Strongyle infections and parasitic control strategies in German horses ― a risk assessment

BMC Veterinary Research

Miriam C Scheuerle¹  Anne M Becher¹  Kurt Pfister¹  Stephanie Schneider¹ 

[1] Comparative Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Leopoldstr. 5, Munich, D-80802, Germany

关键词: Equine;    Selective anthelmintic therapy;    Diagnosis;    FEC;    Larval culture;    Germany;    S. vulgaris;    Strongyle;    Parasite control;   

Others  :  1103494
DOI  :  10.1186/s12917-014-0262-z

 received in 2014-07-23, accepted in 2014-10-23,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

As a consequence of the increasing levels of anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomes, new strategies for equine parasite control are being implemented. To assess the potential risks of these, the occurrence of strongyles was evaluated in a group of 1887 horses. The distribution of fecal egg counts (FECs), the frequency of anthelmintic drug use, and the deworming intervals were also analyzed. Between June 2012 and May 2013, 1887 fecal samples from either selectively or strategically dewormed horses were collected at 195 horse farms all over Germany and analyzed quantitatively with a modified McMaster technique. All samples with FEC ≥20 eggs per gram (EPG) were subjected to coproculture to generate third-stage larvae (LIII) for species differentiation.

Results

Egg counts were below the limit of detection (20 EPG) in 1046 (55.4%) samples and above it in 841 (44.6%) samples. Strongylus vulgaris larvae were identified in two of the 841 positive samples. Infections with cyathostomes were found on every farm. The most frequently applied anthelmintic was ivermectin (788/50.8%), followed by pyrantel (336/21.6%). The mean time since last treatment was 6.3 months. High-egg-shedding (>500 EPG) strategically dewormed horses (183/1357) were treated, on average, three times/year. The planned treatment date was already exceeded by 72.5% of the high egg-shedders and by 58.1% of the moderate (200–500 EPG) and low egg-shedders (20–199 EPG).

