Method for calculating confidence intervals for phase contrast flow measurements

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Peter Kellman²  Souheil J Inati¹  Russell R Cross³  Kendall O’Brien³  Laura J Olivieri³  Michael S Hansen² 

[1] National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA;National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA;Division of Cardiology, Children’s National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Ave., N.W, Washington, DC 20010, USA

关键词: Region of interest;    Standard deviation;    Confidence intervals;    Flow;    Phase contrast;   

Others  :  800890
DOI  :  10.1186/1532-429X-16-46

 received in 2014-03-20, accepted in 2014-06-13,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Phase contrast (PC) measurements play an important role in several cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols but considerable variation is observed in such measurements. Part of this variation stems from the propagation of thermal noise from the measurement data through the image reconstruction to the region of interest analysis used in flow measurement, which limits the precision. The purpose of this study was to develop a method for direct estimation of the variation caused by thermal noise and to validate this method in phantom and in vivo data.

Methods

The estimation of confidence intervals in flow measurements is complicated by noise correlation among the image pixels and cardiac phases. This correlation is caused by sequence and reconstruction parameters. A method for the calculation of the standard deviation of region of interest measurements was adapted and expanded to accommodate typical clinical PC measurements and the region-of-interest analysis used for such measurements. This included the dependency between cardiac phases that arises due to retrospective cardiac gating used in such studies. The proposed method enables calculation of standard deviations of flow measurements without the need for repeated experiments or repeated reconstructions. The method was compared to repeated trials in phantom measurements and pseudo replica reconstructions of in vivo data. Three different flow protocols (free breathing and breath hold with various accelerations) were compared in terms of the confidence interval ranges caused by thermal noise in the measurement data.

Results

Using the proposed method it was possible to accurately predict confidence intervals for flow measurements. The method was in good agreement with repeated measurements in phantom experiments and there was also good agreement with confidence intervals predicted by pseudo replica reconstructions in both phantom and in vivo data. The proposed method was used to demonstrate that the variation in cardiac output caused by thermal noise is on the order of 1% in clinically used free breathing protocols, and on the order of 3-5% in breath-hold protocols with higher parallel imaging factors.

Conclusions

It is possible to calculate confidence intervals for Cartesian PC contrast flow measurements directly without the need for time-consuming pseudo replica reconstructions.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Hansen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Singer JR: Blood flow rates by nuclear magnetic resonance measurements. Science 1959, 130:1652-1653.
• [2]Moran PR: A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. Magn Reson Imaging 1982, 1:197-203.
• [3]Pelc NJ, Sommer FG, Li KC, Brosnan TJ, Herfkens RJ, Enzmann DR: Quantitative magnetic resonance flow imaging. Magn Reson Q 1994, 10:125-147.
• [4]Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, Galanski M: Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. Radiographics 2002, 22:651-671.
• [5]Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E: Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013, 15:91. BioMed Central Full Text
• [6]Powell AJ, Geva T: Blood flow measurement by magnetic resonance imaging in congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2000, 21:47-58.
• [7]Powell AJ, Maier SE, Chung T, Geva T: Phase-velocity cine magnetic resonance imaging measurement of pulsatile blood flow in children and young adults: in vitro and in vivo validation. Pediatr Cardiol 2000, 21:104-110.
• [8]Gatehouse PD, Rolf MP, Graves MJ, Hofman MB, Totman J, Werner B, Quest RA, Liu Y, von Spiczak J, Dieringer M, Firmin DN, van Rossum A, Lombardi M, Schwitter J, Schulz-Menger J, Kilner PJ: Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010, 12:5. BioMed Central Full Text
• [9]Chernobelsky A, Shubayev O, Comeau CR, Wolff SD: Baseline correction of phase contrast images improves quantification of blood flow in the great vessels. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007, 9:681-685.
• [10]Miller TA, Landes AB, Moran AM: Improved accuracy in flow mapping of congenital heart disease using stationary phantom technique. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009, 11:52. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Andersen AH, Kirsch JE: Analysis of noise in phase contrast MR imaging. Med Phys 1996, 23:857-869.
• [12]Kellman P, McVeigh ER: Image reconstruction in SNR units: a general method for SNR measurement. Magn Reson Med 2005, 54:1439-1447.
• [13]Kellman P: Erratum to Kellman P, McVeigh ER. Image reconstruction in SNR units: a general method for SNR measurement. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:1439–1447. Magn Reson Med 2007, 58:211-212.
• [14]Robson PM, Grant AK, Madhuranthakam AJ, Lattanzi R, Sodickson DK, McKenzie CA: Comprehensive quantification of signal-to-noise ratio and g-factor for image-based and k-space-based parallel imaging reconstructions. Magn Reson Med 2008, 60:895-907.
• [15]Hansen MS, Inati SJ, Kellman P: Noise propagation in region of interest measurements. Magn Reson Med 2014. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1002/mrm.2519
• [16]Lenz GW, Haacke EM, White RD: Retrospective cardiac gating: a review of technical aspects and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging 1989, 7:445-455.
• [17]Walsh DO, Gmitro AF, Marcellin MW: Adaptive reconstruction of phased array MR imagery. Magn Reson Med 2000, 43:682-690.
• [18]Bernstein MA, Zhou XJ, Polzin JA, King KF, Ganin A, Pelc NJ, Glover GH: Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction. Magn Reson Med 1998, 39:300-308.
• [19]Lankhaar J-W, Hofman MBM, Marcus JT, Zwanenburg JJM, Faes TJC, Vonk-Noordegraaf A: Correction of phase offset errors in main pulmonary artery flow quantification. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005, 22:73-79.