Students’ motivation to study dentistry in Malaysia: an analysis using confirmatory factor analysis

Human Resources for Health

Jennifer E Gallagher¹  Eduardo Bernabé¹  Muhd Firdaus Che Musa¹ 

[1] Division of Population and Patient Health, King’s College London Dental Institute at Guy’s, King’s College and St Thomas’ Hospitals, Denmark Hill Campus, Bessemer Road, London SE5 9RS, UK

关键词: Dental education;    Malaysian;    Dental students;    Professional career;    Motivation;   

Others  :  1213771
DOI  :  10.1186/s12960-015-0040-4

 received in 2015-01-07, accepted in 2015-06-02,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Introduction

Malaysia has experienced a significant expansion of dental schools over the past decade. Research into students’ motivation may inform recruitment and retention of the future dental workforce. The objectives of this study were to explore students’ motivation to study dentistry and whether that motivation varied by students’ and school characteristics.

Methods

All 530 final-year students in 11 dental schools (6 public and 5 private) in Malaysia were invited to participate at the end of 2013. The self-administered questionnaire, developed at King’s College London, collected information on students’ motivation to study dentistry and demographic background. Responses on students’ motivation were collected using five-point ordinal scales. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the underlying structure of students’ motivation to study dentistry. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to compare factor scores for overall motivation and sub-domains by students’ and school characteristics.

Results

Three hundred and fifty-six final-year students in eight schools (all public and two private) participated in the survey, representing an 83% response rate for these schools and 67% of all final-year students nationally. The majority of participants were 24 years old (47%), female (70%), Malay (56%) and from middle-income families (41%) and public schools (78%). CFA supported a model with five first-order factors (professional job, healthcare and people, academic, careers advising and family and friends) which were linked to a single second-order factor representing overall students’ motivation. Academic factors and healthcare and people had the highest standardized factor loadings (0.90 and 0.71, respectively), suggesting they were the main motivation to study dentistry. MANOVA showed that students from private schools had higher scores for healthcare and people than those in public schools whereas Malay students had lower scores for family and friends than those from minority ethnic groups. No differences were found by age, sex, family income and school type.