Conclusions

S. vulgaris seems to be rare in Germany and no difference in its frequency has yet been found between selectively treated horses and horses receiving treatment in strategic intervals. However, inconsistent parasite control has been observed. Therefore, to minimize the risks for disease, consistent and efficient parasite control should be implemented.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Schneider et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Kaplan RM: Drug resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance: a status report. Trends Parasitol 2004, 20:477-481.
• [2]Kaplan RM: Anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of horses. Vet Res 2002, 33(5):491-507.
• [3]Traversa D, Klei TR, Iorio R, Paoletti B, Lia RP, Otranto D, Sparagano OAE, Giangaspero A: Occurence of anthelmintic resistant equine cyathostome populations in central and southern Italy. Prev Vet Med 2007, 82:314-320.
• [4]Lester HE, Spanton J, Stratford CH, Bartley DJ, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Coumbe K, Mair T, Swan B, Lemon G, Cookson R, Matthews JB: Anthelmintic efficacy against cyathostomins in horses in Southern England. Vet Parasitol 2013, 197(1–2):189-196.
• [5]Canever RJ, Braga PRC, Boeckh A, Grycajuck M, Bier D, Molento MB: Lack of Cyathostomin sp. reduction after anthelmintic treatment in horses in Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2013, 194(1):35-39.
• [6]Comer KC, Hillyer MH, Coles GC: Anthelmintic use and resistance on thoroughbred training yards in the UK. Vet Rec 2006, 158:596-598.
• [7]Osterman Lind E, Kuzmina T, Uggla A, Waller PJ, Höglund J: A field study on the effect of some anthelmintics on cyathostomins of horses in Sweden. Vet Res Commun 2007, 31:53-65.
• [8]Näreaho A, Vainio K, Oksanen A: Impaired efficacy of ivermectin against Parascaris equorum, and both ivermectin and pyrantel against strongyle infections in trotter foals in Finland. Vet Parasitol 2011, 182(2–4):372-377.
• [9]Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Collins SS: Probable reason why small strongyle EPG counts are returning "early" after ivermectin treatment of horses on a farm in Central Kentucky. Parasitol Res 2009, 104(3):569-574.
• [10]Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Collins SS: Reduced activity of moxidectin and ivermectin on small strongyles in young horses on a farm (BC) in Central Kentucky in two field tests with notes on variable counts of eggs per gram of feces (EPGs). Parasitol Res 2011, 108(5):1315-1319.
• [11]Lyons ET, Tolliver SC: Further indication of lowered activity of ivermectin on immature small strongyles in the intestinal lumen of horses on a farm in Central Kentucky. Parasitol Res 2013, 112(2):889-891.
• [12]Molento MB, Antunes J, Bentes RN, Coles GC: Anthelmintic resistant nematodes in Brazilian horses. Vet Rec 2008, 162(12):384-385.
• [13]Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Ionita M, Lewellen A, Collins SS: Field studies indicating reduced activity of ivermectin on small strongyles in horses on a farm in Central Kentucky. Parasitol Res 2008, 103:209-215.
• [14]von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Fritzen B, Demeler J, Schürmann S, Rohn K, Schnieder T, Epe C: Case of reduced cyathostomin egg-reappearance period and failure of Parascaris equorum egg count reduction following ivermectin treatment as well as survey on pyrantel efficacy on German horse farms. Vet Parasitol 2007, 144:74-80.
• [15]Rossano MG, Smith AR, Lyons ET: Shortened strongyle-type egg reappearance periods in naturally infected horses treated with moxidectin and failure of a larvicidal dose of fenbendazole to reduce fecal egg counts. Vet Parasitol 2010, 173(3–4):349-352.
• [16]Geurden T, van Doorn D, Claerebout E, Kooyman F, De Keersmaecker S, Vercruysse J, Besognet B, Vanimisetti B, di Regalbono AF, Beraldo P, Di Cesare A, Traversa D: Decreased strongyle egg re-appearance period after treatment with ivermectin and moxidectin in horses in Belgium, Italy and The Netherlands. Vet Parasitol 2014, 204(3-4):291-6.
• [17]Nielsen MK, Reinemeyer CR, Donecker JM, Leathwick DM, Marchiondo AA, Kaplan RM: Anthelmintic resistance in equine parasites—Current evidence and knowledge gaps. Vet Parasitol 2014, 204:55-63.
• [18]Lloyd S, Smith J, Connan RM, Hatcher MA, Hedges TR, Humphrey DJ, Jones AC: Parasite control methods used by horses owners: factors predisposing to the development of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes. Vet Rec 2000, 146:487-492.
• [19]Nielsen MK: Restrictions of anthelmintic usage: perspectives and potential consequences. Parasit Vectors 2009, 2(Suppl 2):S7. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Drudge JH, Lyons ET: Control of internal parasites of the horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1966, 148(4):378-383.
