National trends in incidence and outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm among elderly type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients in Spain (2003–2012)

Cardiovascular Diabetology

Pilar Carrasco-Garrido⁵  Miguel Ángel Salinero-Fort²  Napoleón Perez-Farinos⁴  Manuel Méndez-Bailón³  José Mª de Miguel-Yanes¹  Valentín Hernández-Barrera⁵  Rodrigo Jiménez-García⁵  Isabel Jiménez-Trujillo⁵  Ana Lopez-de-Andrés⁵ 

[1] Medicine Department, Hospital Gregorio Marañon, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain;Dirección Técnica de Docencia e Investigación, Gerencia Atención Primaria, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain;Medicine Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain;Health Security Agency, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain;Preventive Medicine and Public Health Teaching and Research Unit, Health Sciences Faculty, Rey Juan Carlos University, Avda. de Atenas s/n, Alcorcon, 28922, Comunidad deMadrid, Spain

关键词: In-hospital mortality;    Length of stay;    Hospitalization;    Elderly;    Abdominal aortic aneurysm;    Type 2 diabetes;   

Others  :  1208997
DOI  :  10.1186/s12933-015-0216-1

 received in 2015-03-27, accepted in 2015-04-29,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

This study aims to describe trends in the rate of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and use of open surgery repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in elderly patients with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain, 2003–2012.

Methods

We select all patients with a discharge of AAA using national hospital discharge data. Discharges were grouped by diabetes status: type 2 diabetes and no diabetes. In both groups OSR and EVAR were identified. The incidence of discharges attributed to AAA were calculated overall and stratified by diabetes status and year. We calculated length of stay (LOHS) and in-hospital mortality (IHM). Use of OSR and EVAR were calculated stratified by diabetes status. Multivariate analysis was adjusted by age, sex, year, smoking habit and comorbidity.

Results

From 2003 to 2012, 115,020 discharges with AAA were identified. The mean age was 74.91 years and 16.7% suffered type 2 diabetes. Rates of discharges due to AAA increased significantly in diabetic patients (50.09 in 2003 to 78.23 cases per 100,000 in 2012) and non diabetic subjects (69.24 to 78.66). The incidences were higher among those without than those with diabetes in all the years studied.

The proportion of patients that underwent EVAR increased for both groups of patients and the open repair decreased. After multivariate analysis we found that LOHS and IHM have improved over the study period and diabetic patients had lower IHM than those without diabetes (OR 0.81; 95%CI 0.76-0.85).

