A holistic school-based intervention for improving health-related knowledge, body composition, and fitness in elementary school students: an evaluation of the HealthMPowers program

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Julie A Gazmararian¹  Diane Allensworth²  Christi Kay²  Adria Meyer²  Rachel M Burke¹ 

[1] Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA;HealthMPowers, Norcross, GA, USA

关键词: Children;    Physical fitness;    Nutrition education;    Physical activity;    Childhood obesity;    School-based intervention;   

Others  :  803354
DOI  :  10.1186/1479-5868-11-78

 received in 2014-01-06, accepted in 2014-06-11,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Over the past 30 years, obesity in the United States has increased twofold in children and threefold in adolescents. In Georgia, nearly 17% of children aged 10 – 17 are obese. In response to the high prevalence of child obesity in Georgia and the potential deleterious consequences that this can have, HealthMPowers was founded in 1999 with the goal of preventing childhood obesity by improving health-enhancing behaviors in elementary schools, utilizing a holistic three-year program. This study measures the effectiveness of the HealthMPowers program in improving the school environment, student knowledge, behavior, cardiovascular fitness levels, and Body Mass Index (BMI).

Methods

The present analysis utilizes data from 40 schools that worked with HealthMPowers over the course of the 2012 – 2013 school year (including schools at each of the three years of the intervention period) and provided information on demographics, student knowledge and behaviors, BMI, performance on the PACER test of aerobic capacity, and school practices and policies (measured via school self-assessment with the HealthMPowers-developed instrument “Continuous Improvement Tracking Tool” or CITT), measured at the beginning and end of each school year. Paired two-sample T tests were used to compare continuous variables (e.g., student knowledge scores, BMI-for-age Z scores), while chi-squared tests were used to assess categorical variables (e.g., trichotomized PACER performance).

Results

Students across all grades and cohorts demonstrated improvements in knowledge and self-reported behaviors, with particularly significant improvements for third-graders in schools in the second year of the HealthMPowers program (p < 0.0001). Similarly, decreases were observed in BMI-for-Age Z scores for this cohort (and others) across grades and gender, with the most significant decreases for students overweight or obese at baseline (p < 0.0005). Students also showed significant increases in performance on the PACER test across grades and cohorts (p < 0.0001). Lastly, schools tended to improve their practices over time, as measured via the CITT instrument.

