期刊论文详细信息
BMC Veterinary Research
Trap-effectiveness and response to tiletamine-zolazepam and medetomidine anaesthesia in Eurasian wild boar captured with cage and corral traps
Joaquín Vicente1  Christian Gortázar1  Beatriz Beltrán-Beck1  Jorge Ramón López-Olvera2  José Angel Barasona1 
[1] Sanidad y Biotecnología (SaBio), Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC; CSIC – UCLM – JCCM), Ronda de Toledo, Ciudad Real s.n. 13005, Spain;Servei d’Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Bellaterra E-08193, Spain
关键词: Wild boar;    Zolazepam;    Tiletamine;    Stress;    Medetomidine;    Capture;    Anaesthesia;   
Others  :  1119531
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-6148-9-107
 received in 2013-02-11, accepted in 2013-05-14,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Capture, handling and chemical restraint are basic techniques often needed for research or management purposes. The aim of this study was testing a combination of tiletamine-zolazepam (TZ) (3 mg/kg) and medetomidine (M) (0.05 mg/kg) on Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa). A total of 77 free-ranging wild boar were captured by means of portable cages and corral traps and then anaesthetized with intramuscular darts using a blowpipe. The individual response to chemical immobilization was characterized using anaesthetic, clinical, and serum biochemical variables. After the procedure, 14 of these wild boar were monitored for 20 days using GPS-GSM collars.

Results

Pre-release mortality during capture and handling (6.5%) was associated with severe trauma in corral traps. Capture specificity for wild boar was 96.3% and trapping effort was 16.5 days per captured wild boar. Mean induction period was 4.5 ± 2.2 min, hypnosis period enabling effective handling was 61.6 ± 25.4 min, and recovery period was 12.8 ± 12.1 min. No heart or respiratory failure due to added stress occurred and post-release monitoring by GPS-devices revealed no mortality due to anaesthesia. According to the best statistical model obtained, the main factor driving anaesthetic efficacy and stress indicators is trap type.

Conclusions

Both cage and corral traps are efficient methods to capture wild boar. Cage traps are safer, as demonstrated by mortality rates as well as anaesthetic, physiological, and serum biochemical responses. This anaesthetic protocol is useful for prolonged handling of wild boar and allows sampling and collecting data for ecological and epidemiological studies.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Barasona et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150208074539148.pdf 438KB PDF download
Figure 2. 31KB Image download
Figure 1. 27KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Broom D, Johnson K: Stress and animal welfare. London: Chapman and Hall; 1993.
  • [2]Dawkins MS: A user’s guide to animal welfare science. Trends Ecol Evol 2006, 21:77-82.
  • [3]Powell RA, Proulx G: Trapping and marking terrestrial mammals for research: integrating ethics, performance criteria, techniques, and common sense. ILAR J 2003, 44:259-276.
  • [4]Gordon IJ, Hester AJ, Festa-Bianchet M: Review: the management of wild large herbivores to meet economic, conservation and environmental objectives. J App Ecol 2004, 41:1021-1031.
  • [5]Sàez-Royuela C, Telleria JL: The increased population of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Europa. Mamm Rev 1986, 16:97-101.
  • [6]Geisser H, Reyer HU: Efficacy of hunting, feeding, and fencing to reduce crop damage by wild boar. J Wildl Manage 2004, 68:939-946.
  • [7]Baber D, Coblentz B: Density, home range, habitat use, and reproduction in feral pigs on Santa Catalina Island. J Mammal 1986, 67:512-552.
  • [8]Naranjo V, Gortázar C, Vicente J, de la Fuente J: Evidence of the role of European wild boar as a reservoir of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Vet Microbiol 2008, 127:1-9.
  • [9]Meng X, Lindsay D: Wild boar as sources for infectious diseases in livestock and humans. Phil Trans R Soc B 2009, 364:2697-2707.
  • [10]Jullien JM: Sélectivité de cinq modes de piégeage pour lê Sanglier. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Techniques de capture et de marquage des ongulés sauvages: 20-22 March 1990; Meze-Hérault. Edited by Dubray D. Montpellier: FDC; 1990:95-101.
  • [11]Vassant J, Brandt S: Adaptation du piégeage par enclos-piège de type corral pour la capture de compagnies de sangliers. Gibier Faune Sauvage 1995, 12:51-61.
  • [12]Hebeisen C, Fattebert J, Baubet E, Fischer C: Estimating wild boar (Sus scrofa) abundance and density using capture-resights in Canton of Geneva, Switzerland. Eur J Wildl Res 2008, 54:391-401.
  • [13]Gallagher JF, Lochmiller RL, Grant WE: Immobilization of collared peccaries with ketamine hydrochloride. J Wildl Manage 1985, 49(2):356-357.