Conclusions

Incidence rates were higher in non-diabetic patients. For diabetic and non diabetic patients the use of EVAR has increased and open repair seems to be decreasing. IHM and LOHS have improved from 2003 to 2012. Patients with diabetes had significantly lower mortality.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Lopez-de-Andrés et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Littooy FN, Bandyk D et al.. Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126:441-9.
• [2]Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Hye RJ, Makaroun MS et al.. The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: validation cohort and final results. Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160:1425-30.
• [3]Kent KC, Zwolak RM, Egorova NN. Analysis of risk factors of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of more than 3 million individuals. J Vasc Surg. 2010; 52:539-48.
• [4]Shah AD, Langenberg C, Rapsomaniki E, Denaxas S, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Gale CP et al.. Type 2 diabetes and incidence of cardiovascular diseases: a cohort study in 1 · 9 million people. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015; 3:105-13.
• [5]De Rango P, Farchioni L, Fiorucci B, Lenti M. Diabetes and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014; 47:243-61.
• [6]Guirguis-Blake JM, Beil TL, Sun X, Senger CA, Whitlock EP. Primary care screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet]. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US, Rockville (MD); 2014.
• [7]LeFevre ML. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 161:281-90.
• [8]Schermerhorn ML, O’Malley AJ, Jhaveri A, Cotterill P, Pomposelli F, Landon BE. Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358:464-74.
• [9]Markovic JN, Rajgor DD, Shortell CK. The impact of diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency on the outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2010; 22:235-44.
• [10]Leurs LJ, Laheij RJ, Buth J. Influence of diabetes mellitus on the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2005; 12:288-96.
• [11]Katz DJ, Stanley JC, Zelenock GB. Operative mortality rates for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in Michigan: an eleven-year statewide experience. J Vasc Surg. 1994; 19:804-15.
• [12]Dardik A, Lin JW, Gordon TA, Williams GM, Perler BA. Results of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the 1990s: a population-based analysis of 2335 cases. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 30:985-95.
• [13]Hughes K, Jackson JD, Prendergast TI, Rose DA, Bolorunduro O, Obirieze A et al.. Diabetes mellitus is not associated with major morbidity following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Surg Res. 2013; 184:751-4.
• [14]Salcedo Jódar L, Alcázar Carmona P, Tenías Burillo JM, García Tejada R. Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a rural population of 65–80 year-old males. Semergen. 2014; 40:425-30.
• [15]Gentille-Lorente DI, Salvadó-Usach T. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm by means of transthoracic echocardiography. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011; 64:395-400.
• [16]Villar F, Pedro-Botet J, Vila R, Lahoz C. Aortic aneurysm. Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2013; 25:224-30.
• [17]Sisó-Almirall A, Gilabert Solé R, Bru Saumell C, Kostov B, Mas Heredia M, González-de Paz L et al.. Feasibility of hand-held-ultrasonography in the screening of abdominal aortic aneurysms and abdominal aortic atherosclerosis. Med Clin (Barc). 2013; 141(Sebastián Montal L):417-22.
• [18]Barba A, Vega De Céniga M, Estallo L, de la Fuente N, Viviens B, Izagirre M. Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm is still high in certain areas of southern Europe. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013; 27:1068-73.
• [19]Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria, Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad: Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos, Hospitales del INSALUD. [http://www.ingesa.msc.es/estadEstudios/documPublica/CMBD-2001.htm]
• [20]Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40:373-83.
• [21]Thomsen RW, Nielsen JS, Ulrichsen SP, Pedersen L, Hansen AM, Nilsson T. The Danish Centre for Strategic Research in Type 2 Diabetes (DD2) study: Collection of baseline data from the first 580 patients. Clin Epidemiol. 2012; 4:43-8.
• [22]Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad: Encuesta Nacional de Salud de España. [http://www.msssi.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/encuestaNacional/]
• [23]Soriguer F, Goday A, Bosch-Comas A, Bordiú E, Calle-Pascual A, Carmena R et al.. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation in Spain: the [e-mail] Study. Diabetologia. 2012; 55:88-93.
• [24]Instituto Nacional de Estadística: Population estimates 2010. [www.ine.es]
• [25]De Rango P, Cao P, Cieri E, Parlani G, Lenti M, Simonte G et al.. Comparison of surveillance vs. Aortic Endografting for Small Aneurysm Repair (CAESAR) investigators group. Effects of diabetes on small aortic aneurysms under surveillance according to a subgroup analysis from a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 56:1555-63.
• [26]Sensi L, Tedesco D, Mimmi S, Rucci P, Pisano E, Pedrini L et al.. Hospitalization rates and post-operative mortality for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Italy over the period 2000–2011. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e83855.
• [27]Mureebe L, Egorova N, Giacovelli JK, Gelijns A, Kent KC, McKinsey JF. National trends in the repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 48:1101-7.
• [28]Smelser DT, Tromp G, Elmore JR, Kuivaniemi H, Franklin DP, Kirchner HL et al.. Population risk factor estimates for abdominal aortic aneurysm from electronic medical records: a case control study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014; 14:174. BioMed Central Full Text
• [29]Baumgartner I, Hirsch AT, Abola MT, Cacoub PP, Poldermans D, Steg PG et al.. Cardiovascular risk profile and outcome of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in out-patients with atherothrombosis: data from the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 48:808-14.
• [30]Villard C, Swedenborg J, Eriksson P, Hultgren R. Reproductive history in women with abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 54:341-5.
• [31]Vouyouka AG, Kent KC. Arterial vascular disease in women. J Vasc Surg. 2007; 466:1295-302.
• [32]Mureebe L, Egorova N, McKinsey JF, Kent KC. Gender trends in the repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms and outcomes. J Vasc Surg. 2010; 51:9S-13.
• [33]Thomas G, Khunti K, Curcin V, Molokhia M, Millett C, Majeed A et al.. Obesity paradox in people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes with and without prior cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014; 16:317-25.
• [34]Sidloff D, Stather P, Dattani N, Bown M, Thompson J, Sayers R et al.. Aneurysm global epidemiology study: public health measures can further reduce abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality. Circulation. 2014; 129:747-53.
• [35]Jahangir E, Lipworth L, Edwards TL, Kabagambe EK, Mumma MT, Mensah GA, et al. Smoking, sex, risk factors and abdominal aortic aneurysms: a prospective study of 18782 persons aged above 65 years in the Southern Community Cohort Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015:69:481–8.
• [36]Le MT, Jamrozik K, Davis TM, Norman PE. Negative association between infra-renal aortic diameter and glycaemia: the Health in Men Study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007; 33:599-604.
• [37]Miyama N, Dua MM, Yeung JJ, Schultz GM, Asagami T, Sho E et al.. Hyperglycemia limits experimental aortic aneurysm progression. J Vasc Surg. 2010; 52:975-83.
• [38]Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 364:843-8.
• [39]Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Padberg FT, Matsumura JS, Kohler TR et al.. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009; 302:1535-42.
• [40]Schermerhorn ML, Giles KA, Sachs T, Bensley RP, O’Malley AJ, Cotterill P et al.. Defining perioperative mortality after open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in the US Medicare population. J Am Coll Surg. 2011; 212:349-55.
• [41]López-de-Andrés A, Martínez-Huedo MA, Carrasco-Garrido P, Hernández-Barrera V, Gil-de-Miguel A, Jiménez-García R. Trends in lower-extremity amputations in people with and without diabetes in Spain, 2001–2008. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34:1570-6.
• [42]Lopez-de-Andres A, Jimenez-García R, Hernandez-Barrera V, Perez-Farinos N, de Miguel-Yanes JM, Mendez-Bailon M et al.. National trends in utilization and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures among people with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain (2001–2011). Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014; 13:3. BioMed Central Full Text
• [43]Ribera A, Marsal JR, Ferreira-González I, Cascant P, Pons JM, Mitjavila F et al.. Predicting in-hospital mortality with coronary bypass surgery using hospital discharge data: comparison with a prospective observational study. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008; 61:843-52.