Conclusions

The present report demonstrates the effectiveness of the HealthMPowers program in producing positive change in school policies and practices, student knowledge and behaviors, and student fitness and BMI, supporting the use of holistic interventions to address childhood obesity.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Burke et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]National Center for Health Statistics: Health, United States, 2011: With Special Feature on Socioeconomic Status and Health. Hyattsville, MD; 2012.
• [2]Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM: Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA 2014, 311(8):806-814.
• [3]Han JC, Lawlor DA, Kimm SY: Childhood obesity. Lancet 2010, 375(9727):1737-1748.
• [4]Levi J, Segal L, Thomas K, Laurent RS, Lang A, Rayburn J: F as in Fat. In Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Trust for America’s health Edited by Fox C, Daruwala N. 2013.
• [5]Singh GK, Kogan MD, Van Dyck PC: Changes in state-specific childhood obesity and overweight prevalence in the United States from 2003 to 2007. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010, 164(7):598-607.
• [6]Telama R, Yang X, Viikari J, Valimaki I, Wanne O, Raitakari O: Physical activity from childhood to adulthood: a 21-year tracking study. Am J Prev Med 2005, 28(3):267-273.
• [7]Haynos AF, O’Donohue WT: Universal childhood and adolescent obesity prevention programs: review and critical analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2012, 32(5):383-399.
• [8]Shrestha P, Ghimire L: A review about the effect of life style modification on diabetes and quality of life. Glob J Health Sci 2012, 4(6):185-190.
• [9]Tomporowski PD, Davis CL, Miller PH, Naglieri JA: Exercise and Children’s Intelligence, Cognition, and Academic Achievement. Educ Psychol Rev 2008, 20(2):111-131.
• [10]Trudeau F, Shephard RJ: Physical education, school physical activity, school sports and academic performance. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008, 5:10. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Lavelle HV, Mackay DF, Pell JP: Systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to reduce body mass index. J Public Health (Oxf) 2012, 34(3):360-369.
• [12]Barlow SE: Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics 2007, 120(Suppl 4):S164-S192.
• [13]Dobbins M, Husson H, DeCorby K, LaRocca RL: School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013., 2CD007651
• [14]Bandura A: Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall; 1977.
• [15]McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K: An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988, 15(4):351-377.
• [16]Fishbein M, Ajzen I: Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
• [17]Leger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J: The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci 1988, 6(2):93-101.
• [18]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Guidelines for school health programs to promote lifelong healthy eating. MMWR 1996, 45(RR-9):1-41.
• [19]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Guidelines for school and community programs to promote lifelong physical activity among young people. MMWR 1997, 46(RR-6):1-36.
• [20]U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th edition. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2010. [http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2010/DietaryGuidelines2010.pdf webcite]
• [21]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: How much physical activity do children need?. 2011. [http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/everyone/guidelines/children.html webcite]
• [22]American Academy of Pediatrics: Media and Children. [http://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/aap-health-initiatives/pages/media-and-children.aspx webcite]
• [23]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Health Education Curriculum Analysis Tool. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2012.
• [24]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Washington, D.C; 2008.
• [25]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: A SAS Program for the CDC Growth Charts. [http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpao/growthcharts/resources/sas.htm webcite]
• [26]Beam M, Ehrlich G, Donze Black J, Block A, Leviton LC: Evaluation of the healthy schools program: Part I. Interim progress. Prev Chronic Dis 2012, 9:E65.
• [27]Elinder LS, Heinemans N, Hagberg J, Quetel AK, Hagstromer M: A participatory and capacity-building approach to healthy eating and physical activity- SCIP-school: a 2-year controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012, 9:145. BioMed Central Full Text
• [28]Fung C, Kuhle S, Lu C, Purcell M, Schwartz M, Storey K, Veugelers PJ: From “best practice” to “next practice”: the effectiveness of school-based health promotion in improving healthy eating and physical activity and preventing childhood obesity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012, 9:27. BioMed Central Full Text
• [29]Tomlin D, Naylor PJ, McKay H, Zorzi A, Mitchell M, Panagiotopoulos C: The impact of Action Schools! BC on the health of Aboriginal children and youth living in rural and remote communities in British Columbia. Int J Circumpolar Health 2012, 71:17999.
• [30]Kropski JA, Keckley PH, Jensen GL: School-based obesity prevention programs: an evidence-based review. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008, 16(5):1009-1018.
• [31]Vouri I, Sapkota S, Guell C: Promoting Physical Activity in Schools: An Important Element of a Health-Promoting School. In WHO Information Series on School Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2007.
• [32]Jones JT, Furner M: Health-Promoting Schools: A healthy setting for living, learning and working. In WHO’s Global School Health Initiative. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1998.
• [33]Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Mei Z, Wei R, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL: CDC growth charts for the United States: Methods and development. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2002., 11(246)
• [34]Welk GJ, De Saint-Maurice Maduro PF, Laurson KR, Brown DD: Field evaluation of the new FITNESSGRAM® criterion-referenced standards. Am J Prev Med 2011, 41(4 Suppl 2):S131-S142.
• [35]Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM: Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999, 89(9):1322-1327.
• [36]HealthMPowers: HealthMPowers Overview: PEP Project Overview, Program Outcomes. [http://healthmpowers.org/getmedia/0e3a73ff-60a7-4c80-b5ec-74d16d8705ee/Health-M-Powers-Overview-PEP-results.aspx webcite]