  • [14]Fournier P, Fournier-Chambrillon C, Maillard D, Klein F: Zoletil immobilization of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.). J Mt Ecol 1995, 3:134-136.
  • [15]Gabor T, Hellgren E, Silvy N: Immobilization of collared peccaries (Tayassu tajacu) and feral hogs (Sus scrofa) with Telazol and Xylazine. J Wildl Dis 1997, 33(1):161-164.
  • [16]Sutherland-Smith M, Campos JM, Cramer C, Thorsdtadt C, Toone W, Morris PJ: Immobilization of Chacoan peccaries (Catagonus wagneri) using medetomidine, telazol®, and ketamine. J Wildl Dis 2004, 40(4):731-736.
  • [17]Fenati M, Monaco A, Guberti V: Efficiency and safety of xylazine and tiletamine/zolazepam to immobilize captured wild boar (Sus scrofa L. 1758): analysis of field results. Eur J Wildl Res 2008, 54(2):269-274.
  • [18]Nielsen L: Chemical immobilization of free-ranging terrestrial mammals. In Lumb and Jone’s veterinary anesthesia. 3rd edition. Edited by Thurmon JC, Tranquilli WJ, Benson GJ. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1996:736-764.
  • [19]Sweitzer R, Gonzales B, Gardner I, Vuren D, Wauthman J, Boyce W: A modified panel trap and immobilization technique for capturing multiple wild pigs. Wildl Soc Bull 1997, 25(3):699-705.
  • [20]Enqvist K: Medetomidine /Tiletamine-Zolazepam and Medetomidine /Butorphanol/Tiletamine-Zolazepam: a comparison of two anesthetic regimens for surgical implantation of intraperitoneal radiotransmitters in free ranging juvenile European wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa). In Proceedings of the Annual Conference-American Association of Zoo Veterinarians: 17-21 September 2000; New Orleans, Louisiana. Edited by American Association of Zoo Veterinarians. American Association of Zoo Veterinarians Annual Proceedings; 2000:303-306.
  • [21]Burroughs R, Morkel P, Kock MD, Meltzer D, Hofmeyr M: Chemical immobilization – individual species requirements. In Chemical and physical restraint of wild animals. Edited by Kock MD, Meltzer D, Burroughs R. Greyton, South Africa: Veterinary Association Wildlife Group and International Wildlife Veterinary Services; 2006:116-211.
  • [22]Lin HC, Thurmon JC, Benson GJ, Tranquilli WJ: Telazol: a review of its pharmacology and use in veterinary medicine. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1993, 16(4):383-418.
  • [23]Lin HC: Dissociative anesthetics. In Lumb & Jones’Veterinary Anesthesia. Edited by Thurmon JC, William JT, Benson GJ. Baltimore: Williams & Wikins; 1996.
  • [24]Tranquilli W, Maze M: Clinical pharmacology and use of α-2 adrenergic agonist in veterinary anesthesia. Anesth Pharmacol Rev 1993, 1:297-309.
  • [25]Charney DS, Mihic SJ, Harris RA: Hypnotics and sedatives. In Goodman & Gilman’s Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 10th edition. Edited by Hardman JG, Limbird LE. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001:399.
  • [26]Maze M, Tranquilli W: Alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists: defining the rol in clinical anesthesia. Anethesiology 2001, 74:581-605.
  • [27]Lundy J: Balanced anesthesia. Minn Med 1926, 9:933.
  • [28]Hellgren EC, Lochmiller RL, Amoss MS Jr, Grant WE: Endocrine and metabolic responses of the collared peccary (Tayassu tajacu) to immobilization with ketamine hydrochloride. J Wildl Dis 1985, 21(4):417-425.
  • [29]Tast A, Halli O, Peltronieri OA: A pratical method for nonsurgically inserting intra-arterial catheters in European Wild Boar (Sus scrofa). Vet Res Commun 2000, 24(1):25-30.
  • [30]Wolkers J, Wensing T, Groot Bruinderink GW, Schonewille AT: Nutritional status of wild boar (Sus scrofa): II. Body fat reserves in relation to haematology and blood chemistry. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol 1993, 105:539-542.
  • [31]Wolkers J, Wensing T, Groot Bruinderink GW, Schonewille JT: Lungworm and stomach worm infection in relation to body fat reserves and blood composition in wild boar (Sus scrofa). Vet Q 1994, 16:193-195.
  • [32]Wolkers J, Wensing T, Groot Bruinderink GW, Schonewille JT: The effect of undernutrition on haematological and serum biochemical variables in wild boar (Sus scrofa). Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol 1994, 108:431-437.
