Effects of nurse-led motivational interviewing of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in preparation of rehabilitation treatment (PREPARE) on societal participation, attendance level, and cost-effectiveness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials

Rob J E M Smeets²  Albere J Köke³  Jeanine A Verbunt²  Mariëlle E J B Goossens¹  Vera-Christina Mertens⁴ 

[1] Faculty of Psychology and Neurosciences (FPN), Department of Clinical Psychological Sciences (CPS), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, MD, 6200, The Netherlands;Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P.O. Box 5800, Maastricht, AZ, 6202, The Netherlands;Adelante Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology, P.O. Box 88, Hoensbroek, AB, 6430, The Netherlands;Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maastricht University, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, MD, 6200, The Netherlands

关键词: Societal participation;    Mediators/moderators;    Working mechanism;    Drop-outs;    Design article;    Adherence;    Motivation;    Motivational interviewing;   

Others  :  1094412
DOI  :  10.1186/1745-6215-14-90

 received in 2012-07-27, accepted in 2013-03-13,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Non-adherence and drop-out are major problems in pain rehabilitation. For patients with various health problems, motivational interviewing (MI) has shown promising effects to tackle these problems. In chronic pain patients, the effectiveness of MI is however unknown. Therefore, a MI-based pre-pain rehabilitation intervention (MIP) addressing motivation, expectations, and beliefs has been developed to prepare eligible patients for rehabilitation treatment.

Methods/design

Study design: A parallel randomized controlled trial including two interventions: a motivational interviewing pre-pain rehabilitation intervention (MIP) and a usual care (UC) control arm. Follow-up will be 6 months after completion of rehabilitation treatment.

Study population: One hundred and sixty (n = 80 per arm) patients with chronic non-specific musculoskeletal pain visiting an outpatient rehabilitation department, who are eligible to participate in an outpatient cognitive behavioral pain rehabilitation program.

Intervention: MIP consists of two sessions to prepare and motivate the patient for pain rehabilitation treatment and its bio psychosocial approach. UC consists of information and education about the etiology and the general rehabilitation approach of chronic pain. Both the MIP and UC contain two sessions of 45 to 60 minutes each.

Objective: The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness of MIP compared to UC in terms of an increase in the long-term level of societal participation and decrease of drop-out during rehabilitation treatment.

Main study endpoints: Primary outcome is the change in level of participation (according to the ICF-definition: ‘involvement in a life situation’) 6 months after completion of rehabilitation treatment. Secondary outcomes are adherence and treatment drop-out, disability, pain intensity, self-reported main complaints, (pain-specific) self-efficacy, motivation, and quality of life. Costs are calculated including the costs of the pre-treatment intervention, productivity losses, and healthcare utilization. Potential moderators and active ingredients of MI are explored. For the process evaluation, parameters such as MI fidelity, feasibility, and experiences are explored.

Discussion

The results of this study will provide evidence on the effectiveness of this MI-based pre-treatment in pain rehabilitation. Furthermore, a cost-effectiveness analysis and exploration of moderating and working mechanisms of MI and an extensive process evaluation takes place.

