A decade of improvements in equity of access to reproductive and maternal health services in Cambodia, 2000–2010

International Journal for Equity in Health

Catherine Goodman¹  Timothy Powell-Jackson¹  Antonia Dingle¹ 

[1] Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

关键词: Cambodia;    Reproductive and maternal health services;    Utilisation;    Access;    Equity;   

Others  :  811801
DOI  :  10.1186/1475-9276-12-51

 received in 2013-02-26, accepted in 2013-06-14,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Introduction

Despite encouraging reductions in global maternal mortality rates, Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 5 on reducing maternal mortality and achieving universal access to reproductive health remains the most off-track of all MDGs. Furthermore a preoccupation with aggregate coverage statistics masks extensive disparities in health improvements between societal groups. Recent national health indicators for Cambodia highlight impressive improvements, for example, in maternal, infant and child mortality, whilst substantial government commitments have been made since 2000 to address health inequities. It is therefore timely to explore the extent of equity in access to key reproductive and maternal health services in Cambodia and how this has changed over time.

Methods

Analysis was conducted on three rounds of Demographic and Health Survey data from 2000, 2005 and 2010. Outcome variables comprised utilisation of six reproductive and maternal health services – antenatal care, skilled birth attendance, facility-based delivery, postnatal care, met need for family planning and abortion by skilled provider. Four equity measures were calculated – equity gaps, equity ratios, concentration curves and concentration indices. Household assets were used to create the social-stratification variable, using principal components analysis.

Results

Coverage levels of all six services improved over the decade. Coverage improvements were greatest amongst wealthier quintiles of the population, although poorer quintiles also increased use of services. Critically, inequity in service use of all services dramatically reduced over time, except for postnatal care where inequity increased slightly. However, in 2010 inequity in service use remained favouring wealthier quintiles, greatest in use of skilled birth attendance and facility-based delivery, though the magnitude of inequity was substantially reduced compared to 2000. Met need for family planning was almost perfectly equitable in 2010.

