期刊论文详细信息
Flavour
Evaluation of aroma profile differences between sué, sautéed, and pan-fried onions using an innovative olfactometric approach
Carole Prost3  Sabine Boussely1  Hugues Falquerho1  Fabrice Guillet2  Catherine Fillonneau3  Sarah Le Roy3  Angélique Villière3 
[1] Diana Food, 7 allée Ermengarde d’Anjou, ZAC Atalante Champeaux CS 41137, Rennes Cedex, F-35011, France;Polytech Nantes, LINA CNRS 6241, Rue Christian Pauc, BP 50609, Nantes, F-44306, France;Université Nantes Angers Le Mans, 19 bis Rue La Noue Bras de Fer, Nantes, 44200, France
关键词: Odorant compounds;    Sulfur compounds;    Olfactometric software;    Aroma profile;    Cooked onion;   
Others  :  1219778
DOI  :  10.1186/s13411-015-0034-0
 received in 2015-01-07, accepted in 2015-06-17,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Onions (Allium cepa) are widely used as a flavor agent ingredient in culinary preparations to bring specific cooked onion notes. In this study, three traditional types of preparations—sué, sautéed, and pan-fried onions—were used to investigate their differences in aroma profile.

Results

Headspace solid phase micro-extraction (HS-SPME) and gas chromatography (GC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS), flame ionization detection (FID), and olfactometry were used to analyze the onion preparations. The study enables to identify 66 major compounds in the preparations. Among these compounds, sulfur compounds, aldehydes, and furans were the most represented. The pan-fried onion preparation distinguishes itself by the highest number of compounds represented in a large amount. This result is consistent with this mode of cooking that combines high temperature with long cooking time and favors the formation of compounds from the Maillard reaction and lipid oxidation. In comparison, the sué and sautéed preparations contain globally fewer compounds and, for most of them, in a lower amount compared to the pan-fried preparation. An innovative olfactometric approach was performed, based on a laboratory-developed software using an aroma wheel especially designed for the study of cooked onion. It enables an intuitive, efficient, and precise characterization of odor events along elution. A statistical comparison of intensities perceived for each odor detected during olfactometric analysis was used to understand the aroma balance and nuances perceived for these three traditional onion preparations. In accordance with chromatographic results, the pan-fried onion displays the highest number of odorant zones (65) associated with higher intensity scores and notably, to an enhanced perception of some Maillard compounds. Sué and sautéed onion profiles show an analog number of odorant zones (50 and 53), but the sautéed onion displays higher intensity scores and a particular contribution from pyrazines.

Conclusions

The olfactometric approach used completes advantageously the instrumental characterization of cooked onions samples obtained by these three traditional cooking processes and reveals the essential contribution of minor compounds to the aroma of cooked onions. Particular compounds and balanced profile intensities were pointed out to explain the specific aroma nuances of traditional sué, sautéed, and pan-fried onions.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Villière et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150719003212381.pdf 1240KB PDF download
Fig. 2. 73KB Image download
Fig. 1. 24KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Whitfield FB, Last JH. Vegetables. In: Volatile compounds in foods and beverages. Maarse H, editor. Marcel Dekker, Inc, Zeist; 1991: p.764.
  • [2]Lanzotti V. The analysis of onion and garlic. J Chromatogr A. 2006; 1112:3-22.
  • [3]Block E. The organosulfur chemistry of the genus Allium—implications for the organic chemistry of sulfur. Angenz Chem Int Ed Enn. 1992; 31:1135-1178.
  • [4]Colina-Coca C, Gonzales-Pena D, Vega E, De Ancos B, Sanchez-Moreno C. Novel approach for the determination of volatile compounds in processed onion by headspace gas chromatography–massspectrometry (HS GC–MS). Talanta. 2013; 103:137-144.
  • [5]Kedebe BT, Grauwet T, Mutsokoti L, Palmers S, Vervoort L, Hendrickx M, Van Loey A. Comparing the impact of high pressure high temperature and thermal sterilization on the volatile fingerprint of onion, potato, pumpkin and red beet. Food Res Int. 2014; 56:218-225.
  • [6]Nijssen LM, Visscher CA, Maarse H, Willemsens LC, Boelens MH. Volatile compounds in food qualitative and quantitative data. TNO Nutrition and Food Research Institute, Al Zeist; 1996.
  • [7]Tokitomo Y. Flavor constituents of roasted onions of different cultivars, and comparison of their aroma patterns. Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi. 1995; 42:1003-1011.
  • [8]Tokitomo Y. Volatile components of cooked onions. Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi. 1995; 42:279-287.
  • [9]Boelens M, De Valois PJ, Wobben HJ, Van De Gen A. Volatile flavor compounds from onion. J Agric Food Chem. 1971; 19:984-991.
  • [10]Brodnitz MH, Pollock CL, Vallon PP. Flavor components of onion oil. J Agric Food Chem. 1969; 17:760-763.
  • [11]Yamanishi T, Orioka A. Chemical studies on the change of flavor and taste of onion by boiling. J Home Econom. 1955; 6:45-47.
