期刊论文详细信息
Implementation Science
Improving the organization of palliative care: identification of barriers and facilitators in five European countries
Yvonne Engels6  Kris Vissers6  Ragni Sommerbakk8  Elena Mariani4  Birgit Jaspers5  Wojciech Leppert1  Nathan Davies9  Steve Iliffe9  Franka Meiland2  Frederike Brouwer7  Myrra Vernooij-Dassen3  Jasper van Riet Paap7 
[1] Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245, Poznan, Poland;Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, 1007 MB, The Netherlands;Kalorama Foundation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;Alma Mater Studiorum, Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy;Clinic for Palliative Medicine, University of Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, Goettingen, 37075, Germany;Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands;Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands;European Palliative Care Research Centre, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway;Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK
关键词: Europe;    Organization of care;    Quality improvement;    Barriers and facilitators;    Palliative care;   
Others  :  1139507
DOI  :  10.1186/s13012-014-0130-z
 received in 2014-05-30, accepted in 2014-09-19,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Interventions to improve palliative care encounter challenges beyond the usual implementation problems because of palliative care¿s complex and changing character. In this study, we explored barriers and facilitators faced by health-care professionals in five European countries (England, Germany, Italy, Norway and the Netherlands) with regard to improving the organization of their palliative care service.

Methods

Semi-structured individual and focus group interviews were conducted with purposefully selected health-care professionals. The constant comparative method was used to analyse the data.

Results

Professionals working in hospitals, hospices, nursing homes and primary care facilities who provide palliative care to adult patients were interviewed (n =40) or participated in ten focus group interviews (n =59). Barriers and facilitators were inductively grouped into 16 categories and arranged into five themes: innovation, individual professional level, group dynamics, organizational context and local political-economic context. Although the barriers and facilitators identified differed in scope, context, strength and provenance, they were shared by professionals from different European countries.

