Differential expression of histone H3 genes and selective association of the variant H3.7 with a specific sequence class in Stylonychia macronuclear development

Epigenetics & Chromatin

Jan Postberg¹  Hans J Lipps²  Franziska Jönsson²  Aneta Bulic²  Sakeh Forcob² 

[1] Helios Medical Centre Wuppertal, Paediatrics Centre, Witten/Herdecke University, Wuppertal, Germany;Institute of Cell Biology, ZBAF, Centre for Biomedical Education and Research, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany

关键词: ncRNA;    Piwi;    Sexual reproduction;    Micronucleus;    Macronucleus;    Ciliates;    Chromatin;    H3;    Histone variants;   

Others  :  813494
DOI  :  10.1186/1756-8935-7-4

 received in 2013-12-18, accepted in 2014-01-24,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Regulation of chromatin structure involves deposition of selective histone variants into nucleosome arrays. Numerous histone H3 variants become differentially expressed by individual nanochromosomes in the course of macronuclear differentiation in the spirotrichous ciliate Stylonychia lemnae. Their biological relevance remains to be elucidated.

Results

We show that the differential assembly of H3 variants into chromatin is strongly correlated with the functional separation of chromatin structures in developing macronuclei during sexual reproduction in Stylonychia, thus probably determining the fate of specific sequences. Specific H3 variants approximately 15 kDa or 20 kDa in length are selectively targeted by post-translational modifications. We found that only the 15 kDa H3 variants including H3.3 and H3.5, accumulate in the early developing macronucleus, and these also occur in mature macronuclei. H3.7 is a 20 kDa variant that specifically becomes enriched in macronuclear anlagen during chromosome polytenization. H3.7, acetylated at lysine-32 (probably equivalent to lysine-36 of most H3 variants), is specifically associated with a sequence class that is retained in the mature macronucleus and therefore does not undergo developmental DNA elimination. H3.8 is another 20 kDa variant that is restricted to the micronucleus. H3.8 is selectively targeted by lysine methylation and by serine or threonine phosphorylation. Intriguingly, the expression and chromatin localization of the histone variant H3.3 was impaired during macronuclear differentiation after RNA interference knock-down of Piwi expression.

