期刊论文详细信息
European Journal of Medical Research
Comparison of guideline recommendations with daily practice in patients with renal cell carcinoma
C Gratzke3  CG Stief3  A Bachmann2  M Staehler3  O Reich3  F Bayrle3  D Tilki3  R Ganzer1  MJ Bader3  M Seitz3  B Schlenker3 
[1] Department of Urology, Krankenhaus St. Josef, University of Regensburg, Germany;Department of Urology, Basel University Hospital, Switzerland;Department of Urology, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians- University Munich, Germany
关键词: nephron-sparing surgery;    open radical nephrectomy;    oncological follow-up;    renal cell carcinoma;   
Others  :  1093110
DOI  :  10.1186/2047-783X-15-6-253
 received in 2009-10-25, accepted in 2009-11-10,  发布年份 2010
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Objectives and Aims

To compare guideline recommendations with daily practice patterns in a German patient cohort with renal cell carcinoma.

Patients and methods

81 patients with T1 oder T2 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were included in this prospective single-center study. All patients were operated in a single institution either by open radical nephrectomy (ORN) or nephron sparing surgery (NSS). Patients and doctors were evaluated using a written questionnaire with a follow-up of 12 months. Follow-up intervals, follow-up modalities (e. g. imaging modalities, laboratory controls of blood and urine) and the call on psycho-oncological support were evaluated.

Results

The majority of patients (72%) were followed up by their urologists. Follow-up examinations included abdominal ultrasound, urine and blood diagnostics, conventional chest x-rays, computed tomography (CT) of abdomen, chest or head or abdominal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). There were no significant differences between patients operated by ORN or NSS. In total, 12.5% of patients were asking for psycho-oncological support.

Conclusions

In general, patients were followed up according to existing guideline recommendations. Only a small proportion of patients asked for psycho-oncological treatment.

【 授权许可】

   
2010 I. Holzapfel Publishers

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150130160522597.pdf 1565KB PDF download
Figure 5. 52KB Image download
Figure 4. 43KB Image download
Figure 3. 51KB Image download
Figure 2. 53KB Image download
Figure 1. 48KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Lindblad P: Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Scand J Surg 2004, 93:88-96.
  • [2]Mathew A, Devesa SS, Fraumeni JF Jr, Chow WH: Global increases in kidney cancer incidence, 1973-1992. Eur J Cancer Prev 2002, 11:171-8.
  • [3]Lipworth L, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK: The epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2006, 176:2353-8.
  • [4]Hock LM, Lynch J, Balaji KC: Increasing incidence of all stages of kidney cancer in the last 2 decades in the United States: an analysis of surveillance, epidemiology and end results program data. J Urol 2002, 167:57-60.
  • [5]Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C: Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982-1997). Urology 2000, 56:58-62.
  • [6]Patard JJ, Rodriguez A, Rioux-Leclercq N, Guille F, Lobel B: Prognostic significance of the mode of detection in renal tumours. BJU Int 2002, 90:358-63.
  • [7]Ljungberg B, Hanbury DC, Kuczyk MA, et al.: Renal cell carcinoma guideline. Eur Urol 2007, 51:1502-10.
  • [8]Gratzke C, Seitz M, Bayrle F, et al.: Quality of life and perioperative outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN), open RN and nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2009, 104:470-5.
  • [9]Robson CJ: Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1963, 89:37-42.
  • [10]Staehler M, Haseke N, Stadler T, et al.: Renal surgery in the elderly: morbidity in patients aged > 75 years in a contemporary series. BJU Int 2008, 102:684-7.
  • [11]Bani-Hani AH, Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, Cheville JC, Zincke H, Blute ML: Associations with contralateral recurrence following nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma using a cohort of 2,352 patients. J Urol 2005, 173:391-4.
  • [12]Itano NB, Blute ML, Spotts B, Zincke H: Outcome of isolated renal cell carcinoma fossa recurrence after nephrectomy. J Urol 2000, 164:322-5.
  • [13]Sandhu SS, Symes A, A'Hern R, et al.: Surgical excision of isolated renal-bed recurrence after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2005, 95:522-5.
  • [14]Kattan MW, Reuter V, Motzer RJ, Katz J, Russo P: A postoperative prognostic nomogram for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2001, 166:63-7.
  • [15]Lam JS, Shvarts O, Leppert JT, Pantuck AJ, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS: Postoperative surveillance protocol for patients with localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma based on a validated prognostic nomogram and risk group stratification system. J Urol 2005, 174:466-72. discussion 72; quiz 801
  • [16]Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC, et al.: Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a stratification tool for prospective clinical trials. Cancer 2003, 97:1663-71.
  • [17]Ljungberg B, Alamdari FI, Rasmuson T, Roos G: Follow-up guidelines for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma based on the occurrence of metastases after radical nephrectomy. BJU Int 1999, 84:405-11.
  • [18]Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Wieder J, et al.: Risk group assessment and clinical outcome algorithm to predict the natural history of patients with surgically resected renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20:4559-66.
  • [19]Hafez KS, Novick AC, Campbell SC: Patterns of tumor recurrence and guidelines for followup after nephron sparing surgery for sporadic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1997, 157:2067-70.
  • [20]Johnsen JA, Hellsten S: Lymphatogenous spread of renal cell carcinoma: an autopsy study. J Urol 1997, 157:450-3.
  • [21]Levy DA, Slaton JW, Swanson DA, Dinney CP: Stage specific guidelines for surveillance after radical nephrectomy for local renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1998, 159:1163-7.
  • [22]Schrodter S, Hakenberg OW, Manseck A, Leike S, Wirth MP: Outcome of surgical treatment of isolated local recurrence after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2002, 167:1630-3.
  • [23]Patard JJ, Shvarts O, Lam JS, et al.: Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J Urol 2004, 171:2181-5. quiz 435
  • [24]Ebert T, Fischer C: [When is aftercare useful in renal cell cancer?]. Urologe A 2005, 44:1018. 20-23
  • [25]Goerling U, Odebrecht S, Schiller G, Schlag PM: [Need for psychosocial care in in-patients with tumour disease. Investigations conducted in a clinic specializing in tumour surgery]. Chirurg 2006, 77:41-6. discussion 6
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:43次 浏览次数:19次