  • [33]López-Olvera JR, Höfle U, Vicente J, Fernández-de-Mera IG, Gortázar C: Effect of parasitic helminths and ivermectin treatment on clinical parameters in the European wild boar (Sus scrofa). Parasitol Res 2006, 98:582-587.
  • [34]Wolkers J, Wensing T, Groot Bruinderink GW: Sedation of wild boar (Sus scrofa) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) with medetomidine and the influence on some haematological and serum biochemical variables. Vet Q 1994, 16:7-9.
  • [35]Matschke G: Aging European wild hogs by dentition. J Wldl Manage 1967, 31:109-113.
  • [36]Baubet E, Brandt S, Jullien JM, Vassant J: Valeur de l’examen de la denture pour la determination de l’age chez le sanglier (Sus scrofa). Gibier Faune Sauvage 1994, 11:119-132.
  • [37]Carmona JM: Extracción de sangre en el seno oftálmico del cerdo. [http://www.ivis.org/advances/suis/A5508.0711.ES.pdf webcite]
  • [38]Baubet E, Brandt S, Vassant J, Gendner JP, Klein F: Can wild boar be surveyed using GPS? Mem Natl Inst Polar Res, Spec Issue 2004, 58:188-195.
  • [39]Cano-Manuel J, Granados JE, Castillo A, Serrano E, Pérez JM, Soriguer RC, Fandos P, Travesí R: Nuevas tecnologías aplicadas al seguimiento de ungulados silvestres en Sierra Nevada: Collares GPS-GSM. In Biodiversidad y conservación de fauna y flora en ambientes mediterráneos. Edited by Sierra Nevada: Collares GPS-GSM Ntaasduse, Barea JM, Ballesteros E, Luzón JM, Moleón M, Tierno JM. Granada: SGHG; 2007:691-705.
  • [40]Schall R: Estimation in generalized linear models with random effects. Biometrika 1991, 78:719-727.
  • [41]Sweitzer R, Ghneim G, Gardner I, Vuren D, Gonzales B, Boyce W: Immobilization and physiological parameters associated with chemical restraint of wild pigs with Telazol and Xylazine Hydrochloride. J Wildl Dis 1997, 33(2):198-205.
  • [42]Shender LA, Botzler RG, George TL: Analysis of serum and whole blood values in relation to helminth and ectoparasite infections of feral pigs in Texas. J Wildl Dis 2002, 38:385-394.
  • [43]Harapain I, Bedrica L, Hahn V, Sostaric B, Gracner D: Haematological and biochemical values in blood of wild boar (Sus scrofa ferus). Veterinarski arhiv 2003, 73:333-343.
  • [44]Vidal D, Naranjo V, Mateo R, Gortazar C, de la Fuente J: Analysis of serum biochemical parameters in relation to Mycobacterium bovis infection of European wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Spain. Eur J Wildl Res 2006, 52:301-304.
  • [45]Kahn CM, Line S, Allen DG: The Merck veterinary manual. Whitehouse Station, New Jersey: Merck & Co; 2005.
  • [46]Spraker TR: An overview of the pathophysiology of capture myopathy and related conditions that occur at the time of capture of wild animals. In Chemical Immobilization of North American Wildlife. Edited by Nielsen L, Haigh JC, Fowler ME. Milwaukee, USA: Wisconsin Humane Society; 1982:83-118.
  • [47]Moon P, Smith L: General anesthetic techniques in swine. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 1996, 12:663-691.
  • [48]Berducou C: Chamois et isards: bilan des captures par filets, pieges et engins drivers realisees en France au cours des trente dernieres annees (1958–1989). In Workshop on techniques de capture et de marquage des ongulés sauvage. Edited by Dubray D. Montpellier: Office National de la Chasse et Ministère Chargé de l’Environnemen; 1993:113-120.
  • [49]López-Olvera JR, Marco I, Montané J, Casas-Díaz E, Mentaberre G, Lavín S: Comparative evaluation of effort, capture and handling effects of drive nets to capture roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), Southern chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) and Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica). Eur J Wildl Res 2009, 55(3):193-202.
  • [50]Cattet MR, Caulkett NA, Polischuk SC, Ramsay MA: Reversible immobilization of free-ranging polar bears with medetomidine-zolazepam-tiletamine and atipamezole. J Wildl Dis 1997, 33(3):611-617.
  • [51]Baber DW, Coblentz BE: Immobilization of feral pigs with a combination of ketamine and xylazine. J Wildl Manage 1982, 46(2):557-559.
  • [52]Ajadi AR, Olusa TA, Smith OF, Ajibola ES, Adeleye OE, Adenubi OT, Makinde FA: Tramadol improved the efficacy of ketamine–xylazine anaesthesia in young pigs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2009, 36(6):562-566.
