Bringing it home: expanding the local reach of dissemination and implementation training via a university-based workshop

Implementation Science

Allison Kempe¹  Russell E. Glasgow¹  Bridget Nuechterlein⁵  Michelle Prahl-Wretling⁴  Bonnie Leeman-Castillo³  Anne Lambert-Kerzner⁶  Catherine T. Battaglia⁷  Lisa C. Cicutto²  Jeff Proctor⁵  Borsika Rabin⁶  Elaine H. Morrato¹ 

[1] Colorado Research in Implementation Science Program, Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA;National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA;Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, CO, USA;Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E. 17th Place, Mail Stop B119, Aurora 80045, CO, USA;The Evaluation Center, School of Education and Human Development, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA;Denver Seattle Center for Veteran-centric Value-based Research (DiSCoVVR), Denver, CO, USA;Clinical Science Graduate Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA

关键词: Online education;    Training;    Dissemination and implementation science;   

Others  :  1219011
DOI  :  10.1186/s13012-015-0281-6

 received in 2014-10-19, accepted in 2015-06-15,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Currently, national training programs do not have the capacity to meet the growing demand for dissemination and implementation (D&I) workforce education and development. The Colorado Research in Implementation Science Program (CRISP) developed and delivered an introductory D&I workshop adapted from national programs to extend training reach and foster a local learning community for D&I.

Methods

To gauge interest and assess learning needs, a pre-registration survey was administered. Based on feedback, a 1.5-day workshop was designed. Day 1 introduced D&I frameworks, strategies, and evaluation principles. Local and national D&I experts provided ignite-style talks on key lessons followed by panel discussion. Breakout sessions discussed community engagement and applying for D&I grants. A workbook was developed to enhance the training and provided exercises for application to an individual’s projects. Day 2 offered expert-led mentoring sessions with selected participants who desired advanced instruction. Two follow-up surveys (immediate post-workshop, 6 months) assessed knowledge gained from participation and utilization of workshop content.

Results

Ninety-three workshop registrants completed an assessment survey to inform workshop objectives and curriculum design; 43 % were new and 54 % reported a basic understanding of the D&I field. Pre-registrants intended to use the training to “apply for a D&I grant” (73 %); “incorporate D&I into existing projects” (76 %), and for quality improvement (51 %). Sixty-eight individuals attended Day 1; 11 also attended Day 2 mentoring sessions. In the 1-week post-workshop survey (n = 34), 100 % strongly agreed they were satisfied with the training; 97 % strongly agreed the workshop workbook was a valuable resource. All Day 2 participants strongly agreed that working closely with faculty and experts increased their overall confidence. In the 6-month follow-up evaluation (n = 23), evidence of new D&I-related manuscripts and grant proposals was found. Training materials were published online (www.ucdenver.edu/implementation/workshops) and disseminated via the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium. To sustain reach, CRISP adapted the materials into an interactive e-book (www.CRISPebooks.org) and launched a new graduate course.