Trial registration

Nederlands trial register NTR3065

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Mertens et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Gran JT: The epidemiology of chronic generalized musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003, 17:547-561.
• [2]Badley EM, Webster GK, Rasooly I: The impact of musculoskeletal disorders in the population: are they just aches and pains? Findings from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey. J Rheumatol 1990, 1995:733-739.
• [3]Meerding WJ, Bonneux L, Polder JJ, Koopmanschap MA, van der Maas PJ: Demographic and epidemiological determinants of healthcare costs in Netherlands: cost of illness study. BMJ 1998, 317:111-115.
• [4]Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Thomas S: Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. BMJ 2006, 332:1430-1434.
• [5]Köke A: Consensus Rapport Pijnrevalidatie Nederland [Consensus Report Pain rehabilitation Netherlands]. Maastricht [Pain Knowledge Centre Maastricht]. : Pijn Kennis Centrum Maastricht; 2005.
• [6]Bekkering GE, Hendriks HJM, Koes BW, Oostendorp RAB, Ostelo R, Thomassen JMC, van Tulder MW: Dutch physiotherapy guidelines for low back pain. Physiotherapy 2003, 89:82-96.
• [7]Gatchel RJ, Peng YB, Peters ML, Fuchs PN, Turk DC: The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull 2007, 133:581-624.
• [8]Turk DC, Wilson HD, Cahana A: Treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Lancet 2011, 377:2226-2235.
• [9]World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). ICF full version. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
• [10]Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L: Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005, 113:9-19.
• [11]Keith RA: Conceptual basis of outcome measures. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995, 74:73-80.
• [12]Dijkers MP, Whiteneck G, El Jaroudi R: Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000, 81:S63-S80.
• [13]Morley S, Eccleston C, Williams A: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache. Pain 1999, 80:1-13.
• [14]van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ, Morley SJ, Assendelft WJ: Behavioral treatment for chronic low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 2000, 25:2688-2699.
• [15]Henschke N, Ostelo RW, van Tulder MW, Vlaeyen JW, Morley S, Assendelft WJ, Main CJ: Behavioural treatment for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010., 7CD002014
• [16]Guzman J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E, Bombardier C: Multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002., 1Cd000963
• [17]Sabate E: Adherence to long-term therapies. Evidence for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
• [18]Bendix AE, Bendix T, Haestrup C, Busch E: A prospective, randomized 5-year follow-up study of functional restoration in chronic low back pain patients. Eur Spine J 1998, 7:111-119.
• [19]Peters J, Large RG, Elkind G: Follow-up results from a randomised controlled trial evaluating in- and outpatient pain management programmes. Pain 1992, 50:41-50.
• [20]Rainville J, Ahern DK, Phalen L: Altering beliefs about pain and impairment in a functionally oriented treatment program for chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain 1993, 9:196-201.
• [21]Curran C, Williams AC, Potts HW: Cognitive-behavioral therapy for persistent pain: does adherence after treatment affect outcome? Eur J Pain 2009, 13:178-188.
• [22]Bandura A: Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: WH Freeman; 1997.
• [23]Hirsh AT, Atchison JW, Berger JJ, Waxenberg LB, Lafayette-Lucey A, Bulcourf BB, Robinson ME: Patient satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain: predictors and relationship to compliance. Clin J Pain 2005, 21:302-310.
• [24]Jones KD, Burckhardt CS, Bennett JA: Motivational interviewing may encourage exercise in persons with fibromyalgia by enhancing self efficacy. Arthritis Care Res 2004, 51:864-867.
• [25]Miller WR, Rollnick S: Motivational interviewing, preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York, NY: The Guildford Press; 1991.
• [26]Mesters I: Motivational interviewing: hype or hope? Chronic Illn 2009, 5:3-6.
• [27]Miller WR: Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behav Psychother 1983, 11:147-172.
• [28]Heather N, Rollnick S, Bell A, Richmond R: Effects of brief counselling among male heavy drinkers identified on general hospital wards. Drug Alcohol Rev 1996, 15:29-38.
• [29]Skutle A, Berg G: Training in controlled drinking for early-stage problem drinkers. Br J Addict 1987, 82:493-501.
• [30]Burke BL, Arkowitz H, Menchola M: The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003, 71:843-861.
• [31]Hettema J, Steele J, Miller WR: Motivational interviewing. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2005, 1:91-111.
• [32]Lundahl B, Burke BL: The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice-friendly review of four meta-analyses. J Clin Psychol 2009, 65:1232-1245.
