21]Plante TG, Boccaccini M: The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology 1997, 45:375-387.
• [22]Plante TG, Vallaeys C, Sherman AC, Wallston KA: The development of a brief version of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology 2002, 50:359-368.
• [23]Sherman AC, Plante TG, Simonton S, Adams DC, Harbison C, Burris SK: A multidimensional measure of religious involvement for cancer patients: the Duke Religious Index. Support Care Cancer 2000, 8:102-109.
• [24]Bussing A, Ostermann T, Matthiessen PF: Search for meaningful support and the meaning of illness in German cancer patients. Anticancer Res 2005, 25:1449-1455.
• [25]Bussing A, Ostermann T, Matthiessen PF: Role of religion and spirituality in medical patients: confirmatory results with the SpREUK questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005, 3:10. BioMed Central Full Text
• [26]Bussing A, Ostermann T, Matthiessen PF: Spirituelle Bedürfnisse krebskranker Menschen – Einstellung und Praxis. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Onkologie 2005, 37:13-22.
• [27]Bussing A, Ostermann T: Caritas und ihre neuen Dimensionen: Spiritualität und Krankheit. In Caritas plus. Qualität hat einen Namen. Edited by Patzek M. Kevelaer: Butzon and Bercker; 2004:110-133.
• [28]Ostermann T, Bussing A, Matthiessen PF: [Pilot study for the development of a questionnaire for the measuring of the patients' attitude towards spirituality and religiosity and their coping with disease(SpREUK)]. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd 2004, 11:346-353.
• [29]Bussing A, Ostermann T, Matthiessen PF: Role of Religion and Spirituality in Medical patients in Germany. Journal of Religion and Health 2005, 44:321-340.
• [30]Jagodzinski W, Dobbelaere K: Der Wandel kirchlicher Religiosität in Westeuropa. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 1993, 68-91.
• [31]Kaufmann W: Existentialism: From Dostoevsky to Sartre. Plume Books. 1975.
• [32]Sartre J-P: Being and Nothingness. Washington Square Press; 1943.
• [33]Albani C, Bailer H, Geyer M, Brähler E, Grulke N: Erfassung religiöser und spiritueller Einstellungen – Psychometrische Überprüfung der deutschen Version des „System of Belief Inventory" (SBI-15R-D) von Holland et al. an einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsstichprobe. Psychother Psych Med 2002, 52:306-313.
• [34]Kurtz P: A Secular Humanist Declaration. New York: Prometheus Books; 1980.
• [35]Kurtz P: The Humanist Alternative. New York: Prometheus Books; 1973.
• [36]Holland J: Religious Humanism: The Past We Inherit; The Future We Create. Humanism today 1998., 12
• [37]Batson CD, Schoenrade P, Ventis WL: Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.