Health inequalities as a foundation for embodying knowledge within public health teaching: a qualitative study

International Journal for Equity in Health

Mzwandile A Mabhala¹ 

[1]Department of Community Health and Wellbeing, University of Chester, Riverside Campus, Chester CH1 1SF, UK

关键词: Embodying Knowledge;    Public Health;    Inequalities in Health;    Social Justice;   

Others  :  824726
DOI  :  10.1186/1475-9276-12-46

 received in 2013-01-12, accepted in 2013-06-25,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Introduction

Recent UK health policies identified nurses as key contributors to the social justice agenda of reducing health inequalities, on the assumption that all nurses understand and wish to contribute to public health. Following this policy shift, public health content within pre-registration nursing curricula increased. However, public health nurse educators (PHNEs) had various backgrounds, and some had limited formal public health training, or involvement in or understanding of policy required to contribute effectively to it. Their knowledge of this subject, their understanding and interpretation of how it could be taught, was not fully understood.

Methodology

This research aimed to understand how public health nurse educators’ professional knowledge could be conceptualised and to develop a substantive theory of their knowledge of teaching public health, using a qualitative data analysis approach. Qualitative in-depth semi-structured interviews (n=26) were conducted with eleven university-based PHNEs.

Results

Integrating public health into all aspects of life was seen as central to the knowing and teaching of public health; this was conceptualised as ‘embodying knowledge’. Participants identified the meaning of embodying knowledge for teaching public health as: (a) possessing a wider vision of health; (b) reflecting and learning from experience; and (c) engaging in appropriate pedagogical practices.

