期刊论文详细信息
BMC Veterinary Research
Comparison of Boer, Kiko, and Spanish meat goat does for stayability and cumulative reproductive output in the humid subtropical southeastern United States
Richard Browning1  Ashley N Pellerin1 
[1] Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Research, Tennessee State University, Nashville, USA
关键词: Reproduction;    Mortality;    Adult;    Lifetime performance;    Longevity;    Boer;    Meat goats;   
Others  :  1119751
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-6148-8-136
 received in 2012-02-03, accepted in 2012-07-24,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Longevity is the amount of time breeding females stay active in a herd by avoiding death or culling because of illness or reproductive failure. This is a trait of economic relevance in commercial small ruminant breeding herds as it affects lifetime reproductive output. The purpose of this study was to determine if breed of meat goat influences breeding doe survival rates and cumulative reproductive performance under semi-intensive management.

Results

Boer (n = 132), Kiko (n = 92) and Spanish (n = 79) does were evaluated for longevity trends and cumulative kid production. The herd was managed on humid subtropical pasture. Does had the chance to complete 2 to 6 production years. Survival curves were analyzed for 2 culling methods. The actual culling practice removed does after two failures to wean a kid. An alternative culling protocol removed doe records after the first failure to wean a kid. Kid production traits analyzed across herd life were the total number of kids weaned and cumulative kid weight weaned to the 2-, 3-, and 5-year stayability endpoints. Most (82%) doe exits were illness-related under the actual culling method. Reproductive failure represented 51% of doe exits under the alternative culling protocol. Boer does had greater survival declines (P < 0.01) from 2 to 6 years of herd life compared with Kiko and Spanish under both culling protocols. Boer does had lower stayability rates (P < 0.01) at each year endpoint for both culling protocols. Under the alternative protocol, over 50% of Boer does failed to complete 2 years, whereas over 50% of Kiko and Spanish does successfully completed 4 years. Boer does had lower (P < 0.01) total number of kids weaned and cumulative weight weaned through each stayability endpoint compared with Kiko and Spanish.

