The construction of a decision tool to analyse local demand and local supply for GP care using a synthetic estimation model

Human Resources for Health

Dinny H de Bakker¹  Willemijn A de Graaf-Ruizendaal² 

[1] Department for Social and Behavioural Science, Tranzo Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands;Department of Primary Care Organization, NIVEL: Netherlands Institute for Health Service Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands

关键词: Decision tool;    Spatial microsimulation model;    General practitioner care;    Synthetic estimation method;    Local population demand;    Health workforce planning;   

Others  :  822228
DOI  :  10.1186/1478-4491-11-55

 received in 2013-03-12, accepted in 2013-10-07,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

This study addresses the growing academic and policy interest in the appropriate provision of local healthcare services to the healthcare needs of local populations to increase health status and decrease healthcare costs. However, for most local areas information on the demand for primary care and supply is missing. The research goal is to examine the construction of a decision tool which enables healthcare planners to analyse local supply and demand in order to arrive at a better match.

Methods

National sample-based medical record data of general practitioners (GPs) were used to predict the local demand for GP care based on local populations using a synthetic estimation technique. Next, the surplus or deficit in local GP supply were calculated using the national GP registry. Subsequently, a dynamic internet tool was built to present demand, supply and the confrontation between supply and demand regarding GP care for local areas and their surroundings in the Netherlands.

Results

Regression analysis showed a significant relationship between sociodemographic predictors of postcode areas and GP consultation time (F [14, 269,467] = 2,852.24; P <0.001). The statistical model could estimate GP consultation time for every postcode area with >1,000 inhabitants in the Netherlands covering 97% of the total population. Confronting these estimated demand figures with the actual GP supply resulted in the average GP workload and the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) GP too much/too few for local areas to cover the demand for GP care. An estimated shortage of one FTE GP or more was prevalent in about 19% of the postcode areas with >1,000 inhabitants if the surrounding postcode areas were taken into consideration. Underserved areas were mainly found in rural regions.

