| Journal of Environmental Health Science Engineering | |
| Simulation of anaerobic digestion processes using stochastic algorithm | |
| Sundarambal Palani2  Jegathambal Palanichamy1  | |
| [1] Water Institute, Karunya University, Coimbatore 641114, Tamil Nadu, India;Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119227, Singapore | |
| 关键词: Modeling; Gillespie algorithm; Stochastic algorithm; Anaerobic digestion; | |
| Others : 1164578 DOI : 10.1186/s40201-014-0121-7 |
|
| received in 2013-08-10, accepted in 2014-08-24, 发布年份 2014 | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background
The Anaerobic Digestion (AD) processes involve numerous complex biological and chemical reactions occurring simultaneously. Appropriate and efficient models are to be developed for simulation of anaerobic digestion systems. Although several models have been developed, mostly they suffer from lack of knowledge on constants, complexity and weak generalization. The basis of the deterministic approach for modelling the physico and bio-chemical reactions occurring in the AD system is the law of mass action, which gives the simple relationship between the reaction rates and the species concentrations. The assumptions made in the deterministic models are not hold true for the reactions involving chemical species of low concentration. The stochastic behaviour of the physicochemical processes can be modeled at mesoscopic level by application of the stochastic algorithms.
Method
In this paper a stochastic algorithm (Gillespie Tau Leap Method) developed in MATLAB was applied to predict the concentration of glucose, acids and methane formation at different time intervals. By this the performance of the digester system can be controlled. The processes given by ADM1 (Anaerobic Digestion Model 1) were taken for verification of the model.
Results
The proposed model was verified by comparing the results of Gillespie¿s algorithms with the deterministic solution for conversion of glucose into methane through degraders. At higher value of `?` (timestep), the computational time required for reaching the steady state is more since the number of chosen reactions is less. When the simulation time step is reduced, the results are similar to ODE solver.
Conclusion
It was concluded that the stochastic algorithm is a suitable approach for the simulation of complex anaerobic digestion processes. The accuracy of the results depends on the optimum selection of tau value.
【 授权许可】
2014 Palanichamy and Palani; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150415093122388.pdf | 1290KB | ||
| Figure 5. | 37KB | Image | |
| Figure 4. | 32KB | Image | |
| Figure 3. | 37KB | Image | |
| Figure 2. | 69KB | Image | |
| Figure 1. | 111KB | Image |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Andrews JF: A dynamic model of the anaerobic digestion process. J Sanitary Eng Div Proc Am Soc Civil Eng SA 1969, 1:95-116.
- [2]Andrews JF, Graef SP: Dynamic modelling and simulation of the anaerobic digestion process. In Anaerobic Biological Treatment Processes, Advances in Chemistry Series. 105th edition. Edited by Gould RF. Washington DC: 1971:126¿162. Amer. Chem. Soc, doi:10.1021/ba-1971-0105.ch008.
- [3]Olafadehan OA, Alabi AT: Modelling and simulation of methanogenic phase of an anaerobic digester. J Eng Res 2009, 13(2):1-16.
- [4]Kalyuzhnyi SV: Batch anaerobic digestion of glucose and its mathematical modeling. II: description, verification and application of model. Biore Technol 1997, 59:249-258.
- [5]Gavala HN, Angelidaki I, Ahring BK: Kinetics and modeling of anaerobic digestion process. In Biomethanation I. 81st edition. Edited by Ahring BK. Berlin: Springer, Berlin; 2003:57-93. Available from: 10.1007/3-540-45839-5_3
- [6]Batstone DJ, Keller J, Angelidaki I, Kalyuzhnyi SV, Pavlostathis SG, Rozzi A, Sanders WT, Siegrist H, Vavilin VA: The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1(ADM 1). Water Sci Tech 2002, 45(10):65-73.
- [7]Moletta R, Verrier D, Albagnac G: Dynamic modelling of anaerobic digestion. Wat Res 1986, 20:427-434.
- [8]Hill DT, Barth CL: A dynamic model for simulation of animal waste digestion. J Water Pollut Contr Fed 1977, 10:2129-2143.
- [9]Mosey FE: Mathematical modelling of the anaerobic digestion process: regulatory mechanisms for the formation of short-chain volatile acids from glucose. Wat Sci Technol 1983, 15:209-232.
- [10]Costello DJ, Greenfield PF, Lee PL: Dynamic modelling of a single- stage high-rate anaerobic reactor - I: model derivation. Wat Res 1991, 25:847-858.
- [11]Costello DJ, Greenfield PF, Lee PL: Dynamic modelling of a single-stage high-rate anaerobic reactor - II: model verification. Wat Res 1991, 25:859-871.
- [12]Pullammanapallil P, Owens JM, Svoronos SA, Lyberatos G, Chynoweth DP: Dynamic model for conventionally mixed anaerobic digestion reactors. AIChE Annu Meet 1991, paper 277c:43-53.
- [13]Siegrist H, Renggli D, Gujer W: Mathematical modelling of anaerobic mesophilic sewage sludge treatment. Wat Sci Technol 1993, 27:25-36.
- [14]Angelidaki I: Anaerobic thermophilic biogass process: the effect of lipids and ammonia. The Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen; 1992.
- [15]Angelidaki I, Ellegaard L, Ahring BK: A mathematical model for dynamic simulation of anaerobic digestion of complex substrates: focusing on ammonia inhibition. Biotechnol Bioeng 1993, 42:159-166.
- [16]Mussati M, Aguirre P, Fuentes M, Scenna N: Aspects on methanogenic biofilm reactor modeling. Latin Am Appl Res 2006, 36:173-180.
- [17]Turner TE, Schnell S, Burrage K: Stochastic approaches for modeling in vivo reactions. Comput Biol Chem 2004, 24:165-178.
- [18]Gillespie D: Concerning the validity of the stochastic approach to chemical kinetics. J Stat Phy 1977, 16:311-318.
- [19]Gillespie D: Approximate accelerated stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems. J Chem Phy 2001, 115(4):1716-1733.
- [20]Cao Y, Gillespie D, Petzold L: Multiscale stochastic simulation algorithm with stochastic partial equilibrium assumption for chemically reacting systems. J Comput Phy 2005, 2:395-411.
- [21]Rathinam M, Petzold L, Cao Y, Gillespie D: Stiffness in stochastically reacting systems: the implicit tau-leaping method. J Chem Phy 2003, 119(24):12784-12794.
- [22]Jegathambal P, Becker T, Spiller M, Kongeter J, Mohan S: Multicomponent reaction modeling using a stochastic algorithm. J Comput Visual Sci 2009, 12(2):51-61.
- [23]Jeong HS, Suh CW, Lim JL, Lee SH, Shin HS: Analysis and application of ADM1 for anaerobic methane production. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 2005, 27(2):81-89.
PDF