Conclusion

The concept of public health can mean different things to different people. The variations of meaning ascribed to public health reflect the various backgrounds from which the public health workforce is drawn. The analysis indicates that PHNEs are embodying knowledge for teaching through critical pedagogy, which involves them engaging in transformative, interpretive and integrative processes to refashion public health concepts; this requires PHNEs who possess a vision of what to teach, know how to teach, and are able to learn from experience. Their vision of public health is influenced by social justice principles in that health inequalities, socioeconomic determinants of health, epidemiology, and policy and politics are seen as essential areas of the public health curriculum. They believe in forms of teaching that achieve social transformation at individual, behavioural and societal levels, while also enabling learners to recognise their capacity to effect change.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Mabhala; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Department of health: The new NHS: modern, dependable. London: Stationery office; 1997.
• [2]Department of health: Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health Report. London: Stationery office; 1998.
• [3]Department of health: Saving lives: Our healthier nation. London: Stationery office; 1999.
• [4]Department of health: Tackling health inequalities 2002 Cross-Cutting Review. London: Stationery office; 2002.
• [5]Department of health: Tackling health inequalities: A programme for action. London: Stationery office; 2003.
• [6]Department of health: Tackling health inequalities: Status report on the programme for Action. London: Stationery office; 2005.
• [7]Department of health: Healthy Lives, Healthy People: Our strategy for public health in England 2010. London: Stationery office; 2009.
• [8]Department of health: Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS. London: Stationery office; 2010.
• [9]Marmot M: Fair Society, Healthy Lives: Strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010. http://www.instituteofhealthequity.org/Content/FileManager/pdf/fairsocietyhealthylives.pdf webcite
• [10]Department of health: Tackling Health Inequalities: 10 Years On: A review of developments in tackling health inequalities in England over the last 10 years 2009. London: London Stationery office; 2009.
• [11]Department of health: Making a Difference Strengthening the nursing, midwifery and health visiting contribution to health and healthcare. London: Stationery office; 1999.
• [12]Department of health: Shifting the Balance of Power within the NHS Securing Delivery. London: Stationery office; 2001.
• [13]Department of health: Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer. London: Stationery office; 2001.
• [14]Department of health: Modernising nursing careers setting the direction. London: Stationery office; 2006.
• [15]Bountain MD: Social justice as a framework for nursing profession. J Nurs Educ 2005, 44(9):404-408.
• [16]Bountain DM: Social justice as a framework for undergraduate community health clinical experience in the United States. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2008, 5(1):1-12.
• [17]Levin PF, Cary A, Kulbok P, Leffers J, Molle M, Polivka BJ: Graduate education for advanced practice public health nursing: At the crossroads. Public Health Nurs 2008, 25(2):176-193.
• [18]Alpha research: A Review of pre-registration nursing education: Report of consultation findings. London: Nursing and Midwifery council; 2008.
• [19]Latter S, Speller V, Westwood G, Latchem S: Education for public health capacity in the nursing workforce: findings from a review of education and practice issues. Nurse Educ Today 2003, 23(3):211-18.
• [20]United Kingdom Central Council: Fitness for practice and purpose. London: United Kingdom Central Council; 2001.
• [21]Focusgroup: A Review of Pre-Registration Nursing Education. London: United Kingdom Central Council; 2008.
• [22]Fisher T, Higgins C, Loveless A: Teachers learning with digital technologies: A review of research and projects. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, Oxford Brookes University, University of Brighton; 2006.
• [23]McMahon JB, Zyngier D: Student engagement: contested concepts in two continents. Res Comp Int Educ 2009, 4(2):164-181.
• [24]McLeod P, Steinert Y, Chalk C, Cruess R, Meterissian S, Razack S, Snell L: Which pedagogical principles should clinical teachers know? Teachers and education experts disagree. Disagreement on important pedagogical principles. Medical Teacher 2009, 31(4):e117-e124.
• [25]MCleod PJ, Brwawer J, Steinert Y, McLeod A: A pilot study designed to acquaint medical educators with basic pedagogic principles. Medical Teacher 2008, 30(1):92-93.
• [26]Shulman LS: Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ Res 1986, 15(4):4-14.
• [27]Shulman LS, Shulman JH: How and what teachers learn: a shifting perspective. J Curric Stud 2004, 36(2):257-271.
• [28]Public Health Resource Unit and Skills for Health: Public Health Skills and Career Framework: Multidisciplinary/multi-agency/multi-professional. Oxford: Public Health Resource Unit & Skills for Health; 2008.
• [29]Faculty of Public Health: Good public health practice - General professional expectations of public health physicians and specialists in public health. London: Faculty of Public Health; 2001.
• [30]Lippman L: Embodied knowledge and making sense of prenatal diagnosis. Journal of Genetic Counselling 1999, 8(5):255-274.
• [31]Charmaz K: Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications; 2006.
• [32]Charmaz K: Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods, in Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publications; 2000.
• [33]Glaser BG, Strauss AL: The discovery of grounded theory: Qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter; 1967.
• [34]Strauss A, Corbin J: Basics of Qualitative research, ed. 2nd. London: Sage Publication; 1998.
• [35]Strauss A, Corbin J: Basics of Qualitative research. London: Sage Publication; 1990.
• [36]Glaser BG: Remodelling grounded theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2004, 5(2):1-18.
• [37]Glaser BG: Remodelling grounded theory. Historical Social Research, Supplement 2007, 19:47-68.
• [38]Corbin J, Strauss A: Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles, Calif: Sage Publications; 2008.
• [39]Draucker CB, Martsolf DS, Ross R, Rusk TB: Theoretical sampling and category development in grounded theory. Qual Health Res 2007, 17(8):1137-1148.
• [40]Glaser BG: Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press; 1978.
• [41]Díaz Andrade A: Interpretive research aiming at theory building: adopting and adapting the case study design. The Qualitative Report 2009, 14(1):42-60.
• [42]Dey I: Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1999.
• [43]Royal College of Nursing: Research ethics: RCN guidance for nurses. Nurse Res 2004, 11(1):7-21.
• [44]British Educational Research Association [BERA]: Revised ethical guidelines for the educational research. Notts: BERA; 2004.
• [45]World Health Organisation: All for equity: World conference on social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2011.
• [46]World Health Organisation: Trade, Foreign Policy, Diplomacy and Health. http://www.who.int/trade/en/ webcite
• [47]World Health Organisation: The Commission calls for closing the health gap in a generation. World Health Organisation. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2008.
• [48]Poulton B, McCammon V: Measuring self-perceived public health nursing competencies using a quantitative approach. Nurse Educ Today 2007, 27:238-246.
• [49]Poulton B: Barriers and facilitators to the achievement of community-focused public health nursing practice: a UK perspective. J Nurs Manag 2009, 17:74-83.
• [50]Poulton B, Lyons A, O'Callaghan A: A comparative study of self-perceived public health competencies: practice teachers and qualifying SCPHNs. Community Pract 2008, 81:31-34.
• [51]Zimmerman LW, McQueen L, Guy G: Connections, interconnections, and disconnections: the impact of race, class and gender in the university classroom. Journal of Theory Construction & Testing 2007, 11(1):16-21.
• [52]Grumbach K, Miller J, Mertz E, Finocchio L: How much public health in public health nursing practice? Public Health Nurs 2004, 21(3):266-276.
• [53]Freire P: Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: A Penguin Book; 1972.
• [54]Vickers DA: Social justice: a concept for undergraduate nursing curricula? Southern Online Journal of Nursing Research 2008, 8(1):1-19.
• [55]McAllister M, Rowe J, Venturato L, Tower M, Johnston A, Moyle W: Solution focused teaching: a transformative approach to teaching nursing. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2006, 3(1):1-13.
• [56]Chávez VR, Turalba AN, Malik S: Teaching public health through pedagogy of collegiality. Am J Public Health 2006, 96(7):1175-1180.
• [57]Mezirow J: Transformative learning as discourse. J Transform Educ 2003, 1(1):58-63.
• [58]Lynam MJ, Loock C, Scott L, Khan KB: Culture, health, and inequalities: New paradigms, new practice imperatives. J Res Nurs 2008, 13(2):138-148.
• [59]Lynam MJ: Reflecting on issues of enacting a critical pedagogy in nursing. J Transform Educ 2009, 7(1):44-64.