• [21]Kenyon F, Greer AW, Coles GC, Cringoli G, Papadopoulos E, Cabaret J, Berrag B, Varady M, Van Wyk JA, Thomas E, Vercruysse J, Jackson F: The role of targeted selective treatments in the development of refugia-based approaches to the control of gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants. Vet Parasitol 2009, 164(1):3-11.
• [22]Krecek RC, Guthrie AJ: Alternative approaches to control of cyathostomes: an African perspective. Vet Parasitol 1999, 85(2–3):151-162.
• [23]Nielsen MK: Sustainable equine parasite control: perspectives and research needs. Vet Parasitol 2012, 185(1):32-44.
• [24]Becher AM, Mahling M, Nielsen MK, Pfister K: Selective anthelmintic therapy of horses in the Federal states of Bavaria (Germany) and Salzburg (Austria): An investigation into strongyle egg shedding consistency. Vet Parasitol 2010, 171(1–2):116-122.
• [25]Menzel MA: Selektive Entwurmung der Pferde in einer oberbayrischen Pferdepraxis: Einführung sowie wissenschaftliche und betriebswirtschaftliche Analyse. PhD thesis. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München; 2013.
• [26]Gomez HH, Georgi JR: Equine helminth infections: control by selective chemotherapy. Equine Vet J 1991, 23:198-200.
• [27]Krecek RC, Guthrie AJ, Van Nieuwenhuizen LC, Booth LM: A comparison between the effects of conventional and selective antiparasitic treatments on nematode parasites of horses from two management schemes. JS Afr vet Assoc 1994, 1994:97-100.
• [28]Nielsen MK, Monrad J, Olsen SN: Prescription-only anthelmintics—A questionnaire survey of strategies for surveillance and control of equine strongyles in Denmark. Vet Parasitol 2006, 135(1):47-55.
• [29]Nielsen MK, Pfister K, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G: Selective Therapy in equine parasite control - Application and limitations. Vet Parasitol 2014, 202:95-103.
• [30]Duncan JL, Love S: Preliminary observations on an alternative strategy for the control of horse strongyles. Equine Vet J 1991, 23:226-228.
• [31]Greite L: Untersuchungen zur Verbreitung von Strongylus vulgaris im Rahmen der Selektiven Entwurmung bei Pferden in Süddeutschland. PhD thesis. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München; 2013.
• [32]Nielsen MK, Haaning N, Olsen SN: Strongyle egg shedding consistency in horses on farms using selective therapy in Denmark. Vet Parasitol 2006, 135:333-335.
• [33]Hertzberg H, Schwarzwald CC, Grimm F, Frey CF, Gottstein B, Gerber V: Helminthenmanagement beim adulten Pferde: Notwendigkeit einer Neuorientierung. Schweiz Arch Tierheilk 2014, 156(2):61-70.
• [34]Nielsen MK, Olsen SN, Lyons ET, Monrad J, Thamsborg SM: Real-time PCR evaluation of Strongylus vulgaris in horses on farms in Denmark and Central Kentucky. Vet Parasitol 2012, 190(3–4):461-466.
• [35][http://www.aaep.org/info/parasite-control-guidelines-231] webcite American Association of Equine Practitioners: AAEP Parasite Control Guidelines. []
• [36]Roberts FHS, O´Sullivan PJ: Methods for Egg counts and larval cultures for strongyles infesting the gastro-intestinal tract of cattle. Austr J Agric Res 1950, 1:99-102.
• [37]Bürger HJ, Stoye M: Therapogen Praxisdienst, Parasitologische Diagnostik (Teil II), Eizählung und Larvendifferenzierung: Therapogen-Werk. Zweigniederlassung der Sharp&Dohme GmbH, München; 1968.
• [38]Nielsen MK, Vidyashankar AN, Olsen SN, Monrad J, Thamsborg SM: Strongylus vulgaris associated with usage of selective therapy on Danish horse farms—Is it reemerging? Vet Parasitol 2012, 189(2–4):260-266.
• [39]Nielsen MK, Reist M, Kaplan RM, Pfister K, van Doorn DCK, Becher A: Equine parasite control under prescription-only conditions in Denmark – Awareness, knowledge, perception, and strategies applied. Vet Parasitol 2014, 204:64-72.
• [40]Döpfer D, Kerssens CM, Meijer YGM, Boersema JH, Eysker M: Shedding consistency of strongyle-type eggs in dutch boarding horses. Vet Parasitol 2004, 124:249-258.
• [41]Wood EL, Matthews JB, Stephenson S, Slote M, Nussey DH: Variation in fecal egg counts in horses managed for conservation purposes: individual egg shedding consistency, age effects and seasonal variation. Parasitology 2013, 140(1):115-128.
• [42]Hinney B: Prävalenz von Helminthen und Risikofaktoren für ihre Befallsstärke bei Pferden in Brandenburg. PhD thesis. Freien Universität, Berlin; 2009.
• [43]Hinney B, Wirtherle NC, Kyule M, Micthe N, Zessin K, Clausen P: Prevalence of helminths in horses in the state of Brandenburg, Germany. Parasitol Res 2011, 108:1083-1091.
