Ecological and socio-cultural factors influencing in situ conservation of crop diversity by traditional Andean households in Peru

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

Aldo Cruz-Soriano¹  Juan Torres-Guevara³  Alejandro Casas²  Dora Velásquez-Milla¹ 

[1] Coordinadora de Ciencia y Tecnología en los Andes (CCTA), Camilo Carrillo 300-A, Lima, Perú;Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas (CIECO). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Morelia, Michoacán, México;Departamento de Biología de la Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina (UNALM), Av. Universidad s/n, La Molina, Lima, Perú

关键词: traditional crop varieties;    traditional ecological knowledge;    in situ conservation;    genetic resources;    Andean traditional agriculture;    Andean native tubers;   

Others  :  863094
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-4269-7-40

 received in 2011-04-07, accepted in 2011-12-06,  发布年份 2011

【 摘 要 】

Background

The Peruvian Andean region is a main center of plant domestication of the world. There, several tuber species were domesticated and the area lodges one of the most important reservoirs of their varieties and wild relatives. It is also the setting of traditional cultures using and conserving them. However, crop genetic erosion has been reported in the region since several decades ago; therefore, understanding factors influencing both loss and maintenance of crop variation is relevant to design conservation policies. Previous researches have examined factors influencing agrobiodiversity conservation in the region but additional case studies are recognized to be still necessary for a deeper understanding of causes of genetic erosion and for policy design to prevent and remedy it. Our study focused on analyzing (1) variation in richness of traditional varieties of tubers cultivated among households, (2) changes in varieties richness occurred in four consecutive agricultural cycles, and (3) ecological, social, and cultural factors influencing loss and conservation of varieties.

Methods

Richness of farmer varieties of tuber species cultivated by 28 peasant households was monitored in communities of Cajamarca and Huánuco, Peru during four consecutive agricultural cycles (from 2001 to 2005). In-depth interviews were conducted with 12 of the households with higher reputation as conservationists, in order to document farmers' perception of tubers qualities in ecological, social, economic, technological and culinary aspects and how these influence their decisions of conservation priorities. Traditional varieties were identified according to their local names, which were then confronted among farmers and with scientific catalogues in order to identify synonyms. Based on the information documented, indexes of ecological and socio-cultural factors affecting agricultural practices were designed, and their linear correlations and multivariate relations with varieties richness managed per household were analyzed in order to explore factors with higher influence on conservation of crop variation.

Results

A total of 1483 and 507 farmer varieties of tuber species were found in the whole sample and period studied in Huánuco and Cajamarca, respectively. Significantly more varieties managed per household per year were recorded in Huánuco (146.39 ± 12.02) than in Cajamarca (44.55 ± 9.26), and marked differences in number of varieties per year were documented among households within each region (78.25 to 246.50 in Huánuco, 7.50 to 144.00 in Cajamarca). Correlation and multivariate analyses identified that the extent of agricultural area managed by households, cultural identity, practicing of traditional agricultural techniques, and level of self-sufficiency, are meaningful factors influencing higher varieties richness maintained by households. Yield and culinary attributes were considered by people as main features for selecting and deciding which varieties are priorities for conservation.

Conclusions

Maintenance and promotion of indigenous Andean culture is crucial for ensuring conservation of both traditional agroecological systems and agrobiodiversity. Policies supporting Andean culture (through educational, cultural and economic programs) are therefore directly connected with conservation of traditional farmer varieties. Promotion of seed availability and interchange are effective actions for maintaining and developing diversity, but using and valuing native tubers at regional, national and international levels are fundamental motivations to enhance policies and processes in this direction.

【 授权许可】

   
2011 Velásquez-Milla et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Vavilov N: The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Chron Bot 1951, 13:1-366.
• [2]Brack A: Perú-Diez Mil Años de Domesticación. Lima: PNUD; 2003.
• [3]Harlan J: Crops and Man. Foundation for Modern Crop Science Series. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America; 1975.
• [4]Brush SB, Carney BH, Huamán Z: Dynamics of Andean potato agriculture. Econ Bot 1981, 35:70-85.
• [5]Brush SB: Farmers' Bounty: Locating crop diversity in the contemporary World. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2004.
• [6]Brush SB: Ethnoecology, biodiversity, and modernization in Andean potato agriculture. Human Ecology 1992, 12:161-185.
• [7]Zimmerer KS: Managing diversity in potato and maize fields of the Peruvian Andes. J Ethnobiol 1991, 11:23-49.
• [8]Monroe J: Esquema histórico de las relaciones entre naturaleza y sociedad en las montañas andinas. In La Gestión de Microcuencas: Una Estrategia para el Desarrollo Sostenible en las Montañas del Perú; Propuesta. Edited by Torres J. Lima: CCTA; 1999:3-8.
• [9]Murra J: Formaciones Económicas y Políticas del Mundo Andino. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos; 1975.
• [10]Murra J: La Organización Económica del Estado Inca. México DF: Siglo XXI; 1983.
• [11]Earls J: Planificación Agrícola Andina. Lima: COFIDE; 1989.
• [12]Morlon P: Comprender la Agricultura Campesina en los Andes Centrales Perú-Bolivia. Lima: Instituto Francés de Estudios Andinos; 1996.
• [13]Huamán Z, Spooner DM: Reclassification of landrace populations of cultivated potatoes (Solanum section Petota). Am Jour Bot 2002, 89:947-965.
• [14]Brack A, Bravo F: Peru-Millenary Legacy. Lima: Universidad San Martín de Porres; 2006.
• [15]Zimmerer KS: Biological Diversity in agriculture and global change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 2010, 35:137-166.
• [16]Ochoa C: Potato collecting expeditions in Chile, Bolivia and Peru, and the genetic erosion of indigenous cultivars. In Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow. Edited by Frankel OH, Hawkes JG. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1975:167-173.
• [17]Hawkes JG: Biosystematics of the potato. In The Potato Crop. Edited by Harris PM. London: Chapman and Hall; 1978:15-69.
• [18]Franco S: [http://peru.inka.free.fr/peru/pdf/fitand.pdf] webciteLos Recursos Fitogenéticos Andinos: su erosión, conservación y apropiación. Perú;; 17.
• [19]Figueroa M: La conservación in situ de la papa (Solanum spp.) en la microcuenca de Warmiragra (1950-2004), distrito de Tomayquichua, Provincia de Ambo, Región Huánuco. In Bachelor in Sciences (Biology) Thesis. Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Departamento de Biología; 2006.
• [20]Proyecto Andino de Tecnologías Campesinas (PRATEC): Informe sobre el Inventario de la Variabilidad Nominal de los Cultivos Nativos. Lima: Proyecto In Situ; 2004.
• [21]Coordinadora de Ciencia y Tecnología en los Andes (CCTA): [http://www.ccta.org.pe/uploads/publicaciones/0221718001321049241.pdf] webciteInforme de Cierre. Lima: Proyecto In Situ-CCTA; 2006.
• [22]Instituto de Investigación de la Amazonía Peruana (IIAP), Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD): Informe Año 05 (del) "Perú: Conservación In Situ de Cultivos Nativos y sus Parientes Silvestres". Lima; 2006.
• [23]Raime L, Checya D: Sistematización sobre Caracterización Campesina de Variedades de Papa en Comunidades Conservacionistas de Paucartambo. Lima: Proyecto In Situ; 2006.
• [24]Pulgar Vidal J: Geografía del Perú-Las Ocho Regiones Naturales del Perú. Lima: Editorial Universo; 1987.
• [25]Felipe L: [http://www.ccta.org.pe/uploads/publicaciones/0482878001321306570.pdf] webciteCondiciones meteorológicas iniciales en microcuencas andinas y el riesgo que representan para la conservación in situ de los cultivos nativos en la sierra peruana (campaña agrícola 2001-2002). Lima: Proyecto In Situ-CCTA; 2002.
• [26]Herrera J: La Pobreza en el Perú en 2001: una visión departamental. Lima: INEI; 2002.
• [27]Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (INEI)[http://www.inei.gob.pe/biblioineipub/bancopub/Est/Lib0981/index.html] webcite
• [28]Huamán Z, Williams JT, Salhuana W, Vincent L: Descriptors of the Cultivated Potato. Rome: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources; 1977.
• [29]Quiros C, Brush SB, Douches DS, Zimmerer KS, Huestis G: Biochemical and folk assessment of variability of Andean cultivated potatoes. Econ Bot 1990, 44:254-266.
• [30]De Haan S, Nuñez J, Bonierbale M, Ghislain M: Multilevel agrobiodiversity and conservation of Andean potatoes in Central Peru. Mountain Research and Development 2010, 30:222-231.
• [31]Centro IDEAS: [http://www.ccta.org.pe/uploads/publicaciones/0882739001321391444.pdf] webciteIdentificación y Priorización de Agricultores y Comunidades conservacionistas-Socialización de Metodologías de Inventario de la Conservación. Cajamarca, Perú: Proyecto In Situ-CCTA; 2001.
• [32]Díaz C, Alva J, Flores D, Vara V: [http://www.ccta.org.pe/uploads/publicaciones/0147807001321149191.pdf] webcitePunto de Partida de la Conservación In Situ en la Microcuenca de Mito, Distrito de Kichki, Departamento de Huánuco. Huánuco, Perú: Proyecto In Situ-CCTA; 2002.
• [33]Ochoa C, Vargas F, Simon R, Rojas E, Juarez H, Blancas M, Roca W: [https://research.cip.cgiar.org/genebankdb/wild_specieslist.php?start=21] webciteCIP virtual herbarium of wild potato species (Ochoa collection). 2004.
• [34]Arbizu C, Simon R, Rojas E, Blancas M, Juárez H, Roca W: [https://research.cip.cgiar.org/genebankdb/auto_2list.php?cmd=resetall&id=10] webciteCIP database of FAO in-trust accessions of mashua. 2004.
• [35]Arbizu C, Simon R, Rojas E, Blancas M, Juárez H, Roca W: [https://research.cip.cgiar.org/genebankdb/auto_2list.php?cmd=resetall&id=8] webciteCIP database of FAO in-trust accessions of oca. 2004.
• [36]Arbizu C, Simon R, Rojas E, Blancas M, Juárez H, Roca W: [https://research.cip.cgiar.org/genebankdb/auto_2list.php?cmd=resetall&id=4] webciteCIP database of FAO in-trust accessions of olluco. 2004.
• [37]Egúsquiza R: [http://www.ccta.org.pe/uploads/publicaciones/0344360001321157376.pdf] webciteCaracterización de papas nativas cultivadas en Huánuco. Lima: CCTA; 2009.
• [38]Medina T: [http://www.ccta.org.pe/uploads/publicaciones/0373143001321158887.pdf] webciteDeterminación de la variabilidad de la oca de 10 agricultores de las cuencas de Mito (Distrito de Kichki, Provincia de Huánuco) y Warmiragra (Distrito de Tomayquichua, Provincia de Ambo) del Departamento de Huánuco: informe. Lima: CCTA; 2009.
• [39]Mayer E: Uso de la Tierra en los Andes-Ecología y Agricultura en el Valle del Mantaro del Perú con Referencia Especial a la Papa. Lima, Perú: Centro Internacional de la Papa; 1981.
• [40]Quezada M: Migración, arraigo y apropiación del espacio en la recomposición de identidades socioterritoriales. Cultura y Representaciones Sociales 2007, 2:35-67.
• [41]Sneath P, Sokal R: Numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman; 1973.
• [42]SPSS Inc.: Manual del usuario de SPSS Base 15.0. Chicago; 2006.
• [43]Monroe J: Campesinado Indígena y Modernidad Política-Ciudadanía, Cultura y Discriminación en los Andes Peruanos Contemporáneos. Buenos Aires: CLACSO; en edición
• [44]Servicio Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrología (SENAMHI): Evaluación de las condiciones océano-atmosféricas: abril 2004. Boletín Meteorológico e Hidrológico del Perú 2004, 4:5-17.
• [45]Felipe L: [http://www.ccta.org.pe/uploads/publicaciones/0476493001321188623.pdf] webciteEvolución del clima en el proyecto in situ. Lima: Proyecto conservación in situ de cultivos nativos y sus parientes silvestres; 2004.
• [46]Brack A, Aranda C, Bernales M, Bustamante R, Campos L, Capurro F, Castro M, Delgado J, Galarza E, Gomero L: Diagnóstico Ambiental del Perú. Lima: Ministerio del Ambiente; 2008.
• [47]Monroe J, Arenas F: ¿Somos Iguales?-Un Aporte para el Diálogo sobre la Identidad Cultural en las Escuelas de la Sierra del Perú. Lima: CCTA; 2003.
• [48]Rengifo G: La Enseñanza es Estar Contento-Educación y Afirmación Cultural Andina. Lima: PRATEC; 2003.
• [49]Castillo H: La Educación y su Influencia en la Cultura de Conservación de la Agrobiodiversidad en la Red Educativa Meseta Andina en el Distrito de Frías, durante el Año 2005. Piura, Perú: Proyecto In Situ; 2005.
• [50]Marglin S: Perdiendo el Contacto-Hacia la Descolonización de la Economía. Lima: PRATEC; 2000.
• [51]Godoy R: Indians, Markets, and Rainforests-Theory, Methods, Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press; 2001.
• [52]Kate K, Laird SA: The Commercial use of Biodiversity-Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-sharing. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd; 2000.