  • [53]Jalanka HH, Roeken BO: The use of medetomidine, medetomidine-ketamine combinations, and atipamezole in nondomestic mammals: a review. J Zoo Wildl Med 1990, 21(3):259-282.
  • [54]Lee JY, Jee HC, Jeong SM, Park CS, Kim MC: Comparison of anaesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects of xylazine or medetomidine in combination with tiletamine/zolazepam in pigs. Vet Rec 2010, 167(7):245-249.
  • [55]Thurmon J, Benson C, Tranquilli W, Olson W: The anesthetic and analgesic effects of Telazol and xylazine in pigs. evaluating clinical trials. Vet Med 1988, 83:841-845.
  • [56]Ko JC, Williams BL, Smith VL, McGrath CJ, Jacobson JD: Comparison of telazol, telazol-ketamine, telazol-xylazine, and telazol-ketamine-xvlazine as chemical restraint and anesthetic induction combination in swine. Lab Anim Sci 1993, 43(5):476-480.
  • [57]Allen JL: Immobilization of giant Chacoan peccaries (Catagonus wagneri) with a tiletamine hydrochloride/ zolazepam hydrochloride combination. J Wildl Dis 1992, 28(3):499-501.
  • [58]Siemon A, Wiesner H, von Hegel G, Hellabrunn MT: The use of tiletamine/zolazepam/romifidine for distant immobilization of wild boars. Tierarztl Prax 1992, 20:55-58.
  • [59]Boitani L, Mattei L, Nonis D, Corsi F: Spatial and activity patterns of wild boars in Tuscany, Italy. J Mammal 1994, 75(3):600-612.
  • [60]Fowler ME: Restraint and handling of wild and domestic animals. 2nd edition. Ames, USA: Iowa State University Press; 1995.
  • [61]Kaneko JJ: Carbohydrate metabolism and its diseases. In Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. 5th edition. Edited by Kaneko JJ, Harvey JW, Bruss ML. San Diego: Academic Press Inc; 1997:45-81.
  • [62]DiBartola SP, de Morais Autrain H: Hypokalemia and hyperkalemia. In Fluid Therapy in Small Animal Practice. 2nd edition. Edited by DiBartola SP. Philadelphia: Saunders WB Company; 2000:83-107.
  • [63]Hall LW, Clarke KW, Trim CM: Veterinary Anaesthesia. 10th edition. London, United Kingdom: W.B. Saunders; 2001.
  • [64]Kaneko JJ: Serum proteins and dysproteinemias. In Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. 5th edition. Edited by Kaneko JJ, Harvey JW, Bruss ML. San Diego: Academic Press Inc; 1997:117-138.
  • [65]Finco DR: Kidney function. In Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. 5th edition. Edited by Kaneko JJ, Harvey JW, Bruss ML. San Diego: Academic Press Inc; 1997:485-516.
  • [66]Kock MD, Jessup DA, Clark RK, Franti CE: Effects of capture on biological parameters in free-ranging bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis): evaluation of dropnet, drive-net, chemical immobilization and the net-gun. J Wild Dis 1987, 23(4):641-651.
  • [67]López-Olvera JR, Marco I, Montané J, Lavín S: Haematological and serum biochemical values of southern chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica). Vet Rec 2006, 158:479-484.
  • [68]Kock MD, Clark RK, Franti CE, Jessup DA, Wehausen JD: Effects of capture on biological parameters in free-ranging bighorn sheep (Ovis canadiensis): evaluation of normal, stressed and mortality outcomes and documentation of postcapture survival. J Wild Dis 1987, 23(4):652-662.
  • [69]Kramer JW, Hoffmann WE: Clinical enzymology. In Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. 5th edition. Edited by Kaneko JJ, Harvey JW, Bruss ML. San Diego: Academic Press Inc; 1997:303-325.
  • [70]Harthoorn AM: Physiology of capture myopathy. Quinquennial report. Pretoria: Transvaal Nature Conservation Division; 1976.
  • [71]López-Olvera JR, Marco I, Montané J, Casas-Díaz E, Lavín S: Effects of acepromazine on the stress response in Southern chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) captured by means of drive-nets. Can J Vet Research 2007, 71:41-51.
  • [72]Williams ES, Thorne T: Exertional myopathy (capture myopathy). In Noninfectious diseases of wildlife. 2nd edition. Edited by Fairbrother A, Nocke LN, Hoff GL. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1996:181-193.
  • [73]Lumb W, Jones E: Veterinary anesthesia. Pennsylvania: Lea and Febiger; 1996.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:12次 浏览次数:13次