Conclusion

Boer does had low stayability and cumulative kid production rates compared with Kiko and Spanish does. Poor health was the primary driver of does exiting the herd. Kiko and Spanish does did not differ for longevity and lifetime performance indicators.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Pellerin and Browning; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150208114745344.pdf 410KB PDF download
Figure 2. 34KB Image download
Figure 1. 34KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Borg RC, Notter DR, Kott RW: Genetic analysis of ewe stayability and its association with lamb growth and adult production. J Anim Sci 2009, 87:3515-3524.
  • [2]Núñez-Dominguez R, Dickerson GE, Cundiff LV, Gregory KE, Koch RM: Economic evaluation of heterosis and culling policies for lifetime productivity in Hereford, Angus, Shorthorn, and crossbred cows. J Anim Sci 1992, 70:2328-2337.
  • [3]Rodriguez-Zas SL, Southey BR, Knox RV, Connor JF, Lowe JF, Roskamp BJ: (2003) Bioeconomic evaluation of sow longevity and profitability. J Anim Sci 2003, 81:2915-2922.
  • [4]Conington J, Bishop SC, Waterhouse A, Simm G: A bioeconomic approach to derive economic values for pasture-based sheep genetic improvement programs. J Anim Sci 2004, 82:1290-1304.
  • [5]Serradilla JM, Sanchez-Palma A, Micheo JM: Data Collection and Definition of Objectives in Sheep and Goat Breeding Programmes: New Prospects. In Preliminary analysis of the possibility of including longevity as a breeding goal of Malagueña goats. 33rd edition. Edited by Gabiña D, Bodin L. CIHEAM-IAMZ, Zaragoza Spain; 1997:207-219.
  • [6]Tomar SS, Arun K, Singh RB: Population analysis of a flock of Beetal goats for demographic parameters. J Anim Res 2000, 34:133-135.
  • [7]Pérez-Razo M, Sánchez F, Torres-Hernández G, Becerril-Pérez C, Gallegos-Sánchez J, González-Cosío F, Meza-Herrera C: Risk factors associated with dairy goat stayability. Livest Prod Sci 2004, 89:139-146.
  • [8]Jackson F, Varady M, Bartley DJ: Managing anthelmintic resistance in goats—Can we learn lessons from sheep? Small Rumin Res 2012, 103:3-9.
  • [9]Howell SB, Burke JM, Miller JE, Terrill TH, Valencia E, Williams MJ, Williamson LH, Zajac AM, Kaplan RM: Prevalence of anthelmintic resistance on sheep and goat farms in the southeastern United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008, 233:1913-1919.
  • [10]Lespine A, Chartier C, Hoste H, Alvinerie M: Endectocides in goats: Pharmacology, efficacy and use conditions in the context of anthelmintics resistance. Small Rumin Res 2012, 103:10-17.
  • [11]Anon:Goat Dewormers.http://www.extension.org/pages/19651/goat-dewormers Accessed June 14 2012
  • [12]Malan SW: The improved Boer goat. Small RuminRes 2000, 36:165-170.
  • [13]Glimp HA: Meat goat production and marketing. J Anim Sci 1995, 73:291-295.
  • [14]Batten GJ: Kiko: a new meat goat breed. Proceedings, 4th International Conference on Goats, Brasilia Brazil 1987, 2:1330-1336.
  • [15]Manyuchi B, Tawonezvi HPR, Chiwara RM: Breed and environmental influences on weaner lamb production in Zimbabwe. Trop Anim Health Prod 1991, 23:115-125.
  • [16]Nawaz M, Meyer HH, Thomas DR: Performance of Polypay, Coopworth, and crossbred ewes: II. Survival and cumulative lamb and wool production over 4 years. J Anim Sci 1992, 70:70-77.
  • [17]Annett RW, Carson AF, Dawson LER, Irwin D, Gordon AW, Kilpatrick DJ: Comparison of the longevity and lifetime performance of Scottish Blackface ewes and their crosses within hill sheep flocks. Animal 2011, 5:347-355.
  • [18]Browning J, Leite-Browning ML, Byars M: Reproductive and health traits among Boer, Kiko, and Spanish meat goat does under humid, subtropical pasture conditions of the southeastern United States. J Anim Sci 2011, 89:648-660.
  • [19]Browning R, Kebe SH, Byars M: Preliminary assessment of Boer and Kiko does as maternal lines for kid performance under humid, subtropical conditions. S Af J Anim Sci 2004, 34:1-3.
  • [20]Browning R, Leite-Browning ML: Birth to weaning kid traits from a complete diallel of Boer, Kiko, and Spanish meat goat breeds semi-intensively managed on humid subtropical pasture. J Anim Sci 2011, 89:2696-2707.
  • [21]Vatankhah M, Zamani F: Phenotypic and genetic characteristics of longevity in Lori-Bakhtiari sheep. Biotechnol Anim Husb 2007, 23:323-329.
  • [22]Norman LM, Hohenboken W: Genetic and environmental effects of internal parasite, foot soundness and attrition in crossbred ewes. J Anim Sci 1979, 48:1329-1337.
  • [23]Nugent RAIII, Jenkins TG: Effects of alternative lamb production systems, maternal line, and culling strategy on flock age structure. J Anim Sci 1992, 70:2285-2295.
  • [24]Hoste H, Torres-Acosta JFJ, Aguilar-Caballero AJ: Nutrition–parasite interactions in goats: is immunoregulation involved in the control of gastrointestinal nematodes? Parasite Immunol 2008, 30:79-88.
  • [25]Saoud NB, Hohenboken WD: Genetic, environmental and interaction effects on lifetime production efficiency of crossbred ewes. J Anim Sci 1984, 59:594-606.
  • [26]Valencia-Posadas M, Torrero-Garza Y, Vicencio-Reyes CV, Shepard L, Montaldo HH: Relaciones fenotípicas entre características de conformación con la habilidad de permanencia a los 36 meses en cabras Alpinas. Acta Universitaria (Guanajuato México) 2010, 20:40-44.
  • [27]Rohrer GA, Baker JF, Long CR, Cartwright TC: Productive longevity of first-cross cows produced in a five-breed diallel: I. Reasons for removal. J Anim Sci 1988, 66:2826-2835.
  • [28]Vesely JA, Peters HF: Lamb production from ewes of four breeds and their two-breed and three-breed crosses. Can J Anim Sci 1974, 54:543-549.
  • [29]Hohenboken W, Vavre M, Phillips R, McArthur JAB: The effects of age at first lambing on production and longevity of Columbia and Targhee ewes. Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin; 1977. No 138.
  • [30]Kern G, Kemper N, Traulsen I, Henze C, Stamer E, Krieter J: Analysis of different effects on longevity in four sheep breeds of northern Germany. Small Rumin Res 2010, 90:71-74.
  • [31]Wolfová M, Wolf J, Milerski M: Economic weights of production and functional traits for Merinolandschaf, Romney, Romanov and Sumavska sheep in the Czech Republic. Small Rumin Res 2011, 99:25-33.
  • [32]Qureshi MA, Nawaz M, Khan MA: Lifetime production of Kajli ewes at Khushab and Khizerabad: reproduction and lamb production as affected by ewe longevity. Australas J Anim Sci 1997, 10:408-415.
  • [33]McGregor BA: Incisor development, wear and loss in sheep and their impact on ewe production, longevity and economics: a review. Small Rumin Res 2011, 95:79-87.
  • [34]Iman NY, Slyter AL: Lifetime lamb and wool production of Targhee or Finn-Dorset-Targhee ewes managed as farm or range flock: II. Cumulative lamb and wool production. J Anim Sci 1996, 74:1765-1769.
  • [35]Ercanbrack SK, Knight AD: Lifetime production of ¼ and ½ Finnsheep ewes from Rambouillet, Targhee and Colombia dams as affected by natural attrition. J Anim Sci 1989, 67:3258-3265.
  • [36]Wilson RT: Reproductive performance of African indigenous small ruminants under various management systems: a review. Anim Reprod Sci 1989, 20:265-286.
  • [37]Nugent RAIII, Jenkins TG: Simulated effects of culling ewes for age and failure to conceive on biological efficiency of an annual lambing production system. J Anim Sci 1993, 71:310-320.
  • [38]Oishi K, Kahi AK, Nagura Y, Fujita M, Hirooka H: Effect of culling age of does on milk and meat production in Japanese-Saanen goats. Livest Sci 2008, 114:220-232.
  • [39]Campbell QP: The origin and description of southern Africa’s indigenous goats. S Afr J Anim Sci 2003, 4:18-22.
  • [40]Olivier JJ, Cloete SWP, Schoeman SJ, Muller CJC: Performance testing and recording in meat and dairy goats. Small Rumin Res 2005, 60:83-93.
  • [41]Rauw WM, Kanis E, Noordhuizen-Stassen EN, Grommers FJ: Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: A review. Lives Prod Sci 1998, 56:15-33.
  • [42]Van der Waaij EH: A resource allocation model describing consequences of artificial selection under metabolic stress. J Anim Sci 2004, 82:973-981.
  • [43]Erasmus JA: Adaptation to various environments and resistance to disease of the Improved Boer goat. Small Rumin Res 2000, 36:179-187.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:16次 浏览次数:8次