期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Comparison of the sagittal profiles among thoracic idiopathic scoliosis patients with different Cobb angles and growth potentials
Ming Li3  Yue-hua Qiao2  Xin-zhu Zhang1  Xiang-yang Chen1  Bing Zhou1  Dun-yi Qi4  Kai-jin Guo1  Feng-chao Zhao1  Ji-bin Wu1  Jia-yu Chen5  Feng Shen3  Guo-you Zhang3  Bo Ran1 
[1] Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College, No. 99 Huaihai road, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221006, China;Institute of Audiology and Speech Science, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221006, China;Department of Orthopedics, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China;Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College, No. 99 Huaihai road, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221006, China;Department of Orthopedics, Kunming General Hospital of Chengdu Military Command, Kunming 650032, China
关键词: Lumbar lordosis;    Thoracic kyphosis;    Idiopathic scoliosis;    Sagittal profiles;   
Others  :  813536
DOI  :  10.1186/1749-799X-9-19
 received in 2013-12-24, accepted in 2014-02-24,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Previous studies have demonstrated that pelvic incidence and sacral slope are significantly greater in idiopathic scoliosis patients compared with normal adolescents. However, whether these sagittal parameters are related to the progression of scoliosis remain unknown. The present was designed to determine the differences in the sagittal profiles among thoracic idiopathic scoliosis patients with different potentials for curve progression.

Methods

Ninety-seven outpatient idiopathic scoliosis patients enrolled from June 2008 to June 2011 were divided to three groups according to different Cobb angles and growth potentials: (1) non-progression of thoracic curve group, Risser sign of 5 and Cobb’s angle < 40°; (2) moderate progression of thoracic curve group, Risser sign of 5 and Cobb’s angle ≥ 40°; and (3) severe progression of thoracic curve group, Risser sign ≤ 3 and Cobb’s angle ≥ 40°. All patients underwent whole spinal anteroposterior and lateral X-ray in standing position, and the sagittal parameters were measured, including thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt.

Results

The average thoracic scoliosis Cobb’s angle in the non-progression group was significantly less than that in the moderate progression group (P < 0.01) and severe progression group (P < 0.01), but there was no statistical difference in the average thoracic scoliosis Cobb’s angle between the severe progression group and moderate progression group. The average thoracic kyphosis angle in the severe progression group (9° ± 4°) was significantly smaller than that in the non-progression group (18° ± 6°, P < 0.01) and moderate progression group (14° ± 5°, P < 0.05). No statistical differences were present in the average lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt among the three groups.

Conclusions

Thoracic hypokyphosis is strongly related with the curve progression in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis patients, but not pelvic sagittal profiles.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Ran et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140710005015751.pdf 663KB PDF download
Figure 3. 70KB Image download
Figure 2. 78KB Image download
Figure 1. 85KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Ogilvie J: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and genetic testing. Curr Opin Pediatr 2010, 22:67-70.
  • [2]S-h M, Jiang J, Sun X, Zhao Q, Qian B-p, Liu Z, Shu H, Qiu Y: Timing of menarche in Chinese girls with and without adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: current results and review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2011, 20:260-265.
  • [3]Dolan L, Masrouha K, El-Khoury G, Weinstein S: The reliability and prognostic implications of a simplified bone age classification system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 2012, 7:O14. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [4]Lee C, Fong DY, Cheung K, Cheng JC, Ng BK, Lam T, Yip PS, Luk KD: A new risk classification rule for curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 2012, 12:989-995.
  • [5]Dede O, Akel I, Demirkiran G, Yalcin N, Marcucio R, Acaroglu E: Is decreased bone mineral density associated with development of scoliosis? A bipedal osteopenic rat model. Scoliosis 2011, 6:24. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [6]Hayashi K, Upasani VV, Pawelek JB, Aubin C-É, Labelle H, Lenke LG, Jackson R, Newton PO: Three-dimensional analysis of thoracic apical sagittal alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2009, 34:792-797.
  • [7]Upasani VV, Tis J, Bastrom T, Pawelek J, Marks M, Lonner B, Crawford A, Newton PO: Analysis of sagittal alignment in thoracic and thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how do these two curve types differ? Spine 2007, 32:1355-1359.
  • [8]Ylikoski M: Growth and progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in girls. J Pediatr Orthop B 2005, 14:320-324.
  • [9]Ogura Y, Takahashi Y, Kou I, Nakajima M, Kono K, Kawakami N, Uno K, Ito M, Minami S, Yanagida H: A replication study for association of 5 single nucleotide polymorphisms with curve progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Japanese patients. Spine 2013, 38:571-575.
  • [10]Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Schroeder TM, O’Brien MF: Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006, 31:1240-1246.
  • [11]Weinstein SL: Natural history. Spine 1999, 24:2592.
  • [12]Guo X, Chau W-W, Chan Y-L, Cheng J-Y: Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of disproportionate endochondral-membranous bone growth. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85:1026-1031.
  • [13]Burwell R: Aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: current concepts. Dev Neurorehabil 2003, 6:137-170.
  • [14]Rigo M, Quera-Salvá G, Villagrasa M: Sagittal configuration of the spine in girls with idiopathic scoliosis: progressing rather than initiating factor. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006, 123:90.
  • [15]Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C: Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 1998, 7:99-103.
  • [16]Mac-Thiong J-M, Labelle H, Charlebois M, Huot M-P, de Guise JA: Sagittal plane analysis of the spine and pelvis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis according to the coronal curve type. Spine 2003, 28:1404-1409.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:15次 浏览次数:28次