Randomized controlled trial comparing telephone and mail follow-up for recruitment of participants into a clinical trial of colorectal cancer screening

Trials

John J You³  Parag Vora²  Paul Moayyedi¹  Gordon H Guyatt³  John Kirby²  Arthur D Wong¹ 

[1] Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

关键词: Colorectal cancer screening;    Mail;    Telephone;    Recruitment;    Randomized controlled trial;   

Others  :  1094799
DOI  :  10.1186/1745-6215-14-40

 received in 2012-08-06, accepted in 2013-01-30,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Investigators often face challenges when recruiting participants into randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Some data suggest that telephone reminders may lead to greater participant enrollment.

Methods

Patients aged 50 to 70 years from family practice rosters were initially mailed invitations to participate in an RCT of colorectal cancer screening. Patients who did not respond were randomly allocated to follow-up invitations by either telephone or mail four weeks after the initial invitation. The primary outcome was attendance for eligibility screening with the study nurse.

Results

After mailing invitations to 1,348 patients, 104 patients were initially enrolled in the RCT of colon cancer screening. Of 952 patients who did not respond to the initial mailed invitation, we randomly allocated 480 to follow-up invitation by telephone and 472 to follow-up invitation by mail. Attendance for eligibility screening with the study nurse was more frequent when non-responders were followed-up by telephone (84/480, 17.5%) than by mail (43/472, 9.1%) (relative risk (RR) 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36 to 2.71, P < 0.001). Enrollment into the RCT was also greater among patients followed-up by telephone (59/480, 12.3%) compared to those followed-up by mail (35/472, 7.4%) (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.47, P=0.01).

Conclusions

Telephone-based follow-up results in greater enrollment compared to a mail-based method. Our findings should be of interest to investigators conducting RCTs, particularly trials of screening interventions involving asymptomatic participants for which volunteer participation may be challenging.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00865527

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Wong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Swanson GM, Ward AJ: Recruiting minorities into clinical trials: toward a participant-friendly system. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995, 87(23):1747-1759.
• [2]Walson PD: Patient recruitment: US perspective. Pediatrics 1999, 104(3 Pt2):619-622.
• [3]Easterbrook PJ, Matthews DR: Fate of research studies. J R Soc Med 1992, 85(2):71-76.
• [4]Caldwell PHY, Hamilton S, Tan A, Craig JC: Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review. PLoS Med 2010, 7(11):e1000368.
• [5]Treweek S, Mitchell E, Pitkethly M, Cook J, Kjeldstrøm M, Taskila T, Johansen M, Sullivan F, Wilson S, Jackson C, Jones R: Strategies to improve recruitment to randomized controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010, 1:MR000013.
• [6]Simpson NK, Johnson CC, Ogden SL, Gamito E, Trocky N, McGuire C, Martin J, Barrow S, Lamerato L, Flickinger LM, Broski KG, Engelhard D, Hilke C, Bonk J, Gahagan B, Gren LH, Childs J, Lappe K, Fouad M, Thompson J, Sullivan D: Recruitment strategies in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: the first six years. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005, 97(13):989-997.
• [7]Nystuen P, Hagen KB: Telephone reminders are effective in recruiting non-responding patients to randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2004, 57(8):773-776.
• [8]Harris TJ, Carey IM, Victor CR, Adams R, Cook DG: Optimizing recruitment into a study of physical activity in older people; a randomized controlled trial of different approaches. Age Ageing 2008, 37(6):659-665.
• [9]McAuley RG, Lusk S: Mammography screening by family physicians. CMAJ 1989, 141(8):765-767.
• [10]McAuley RG, Rand C, McPhail T: Recruitment to mammography screening. CMAJ 1992, 146(9):1531-1532.
• [11]McAuley RG, Rand C, Levine M: Recruiting women for breast screening. Family Physician Model strategy. Can Fam Physician 1997, 43:883-888.