Conclusions

Cambodia has made impressive improvements in overall coverage of reproductive and maternal health services over the last decade, and also in the distribution of their use across wealth quintiles. A range of pro-poor health financing and supply-side policies as well as non-health factors may have contributed to these achievements. Further research will explore specific schemes qualitatively and quantitatively to assess their impact on equity and service use.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Dingle et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]World Health Organisation: Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990–2010 - WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and the World Bank Estimates. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2012.
• [2]Hogan MC, Foreman KJ, Naghavi M, Ahn SY, Wang M, Makela SM, Lopez AD, Lozano R, Murray CJL: Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. Lancet 2010, 375:1609-1623.
• [3]Bhutta ZA, Chopra M, Axelson H, Berman P, Boerma T, Bryce J, Bustreo F, Cavagnero E, Cometto G, Daelmans B, De Francisco A, Fogstad H, Gupta N, Laski L, Lawn J, Maliqi B, Mason E, Pitt C, Requejo J, Starrs A, Victora CG, Wardlaw T: Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000 – 10): taking stock of maternal, newborn, and child survival. Lancet 2010, 375:2032-2044.
• [4]Ronsmans C, Graham W: Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet 2006, 368:1189-1200.
• [5]Rahman MH, Mosley WH, Ahmed S, Akhter HH: Does service accessibility reduce socioeconomic differentials in maternity care seeking? Evidence from rural Bangladesh. J Biosoc Sci 2008, 40:19-33.
• [6]Amin R, Shah NM, Becker S: Socioeconomic factors differentiating maternal and child health-seeking behavior in rural Bangladesh: A cross-sectional analysis. Int J Equity Health 2010, 9:9. BioMed Central Full Text
• [7]Chowdhury ME, Ronsmans C, Killewo J, Anwar I, Gausia K, Das-Gupta S, Blum LS, Dieltiens G, Marshall T, Saha S, Borghi J: Equity in use of home-based or facility-based skilled obstetric care in rural Bangladesh: an observational study. Lancet 2006, 367:327-332.
• [8]Baqui AH, Rosecrans AM, Williams EK, Agrawal PK, Ahmed S, Darmstadt GL, Kumar V, Kiran U, Panwar D, Ahuja RC, Srivastava VK, Black RE, Santosham M: NGO facilitation of a government community-based maternal and neonatal health programme in rural India: improvements in equity. Health Policy Plan 2008, 23:234-243.
• [9]Mohanty SK, Pathak PK: Rich-poor gap in utilization of reproductive and child health services in India, 1992–2005. J Biosoc Sci 2009, 41:381-398.
• [10]Say L, Raine R: A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ 2007, 85:812-819.
• [11]Zere E, Tumusiime P, Walker O, Kirigia J, Mwikisa C, Mbeeli T: Inequities in utilization of maternal health interventions in Namibia: implications for progress towards MDG 5 targets. Int J Equity Health 2010, 9:16. BioMed Central Full Text
• [12]Kunst AE, Houweling T: A global picture in rich-poor differences in the utilisation of delivery care. Studies Health Serv Org Pol 2001, 17:293-311.
• [13]Gwatkin DR, Bhuiya A, Victora CG: Making health systems more equitable. Lancet 2004, 364:1273-1280.
• [14]Houweling TAJ, Ronsmans C, Kunst AE: Huge poor – rich inequalities in maternity care : an international comparative study of maternity and child care in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 2007, 038588(April):745-754.
• [15]Magadi MA, Zulu EM, Brockerhoff M: The inequality of maternal health care in urban sub-Saharan Africa in the 1990s. Popul Stud 2003, 57:347-366.
• [16]Collin SM, Anwar I, Ronsmans C: A decade of inequality in maternity care: antenatal care, professional attendance at delivery, and caesarean section in Bangladesh (1991–2004). Int J Equity Health 2007, 6:9. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Ronsmans C, Etard J, Walraven G, Høj L, Dumont A, De Bernis L, Kodio B: Maternal mortality and access to obstetric services in West Africa. Trop Med Int Health 2003, 8:940-948.
• [18]Feng XL, Xu L, Guo Y, Ronsmans C: Socioeconomic inequalities in hospital births in China between 1988 and 2008. Bull World Health Organ 2011, 89:432-441.
• [19]González C, Houweling TA, Marmot MG, Brunner EJ: Comparison of physical, public and human assets as determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in contraceptive use in Colombia - moving beyond the household wealth index. Int J Equity Health 2010, 9:1-2. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Wirth ME, Balk D, Delamonica E, Storeygard A, Sacks E, Minujin A: Setting the stage for equity-sensitive monitoring of the maternal and child health Millennium Development Goals. Bull World Health Organ 2006, 84:519-527.
• [21]Pallikadavath S, Foss M, Stones RW: Antenatal care: provision and inequality in rural north India. Soc Sci Med 2004, 59:1147-1158.
• [22]Malarcher S, Olson LG, Hearst N: Unintended pregnancy and pregnancy outcome: Equity and social determinants. In Equity, Social Determinants and Public Health Programmes. Edited by Blas E, Kurup AS. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
• [23]Barros AJD, Ronsmans C, Axelson H, Loaiza E, Bertoldi AD, França GVA, Bryce J, Boerma JT: Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in Countdown to 2015: a retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries. Lancet 2012, 379:1225-1233.
• [24]O’Donnell O, Van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M: Analysing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data: a Guide to Techniques and Their Implementation. Volume 86 edition. Washington DC: World Bank; 2008.
• [25]Karim F, Tripura A, Gani MS, Chowdhury AMR: Poverty status and health equity: evidence from rural Bangladesh. Public Health 2006, 120:193-205.
• [26]Countdown 2008 Equity Analysis Group: Mind the gap: equity and trends in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health services in 54 Countdown countries. Lancet 2008, 371:1259-1267.
• [27]Ministry of Health: National Health Strategic Plan (2008–2015). Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Royal Government of Cambodia; 2008.
• [28]Ministry of Health: Fast Track Initiative Road Map For Reducing Maternal & Neonatal Mortality (2010–2015). Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Royal Government of Cambodia; 2010.
• [29]Royal Government of Cambodia: National Social Strategy for Protection of the Poor and Vulnerable. Phnom Penhm, Cambodia: Royal Government of Cambodia; 2011.
• [30]Royal Government of Cambodia: Master Plan on Social Health Protection. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Royal Government of Cambodia; 2009.
• [31]Jonsson K: Policymaking in transitional economies: Poverty reduction and healthcare in Cambodia and Laos. Studies Health Serv Org Pol 2008, 23:157-188.
