期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Environmental Health Science Engineering
Soil to plant transfer of alpha activity in potato plants: impact of phosphate fertilizers
Amit Kumar1  Rishi Pal Chauhan1 
[1] Department of Physics, National Institute of Technology, Kurkshetra 136119, India
关键词: Phosphate fertilizers;    LR-115;    Alpha radioactivity;    Potato;   
Others  :  1216882
DOI  :  10.1186/s40201-015-0200-4
 received in 2014-07-04, accepted in 2015-05-05,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Radionuclides in the phosphate fertilizers belonging to 232Th and 238U and 40 K are the major contributors to the outdoor terrestrial natural radiation. These radionuclides are transferred from fertilizer to food through soil.

Materials and methods

Present work deals with the alpha activity in the different parts of the potato (Solanum Tuberosum) plants grown under controlled pots experiment using different amounts of phosphate fertilizers and urea. Alpha activities have been measured by track etch technique using the solid-state nuclear track detectors (LR-115).

Results

Translocation factor for the fruit (edible Part) varied from 0.13 (for DAP) to 0.73 (for PF) with an average of 0.40 ± 0.26 for the plant grown with 20 g of fertilizers. Translocation factors increased with the increase in amount of fertilizers having value 0.51 ± 0.31 for the plant grown with 50 g of fertilizers. The translocation factor for the lower and the upper part of leaves varied from 0.44 to 0.67 and 0.22 to 0.83 with an average value 0.55 ± 0.15 and 0.45 ± 0.23 respectively. The transfer factor (TF’s) for the potato plants varied from 1.5 × 10−2 to 1.03 × 10−1 for root, from 1.3 × 10−2 to 1.23 × 10−1 for stem, from 2.1 × 10−3 to 4.5 × 10−2 for fruit and from 5.4 × 10−3 to 5.8 × 10−3 for lower part of the leaves after 105 days of the plantation.