• [33]Habib S, Morrissey S, Helmes E: Preparing for pain management: a pilot study to enhance engagement. J Pain 2005, 6:48-54.
• [34]Vong SK, Cheing GL, Chan F, So EM, Chan CC: Motivational enhancement therapy in addition to physical therapy improves motivational factors and treatment outcomes in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011, 92:176-183.
• [35]van der Zee CH, Post MWM, Kap A, Schouten E, van Royen R, Rambaran Mishre RR, van Berlekom SH B: Het meten van participatie als uitkomst van poliklinische revalidatiebehandeling: Meten is Weten 2; een prospectieve multi-centre studie. [Measurement of participation as an outcome of outpatient rehabilitation: To measure is to know 2; a prospective multi-centre study]. Revalidata 2008, 146:12-16.
• [36]van der Zee CH, Priesterbach AR, van der Dussen L, Kap A, Schepers VP, Visser Meily JM, Post MW: Reproducibility of three self-report participation measures: The ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener, the Participation Scale, and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation. J Rehabil Med 2010, 42:752-757.
• [37]Van der Zee CH, Post MW, Hennink J, Schafrat CG, Visser Meily JM, Van Berlekom SB: Validity of the Utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitiation. Disabil Rehabil 2012, 34:478-485.
• [38]Van der Zee CH, Kap A, Rambaran Mishre RR, Schouten E, Post MW: Responsiveness of four participation measures for outcomes of outpatient rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2011, 43:1003-1009.
• [39]Vasilaki EI, Hosier SG, Cox WM: The efficacy of motivational interviewing as a brief intervention for excessive drinking: a meta-analytic review. Alcohol Alcohol 2006, 41:328-335.
• [40]Cohen J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Hillsdale, NJe: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
• [41]Köke A, Brouwers M, Heuts P, Schiphorst Preuper R, Smeets R, Swaan L, Vlaeyen J, Patijn J: Consensus Rapport Pijnrevalidatie Nederland. Een beschrijvend overzicht van pijnrevalidatieprogramma’s in Nederland met betrekking tot doelen en inhoud. [Consensus Report Pain rehabilitation Netherlands. A descriptive overview of pain rehabilitaion programs in the Netherlands with regard to goals and content]. Maastricht: PijnKennis Centrum Maastricht [Pain Knowledge Centre Maastricht]; 2005.
• [42]Winter F: De pijn de baas [Mastering pain]. 9th edition. Soest: Ruitenberg Boek; 2008.
• [43]Butler D, Moseley L: Sunyata: Explain Pain . Minneapolis, MN: Orthopedic Physical Therapy Products; 2003.
• [44]Emmons KM, Rollnick S: Motivational interviewing in health care settings. Opportunities and limitations. Am J Prev Med 2001, 20:68-74.
• [45]Lane C, Hood K, Rollnick S: Teaching motivational interviewing: Using role play is as effective as using simulated patients. Med Educ 2008, 42:637-644.
• [46]Madson MB, Loignon AC, Lane C: Training in motivational interviewing: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat 2009, 36:101-109.
• [47]Miller WR, Moyers TB: Eight stages in learning motivational interviewing. J Teach Addict 2007, 5:3-17.
• [48]Miller WR, Yahne CE, Moyers TB, Martinez J, Pirritano M: A randomized trial of methods to help clinicians learn motivational interviewing. J Consult Clin Psychol 2004, 72:1050-1062.
• [49]Söderlund LL, Nilsen P, Kristensson M: Learning motivational interviewing: Exploring primary health care nurses’ training and counselling experiences. Health Educ J 2008, 67:102-109.
• [50]Lansinger B, Nordholm L, Sivik T: Characteristics of low back pain patients who do not complete physiotherapeutic treatment. Scand J Caring Sci 1994, 8:163-167.
• [51]Carosella AM, Lackner JM, Feuerstein M: Factors associated with early discharge from a multidisciplinary work rehabilitation program for chronic low back pain. Pain 1994, 57:69-76.
• [52]Glombiewski JA, Hartwich-Tersek J, Rief W: Attrition in cognitive-behavioral treatment of chronic back pain. Clin J Pain 2010, 26:593-601. 510.1097/AJP.1090b1013e3181e37611
• [53]Sloots M, Dekker JH, Pont M, Bartels EA, Geertzen JH, Dekker J: Reasons of drop-out from rehabilitation in patients of Turkish and Moroccan origin with chronic low back pain in The Netherlands: a qualitative study. J Rehabil Med 2010, 42:566-573.
• [54]Post MW, van der Zee CH, Hennink J, Schafrat CG, Visser Meily JM, van Berlekom SB: Validity of the Utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation. Disabil Rehabil 2012, 34:478-485.
• [55]Post MW, van de Port IGL, Kap A, van Berlekom SB: Development and Validation of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Clinical Rehabilitation (USER). Clin Rehabil 2009, 43:909-917.
• [56]Pollard CA: Preliminary validity study of the Pain Disability Index. Percept Mot Skills 1984, 59:974.
• [57]Chibnall JT, Tait RC: The Pain Disability Index: factor structure and normative data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994, 75:1082-1086.
• [58]Carlsson AM: Assessment of chronic pain I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 1983, 16:87-101.