• [44]Fritzen BM: Untersuchungen zum Vorkommen von Anthelminthika-Resistenz in nordrhein-westfälischen Pferdebeständen. PhD thesis. Tierärztliche Hochschule, Hannover; 2005.
• [45]Pilo C, Altea A, Pirino S, Nicolussi P, Varcasia A, Genchi M, Scala A: Strongylus vulgaris (Looss, 1900) in horses in Italy: Is it still a Problem? Vet Parasitol 2012, 184:161-167.
• [46]Mughini Gras L, Usai F, Stancampiano L: Strongylosis in horses slaughtered in Italy for meat production: epidemiology, influence of the horse origin and evidence of parasite self-regulation. Vet Parasitol 2011, 179:167-174.
• [47]Studzinska MB, Tomczuk K, Demkowska-Kutrzepa M, Szczepaniak K: The Strongylidae belonging to Strongylus genus in horses from southeastern Poland. Parasitol Res 2012, 111(4):1417-1421.
• [48]Borgsteede FHM, Boersma JH, Gaasenbeek CPH, van der Burg WPJ: The reappearance of eggs in faeces of horses after treatment with ivermectin. Vet Quart 1993, 15:24-26.
• [49]Meier A, Hertzberg H: Strongyliden beim Pferd. II Vorkommen von Anthelminthika-Resistenzen in der Schweiz. Schweiz Arch Tierheilk 2005, 147(9):389-396.
• [50]Craven J, Bjorn H, Henriksen SA, Nansen P, Larsen M, Lendal S: Survey of anthelmintic resistance on Danish horse farms, using 5 different methods of calculating faecal egg count reduction. Equine Vet J 1998, 30(4):289-293.
• [51]Reinemeyer CR, Smith SA, Gabel AA, Herd RP: The prevalence and intensity of internal parasites of horses in the U.S.A. Vet Parasitol 1984, 15(1):75-83.
• [52]Tolliver SC, Lyons ET, Drudge JH: Prevalence of internal parasites in horses in critical tests of activity of parasiticides over a 28-year period (1956–1983) in Kentucky. Vet Parasitol 1987, 23(3–4):273-284.
• [53]Kuzmina TA: Contamination of the environment by strongylid (Nematoda: Strongylidae) infective larvae at horse farms of various types in Ukraine. Parasitol Res 2012, 110(5):1665-1674.
• [54]Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Drudge JH: Historical perspective of cyathostomes: prevalence, treatment and control programs. Vet Parasitol 1999, 85(2–3):97-112.
• [55]Becher AM: Untersuchungen zur Einführung der Selektiven Anthelmintischen Therapie beim Pferd im Raum Salzburg. PhD thesis. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München; 2010.
• [56]Love S, Murphy D, Mellor D: Pathogenicity of cyathostome infection. Vet Parasitol 1999, 85(2–3):113-122.
• [57]Corning S: Equine cyathostomins: a review of biology, clinical significance and therapy. Parasit Vectors 2009, 2(Suppl 2):S1. BioMed Central Full Text
• [58]Peregrine AS, McEwen B, Bienzle D, Koch TG, Weese JS: Larval cyathostominosis in horses in Ontario: an emerging disease? Can Vet J 2006, 47(1):80-82.
• [59]Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Kuzmina TA: Investigation of strongyle EPG values in horse mares relative to known age, number positive, and level of egg shedding in field studies on 26 farms in Central Kentucky (2010–2011). Parasitol Res 2012, 110:2237-2245.
• [60]Lloyd S: Effects of previous control programmes on the proportion of horses shedding small numbers of strongyle-type eggs. Vet Rec 2009, 164:108-111.
• [61]Hinney B, Wirtherle N, Kyule M, Miethe N, Zessin K, Clausen P: A questionnaire survey on helminth control on horse farms in Brandenburg, Germany and the assessment of risks caused by different kinds of management. Parasitol Res 2011, 109:1625-1635.
• [62]Matthee S, Dreyer FH, Hoffmann WA, van Niekerk FE: An introductory survey of helminth control practices in South Afrika and anthelmintic resistance on Thoroughbred stud farms in the Western Cape Province. Jl S Afr vet Ass 2002, 73(4):195-200.
• [63]Osterman Lind E, Rautalinko E, Uggla A, Waller PJ, Morrison DA, Hoglund J: Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms. Acta Vet Scand 2007, 49:25. BioMed Central Full Text
• [64]Coles GC, Jackson F, Pomroy WE, Prichard RK, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Silvestre A, Taylor MA, Vercruysse J: The detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet Parasitol 2006, 136:167-185.
• [65]van Doorn DCK, Eysker M, Kooyman FNJ, Wagenaar JA, Ploeger HW: Searching for ivermectin resistance in Dutch horses. Vet Parasitol 2012, 185:355-358.
• [66]Matthews JB: An update on cyathostomins: Anthelmintic resistance and worm control. Equine vet Educ 2008, 20(10):552-560.
• [67]von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Ilchmann G, Clausen PH, Schein E, Fritzen B, Handler J, Lischer CJ, Schnieder T, Demeler J, Reimers G, Mehn P: Empfehlungen zur nachhaltigen Kontrolle von Magen-Darmwurminfektionen beim Pferd in Deutschland. Pferdeheilkunde 2011, 27(2):127-140.
• [68]Herd RP, Willardson KL, Gabel AA: Epidemiological approach to the control of horse strongyles. Equine Vet J 1985, 17(3):202-207.