Harm Reduction Journal | |
Physicians’ attitudes towards office-based delivery of methadone maintenance therapy: results from a cross-sectional survey of Nova Scotia primary-care physicians | |
Susan Kirkland1  John Fraser2  Mark Asbridge3  Jessica Dooley3  | |
[1] Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, 5790 University Ave, Halifax, NS B3H 1V7, Canada;North End Community Health Centre, Halifax, NS B3K 3B5, Canada;Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 1V7, Canada | |
关键词: Barriers; Access; Office-based delivery; Primary care physicians; Methadone Maintenance Therapy (MMT); | |
Others : 810003 DOI : 10.1186/1477-7517-9-20 |
|
received in 2011-10-19, accepted in 2012-05-27, 发布年份 2012 | |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Approximately 90,000 Canadians use opioids each year, many of whom experience health and social problems that affect the individual user, families, communities and the health care system. For those who wish to reduce or stop their opioid use, methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) is effective and supporting evidence is well-documented. However, access and availability to MMT is often inconsistent, with greater inequity outside of urban settings. Involving community based primary-care physicians in the delivery of MMT could serve to expand capacity and accessibility of MMT programs. Little is known, however, about the extent to which MMT, particularly office-based delivery, is acceptable to physicians. The aim of this study is to survey physicians about their attitudes towards MMT, particularly office-based delivery, and the perceived barriers and facilitators to MMT delivery.
Methods
In May 2008, facilitated by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia, a cross-sectional, e-mail survey of 950 primary-care physicians practicing in Nova Scotia, Canada was administered via the OPINIO on-line survey software, to assess the acceptability of office-based MMT. Logistic regressions, adjusted for physician sociodemographic characteristics, were used to examine the association between physicians’ willingness to participate in office-based MMT, and a series of measures capturing physician attitudes and knowledge about treatment approaches, opioid use, and methadone, as well as perceived barriers to MMT.
Results
Overall, 19.8% of primary-care physicians responded to the survey, with 56% who indicated that they would be willing to be involved in MMT under current or similar circumstances; however, willingness was associated with numerous attitudinal and systemic factors. The barriers to involvement in MMT that were frequently cited included a lack of training or experience in MMT, lack of support services, and potential challenges of working with an MMT patient population.
Conclusions
Study findings provide valuable information to help facilitate greater involvement of primary-care physicians in MMT, while highlighting concerns around administration, support, and training. Even limited uptake by primary-care physicians would greatly enhance MMT access in Nova Scotia, particularly for methadone clients located in rural communities. These findings are applicable broadly, to any jurisdictions where office-based MMT is not currently available.
【 授权许可】
2012 Dooley et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20140709031422474.pdf | 225KB | download |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Popova S, Rehm J, Fischer B: An overview of illegal opioid use and health services utilization in Canada. Public Health 2006, 120:320-328.
- [2]Rehm J, Baliuna D, Brochu S, Fischer B, Gnam W, Patra J, Popova S, Sarnocinska-Hart A, Taylor B: The costs of substance abuse in Canada 2002. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, Ottawa, ON; 2006.
- [3]Fischer B, Brissette S, Brochu S, Bruneau J, El-Guebaly N, Noel L, Rehm J, Tyndall M, Wild C, Mun P, Haydon E, Baliunas D: Determinants of overdose incidents among illicit opioid users in 5 Canadian cities. Can Med Assoc J 2004, 171(3):235-239.
- [4]Hser Y, Hoffman V, Grella CE, Anglin MD: A 33-year follow-up of narcotic addicts. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001, 58:503-508.
- [5]Millson P, Challacombe L, Villeneuve PJ, Fischer B, Strike CJ, Myers T, Shore R, Hopkins S, Raftis S, Pearson M: Self-perceived health among Canadian opiate users. Can J Public Health 2004, 95(2):99-104.
- [6]Novick DM, Richman BL, Friedman JM, Friedman JE, Fried C, Wilson JP, Townley A, Kreek MJ: The medical status of methadone maintenance patients in treatment for 11–18 years. Drug Alcohol Depend 1993, 33(3):235-245.
- [7]Kreek MJ: Medical safety and side effects of methadone in tolerant individuals. J Am Med Assoc 1973, 223(6):665-668.
- [8]Strain EC, Stitzer ML, Liebson IA, Bigelow GE: Dose–response effects of methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence. Ann Intern Med 1993, 119(1):23-27.
- [9]Thiede H, Hagan H, Murrill CS: Methadone treatment and HIV and hepatitis B and C risk reduction among injectors in the Seattle area. J Urban Health 2000, 77(3):331-345.
- [10]Dolan KA, Shearer J, MacDonald M, Mattick RP, Hall W, Wodak AD: A randomised controlled trial of methadone maintenance treatment versus wait list control in an Australian prison system. Drug Alcohol Depend 2003, 72(1):59-65.
- [11]Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D, Kidd T: The national treatment outcome research study (NTORS): 4–5 year follow-up results. Addiction 2003, 98:291-303.
- [12]Willner-Reid J, Belendiuk KA, Epstein DH, Schmittner J, Preston KL: Hepatitis C and HIV risk behaviour in polydrug users on methadone maintenance. J Subst Abuse Treat 2008, 35(1):78-86.
- [13]Millson P, Challacombe L, Villeneuve PJ, Strike CJ, Fischer B, Myers T, Shore R, Hopkins S: Reduction in injection-related HIV risk after 6 months in a low-threshold methadone treatment program. AIDS Educ Prev 2007, 19(2):124-136.