• [59]Köke A: Rubriek 'Meten in de praktijk' Patiënt specifieke klacht. [Section 'Measurement in practice' Patient specific complaint]. Ned Tijdschr Fysiother 2007, 117:154.
• [60]Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ, Lindeman E, van der Heijden GJ, Regtop W, Knipschild PG: A patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999, 22:144-148.
• [61]Ostelo RW, de Vet HC, Knol DL, van den Brandt PA: 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2004, 57:268-276.
• [62]Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ: Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996, 65:71-76.
• [63]Spetch LA, Kolt GS: Adherence to sport injury rehabilitation: implications for sports medicine providers and researchers. Phys Ther Sport 2001, 2:80-90.
• [64]Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M: Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio Causal and control beliefs. Edited by Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M. Windsor: Nfer-Nelson; 1995:35-37.
• [65]Bosscher RJ, Smit JH: Confirmatory factor analysis of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Behav Res Ther 1998, 36:339-343.
• [66]Anderson KO, Dowds BN, Pelletz RE, Edwards WT, Peeters-Asdourian C: Development and initial validation of a scale to measure self-efficacy beliefs in patients with chronic pain. Pain 1995, 63:77-84.
• [67]Hakkaart-van Roijen L, van Straten A, Donker M, Tiemens B: Manual Trimbos/iMTA questionnaire for Costs associated with Psychiatric illness (TiC-P). Rotterdam: Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam; 2002.
• [68]Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Bouwmans CAM: Short Form-Health and Labour Questionnaire (SF-HLQ). Rotterdam: Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam; 2007.
• [69]Hakkaart- Van Roijen L, Tan SS, Bouwmans CAM: Handleiding voor kostenonderzoek, methoden en standaard kostprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg [Manual for research of costs, methods and standard prices for economic evaluations in health care]. Diemen: College voor Zorgverzekeringen (CVZ) [Dutch Health Care Insurance Board (CVZ)]; Geactualiseerde versie; 2010. [Updated version 2010]
• [70]Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF: Standardisation of costs: the Dutch Manual for Costing in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeco 2002, 20:443-454.
• [71]van der Zee KI, Sanderman R: Het meten van de algemene gezondheidstoestand met de RAND-36. Een handleiding [Measuring the General Health Status by the RAND-36. A manual]. Groningen: Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondheidsvraagstukken (NCG) [Northern centre for health issues (NCG)]; 1993.
• [72]Goossens ME, Evers SM, Vlaeyen JW, Rutten-van Mölken MP, van der Linden SM: Principles of economic evaluation for interventions of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Eur J Pain 1999, 3:343-353.
• [73]Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M: The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002, 21:271-292.
• [74]Dolan P: Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States. Med Care 1997, 35:1095-1108.
• [75]Moyers TB, Martin T, Christopher PJ, Houck JM, Tonigan JS, Amrhein PC: Client language as a mediator of motivational interviewing efficacy: where is the evidence? Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2007, 31:40s-47s.
• [76]Moyers TB, Miller WR, Hendrickson SM: How does motivational interviewing work? Therapist interpersonal skill predicts client involvement within motivational interviewing sessions. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005, 73:590-598.
• [77]Nielson WR, Jensen MP, Kerns RD: Initial development and validation of a multidimensional pain readiness to change questionnaire. J Pain 2003, 4:148-158.
• [78]Nielson WR, Armstrong JM, Jensen MP, Kerns RD: Two brief versions of the multidimensional pain readiness to change questionnaire, version 2 (MPRCQ2). Clin J Pain 2009, 25:48-57.
• [79]Vlaeyen JW, Morley S: Cognitive-behavioral treatments for chronic pain: what works for whom? Clin J Pain 2005, 21:1-8.
• [80]Smeets RJ, Beelen S, Goossens ME, Schouten EG, Knottnerus JA, Vlaeyen JW: Treatment expectancy and credibility are associated with the outcome of both physical and cognitive-behavioral treatment in chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain 2008, 24:305-315.
• [81]Goossens ME, Vlaeyen JW, Hidding A, Kole-Snijders A, Evers SM: Treatment expectancy affects the outcome of cognitive-behavioral interventions in chronic pain. Clin J Pain 2005, 21:18-26. discussion 69–72
• [82]Devilly GJ, Borkovec TD: Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2000, 31:73-86.
• [83]Ryan RM, Plant RW, O'Malley S: Initial motivations for alcohol treatment: Relations with patient characteristics, treatment involvement, and dropout. Addict Behav 1995, 20:279-297.
• [84]Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelsohn M, Mock J, Erbaugh J: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961, 4:561-571.