Conclusions

Differential deposition of H3 variants into chromatin strongly correlates with the functional distinction of genomic sequence classes on the chromatin level, thus helping to determine the fate of specific DNA sequences during sexual reproduction in Stylonychia. Consequently, H3 variants are selectively targeted by post-translational modifications, possibly as a result of deviations within the recognition motifs, which allow binding of effector proteins. We propose that differential assembly of histone variants into chromatin of various nuclear types could contribute to nuclear identity, for example, during differential development of either new micronuclei or a macronuclear anlage from mitosis products of the zygote nucleus (synkaryon). The observation that the Piwi-non-coding RNA (ncRNA) pathway influences the expression and deposition of H3.3 in macronuclear anlagen indicates for the first time that selective histone variant assembly into chromatin might possibly depend on ncRNA.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Forcob et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Bogdanovic O, Veenstra GJ: DNA methylation and methyl-CpG binding proteins: developmental requirements and function. Chromosoma 2009, 118(5):549-565.
• [2]Suzuki MM, Bird A: DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet 2008, 9(6):465-476.
• [3]Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T: Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res 2011, 21(3):381-395.
• [4]Kouzarides T: Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 2007, 128(4):693-705.
• [5]Loyola A, Almouzni G: Marking histone H3 variants: how, when and why? Trends Biochem Sci 2007, 32(9):425-433.
• [6]Hake SB, Allis CD: Histone H3 variants and their potential role in indexing mammalian genomes: the “H3 barcode hypothesis”. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103(17):6428-6435.
• [7]Ahmad K, Henikoff S: The histone variant H3.3 marks active chromatin by replication-independent nucleosome assembly. Mol Cell 2002, 9(6):1191-1200.
• [8]Banaszynski LA, Allis CD, Lewis PW: Histone variants in metazoan development. Dev Cell 2010, 19(5):662-674.
• [9]Loppin B, Bonnefoy E, Anselme C, Laurencon A, Karr TL, Couble P: The histone H3.3 chaperone HIRA is essential for chromatin assembly in the male pronucleus. Nature 2005, 437(7063):1386-1390.
• [10]Szenker E, Ray-Gallet D, Almouzni G: The double face of the histone variant H3.3. Cell Res 2011, 21(3):421-434.
• [11]van der Heijden GW, Dieker JW, Derijck AA, Muller S, Berden JH, Braat DD, van der Vlag J, de Boer P: Asymmetry in histone H3 variants and lysine methylation between paternal and maternal chromatin of the early mouse zygote. Mech Dev 2005, 122(9):1008-1022.
• [12]Postberg J, Forcob S, Chang WJ, Lipps HJ: The evolutionary history of histone H3 suggests a deep eukaryotic root of chromatin modifying mechanisms. BMC Evol Biol 2010, 10:259. BioMed Central Full Text
• [13]Cui B, Liu Y, Gorovsky MA: Deposition and function of histone H3 variants in Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol Cell Biol 2006, 26(20):7719-7730.
• [14]Jahn CL, Ling Z, Tebeau CM, Klobutcher LA: An unusual histone H3 specific for early macronuclear development in Euplotes crassus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997, 94(4):1332-1337.
• [15]Bernhard D: Several highly divergent histone H3 genes are present in the hypotrichous ciliate Stylonychia lemnae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999, 175(1):45-50.
• [16]Postberg J, Heyse K, Cremer M, Cremer T, Lipps HJ: Spatial and temporal plasticity of chromatin during programmed DNA-reorganization in Stylonychia macronuclear development. Epigenetics Chromatin 2008, 1(1):3. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Prescott DM: Evolution of DNA organization in hypotrichous ciliates. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999, 870:301-313.
• [18]Ammermann D, Steinbruck G, Berger LV, Hennig W: The development of the macronucleus in the ciliated protozoan Stylonychia mytilus. Chromosoma 1974, 45(4):401-429.
• [19]Prescott DM: The DNA of ciliated protozoa. Microbiol Rev 1994, 58(2):233-267.
• [20]Fetzer CP, Hogan DJ, Lipps HJ: A PIWI homolog is one of the proteins expressed exclusively during macronuclear development in the ciliate Stylonychia lemnae. Nucleic Acids Res 2002, 30(20):4380-4386.
• [21]Paschka AG, Horejschi V, Jonsson F, Lindecke A, Weier G, Kaltschmidt C, Lipps HJ: A microarray analysis of developmentally regulated genes during macronuclear differentiation in the stichotrichous ciliate Stylonychia lemnae. Gene 2005, 359:81-90.
• [22]Chalker DL, Yao MC: Nongenic, bidirectional transcription precedes and may promote developmental DNA deletion in Tetrahymena thermophila. Genes Dev 2001, 15(10):1287-1298.
• [23]Fang W, Wang X, Bracht JR, Nowacki M, Landweber LF: Piwi-interacting RNAs protect DNA against loss during Oxytricha genome rearrangement. Cell 2012, 151(6):1243-1255.
• [24]Zahler AM, Neeb ZT, Lin A, Katzman S: Mating of the stichotrichous ciliate Oxytricha trifallax induces production of a class of 27 nt small RNAs derived from the parental macronucleus. PLoS One 2012, 7(8):e42371.
• [25]Juranek SA, Rupprecht S, Postberg J, Lipps HJ: snRNA and heterochromatin formation are involved in DNA excision during macronuclear development in stichotrichous ciliates. Eukaryot Cell 2005, 4(11):1934-1941.
• [26]Mochizuki K: RNA-directed epigenetic regulation of DNA rearrangements. Essays Biochem 2010, 48(1):89-100.
• [27]Curtis EA, Landweber LF: Evolution of gene scrambling in ciliate micronuclear genes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999, 870:349-350.
• [28]Valdar WS: Scoring residue conservation. Proteins 2002, 48(2):227-241.
• [29]Ray-Gallet D, Almouzni G: Nucleosome dynamics and histone variants. Essays Biochem 2010, 48(1):75-87.
• [30]Schlegel M, Muller S, Ruder F, Büsen W: Transcriptionally inactive micronuclei, macronuclear anlagen and transcriptionally active macronuclei differ in histone composition in the hypotrichous ciliate Stylonychia lemnae. Chromosoma 1990, 99:401-406.
• [31]Daujat S, Weiss T, Mohn F, