Folk taxonomy and use of mushrooms in communities around Ngorongoro and Serengeti National Park, Tanzania

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

Donatha Damian Tibuhwa¹ 

[1] Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Dar es Salaam, P.O. Box 35179, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

关键词: Serengeti national park;    Tonic;    Maasai;    Kurya;    Ethnomycology;   

Others  :  862755
DOI  :  10.1186/1746-4269-8-36

 received in 2012-03-30, accepted in 2012-09-18,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Maasai and Kurya form two main communities around the Serengeti National Park in Tanzania which are mainly pastoralists. Changing climate to excessive drought, have recently forced them to start practicing subsistence farming which is severely affected by wild animals. This study explored status of the folk taxonomy and uses of mushrooms in the two communities as a pave way for possibilities of introducing mushroom cultivation, an alternative crop which is hardly affected by wild animals.

Methods

Folk taxonomy and use mushrooms by the Kurya and Maasai communities were investigated. Information was collected by face to face interviews with 150 individuals in 6 selected villages. Using descriptive statistics by Statistic Package for the Social Science (SPSS) version 17.0, the demographic characteristics of informants were evaluated and cross relationships with the recorded data were analysed.

Results

Kurya are mycophilic with 94% of the informants recognizing utilization of the wild mushroom either as foodstuff or as tonics while the Maasai are mycophobic with 99% being unaware of the edibility of mushroom although 28% recognized mushrooms as tonic. For both communities, the knowledge of mushroom utilization and folk taxonomy increased with age of the informants, while it decreases with formal education level of the informants which imply that the basis of knowledge is mainly traditional. Comparing the two communities, the Maasai use mushrooms only for medicinal purposes and never sought them for food while the Kurya were well knowledgeable on the edibility and folk classification especially the Termitomyces species. Characters used in folkal taxonomy included color and size of the basidiomata, shape and size of the pseudorrhiza, habitats and edibility information. A new use of ascospores whereby they anaesthaesia bees during honey harvesting was discovered, and mushroom cultivation was widely welcomed (94.7%) as an alternative crop which is rarely affected by wild animals.

Conclusion

In order to salvage a noted tremendous decrease of knowledge in mushroom utilization and folk taxonomy from vanishing, there is a need to document it throughout, and incorporate it in lower levels of our education system. Mushroom cultivation may possibly be the best alternative crop for the two communities thus should be advocated for improving livelihood and reduce human wildlife conflicts. The new recorded use of ascospores to anaesthaesia the bees during honey harvesting should be exploited and scaled up for sustainable integrated bee keeping and mushroom farming.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Tibuhwa; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Ruán-Soto F, Garibay-Orije R, Cifuentes J: Process and dynamics of traditional selling wild edible mushrooms in tropical. J Ethonobiology Ethnomedicine 2006, 2:1-13. BioMed Central Full Text
• [2]Cardoso DBOS, Queiroz LP, Bandeira FP, Góes-Neto A: Correlations between indigenous brazilian folk classifications of fungi and their systematics. J Ethnobiol 2010, 30:255-267.
• [3]Härkönen M, Niemelä T, Mwasumbi L: Edible Mushrooms of Tanzania. Karstenia; 1995:92p.
• [4]Zent EL, Zent S, Iturriaga T: Knowledge and use of fungi by a mycophilic society of the Venezuelan Amazon. Econ Bot 2004, 58:214-226.
• [5]Härkönen M: An ethnomycological approach to Tanzanian species of Amanita. Acta Universitas Uppsala Symb Bot Ups 1995, 30:145-151.
• [6]Tibuhwa DD: Substrate specificity and phenology of macrofungi community at the University of Dar es Salaam Main Campus, Tanzania. J Appl Biol Sci 2011, 46:3173-3184.
• [7]Härkönen M, Saarimäki T, Mwasumbi L: Tanzanian mushrooms and their uses. Some reddish edible and poisonous Amanita species. Karstenia 1994, 34:47-60.
• [8]Walshaw SC: Tanzanian mushrooms. edible, harmful and other fungi. Econ Bot 2004, 58:487-487.
• [9]Tibuhwa DD, Nyawira M, Masiga CW, Mugoya C, Muchai M: An inventory of macro-fungi and their diversity in the serengeti-masai mara ecosystem, Tanzania and Kenya. J Biol Sci 2011, 11:399-410.
• [10]Kivaisi AK (Ed): Uujue uyoga na namna ya kulima aina mbalimbali kwa kutumia tekinolojia rahisi. Published by Dar es Salaam University Press; 2009:59p. ISBN 978-9976-60-488-2.2
• [11]Herlocker D: Woody vegetation of the Serengeti National Park College Station. Texas A & M University 1976, 408p.
• [12]Arora D: Mushrooms demystified: A comprehensive guide to the fleshy fungi. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press; 1986:959p.
• [13]Härkönen M: Edible, harmful and other fungi. Norrlinia 2003, 200p.
• [14]Lodge JD, Ammirati FJ, O”Dell ET, Mueller MJ: Collecting and describing macrofungi. In Biodiversity of Fungi: Inventory and Monitoring Methods. Edited by Mueller MG, Bills FG, Foster SM. Elsevier Academic Press; 2004:128-158.
• [15]Han Van D, Onguene AN, Kuyper TW: Knowledge and utilization of edible mushrooms by local populations of the rain forest of South Cameroon. Ambio 2003, 32:19-23.
• [16]Yongabi K, Agho M, Martínes-Carrera D: Ethnomycological studies on wild mushroom in Cameroon Central Africa. Micologia aplicada Internacional 2004, 16:34-36.
• [17]Buyck B, Nzigidahera B: Ethnomycological notes from western Burundi. Belg J Bot 1995, 128:131-138.
• [18]Oso BA: Mushrooms and the Yoruba people of Nigeria. Mycologia 1975, 67:311-319.
• [19]Piearce G: Zambian mushrooms culture and folklore. Bull Br Mycol Soc 1981, 15:139-142.
• [20]Prance GT: The use of edible fungi by amazonian indians. Adv Econ Bot 1984, 1:127-139.
• [21]Mapes C, Bandeira FP, Caballero J, Goes-Neto A: Mycophobic or Mycophilic? a comparative Etnomycological study between Amazonia and Mesoamerica. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Ethnobiology: 23–27. Edited by Stepp JR, Wyndham FS, Zarger RK. Athens: University of Georgia Press; 2002:180-188.
• [22]Goes-Neto A, Bandeira FP: A review of the Ethnomycology of indigenous people in Brazil and its relevance to ethnomycological investigation in Latin America. Revista Mexicana de Micología 2003, 17:11-16.
• [23]Bulmer R, Tyler M: Karam classification of frogs. J Polynesian Soc Sci 1968, 77:333-385.
• [24]Berlin B: Speculations on the growth of ethnobotanical nomenclature. Lang Soc 1972, 1:51-86.
• [25]Berlin B, Breedlove DE, Raven PH: General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. Am Anthropol 1973, 75:214-242.