• [85]Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG: Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1988, 8:77-100.
• [86]Beck AT, Steer RA: Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1993.
• [87]McCracken LM, Zhao-O’Brien J: General psychological acceptance and chronic pain: there is more to accept than the pain itself. Eur J Pain 2010, 14:170-175.
• [88]Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, Waltz T, Zettle RD: Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther 2011, 42:676-688.
• [89]Jacobs N, Kleen M, De Groot F, A-Tjak J: Het meten van experiëntiële vermijding. De Nederlandse versie van de Acceptance and Action Qustionnaire (AAQ-II). [Measurement of experiental avoidance. The Dutch version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II)]. Gedragstherapie 2008, 41:349-361.
• [90]Goossens ME, Kindermans HP, Morley SJ, Roelofs J, Verbunt J, Vlaeyen JW: Self-discrepancies in work-related upper extremity pain: relation to emotions and flexible-goal adjustment. Eur J Pain 2010, 14:764-770.
• [91]Kranz D, Bollinger A, Nilges P: Chronic pain acceptance and affective well-being: a coping perspective. Eur J Pain 2010, 14:1021-1025.
• [92]Brandtstädter J, Renner G: Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping. Psychol Aging 1990, 5:58-67.
• [93]Rollnick S, Butler CC, Kinnersley P, Gregory J, Mash B: Motivational interviewing. BMJ 2010., 340
• [94]Revised Global Scales: Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity 3.1.1 (MITI 3.1.1) [http://casaa.unm.edu/download/MITI3_1.pdf webcite]
• [95]Moyers TB, Martin T, Manuel JK, Hendrickson SM, Miller WR: Assessing competence in the use of motivational interviewing. J Subst Abuse Treat 2005, 28:19-26.
• [96]Pierson HM, Hayes SC, Gifford EV, Roget N, Padilla M, Bissett R, Berry K, Kohlenberg B, Rhode R, Fisher G: An examination of the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity code. J Subst Abuse Treat 2007, 32:11-17.
• [97]Forsberg L, Berman AH, Kallmen H, Hermansson U, Helgason AR: A test of the validity of the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code. Cogn Behav Ther 2008, 37:1-9.
• [98]Madson MB, Campbell TC: Measures of fidelity in motivational enhancement: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat 2006, 31:67-73.
• [99]Miller WR, Mount KA: A small study of training in Motivational Interviewing: does one workshop change clinician and client behavior? Behav Cogn Psychoth 2001, 29:457-471.
• [100]Moyers T, Martin T, Catley D, Harris KJ, Ahluwalia JS: Assessing the integrity of motivational interviewing interventions: Reliability of the motivational interviewing skills code. Behav and Cogn Psychoth 2003, 31:177-184.
• [101]Steckler A, Linnan L: Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
• [102]de Witte L, Schoot T, Proot I: Development of the client-centred care questionnaire. J Adv Nurs 2006, 56:62-68.
• [103]Schoot T, Friesen J, Balk S, Köke A: Implementatie van cliëntgecentreerde zorg binnen het multidisciplinaire pijnteam van Adelante Zorggroep te Hoensbroek [Implementation of client-centred care at the multidisciplinary pain team of the Adelante care group in Hoensbroek.]. 1-10-2010 edn. Adelante: Hoensbroek; 2010.
• [104]Fenwick E, O'Brien BJ, Briggs A: Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves – facts, fallacies and frequently asked questions. Health Econ 2004, 13:405-415.
• [105]Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, Uebelhart D, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G: Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther 2002, 82:1098-1107.
• [106]Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A: Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2003, 25:628-634.
• [107]Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Kerns RD, Ader DN, Brandenburg N, Burke LB, Cella D, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dimitrova R, Dionne R, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick C, McDermott DP, McQuay HJ, Patel S, Porter L, Quessy S, Rappaport BA: Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 2008, 9:105-121.
• [108]Dworkin RH, Turk DC, McDermott MP, Peirce-Sandner S, Burke LB, Cowan P, Farrar JT, Hertz S, Raja SN, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Sampaio C: Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2009, 146:238-244.
• [109]Leonhardt C, Keller S, Chenot JF, Luckmann J, Basler HD, Wegscheider K, Baum E, Donner-Banzhoff N, Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J, Kochen MM, Becker A: TTM-based motivational counselling does not increase physical activity of low back pain patients in a primary care setting–A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 70:50-60.
• [110]Walters ST, Matson SA, Baer JS, Ziedonis DM: Effectiveness of workshop training for psychosocial addiction treatments: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat 2005, 29:283-293.
• [111]Söderlund LL, Madson MB, Rubak S, Nilsen P: A systematic review of motivational interviewing training for general health care practitioners. Patient Educ Couns 2011, 84:16-26.