• [32]Cambodia Profile. AusAID; http://www.ausaid.gov.au/countries/eastasia/cambodia/Pages/home.aspx webcite
• [33]National Institute of Statistics: General Population Census of Cambodia 2008 Report. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Royal Government of Cambodia; 2008.
• [34]World Health Organisation: World Health Statistics. Geneva: World Health; 2011.
• [35]World Bank: Poverty Profile and Trends in Cambodia. Washington DC: World Bank; 2009.
• [36]World Bank: World Bank Databank. World Bank; 2012. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/home.aspx webcite
• [37]Global Health Observatory - Antenatal Care. http://www.who.int/gho/maternal_health/reproductive_health/antenatal_care/en/index.html webcite
• [38]World Health Organisation: Making Pregnancy Safer: The Critical Role of the Skilled Attendant. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2004.
• [39]World Health Organisation: Pregnancy Childbirth, Postpartum and Newborn Care. A Guide to Essential Practice. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2009.
• [40]Rutstein SO, Rojas G: Guide to DHS Statistics. Maryland: Calverton; 2006.
• [41]World Health Organisation: Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2012.
• [42]Royal Government of Cambodia: National Institute of Public Health, National Institute of Statistics. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Royal Government of Cambodia; 2010. [Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey]
• [43]Royal Government of Cambodia: National Institute of Public Health, National Institute of Statistics. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Royal Government of Cambodia; 2005. [Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey]
• [44]Royal Government of Cambodia: National Institute of Public Health, National Institute of Statistics. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Royal Government of Cambodia; 2000. [Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey]
• [45]Filmer D, Pritchett LH: Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data-or tears: an application to educational enrolments in states of India. Demography 2001, 38:115-132.
• [46]Sahn DE, Stifel D: Exploring alternative measures of welfare in the absence of expenditure data. Rev Incom Wealth 2003, 49:463-489.
• [47]Wagstaff A, Watanabe N: What difference does the choice of SES make in health inequality measurement? Heal Econ 2003, 12:885-890.
• [48]World Health Organisation: UNICEF: Countdown to 2015 Decade Report (2000–2015): Taking Stock of Maternal, Newborn and Child Survival. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2010.
• [49]Barros A, Victora CG: Measuring coverage in MNCH: Determining and interpreting inequalities in coverage of maternal, newborn and child health interventions. PLoS Med 2013, 10:e1001390.
• [50]Wagstaff A, Paci P, Van Doorslaer E: On the measurement of inequalities in health. Soc Sci Med 1991, 33:545-557.
• [51]Wagstaff A, Van Doorslaer E, Paci P: On the measurement of horizontal inequity in the delivery of health care. J Heal Econ 1991, 10:169-205.
• [52]Wagstaff A, Doorslaer E: Van: Measuring and Testing for Inequity in the Delivery of Health Care. J Hum Resour 2000, 35:716-733.
• [53]Oster E: Does increased access increase equality? Gender and child health investments in India. J Dev Econ 2009, 89:62-76.
• [54]Victora CG, Vaughan J, Barros F, Silva A, Tomasi E: Explaining trends in inequities: Evidence from Brazilian child health studies. Lancet 2000, 356:1093-1098.
• [55]Vyas S, Kumaranayake L: Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan 2006, 21:459-468.
• [56]Lindelow M: Sometimes more equal than others: how health inequalities depend on the choice of welfare indicator. Heal Econ 2006, 15:263-279.
• [57]Fetters T, Vonthanak S, Picardo C, Rathavy T: Abortion-related complications in Cambodia. BJOG 2008, 115:957-968.
• [58]Hemmings J, Rolfe B: Abortion in Cambodia - Care Seeking for Abortion and Family Planning Services. London, UK: Options Consultancy Services; 2008.
• [59]Petitet PH, Desclaux A: Reproductive Health and HIV in Cambodia - From Anthropology to Public Health. Phnom Penh: National Institute of Public Health, Royal Government of Cambodia; 2011.
• [60]Jacobs B, Ir P, Bigdeli M, Annear PL, Van Damme W: Addressing access barriers to health services: an analytical framework for selecting appropriate interventions in low-income Asian countries. Health Policy Plan 2012, 27:288-300.
• [61]University Research Company: Better Health Services Project: Health Equity Funds - Implementing Pro-poor Health Financing. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: University Research Company; 2011.
• [62]Hardeman W, Van Damme W, Van Pelt M, Ir P, Kimvan H, Meessen B: Access to health care for all? User fees plus a Health Equity Fund in Sotnikum, Cambodia. Health Policy Plan 2004, 19:22-32.
• [63]Noirhomme M, Meessen B, Griffiths F, Ir P, Jacobs B, Thor R, Criel B, Van Damme W: Improving access to hospital care for the poor: comparative analysis of four health equity funds in Cambodia. Health Policy Plan 2007, 22:246-262.
• [64]University Research Company: Better Health Services Project Technical Brief: Improving Maternal and Newborn Health in Cambodia. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: University Research Company; 2011.
• [65]Ir P, Horemans D, Souk N, Van Damme W: Using targeted vouchers and health equity funds to improve access to skilled birth attendants for poor women: a case study in three rural health districts in Cambodia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010, 10:1-11. BioMed Central Full Text
• [66]EPOS Health Management: Vouchers for Reproductive Health Services: Inception Report. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: EPOS Health Management; 2010.
• [67]Liljestrand J, Sambath R: Socio-economic improvements and health system strengthening of maternity care are contributing to maternal mortality reduction in Cambodia. Reprod Health Matters 2012, 20:62-72.
• [68]Ir P, Chheng K: Evaluation of Government Midwifery Incentive Scheme in Cambodia. In An Exploration of the Scheme Effects on Institutional Deliveries and Health System Final. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: National Institute of Public Health, Royal Government of Cambodia; 2012:1-39.
• [69]Ministry of Planning: Achieving Cambodia’s Millennium Development Goals: Update 2010. Phnom Penh: Royal Government of Cambodia; 2010.
• [70]Fetters T, Barnett S, Chourn T, Vannat S, Rattanak K, Andersen K, Saphonn V, Rathavy T, Hulton L: Making a Difference: A National Assessment of Abortion Care in Cambodia, 2005 and 2010. Cambodia: Ipas; 2010.
• [71]Population Services International: Safe Abortion in Cambodia - Clients, Providers and Products. Phnom Penh: Population Services International; 2010.