Conclusions

The results revealed that the alpha activity in the potato plants was higher in case of the plants grown with the use of phosphate fertilizers than with other fertilizers.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Chauhan and Kumar; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150703095331184.pdf 1166KB PDF download
Fig. 4. 29KB Image download
Fig. 3. 25KB Image download
Fig. 2. 23KB Image download
Figure 3. 52KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 3.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Ozaki T, Ambe S, Abe T, Francis AJ. Adsorption of Radionuclides on Silica and Their Uptake by Rice Plants from Silica-Multitracer Solutions: The Effects of pH. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2002; 90:273-81.
  • [2]Ehlken S, Kirchner G. Environmental processes affecting plant root uptake of radioactive trace elements and variability of transfer factor data: a review. J Environ Radioact. 2002; 58:97-112.
  • [3]Ahmed NK, El-Arabi AGM. Natural radioactivity in farm soil and phosphate fertilizer and its environmental implications in Qena governorate, Upper Egypt. J Environ Radioact. 2005; 84:51-64.
  • [4]Spalding RF, Sackett WM. Uranium in runoff from the Gulf of Mexico distribution province Anomalous concentration. Science. 1972; 175:629-31.
  • [5]Miranzadeh H, Emam Y, Pilesjö P, Seyyedi H. Water use efficiency of four dryland wheat cultivars under different levels of nitrogen fertilization. J Agriculture Sci Technol. 2011; 13:843-54.
  • [6]Lambert R, Grant C, Sauve C. Cadmium and zinc in soil solution extracts following the application of phosphate fertilizers. Sci Total Environ. 2007; 378:293-305.
  • [7]Cheraghi ML, Merrikhpour H. Investigation of the Effects of Phosphate Fertilizer Application on the Heavy Metal Content in Agricultural Soils with Different Cultivation Patterns. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2012; 145:87-92.
  • [8]Grant CA, Sheppard SC. Fertilizer Impacts on Cadmium Availability in Agricultural Soils and Crops. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2008; 14:210-28.
  • [9]Khater AEM, AL-Sewaidan HA. Radiation exposure due to agricultural uses of phosphate fertilizers. Radiat Meas. 2008; 43:1402-7.
  • [10]Taher AE, Makhluf S. Natural activity level in phosphate fertilizers and its environment implication in assuit governorate, Upper Egypt. Indian J Pure Appl Physics. 2010; 48:697-702.
  • [11]Mazzilli B, Palmiro V, Saueia C, Nisti MB. Radiochemical characterization of Brazilian phosphogypsum. J Environ Radioact. 2000; 49:113-22.
  • [12]Da Conceicao TF, Bonotto DM. Radionuclides, heavy metals and fluorine incidence at Tapira phosphate rocks, Brazil, and their industrial by- products. Environ Pollution. 2006; 139:232-43.
  • [13]Bouwer FJ, MeKlveen JW, McDowell WJ. Uranium assay of phosphate fertilizers and other phosphatic materials. Health Phys. 1978; 34:345-52.
  • [14]Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiation to the general assembly. Exposures from natural radiation sources, United Nations, New York; 2000.
  • [15]Cataldo DA, Wildung RE. The role of soil and plant metabolic processes in controlling trace element behavior and bioavailability to animals. Sci Total Environ. 1983; 28:159-68.
  • [16]Tuovinen TS, Roivainen P, Makkonen S, Kolehmainen M, Holopainen T, Juutilainen J. Soil-to-plant transfer of elements is not linear: Results for five elements relevant to radioactive waste in five boreal forest species. Sci Total Environ. 2011; 410–411:191-7.
  • [17]Chen SB, Zhua YG, Hu QH. Soil to plant transfer of 238U, 226Ra and 232Th on a uranium mining-impacted soil from southeastern China. J Environ Radioact. 2005; 82:223-36.
  • [18]Blanco Rodrıguez P, Vera Tome F, Lozano JC. About the assumption of linearity in soil-to-plant transfer factors for uranium and thorium isotopes and 226Ra. Sci Total Environ. 2002; 284:167-75.
  • [19]Blanco Rodrıguez P, Vera Tome F, Perez Fernandez F, Lozano JC. Linearity assumption in soil-to-plant transfer factors of natural uranium and radium in Helianthus annuus L. Sci Total Environ. 2006; 361:1-7.
  • [20]Chauhan P, Chauhan RP. Elemental analysis of fertilizers using X-ray fluorescence and their impact on alpha radioactivity of plants. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2013; 295:1097-105.
  • [21]Qian P, Schoenau JJ, Mooleki P. Phosphorus Amount and Distribution in a Saskatchewan Soil after Five Years of Swine and Cattle Manure Application. Candian J Soil Sci. 2004; 84:275-81.
  • [22]Al-Mohammadi F, Al-Zubi Y. Soil chemical properties and yield of tomato as influenced by different levels of irrigation water and fertilizer. J Agriculture Sci Rechnol. 2011; 13:289-99.
  • [23]Jin S, Verma AD, Lange T, Daniell H. Release of Hormones from Conjugates: Chloroplast Expression of β-Glucosidase Results in Elevated Phytohormone Levels Associated with Significant Increase in Biomass and Protection from Aphids or Whiteflies Conferred by Sucrose Esters. Plant Physiol. 2011; 155:222-35.
  • [24]Chauhan P, Chauhan RP, Gupta M. Estimation of naturally occurring radionuclides in fertilizers using gamma spectrometry and elemental analysis by XRF and XRD techniques. Microchem J. 2013; 106:73-8.
  • [25]Denny H. Plant mineral nutrition. In: Plants. Ridge I, editor. Oxford University Press, New York; 2002: p.167-220.
  • [26]Soudek P, Petrova S, Benesova D, Kotyza J, Vagner M, Vankova R et al.. Study of soil–plant transfer of 226Ra under greenhouse conditions. J Environ Radioact. 2010; 101:446-50.
  • [27]Al-Masri MS, Al-Akel B, Nashawani A, Amin Y, Khalifa KH, Al-Ain F. Transfer of 40 K, 238U, 210Pb, and 210Po from soil to plant in various locations in south of Syria. J Environ Radioact. 2008; 99:322-31.
  • [28]Sheppard MI. The environmental behaviour of uranium and thorium. AECL, At Energy Canada Ltd, Canada; 1980.
  • [29]Sheppard MI, Sheppard SC. The plant concentration concept as applied to natural uranium. Health Phys. 1985; 48:494-500.
  • [30]Efroymson RA, Sample BE, Suter GW. Bioaccumulation of Inorganic Chemicals from Soil by Plants: Spiked Soils vs. Field Contamination or Background. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2004; 10:1117-27.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:26次 浏览次数:25次