Conclusions

The constructed decision tool is freely accessible on the Internet and can be used as a starting point in the discussion on primary care service provision in local communities and it can make a considerable contribution to a primary care system which provides care when and where people need it.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 de Graaf-Ruizendaal and de Bakker; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]World Health Organization: Primary health care: a framework for future strategic directions. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
• [2]Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J: Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 2005, 83:457-502.
• [3]VWS: Visie op de eerstelijnszorg: 'Dynamische eerstelijnszorg’. [Vision on primary health care: 'Dynamic primary health care] Kamerstuk, 25 januari 2008. [http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/eerstelijnszorg/documenten-en-publicaties/kamerstukken/2008/01/25/dynamische-eerstelijnszorg.html webcite]
• [4]Campbell JL, Ramsay J, Green J: Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients assessments of primary health care. Qual Health Care 2001, 10:90-95.
• [5]Farooqi A: How can family practice improve access? In Access to health care for people from black and ethinic minorities. Edited by Hopkins A, Bahl V. London: Royal College of Physicians; 1993.
• [6]Carr-Hill RA, Rice N, Roland M: Socioeconomic determinants of rates of consultations in general practice based on fourth national morbidity survey of general practices. BMJ 1996, 312:1137-1139.
• [7]Bertakis KD, Azari R, Helms LJ, Callahan EJ, Robbins JA: Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J Fam Pract 2000, 49:147-153.
• [8]Scholes S, Bajekal M, Pickering K: Synthetic estimation of healthy lifestyles indicators: User guide. London: National Centre for Social Research; 2005.
• [9]Twigg L, Moon G, Jones K: Predicting small area health related behaviour: a comparison of smoking and drinking indicators. Soc Sci Med 2000, 50:1109-1120.
• [10]Twigg L, Moon G: Predicting small area health related behaviour: a comparison of multilevel synthetic estimation and local survey data. Soc Sci Med 2002, 54:931-937.
• [11] : White paper Population Management. Almere: Jan van Es Institute; [http://www.jvei.nl/2012/05/09/white-paper-populatiemanagement webcite]
• [12]Smith DM, Pearce JR, Harland K: Can a deterministic spatial microsimulation model provide reliable small- area estimates of health behaviours? An example of smoking prevalence in New Zealand. Health & Place 2011, 2011(17):618-624.
• [13]Edwards KL, Clarke GP: The design and validation of a spatial microsimulation model of obesogenic environments for children in Leeds, UK: SimObesity. Soc Sci Med 2009, 69:1127-1134.
• [14]Ballas D, Clarke G, Dorling D, Eyre H, Thomas B, Rossiter D: SimBritain: a spatial microsimulation approach to population dynamics. Popul Space Place 2005, 11:13-34.
• [15]Smith DM, Riva M: Health in small places: deriving and validating estimates of common mental disorders at the lower super output areas using microsimulation procedures. J Epidemiol Community Health 2010, 64(1):745-755.
• [16]Morrissey K, Clarke G, Ballas D, Hynes S, O’Donoghue C: Examining access to GP service in rural Ireland using microsimulation analysis. Area 2008, 40:354-364.
• [17]Verheij RA, Van Dijk CE, Stirbu-Wagner I, Dorsman SA, Visscher S, Abrahamse H, Davids R, Braspenning J, Van Althuis T, Korevaar JC: Landelijk Informatienetwerk Huisartsenzorg. Feiten en cijfers over huisartsenzorg in Nederland. National Information network GP care. Facts and figures about GP care in the Netherlands; [http://www.nivel.nl/linh webcite]
• [18]Statistics Netherlands: Bevolking en huishoudens; viercijferige postcode, 1 januari 2009. [http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/selection/?DM=SLNL&PA=80280NED&VW=T webcite]
• [19]Van Lindert H, Droomers M, Westert GP: Tweede Nationale Studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk. Een kwestie van verschil: Verschillen in zelfgerapporteerde leefstijl, gezondheid en zorggebruik. [Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice; a matter of difference; differences in self-reported lifestyle, health and health use]. Utrecht: NIVEL; 2004.
• [20]Haynes R: Inequalities in health and health services use: evidence from the general household survey. Soc Sci Med 1991, 33:361-368.
• [21]Stronks K, Ravelli ACJ, Reijneveld SA: Immigrants in the Netherlands: Equal access for equal needs? J Epidemiol Community Health 2001, 55:701-707.
• [22]Schofield D, McRae I, Shrestha R: Equity, poverty, and access to GP services in Australia. International Medical Workforce Conference 2008. [http://crmcc.medical.org/publicpolicy/imwc/Equity_%20Australia.pdf webcite]
• [23]Kroneman M, Verheij R, Tacken M, Van der Zee J: Urban–rural health differences: primary care data and self-reported data render different results. Health and Place 2010, 16:893-902.
• [24]Hingstman L, Kenens RJ: Cijfers uit de registratie van huisartsen: peiling 2009. Utrecht: NIVEL; 2009.
• [25]Heiligers PJM, Noordman J, Korevaar JC, Dorsman S, Hingstman L, Van Dulmen AM, De Bakker DH: Kennisvraag: Praktijkondersteuners in de huisartsenpraktijk, klaar voor de toekomst? [Assistants in general practice, ready for the future?]. Utrecht: NIVEL; 2004.
• [26] : StataCorp. College Station, TX: StataCorp; 2007.
• [27]De Bakker DH: Hoe community based werkt de huisarts? [To what extend do GPs work community based?]. Huisarts en Wetenschap 2006, 49:293.
• [28]Butler DC, Petterson S, Bazemore A, Douglas KA: Use of measures of socioeconomic deprivation in planning primary health care workforce and defining health care need in Australia. Aust J Rural Health 2010, 18:199-204.
• [29]Kazanjian A, Pagliccia N: Key factors in physicians’ choice of practice location: findings from a survey of practitioners and their spouses. Health Place 1996, 2:27-34.
• [30]Continelli T, McGinnis S, Holmes T: The effect of local primary care physician supply on utilization of preventive health services in the United States. Health Place 2010, 16:942-951.
• [31]Teljeur C, Thomas S, O’Kelly FD, O’Dowd T: General Practitioner workforce planning: assessment of four policy directions. BMC Health Service Research 2010, 10:148. BioMed Central Full Text
• [32]Australian Government. Department of Health and Ageing: National Health Reform. Commonwealth of Australia: Improving primary health care for all Australians; 2011.
• [33]Pierard E: The effect of physician supply on health status as measured in NPHS, 2009 in Continelli T, McGinnis S, Holmes T: The effect of local primary care physician supply on utilization of preventive health services in the United States. Health Place 2010, 16:942-951.
• [34]Zwaanswijk M, Quak ES, Bouwman J, Zantinge EM, Verhaak PFM, De Bakker DH: Validiteit van de Vraag Aanbod Analyse Monitor (VAAM): overeenstemming met populatiegegevens uit lokale gezondheidspeilingen. [The validity of the Demand Supply Analysis Monitor (VAAM): conformity with population data from local health surveys]. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen 2009, 87:272-278.
• [35]Linden MW, Van der Westert GP, De Bakker DH, Schellevis FG: De tweede nationale studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartsenpraktijk. Klachten en aandoeningen in de bevolking en in de huisartsenpraktijk, [Second Dutch National Survey for diseases and proceedings in General Practice. Complaints and disorders in the population and general practice]. Utrecht/Bilthoven: NIVEL/RIVM; 2004.
• [36]Reijneveld SA, Verheij RA, De Bakker DH: The impact of area deprivation on differences in health: does the choice of the geographical classification matter? J Epidemiol Community Health 2000, 54:306-313.
• [37]Rosenthal M, Zaslavsky A, Newhouse J: The geographic distribution of physicians revisited. Health Serv Res 2005, 40:1931-1952.
• [38]VAAM. 2009. [http://www.nivel.nl/vaam webcite]
• [39]De Graaf- Ruizendaal WA, Spies-Dorgelo M, Kenens RJ, Van den Broek RW, De Bakker DH: Vraag Aanbod Analyse Monitor. Verantwoording rekenmodellen versie 3.0. [Demand Supply Analysis Monitor. Methods and statistical models]. Utrecht: NIVEL; 2011.