Organizational factors affecting length of stay in the emergency department: initial observational study

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research

Ruth Stalnikowicz¹  Sari Mizrahi³  Rachel Haligoa³  Sigalit Caspi¹  Osnat Bashkin² 

[1] Department of Emergency Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center–Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel;Department of Public Health, School of Health Sciences, Ashkelon Academic College, Ashkelon, Israel;Department of Industrial Engineering & Management, Azrieli College of Engineering, Jerusalem, Israel

关键词: Ishikawa causal diagram;    Organizational factors;    Length of stay;    Emergency department;   

Others  :  1230553
DOI  :  10.1186/s13584-015-0035-6

 received in 2014-04-15, accepted in 2015-07-22,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Length of stay (LOS) is considered a key measure of emergency department throughput, and from the perspective of the patient, it is perceived as a measure of healthcare service quality. Prolonged LOS can be caused by various internal and external factors. This study examined LOS in the emergency department and explored the main factors that influence LOS and cause delay in patient care.

Methods

Observations of 105 patients were performed over a 3-month period at the emergency room of a community urban hospital. Observers monitored patients from the moment of entrance to the department until discharge or admission to another hospital ward.

Results

Analysis revealed a general average total emergency department LOS of 438 min. Significant differences in average LOS were found between admitted patients (Mean = 544 min, SD = 323 min) and discharged patients (Mean = 291 min, SD = 286 min). In addition, nurse and physician change of shifts and admissions to hospital wards were found to be significant factors associated with LOS. Using an Ishikawa causal diagram, we explored various latent organizational factors that may prolong this time.

Conclusions

The study identified several factors that are associated with high average emergency department LOS. High LOS may lead to increases in expenditures and may have implications for patient safety, whereas certain organizational changes, communication improvement, and time management may have a positive effect on it. Interdisciplinary methods can be used to explore factors causing prolonged emergency department LOS and contribute to a better understanding of them.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Bashkin et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Schneider SM, Hamilton GC, Moyer P, Stapczynski JS. Definition of Emergency Medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 1998; 5(4):348-351.
• [2]Williams RM. The cost of visits to emergency departments. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334:642-646.
• [3]Hospital-based emergency care: at the breaking point. National Academies Press, Washington, DC; 2006.
• [4]Weiss SJ, Derlet R, Arndahl J, Ernst AA, Richards J, Fernández-Frackelton M et al.. Estimating the degree of emergency department overcrowding in academic medical centers: results of the national ED overcrowding study (NEDOCS). Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11(1):38-50.
• [5]Hoot NR, Aronsky D. Review of emergency department crowding: Causes, effects, and solutions. Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 52:127-36.
• [6]Yoon P, Steiner I, Reinhardt G. Analysis of factors influencing length of stay in the emergency department. Can J Emerg Med. 2003; 5(3):155-161.
• [7]Stock LM, Bradley GE, Lewis RJ, Baker DW, Sipsey J, Stevens CD. Patients who leave emergency departments without being seen by a physician: magnitude of the problem in Los Angeles County. Ann Emerg Med. 1994; 23:294-8.
• [8]Fernandes CM, Price A, Christenson JM. Does reduced length of stay decrease the number of emergency department patients who leave without seeing a physician? J Emerg Med. 1997; 15:397-9.
• [9]Liew D, Liew D, Kennedy MP. Emergency department length of stay independently predicts excess inpatient length of stay. Med J Aust. 2003; 179:524-526.
• [10]Richardson DB. The access-block effect: relationship between delay to reaching an inpatient bed and inpatient length of stay. Med J Aust. 2002; 177:492-5.
• [11]Karsh BT, Holden RJ, Alper SJ, Or CKL. A human factors engineering paradigm for patient safety: designing to support the performance of the healthcare professional. Qual Saf Health care. 2006; 15:59-65.
• [12]Reason J. Understanding adverse events: human factors. Qual Healthcare. 1995; 4:80-89.
• [13]Ishikawa K. Guide to quality control. Asian productivity organization. CRC Press LLC, Florida; 2004.
• [14]Lawrence R, Tomolo A, Garlisi A, Aron DC. Conceptualizing handover strategies at change of shift in the emergency department: a grounded theory study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8(1):256. BioMed Central Full Text
• [15]Behara R, Wears RL, Perry SJ. A conceptual framework for studying the safety of transitions in emergency care. In: Advances in patient safety: from research to implementation. Vol. 2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville; 2005: p.309-321.
• [16]Ye K, McD Taylor D, Knott JC, Dent A, MacBean CE. Handover in the emergency department: deficiencies and adverse effects. Emerg Med Aust. 2007; 19:433-441.
• [17]JCAHO sentinel event alert, issue 26—delays in treatment. Sentinel Event Alert Advisory Group. Available at: http://www.jointcommission.org/sentinel_event_alert_issue_26_delays_in_treatment/. Accessed February 13, 2014.
• [18]Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in Communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007; 297(8):831-841.
• [19]McFetridge B, Gillespie M, Goode D, Melby V. An exploration of the handover process of critically ill patients between nursing staff from the emergency department and the intensive care unit. Nurs Crit Care. 2007; 12:261-269.
• [20]Apker J, Mallak LA, Gibson SC. Communication in the “gray zone”: perceptions about emergency physician hospitalist handoffs and patient safety. Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14:884-894.
• [21]Schull MJ, Slaughter PM, Redelmeier DA. Urban emergency department overcrowding: defining the problem and eliminating misconceptions. Can J Emerg Med. 2002; 4:76-83.
• [22]Derlet RW, Richards JR. Overcrowding in the nation’s emergency departments: complex causes and disturbing effects. Ann Emerg Med. 2000; 35:63-8.
• [23]Forster AJ, Stiell I, Wells G, Lee AJ, van Walraven C. The effect of hospital occupancy on emergency department length of stay and patient disposition. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10:127-133.
• [24]McCarthy ML, Zeger SL, Ding R, Levin SR, Desmond JS, Lee J et al.. Crowding delays treatment and lengthens emergency department length of stay, even among high-acuity patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2009; 54:492-503.
• [25]Womack JP, Jones DT. Beyond Toyota: how to root out waste and pursue perfection. Harvard Business Rev. 1996; 74(5):140-158.
• [26]Going lean in the NHS. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. 2007.