Policy development, implementation and evaluation by the AIDS control program in Uganda: a review of the processes

Health Research Policy and Systems

Nelson Sewankambo³  Zainab Akol¹  Rhoda Wanyenze²  Damalie Nakanjako³  Benson T Tumwesigye¹ 

[1] STD/AIDS Control Program, Ministry of Health Uganda, P.O. Box 7272, Kampala, Uganda;School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda;School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda

关键词: Policy revision;    Policy processes;    Policy development;    Health policy;   

Others  :  809861
DOI  :  10.1186/1478-4505-11-7

 received in 2012-10-26, accepted in 2013-02-11,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

The AIDS Control Program (ACP) in Uganda has spearheaded the national health sector HIV response for the last three decades. ACP has developed, revised and implemented various HIV prevention, care and treatment policies in order to keep interventions relevant to the changing dynamics of the HIV epidemic. However, the ACP team and partners remain concerned about the lengthy policy development processes. This study documented the policy development and revision processes to identify strengths and weaknesses in order to inform adjustments as Uganda embraces the move to ‘zero’ HIV infections.

Methods

Data was collected through a review of the relevant policy documents and key informant interviews with the five program officers involved in the recently developed Safe Male Circumcision (SMC) policy and the recently revised HIV Counseling and Testing (HCT) policy. Qualitative data was analyzed manually using pre-determined themes.

Results

Development and revision of the SMC and HCT policies followed similar processes that included a series of meetings between senior management and a selected technical working group. However, the gaps included: i) inadequate awareness of the existence of national policy development and management guidelines; ii) limited engagement of the policy analysis unit in the policy development/revision processes; iii) inadequate tracking and evaluation of the policies before revision or development of new related policies; iv) lack of specific protocols/standard operating procedures (SOPs); and, v) limited indigenous funding for the entire policy development processes which contributed to non-adherence to the anticipated timelines.

Conclusions

Policy development and revision of the SMC and HCT policies followed similar processes. Gaps identified included lack of protocols/SOPs for the processes and limited indigenous funding to support adherence to anticipated timelines. We recommend active involvement of the policy analysis unit in all policy processes. Specific protocols/SOPs for development, analysis, revision, implementation, monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment processes should be developed prior to commencement of the activities.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Tumwesigye et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Uganda Ministry of Health and ICF International: 2011 Uganda AIDS Indicator Survey: Key Findings. Calverton, Maryland, USA: MOH and ICF International; 2012. http://health.go.ug/docs/UAIS_2011_KEY_FINDINGS.pdf webcite
• [2]Rutten A, Abu-Omar K, Gelius P, Dinan-Young S, Frandin K, Hopman-Rock M, Young A: Policy assessment and policy development for physical activity promotion: results of an exploratory intervention study in 15 European nations. Health Res Policy Syst 2012, 10:14. BioMed Central Full Text
• [3]Hanney SR, Gonzalez-Block MA, Buxton MJ, Kogan M: The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Res Policy Syst 2003, 1:2. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]Lavis JN, Boyko JA, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A: SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 14: organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst 2009, 7(Suppl 1):S14. BioMed Central Full Text
• [5]Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Grimshaw J, Johansen M, Boyko JA, Lewin S, Fretheim A: SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 7: finding systematic reviews. Health Res Policy Syst 2009, 7(Suppl 1):S7. BioMed Central Full Text
• [6]Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Souza NM, Lewin S, Gruen RL, Fretheim A: SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 9: assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst 2009, 7(Suppl 1):S9. BioMed Central Full Text
• [7]Lavis JN, Permanand G, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A: SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 13: preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst 2009, 7(Suppl 1):S13. BioMed Central Full Text
• [8]Lavis JN, Wilson MG, Oxman AD, Grimshaw J, Lewin S, Fretheim A: SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 5: using research evidence to frame options to address a problem. Health Res Policy Syst 2009, 7(Suppl 1):S5. BioMed Central Full Text
• [9]Government of Uganda Ministry of Health: Safe Male Circumcision policy. 2010. http://malecircumcision.org/programs/documents/Uganda_MC_policy_JAN10.pdf webcite
• [10]Cabinet Secretariat of Uganda: A Guide to Policy Development & Management in Uganda. 2009. [http://www.cabinetsecretariat.go.ug webcite]
• [11]Chanda-Kapata P, Campbell S, Zarowsky C: Developing a national health research system: participatory approaches to legislative, institutional and networking dimensions in Zambia. Health Res Policy Syst 2012, 10:17. BioMed Central Full Text
• [12]Lavis JN: How can we support the use of systematic reviews in policymaking? PLoS Med 2009, 6(11):e1000141.
• [13]Lavis JN, Wilson MG, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A: SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 4: using research evidence to clarify a problem. Health Res Policy Syst 2009, 7(Suppl 1):S4. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]Panisset U, Koehlmoos TP, Alkhatib AH, Pantoja T, Singh P, Kengey-Kayondo J, McCutchen B: Implementation research evidence uptake and use for policy-making. Health Res Policy Syst 2012, 10:20. BioMed Central Full Text