Conclusion

Using CFA, this study shows that academic factors were the main motivation to study dentistry in this group of Malaysian students. There were also variations in students’ motivation by students’ ethnicity and school sector but not by other factors.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Che Musa et al.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Working together for health - The World Health Report. WHO, Geneva; 2006.
• [2]Du Toit J, Jain S, Montalli V, Govender U. Dental students’ motivations for their career choice: an international investigative report. J Dent Educ. 2014; 78(4):605-13.
• [3]Costa SD, Silveira MF, Duraes SJA, de Abreu MHNG, Bonan PRF. Perceptions of dental students regarding dentistry, the job market and the public healthcare system. Cien Saude Colet. 2012; 17(5):1285-96.
• [4]Brown D. Introduction to theories of career development and choice: origins, evolution and current efforts. In: Career choice and development. 4th ed. Brown D, editor. Wiley, San Francisco, CA; 2002: p.3-23.
• [5]Holland JL. Making vocational choices: a theory of vocational personalities and work environments. 3rd ed. Odessa, FL, Psychological Assessment Resources; 1997.
• [6]Patton W, McMahon M. Career development and systems theory: connecting theory and practice. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers; 2014.
• [7]Bernabe E, Icaza JL, Delgado-Angulo EK. Reasons for choosing dentistry as a career: a study involving male and female first-year students in Peru. Eur J Dent Educ. 2006; 10(4):236-41.
• [8]Khami MR, Murtomaa H, Jafarian M, Vehkalahti MM, Virtanen JI. Study motives and career choices of Iranian dental students. Med Princ Pract. 2008; 17(3):221-6.
• [9]Vahid Dastjerdi M, Mahdian M, Vahid Dastjerdi E, Namdari M. Study motives and career choices of Iranian medical and dental students. Acta Med Iran. 2012; 50(6):417-24.
• [10]Gallagher JE, Patel R, Donaldson N, Wilson NH. The emerging dental workforce: why dentistry? A quantitative study of final year dental students’ views on their professional career. BMC Oral Health. 2007; 7:7. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Skelly AM, Fleming GJ. Perceptions of a dental career among successful applicants for dentistry compared with those of fifth-year dental students. Prim Dent Care. 2002; 9(2):41-6.
• [12]Gallagher J, Clarke W, Wilson N. Understanding the motivation: a qualitative study of dental students’ choice of professional career. Eur J Dent Educ. 2008; 12(2):89-98.
• [13]Belsi A, Gallagher JE, Asimakopoulou K. Personality profile of students entering dentistry, hygiene/therapy and dental nursing at one London dental institute. Eur J Dent Educ. 2011; 15(2):80-4.
• [14]Karibe H, Kawakami T, Suzuki A, Warita S, Ogata K, Aoyagi K et al.. Career choice and attitudes towards dental education amongst dental students in Japan and Sweden. Eur J Dent Educ. 2009; 13(2):80-6.
• [15]Vigild M, Schwarz E. Characteristics and study motivation of Danish dental students in a longitudinal perspective. Eur J Dent Educ. 2001; 5(3):127-33.
• [16]Marino RJ, Morgan MV, Winning T, Thomson WM, Marshall RI, Gotjamanos T et al.. Sociodemographic backgrounds and career decisions of Australian and New Zealand dental students. J Dent Educ. 2006; 70(2):169-78.
• [17]Brand AA, Chikte UM, Thomas CJ. Choosing dentistry as a career–a profile of entering students (1992) to the University of Sydney, Australia. Aust Dent J. 1996; 41(3):198-205.
• [18]Scarbecz M, Ross JA. Gender differences in first-year dental students’ motivation to attend dental school. J Dent Educ. 2002; 66(8):952-61.
• [19]Cohen R, Coburn D. Motivations for studying dentistry among first-year dental students. Med Educ. 1977; 11(2):139-50.
• [20]Karibe H, Suzuki A, Sekimoto T, Srithavaj ML, Iamaroon A, Warita S et al.. Cross-cultural comparison of the attitudes of dental students in three countries. J Dent Educ. 2007; 71(11):1457-66.
• [21]Rashid H, Manoharan A, Abufanas S, Gallagher J. Motivation for a career in dentistry: the views of dental students in the United Arab Emirates. Int Dent J. 2013; 63(5):259-65.
• [22]Stewart FM, Drummond JR, Carson L, Hoad RG. The future of the profession–a survey of dental school applicants. Br Dent J. 2004; 197(9):569-73.
• [23]Bedi R, Gilthorpe MS. Ethnic and gender variations in university applicants to United Kingdom medical and dental schools. Br Dent J. 2000; 189(4):212-5.
• [24]Halawany HS. Career motivations, perceptions of the future of dentistry and preferred dental specialties among saudi dental students. Open Dent J. 2014; 8:129-35.
• [25]Al Jazairy YH, Halawany HS, Hussainan NA, Maflehi NA, Abraham NB, Jacob V. Factors affecting job satisfaction and their correlation with educational standards among dental assistants. Ind Health. 2014; 52(4):324-33.
• [26]Aggarwal A, Mehta S, Gupta D, Sheikh S, Pallagatti S, Singh R et al.. Dental students’ motivations and perceptions of dental professional career in India. J Dent Educ. 2012; 76(11):1532-9.
• [27]National Oral Health Survey of School Children 6 Year Olds. OHD, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya; 2009.
• [28]12 year olds. OHD, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya; 2007.
• [29]National Oral Health Survey of Adults 2010 (NOHSA 2010). Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya; 2013.
• [30]Health Facts 2012. Health Informatics Centre, Planning and Development Division. Ministry of Health, Malaysia; 2013.
• [31]Annual Report 2011. Malaysian Dental Council, Cyberjaya; 2012.
• [32]Annual Report 2010. Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya; 2011.
• [33]Annual Report 2013. Malaysian Dental Council, Cyberjaya; 2014.
• [34]Country Health Plan-10th Malaysia Plan 2011-2015. Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya; 2010.
• [35]Gallagher JE, Clarke W, Eaton KA, Wilson NH. Dentistry - a professional contained career in healthcare. A qualitative study of vocational dental practitioners’ professional expectations. BMC Oral Health. 2007; 7:16. BioMed Central Full Text
• [36]Kevin KE. Using Mplus for structural equation modeling. Saint Mary’s University. SAGE Publications, Canada; 2014.
• [37]Byrne BM. Factor analytic models: viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives. J Pers Assess. 2005; 85(1):17-32.
• [38]Kline R. Principle and practice of structural equation modelling. 2nd ed. The Guilford Press, New York; 2005.
• [39]Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assessment. 1995; 7(3):286-99.
• [40]Alatas SH. The grading of occupational prestige amongst the Malays in Malaysia. J Malays Branch R Asiat Soc. 1968; 41(1):146-56.
• [41]Gallagher J. Specialties in transition: the case of oral and maxillofacial surgery. In: The future health workforce. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke & New York; 2003: p.104-23.
• [42]Hassler D, Stage FK. Family and high school experience influences on the postsecondary educational plans of ninth-grade students. Am Educ Res J. 1992;29(425).
• [43]Connor HC, Tyers T, Mdoood T, Hillage J. Why the difference? A closer look at higher education minority ethnic students and graduates. Department for Education and Skills, London; 2004.
• [44]Embong A. State-led modernization and the new middle class in Malaysia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York; 2002.
• [45]Veal K, Perry M, Stavisky J, Herbert KD. The pathway to dentistry for minority students: from their perspective. J Dent Educ. 2004; 68(9):938-46.