  • [12]Galetto WG, Hoffman PG. Synthesis and flavor evaluation of some alkylthiophenes. Volatile components of onion. J Agric Food Chem. 1976; 24:852-854.
  • [13]Tokitomo Y, Yamanishi T. Sweet flavor of cooked onion. Journal de l'économie domestique du Japon. 1993; 44:347-353.
  • [14]Curioni PMG, Bosset JO. Key odorants in various cheese types as determined by gas chromatography-olfactometry. Int Dairy J. 2008; 12:959-984.
  • [15]Plutowska B, Wardencki W. Application of gas chromatography–olfactometry (GC–O) in analysis and quality assessment of alcoholic beverages—a review. Food Chem. 2008; 107:449-463.
  • [16]Sunarharum WB, Williams DJ, Smyth HE. Complexity of coffee flavor: a compositional and sensory perspective. Food Res Int. 2014; 62:315-325.
  • [17]Garruti DS, Franco MRB, Da Silva MAAP, Janzantti NS, Alves GL. Assessment of aroma impact compounds in a cashew apple-based alcoholic beverage by GC-MS and GC-olfactometry. Food Sci Technol. 2006; 39:373-378.
  • [18]Debonneville C, Orsier B, Flament I, Chaintreau A. Improved hardware and software for quick gas chromatography-olfactometry using CHARM and GC-"SNIF" analysis. Anal Chem. 2002; 74:2345-2351.
  • [19]Berdagué JL, Tournayre P, Cambou S. Novel multi-gas chromatography-olfactometry device and software for the identification of odour-active compounds. J Chromatogr A. 2007; 1146:85-92.
  • [20]Charles M, Martin B, Ginies C, Etiévant P, Coste G, Guichard E. Potent aroma compounds of two red wine vinegars. J Agric Food Chem. 2000; 48:70-77.
  • [21]Le Fur Y, Mercurio V, Moio L, Blanquet J, Meunier JM. A new approach to examine the relationships between sensory and gas chromatography-olfactometry data using generalized procrustes analysis applied to six french chardonnay wines. J Agric Food Chem. 2003; 51:443-452.
  • [22]Moio L, Chambellant E, Lesschaeve I, Issanchou S, Schlich P, Etiévant P. Production of representative wine extracts for chemical and olfactory analysis. Ital J Food Sci. 1995; 3:265-278.
  • [23]Pollien P, Ott A, Montignon F, Baumgartner M, Munos-Box R, Chaintreau A. Hyphenated headspace-gas chromatography-sniffing technique: screening of impact odorants and quantitative aromagram comparisons. J Agric Food Chem. 1997; 45:2630-2637.
  • [24]Van Ruth SM. Evaluation of two gas chromatography-olfactometry methods: the detection frequency and perceived intensity method. J Chromatogr A. 2004; 1054:33-37.
  • [25]Etiévant P, Callement G, Langlois D, Issanchou S, Coquibus N. Odor intensity evaluation in gas chromatography-olfactometry by finger span method. J Agric Food Chem. 1999; 47:1673-1680.
  • [26]Guichard H, Guichard E, Langlois D, Issanchou S, Abbott N. GC-sniffing analysis: olfactive intensity measurement by two methods. Z Lebensmittel Untersuch Forsch. 1995; 201:344-350.
  • [27]Nimmi J, Leus M, Silcock P, Hamid N, Bremer P. Characterisation of odour active compounds of New Zealand sea urchin (Evechinus chloroticus) roe using chromatography-olfactometry-finger span cross modality (GC-O-FSCM) method. Food Chem. 2010; 121:601-607.
  • [28]Dussort P, Deprêtre N, Bou-Maroun E, Fant C, Guichard E, Brunerie P, Le Fur Y, Le Quéré J-L. An original approach for gas chromatography-olfactometry detection frequency analysis: application to gin. Food Res Int. 2012; 49:253-262.
  • [29]Garcia CV, Stevenson RJ, Atkinson RG, Winz RA, Quek SY. Changes in the bound aroma profiles of ‘Hayward’ and ‘Hort16A’ kiwifruit (Actinidia spp.) during ripening and GC-olfactometry analysis. Food Chem. 2013; 137:45-54.
  • [30]Rouby C, Thomas-Danguin T, Sicard G, Vigouroux M, Jiang T, Poitevineau J, Issanchou S. Influence of the semantic context on odor identification performance. Psychologie française. 2005; 50:225-239.
  • [31]Cain WS. To know with the nose: keys to odor identification. Science. 1979; 203:467-470.
  • [32]Cotte VME, Prasad SK, Wan PHW, Linforth RST, Taylor AJ. Cigarette smoke: GC-olfactometry analyses using two computer programs. In: Expression of multidisciplinary flavour science—proceedings of the 12th Weurman Symposium; 2010. Blank I, Wust M, Yeretzian C, editors. Institute of chemistry and biological chemistry, Interlaken; 2008: p.498-501.
  • [33]Jarvenpaa EP, Zhang Z, Huopalahti R, King JW. Determination of fresh onion (Allium cepa L.) volatiles by solid phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch A. 1998; 207:39-43.
  • [34]Mazza G. Headspace sampling procedures for onion (Allium cepa L.) - aroma assessment. Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology. 1980; 13:87-96.