Conclusions

Local D&I training workshops can extend the reach of national training programs.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Morrato et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.; 2001.
• [2]Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Priority areas for national action: transforming health care quality. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C; 2003.
• [3]Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(7):1274-81.
• [4]Colditz GA. The promise and challenge of dissemination and implementation research. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Oxford University Press, New York, NY; 2012.
• [5]Department of Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research & Development, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative. 2013.
• [6]Accelerating Change and Transformation in Organizations and Networks (ACTION): fact sheet: field partnerships for applied research Rockville, MD: agency for healthcare research and quality. 2009.
• [7]Research Centers for Excellence in Clinical Preventive Services Rockville, MD: agency for healthcare research and quality. 2014. [updated March 2014]. Available from:. http://www. ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/decision/research-centers/index.html webcite
• [8]Dissemination and implementation research in health (R01). In: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, editors. 2013
• [9]Tinkle M, Kimball R, Haozous EA, Shuster G, Meize-Grochowski R. Dissemination and implementation research funded by the US National Institutes of Health, 2005–2012. Nurs Res Pract. 2013; 2013:909606.
• [10]NIH HCS Research Collaboratory. 2014.
• [11]Merit review criteria 2014. 2014.
• [12]Esposito D, Heeringa J, Bradley K, Croake S, Kimmey L. PCORI Dissemination and Implementation Framework. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, D.C.; 2015.
• [13]2013 annual report. 2014.
• [14]Dearing JW, Keith RE. Historical roots of dissemination and implementation science. Dissemination and Implementation Research in health: Translating Science to Practice. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Oxford University Press, New York, NY; 2012.
• [15]Meissner HI, Glasgow RE, Vinson CA, Chambers D, Brownson RC, Green LW, Ammerman AS, Weiner BJ, Mittman B. The U.S. training institute for dissemination and implementation research in health. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:12.
• [16]Stamatakis KA, Norton WE, Stirman SW, Melvin C, Brownson RC. Developing the next generation of dissemination and implementation researchers: insights from initial trainees. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:29.
• [17]Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Baumann AA, Mittman BS, Aarons GA, Brownson RC, Glisson C, Chambers D. The implementation research institute: training mental health implementation researchers in the United States. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:105.
• [18]Gonzales R, Handley MA, Ackerman S, O’Sullivan PS. A framework for training health professionals in implementation and dissemination science. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2012; 87(3):271-8.
• [19]Academy Health. 7th annual conference on the science of dissemination and implementation: transforming health systems to optimize individual and population health. Academy Health, Bethesda, MD; 2014.
• [20]Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. Oxford University Press, New York, NY; 2012.
• [21]Mentored Training for Dissemination and Implementation Research in Cancer (MT-DIRC) Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Washington University in St. Louis [October 17, 2014]. Available from:. http://prcstl. wustl.edu/training/Pages/MTDIRC.aspx webcite
• [22]Leung BM, Catallo C, Riediger ND, Cahill NE, Kastner M. The trainees’ perspective on developing an end-of-grant knowledge translation plan. Implement Sci. 2010; 5:78.
• [23]QUERI Implementation Seminar Series Cyberseminars Series: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. 2015.
• [24]National Cancer Institute (NCI) Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences Implementation Science Team. 2014.
• [25]Morrato EH, Concannon TW, Meissner P, Shah ND, Turner BJ. Dissemination and implementation of comparative effectiveness evidence: key informant interviews with Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. 2013; 2(2):185-94.
• [26]Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI) needs assessment. University of Colorado Denver. 2014.
• [27]Glasgow RE, Kessler RS, Ory MG, Roby D, Gorin SS, Krist A. Conducting rapid, relevant research: lessons learned from the My Own Health Report project. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2014; 47(2):212-9.
• [28]Dickinson LM, Dickinson WP, Nutting PA, Fisher L, Harbrecht M, Crabtree BF, Glasgow RE, West DR. Practice context affects efforts to improve diabetes care for primary care patients: a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2015; 30(4):476-82.
• [29]Neta G, Glasgow RE, Carpenter CR, Grimshaw JM, Rabin BA, Fernandez ME, Brownson RC. A framework for enhancing the value of research for dissemination and implementation. Am J Public Health. 2015; 105(1):49-57.
• [30]Albright K, Gechter K, Kempe A. Importance of mixed methods in pragmatic trials and dissemination and implementation research. Acad Pediatr. 2013; 13(5):400-7.
• [31]Smith MY, Morrato E. Advancing the field of pharmaceutical risk minimization through application of implementation science best practices. Drug safety: an International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Drug Experience. 2014; 37(8):569-80.
• [32]Bender BG, Dickinson P, Rankin A, Wamboldt FS, Zittleman L, Westfall JM. The Colorado Asthma Toolkit Program: a practice coaching intervention from the High Plains Research Network. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011; 24(3):240-8.
• [33]Westfall JM, Zittleman L, Sutter C, Emsermann CB, Staton EW, Van Vorst R, Dickinson LM. Testing to prevent colon cancer: results from a rural community intervention. Ann Fam Med. 2013; 11(6):500-7.
• [34]Kempe A, Saville A, Dickinson LM, Eisert S, Reynolds J, Herrero D, Beaty B, Albright K, Dibert E, Koehler V, Lockhart S, Calonge N. Population-based versus practice-based recall for childhood immunizations: a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103(6):1116-23.
