Measuring subjective complaints of attention and performance failures - development and psychometric validation in tinnitus of the self-assessment scale APSA

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Roman Görtelmeyer¹  Ulli Simone Bankstahl² 

[1] Faculty of Social Sciences, Clinical and Biological Psychology, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany;Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH Global R&D, Frankfurt, Germany

关键词: Reliability;    Validity;    Self rating scale;    Performance;    Attention;   

Others  :  823644
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7525-11-86

 received in 2012-09-26, accepted in 2013-05-27,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

There is a need for a validated self-assessment questionnaire for cognitive impairment in subjects reporting subjective tinnitus. The objective was to develop a patient-reported outcome measure.

Methods

This was a prospective, non-interventional, multicultural study. The 30-item “Attention and Performance Self-Assessment Scale” (APSA) was linguistically validated in Germany, Mexico and USA and was analyzed for content and structure. The analysis included descriptive statistics of baseline data, item characteristics, test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients, ICC), definition of internal consistency (Cronbach’ s alpha), and explorative and confirmatory factor analysis to define the structure of the scale. Correlations with various tinnitus scales and subscales from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were done to estimate convergent validity.

Results

The data for 211 subjects aged 30 through 60 years, (mean= 48.5 years, SD= 8.3) with mild to moderate tinnitus (mean Tinnitus Handicap Inventory-12 (THI-12) total score 11.2, SD= 5.3) were analyzed. The majority of subjects had sub-clinical scores for anxiety and depression (HADS below 11 points). Sequential principal factor analyses of the APSA resulted in a subscale which included 20 (APS20) of the original 30 items and two correlated subscales (AP-F1, AP-F2) defined by 9 items each. Both factor solutions were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. Test retest reliability of the APS20, AP-F1 and AP-F2 (ICC ≥ 0.87) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.89) are high. APS20 correlated moderately high with HADS (depression: 0.54; anxiety: 0.62) and THI-12 total (0.52). In a few cases, AP-F2 correlated higher than AP-F1 with other scales (e.g. HADS-depression with AP-F1: only 0.46, but AP-F2: 0.59).

Conclusions

APS20, AP-F1, and AP-F2 have good psychometrical properties. The scales will add value to the assessment of cognitive aspects of quality of life and mental health in the population with subjective tinnitus. The subscales AP-F1 and AP-F2 may be helpful for detecting specific cognitive failures and may be sensitive to different interventional effects.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Bankstahl and Görtelmeyer; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Andersson G: Tinnitus patients with cognitive problems: causes and possible treatments. Hearing Journal 2009, 62:27-30.
• [2]Rossiter S, Stevens C, Walker G: Tinnitus and its effect on working memory and attention. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006, 49:150-160.
• [3]Hallam RS, McKenna L, Shurlock L: Tinnitus impairs cognitive efficiency. Int J Audiol 2004, 43:218-226.
• [4]Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, FitzGerald P, Parkes KR: The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Br J Clin Psychol 1982, 21(Pt 1):1-16.
• [5]ATA member survey results. http://www.ata.org/survey-results webcite
• [6]Tyler RS, Baker LJ: Difficulties experienced by tinnitus sufferers. J Speech Hear Disord 1983, 48:150-154.
• [7]The WHOQOL Group: The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Social science & medicine 1998, 46:1569-1585.
• [8]Reason J: Self-report questionnaires in cognitive psychology: have they delivered the goods? In Attention: selection, awareness, and control: a tribute to donald boradbent. Edited by Baddeley A, Weiskrantz L. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993:406-423.
• [9]Scholz A, Kubinger KD, Schmidt-Atzert L: Konzentration im Alltag Erleben und Leistung. Dresden: Technische Universität; 2006.
• [10]Volz-Sidiropoulou E, Böcker M, Niemann H, Privou C, Zimmermann P, Gauggel S: Skala zur Erfassung von Aufmerksamkeitsdefiziten (SEA). Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie 2007, 18:299-309.
• [11]Montigny C, Görtelmeyer R, Korbel US: Linguistic validation of the attention and performance self assessment scale, APSA, for use in international studies. Value Health 2009, 12:A78.
• [12]Bankstahl US, Elkin EP, Gebauer A, Görtelmeyer R: Validation of the THI-12 questionnaire for international use in assessing tinnitus: a multi-centre, prospective, observational study. IntJAudiol 2012, 51:671-677.
• [13]Görtelmeyer R, Schmidt J, Suckfüll M, Jastreboff P, Gebauer A, Krüger H, Wittmann W: Assessment of tinnitus-related impairments and disabilities using the German THI-12: sensitivity and stability of the scale over time. Int J Audiol 2011, 50:523-529.
• [14]Greimel KV, Leibetseder M, Unterrainer J, Albegger K: Ist Tinnitus meßbar? Methoden zur Erfassung tinnitusspezifischer Beeinträchtigungen und Präsentation des Tinnitus-Beeinträchtigungs-Fragebogens (TBF-12) (Can tinnitus be measured? Methods for assessment of tinnitus-specific disability and presentation of the tinnitus disability questionnaire). HNO 1999, 47:196-201.
• [15]Greimel KV, Leibetseder M, Unterrainer J, Biesinger E, Albegger K: Tinnitus-beeinträchtigungs-fragebogen (TBF-12) manual (tinnitus handicap inventory (THI-12) manual). Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.: Frankfurt am Main; 2000.
• [16]Snaith RP: The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003, 1:1-4. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Zigmond AS, Snaith RP: The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983, 67:361-370.
• [18]MAPI Research Trust: PROQOLID patient-reported outcome and quality of life instruments database. 2012. http://www.proqolid.org/ webcite
• [19]Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ: Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods 1999, 4:272-299.
• [20]Gorsuch RL: Factor analysis. 2nd edition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1983.
• [21]Bollen K: Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley; 1989.
• [22]Bentler PM: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990, 107:238-246.
• [23]McDonald RP, Ho MH: Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. PsycholMethods 2002, 7:64-82.
• [24]Shrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979, 86:420-428.
• [25]de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM: Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006, 4:54. BioMed Central Full Text
• [26]Einstein GO, McDaniel MA: Prospective memory: multiple retrieval processes. Psychol Sci 2005, 14:286-290.
• [27]Landgrebe M, Langguth B: Tinnitus and psychiatric Co-morbidity. In Textbook of tinnitus. Edited by Møller AR, Langguth B, DeRidder D, Kleinjung T. New York: Springer; 2011:491-492.
• [28]Langguth B, Landgrebe M: Tinnitus and depression. In Textbook of tinnitus. Edited by Møller AR, Langguth B, DeRidder D, Kleinjung T. New York: Springer; 2011:493-498.