  • [35]Mochizuki E, Yamamoto T. Identification of Allium products using flame photometric detection Gas chromatography and distribution patterns of volatile sulfur compounds. J Agric Food Chem. 1998; 46:5170-5176.
  • [36]Ohta H, Osajima Y. Volatile components recovered from fresh onion (Allium cepa L.) with combination of ethyl ether extraction and new cold trap apparatus. J Fat Agr. 1992; 37:125-131.
  • [37]Whitfield FB. Volatiles from interactions of Maillard reactions and lipids. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1992; 31:1-58.
  • [38]Iranshahi M. A review of volatile sulfur-containing compounds from terrestrial plants: biosynthesis, distribution and analytical methods. J Essent Oil Res. 2012; 24:393-434.
  • [39]Arnold RG, Libbey LM, Lindsay RC. Volatile flavour compounds produced by heat degradation of thiamine (vitamin B1). J Agric Food Chem. 1969; 17:390-392.
  • [40]Kato S, Kurata T, Ishiguro S, Fujimaki M. Additional volatile compounds produced by pyrolysis of sulfur containing amino acids. Agric Biol Chem. 1973; 37:1759-1761.
  • [41]Mussinan CJ, Katz I. Isolation and identification of some sulfur chemicals present in two model systems approximating cooked meat. J Agric Food Chem. 1973; 21:43-45.
  • [42]Li C, Schmidt NE, Gitaitis R. Detection of onion postharvest diseases by analyses of headspace volatiles using a gas sensor array and GC-MS. Food Sci Technol. 2011; 44:1019-1025.
  • [43]Berger RG. Flavours and fragrances, chemistry, bioprocessing and sustainability. Springer, Berlin; 2007.
  • [44]Wang Y, Raghavan S, Ho CT. Process flavors of Allium vegetables. Fruit and vegetables flavour, recent advances and future prospects. Bruckner B, Wyllie SG, editors. Woodhead publishing, Cambridge; 2008.
  • [45]Baysal T, Demirdoven A. Lipoxygenase in fruits and vegetables: a review. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2006; 40:491-496.
  • [46]Ledl F. Untersuchung des rostzwiebelaromas. Z Lebensm Unters-Forsch. 1975; 157:229-234.
  • [47]Frankel EN. Lipid oxidation. rth ed. Woodhead publishing limited, Cambridge; 2005.
  • [48]Guillen MD, Goicoechea E. Formation of oxygenated a, b-unsaturated aldehydes and other toxic compounds in sunflower oil oxidation at room temperature in closed receptacles. Food Chem. 2008; 111:157-164.
  • [49]Taylor AJ. Flavour science : recent developments. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge; 1996.
  • [50]Chatzivasileiadis EA, Boon JJ, Sabelis MW. Accumulation and turnover of 2-tridecanone in Tetranychus urticae and its consequences for resistance of wild and cultivated tomatoes. Exp Appl Acarol. 1999; 23:1011-1021.
  • [51]Chatzivasileiadis EA, Sabelis MW. Toxicity of methyl ketones from tomato trichomes to Tetranychu urticae Koch. Exp Appl Acarol. 1997; 21:473-484.
  • [52]Fery RL, Kennedy GG. Genetic analysis of 2-tridecanone concentration, leaf tricome characteristics, and tobacco hornworm resistance in tomato. J Am Soc Hort Sci. 1987; 11:886-891.
  • [53]Jasoni R, Kane C, Green C, Peffley E, Tissue D, Thompson L, Payton P, Paré PW. Altered leaf and root emissions from onion (Allium cepa L.) grown under elevated CO 2 conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2004; 51:273-280.
  • [54]Forney FW, Markovetz AJ. Subterminal oxidation of aliphatic hydrocarbons. J Bacteriol. 1970; 102:281-282.
  • [55]Eskin NAM, Ho CT, Shahidi F, Eskin N. Browning reactions in foods. In: Biochemistry of foods. Academic press, San Diego; 2013: p.584.
  • [56]Leffingwell database. The Good Scents Company (tgsc) 1977 East Montana Avenue Oak Creek, WI, 53154 USA. http://www.leffingwell.com/odorthre.htm. Accessed Dec 2014.
  • [57]Wagner R, Grosch W. Key odorants of french fries. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1998;75:1385–92.
  • [58]Belitz HD, Grosch W, Schieberle P. Food chemistry. 4th ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin; 2009.
  • [59]Davidek J, Velisek J, Pokorny J. Development in food science: chemical changes during food processing. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam; 1990.
  • [60]Ho CT. Thermal generation of Maillard aromas. In: The Maillard reaction: consequences for the chemical and life sciences. Ikan R, editor. Wiley, New York; 1996: p.27-54.
  • [61]The good scent company database. Leffingwell & Associates Canton, Georgia, USA. http://www. thegoodscentscompany.com/ webcite
  • [62]Kubec R, Drhova V, Velısek J. Volatile compounds thermally generated from S-propylcysteine and S-propylcysteine sulfoxides - aroma precursors of Allium vegetables. J Agric Food Chem. 1999; 47:1132-1138.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:4次