• [35]Westfall JM, Ingram B, Navarro D, Magee D, Niebauer L, Zittleman L, Fernald D, Pace W. Engaging communities in education and research: PBRNs, AHEC, and CTSA. Clinical and Translational Science. 2012; 5(3):250-8.
• [36]Westfall JM, Dolor RJ, Mold JW, Hedgecock J. PBRNS engaging the community to integrate primary care and public health. Ann Fam Med. 2013; 11(3):284-5.
• [37]Schilling LM, Kwan BM, Drolshagen CT, Hosokawa PW, Brandt E, Pace WD, Uhrich C, Kamerick M, Bunting A, Payne PR, Stephens WE, George JM, Vance M, Giacomini K, Braddy J, Green MK, Kahn MG. Scalable Architecture for Federated Translational Inquiries Network (SAFTINet) Technology Infrastructure for a Distributed Data Network. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013; 1(1):1027.
• [38]Pace WD, Fox CH, White T, Graham D, Schilling LM, West DR. The DARTNet Institute: seeking a sustainable support mechanism for electronic data enabled research networks. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014; 2(2):1063.
• [39]Training the next generation of leaders in clinical preventive services: profiles from the AHRQ Research Centers for Excellence Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013 [5/1/2014]. Available from:. http://www. ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/decision/research-centers/rce_profile_morrato.html webcite
• [40]Thacker SB, Brownson RC. Practicing epidemiology: how competent are we? Public Health Reports. 2008; 123 Suppl 1:4-5.
• [41]Padek M, Brownson RC, Proctor EK, Colditz GA, Kreuter MW, Dobbins M, et al. Developing dissemination and implementation competencies for training programs. In: The National Institutes for Health (NIH), The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, William T. Grant Foundation, (VA) VA, editors. 7th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation. Bethesda, MD: Academy Health; 2014.
• [42]Stetler CB, McQueen L, Demakis J, Mittman BS. An organizational framework and strategic implementation for system-level change to enhance research-based practice: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008; 3:30.
• [43]Washington, D.C.: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. 2012.
• [44]Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2012; 43(3):337-50.
• [45]Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers D, Brownson RC. Models in dissemination and implementation research: useful tools in public health services and systems research. Frontiers in PHSSR. 2013; 2(1):8.
• [46]Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. Free Press, New York; 2003.
• [47]Dearing JW, Smith DK, Larson RS, Estabrooks CA. Designing for diffusion of a biomedical intervention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2013; 44(1 Suppl 2):S70-6.
• [48]Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:50.
• [49]Wandersman A, Duffy J, Flaspohler P, Noonan R, Lubell K, Stillman L, Blachman M, Dunville R, Saul J. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008; 41(3-4):171-81.
• [50]Flaspohler P, Lesesne CA, Puddy RW, Smith E, Wandersman A. Advances in bridging research and practice: introduction to the second special issue on the interactive system framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2012; 50(3-4):271-81.
• [51]Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient safety / Joint Commission Resources. 2008; 34(4):228-43.
• [52]Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health program planning: an educational and ecological approach. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York; 2001.
• [53]Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89(9):1322-7.
• [54]Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA, McElwee N, Guise JM, Santa J, Conway PH, Daudelin D, Morrato EH, Leslie LK. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2012; 27(8):985-91.
• [55]Norman N, Bennett C, Cowart S, Felzien M, Flores M, Flores R, Haynes C, Hernandez M, Rodriquez MP, Sanchez N, Sanchez S, Winkelman K, Winkelman S, Zittleman L, Westfall JM. Boot camp translation: a method for building a community of solution. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013; 26(3):254-63.
• [56]Advances in patient safety: from research to implementation. 2005.
• [57]Sofaer S, Talis N, Edmunds M, Papa K. Navigating the translation and dissemination of PHSSR findings: a decision guide for researchers. AcademyHealth, Washington, D.C; 2013.
• [58]Glasgow RE, Magid DJ, Beck A, Ritzwoller D, Estabrooks PA. Practical clinical trials for translating research to practice: design and measurement recommendations. Med Care. 2005; 43(6):551-7.
• [59]Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: “to whom do the results of this trial apply?”. Lancet. 2005; 365(9453):82-93.
• [60]Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, Treweek S, Furberg CD, Altman DG, Tunis S, Bergel E, Harvey I, Magid DJ, Chalkidou K. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2009; 62(5):464-75.
• [61]Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003; 290(12):1624-32.
• [62]Glasgow RE, Riley WT. Pragmatic measures: what they are and why we need them. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2013; 45(2):237-43.
• [63]Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011; 38(2):65-76.
• [64]Ritzwoller DP, Sukhanova A, Gaglio B, Glasgow RE. Costing behavioral interventions: a practical guide to enhance translation. Ann Behav Med. 2009; 37(2):218-27.
• [65]Byrne DW, Biaggioni I, Bernard GR, Helmer TT, Boone LR, Pulley JM, Edwards T, Dittus RS. Clinical and translational research studios: a multidisciplinary internal support program. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2012; 87(8):1052-9.
• [66]Loudon K, Zwarenstein M, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Treweek S. PRECIS-2: a tool to improve the applicability of randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2013; 14 Suppl 1:O28. BioMed Central Full Text
• [67]Byrne DW, Biaggioni I, Bernard GR, Helmer TT, Boone LR, Pulley JM, Edwards T, Dittus RS. Clinical and translational research studios: a multidisciplinary internal support program. Academic Medicine. 2012; 87(8):1052-9.