- [14]Canadian Press, May 13, 2011. “Nova Scotia government to expand methadone treatment after drug-related deaths.” http://www.ipolitics.ca/2011/05/13/nova-scotia-government-to-expand-methadone-treatment-after-drug-related-deaths/
- [15]Nova Scotia Addiction Services 2009–2010 Annual Report. Nova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness, Halifax; 2011.
- [16]Byrne A, Wodak A: Census of patients receiving methadone treatment in a general practice. Addict Res 1996, 3(4):341-349.
- [17]Greenwood J: Persuading general practitioners to prescribe - good husbandry or recipe for chaos? Br J Addict 1992, 87:567-575.
- [18]Van Brussel G: Methadone treatment in Amsterdam: The critical role of general practitioners. Addict Res 1996, 3(4):363-368.
- [19]Novick DM, Joseph H, Salsitz EA, Kalin MF, Keefe JB, Miller EL, Richman BL: Outcomes of treatment of socially rehabilitated methadone maintenance patients in physicians’ offices (medical maintenance): Follow-up at three and a half to nine and a fourth years. J Gen Intern Med 1994, 9(3):127-130.
- [20]Latowsky M, Kallen E: Mainstreaming methadone maintenance treatment: The role of the family physician. Can Med Assoc J 1997, 157(4):395-398.
- [21]Fiellin DA, O’Connor PG, Chawarski M, Pakes JP, Pantalon MV, Schottenfeld RS: Methadone maintenance in primary care: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001, 286(14):1724-1731.
- [22]Salsitz EA, Joseph H, Frank B, Perez J, Richman BL, Saloman N, Kalin MF, Novick DM: Methadone medical maintenance (MMM): Treating chronic opioid dependence in private medical practice - A summary report (1983–1998). Mt Sinai J Med 2000, 67(5&6):388-397.
- [23]Fischer B, Rehm J, Patra J, Crus MF: Change in illicit opioid use across Canada. CMAJ 2006, 175(11):1385-1387.
- [24]Best practices - methadone maintenance treatment. No. H49-164/2002E. Health Canada, Ottawa, ON; 2002.
- [25]Anderson JF: Methadone maintenance: BC leads the way. Can Med Assoc J 1997, 157(9):1198.
- [26]Fischer B, Cape D, Daniel N, Gliksman L: Methadone treatment in Ontario after the 1996 regulation reforms. Ann Med Intern 2002, 153(7):2S11-2S21.
- [27]Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D, Lehmann P, Strang J: Methadone treatment practices and outcome for opiate addicts in drug clinics and in general practice results from the national treatment outcome research study. Br J Gen Pract 1999, 49:31-34.
- [28]Jones ES, Moore BA, Sindelarc JL, O’Connora PG, Schottenfeld RS, Fiellin DA: Cost analysis of clinic and office-based treatment of opioid dependence: Results with methadone and buprenorphine in clinically stable patients. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009, 99:132-140.
- [29]van Brussel G: Methadone treatment by general practitioners in Amsterdam. Bull N Y Acad Med 1995, 72(2):348-358.
- [30]Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB: Handbook of survey research. Academic, New York; 1983.
- [31]Streiner DL, Norman GR: Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 1989.
- [32]Caplehorn JRM, Irwig L, Saunders JB: Attitudes and beliefs of staff working in methadone maintenance clinics. Subst Use Misuse 1996, 31(4):437-452.
- [33]Gjersing LR, Butler T, Caplehorn J, Belcher JM, Matthews R: Attitudes and beliefs towards methadone maintenance treatment among Australian prison health staff. Drug and Alcohol Review 2007, 26:501-508.
- [34]McKeown A, Matheson C, Bond C: A qualitative study of GPs’ attitudes to drug misusers and drug misuse services in primary care. Family Practice 2002, 20(2):120-125.
- [35]McGillion J, Wanigaratne S, Feinmann C, Godden T, Byrne A: GPs’ attitudes towards the treatment of drug misusers. Br J Gen Pract 2000, 50:385-386.
- [36]Pelet A, Doll S, Huissoud T, Resplendino J, Besson J, Favrat B: Methadone maintenance treatment in the Swiss Canton of Vaud: demographic and clinical data on 1,782 ambulatory patients. Eur Addict Res 2005, 11:99-106.
- [37]Hobden KL, Cunningham JA: Barriers to the dissemination of four harm reduction strategies: A survey of addiction treatment providers in Ontario. Harm Reduct J 2006, 3(35):1-20. BioMed Central Full Text
- [38]Ogborne AC, Birchmore-Timney C: Support for harm-reduction among staff of specialized treatment services in Ontario, Canada. Drug Alcohol Rev 1998, 17(1):51-58.
- [39]Ogborne AC, Wild CT, Braun K, Newton-Taylor B: Measuring treatment process beliefs among staff of specialized addiction treatment services. J Subst Abuse Treat 1998, 15(4):301-312.
- [40]Ruch JD, Boutwell AE, Shield DC, Key RG, McKenzie M, Clarke JG, Friedmann PD: Attitudes and practices regarding the use of methadone in US and state federal prisons. J Urban Health 2005, 82(3):411-418.
- [41]Weber EM: Failure of physicians to prescribe pharmacotherapies for addiction: regulatory restrictions and physician resistance. J Health Care L & Pol’y 2010, 13(1):49.
- [42]Strang J, Manning V, Mayet S, Ridge G, Best D, Sheridan J: Does prescribing for opiate addiction change after national guidelines? Methadone and buprenorphine prescribing to opiate addicts by general practitioners and hospital doctors in England, 1995–2005. Addiction 2007, 102(5):761-770.
- [43][http://www.nationalphysiciansurvey.ca/nps/2007_Survey/2007nps-e.asp] webcite