Conclusion

This study identified barriers and facilitators to organizational change in palliative care. Some of these barriers and facilitators were experienced by professionals in almost all countries and are therefore prerequisites to change. Understanding the barriers to and facilitators of change will help tailor organizational improvements to the needs of individuals and organizations.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 van Riet Paap et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150321153412339.pdf 244KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Radbruch L, Payne S: White paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe: part 1. Eur J Palliat Care 2009, 16:278-289.
  • [2]Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, Gallagher ER, Admane S, Jackson VA, Dahlin CM, Blinderman CD, Jacobsen J, Pirl WF, Billings JA, Lynch TJ: Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2010, 363:733-742.
  • [3]Sigurdardottir KR, Haugen DF, Bausewein C, Higginson IJ, Harding R, Rosland JH, Kaasa S: A pan-European survey of research in end-of-life cancer care. Support Care Cancer 2012, 20:39-48.
  • [4]Teunissen SC, Wesker W, Kruitwagen C, de Haes HC, Voest EE, de Graeff A: Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007, 34:94-104.
  • [5]Vissers KC, van den Brand MW, Jacobs J, Groot M, Veldhoven C, Verhagen C, Hasselaar J, Engels Y: Palliative medicine update: a multidisciplinary approach. Pain Pract 2013, 13:576-588.
  • [6]Radbruch L, Payne S: White paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe: part 2. Eur J Palliat Care 2010, 17:22-33.
  • [7]Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles MP: Improving Patient Care: the Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice. Elsevier, Edinburgh; 2005.
  • [8]Hesselink G, Flink M, Olsson M, Barach P, Dudzik-Urbaniak E, Orrego C, Toccafondi G, Kalkman C, Johnson JK, Schoonhoven L, Vernooij-Dassen M, Wollersheim H: Are patients discharged with care? A qualitative study of perceptions and experiences of patients, family members and care providers. BMJ Qual Saf 2012, 21(Suppl 1):i39-i49.
  • [9]Minkman MM, Ligthart SA, Huijsman R: Integrated dementia care in The Netherlands: a multiple case study of case management programmes. Health Soc Care Community 2009, 17:485-494.
  • [10]Verkaik R, Francke AL, van Meijel B, Ouwerkerk J, Ribbe MW, Bensing JM: Introducing a nursing guideline on depression in dementia: a multiple case study on influencing factors. Int J Nurs Stud 2011, 48:1129-1139.
  • [11]van Riet PJ, Engels Y, Iliffe S, Radbruch L, Kaasa S, Chattat R, Vissers K, Vernooij-Dassen M: Improving the organization of palliative care by implementing quality indicators and national and setting-specific interventions: study protocol of the IMPACT project. Prog Palliat Care 2014, 22:201-205.
  • [12]Patton MQ: Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks; 2001.
  • [13]Bowling A, Ebrahim S: Handbook of Health Research Methods. Open University Press, Buckinghamshire; 2005.
  • [14]Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P: Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 1998, 2:iii-ix. 1¿274
  • [15]Johnson JK, Barach P, Vernooij-Dassen M: Conducting a multicentre and multinational qualitative study on patient transitions. BMJ Qual Saf 2012, 21(Suppl 1):i22-i28.
  • [16]Grol R, Wensing M: What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust 2004, 180:S57-S60.
  • [17]Donabedian A: The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA 1988, 260:1743-1748.
  • [18]Centeno C, Pons JJ, Lynch T, Donea O, Rocafort J, Clark D: EAPC Atlas of Palliative Care in Europe 2013 - Cartographic Edition. EAPC Press, Milan; 2013.
  • [19]Van Beek K, Woitha K, Ahmed N, Menten J, Jaspers B, Engels Y, Ahmedzai SH, Vissers K, Hasselaar J: Comparison of legislation, regulations and national health strategies for palliative care in seven European countries (Results from the Europall Research Group): a descriptive study. BMC Health Serv Res 2013, 13:275. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [20]Iliffe S, Davies N, Vernooij-Dassen M, van Riet PJ, Sommerbakk R, Mariani E, Jaspers B, Radbruch L, Manthorpe J, Maio L, Haugen D, Engels Y: Modelling the landscape of palliative care for people with dementia: a European mixed methods study. BMC Palliat Care 2013, 12:30. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [21]Davies N, Maio L, Paap JV, Mariani E, Jaspers B, Sommerbakk R, Grammatico D, Manthorpe J, Ahmedzai S, Vernooij-Dassen M, Iliffe S: Quality palliative care for cancer and dementia in five European countries: some common challenges. Aging Ment Health 2013, 18:400-410.
  • [22][http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/en/] webcite Palliative Care []
  • [23]Hasson F, Kernohan WG, Waldron M, Whittaker E, McLaughlin D: The palliative care link nurse role in nursing homes: barriers and facilitators. J Adv Nurs 2008, 64:233-242.
  • [24]Meiland FJ, Droes RM, de Lange J, Vernooij-Dassen MJ: Facilitators and barriers in the implementation of the meeting centres model for people with dementia and their carers. Health Policy 2005, 71:243-253.
  • [25]Yevchak AM, Fick DM, McDowell J, Monroe T, May K, Grove L, Kolanowski AM, Waller JL, Inouye SK: Barriers and facilitators to implementing delirium rounds in a clinical trial across three diverse hospital settings. Clin Nurs Res 2013, 23:201-215.
  • [26]Antunes B, Harding R, Higginson IJ: Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliat Med 2013, 28:158-175.
  • [27]Lynch T, Clark D, Centeno C, Rocafort J, de Lima L, Filbet M, Hegedus K, Belle O, Giordano A, Guillen F, Wright M: Barriers to the development of palliative care in Western Europe. Palliat Med 2010, 24:812-819.
  • [28]Van¿t Leven N, Graff MJ, Kaijen M, de Swart BJ, Olde Rikkert MG, Vernooij-Dassen MJ: Barriers to and facilitators for the use of an evidence-based occupational therapy guideline for older people with dementia and their carers. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012, 27:742-748.
  • [29]West MA: The social psychology of innovations in groups. In Innovations and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies. Edited by West MA, Farr JL. Wiley, Chichester; 1990:309-333.
  • [30]Vries HD, Mudde AN: Predicting stage transitions for smoking cessation applying the attitude-social influence-efficacy model. Psychol Health 1998, 13:369-385.
  • [31]Ajzen I: The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991, 50:179-211.
  • [32]Rogers EM: Diffusion of Innovation. Free Press, New York; 2003.
  • [33]Campbell NC, Murray E, Darbyshire J, Emery J, Farmer A, Griffiths F, Guthrie B, Lester H, Wilson P, Kinmonth AL: Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ 2007, 334:455-459.
  • [34]Langley G, Nolan K, Norman C, Provost L, Nolan T: The Improvement Guide: a Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. Jossey Bass Publ, San Francisco; 1996.
  • [35]Bosch M, van der Weijden T, Wensing M, Grol R: Tailoring quality improvement interventions to identified barriers: a multiple case analysis. J Eval Clin Pract 2007, 13:161-168.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:9次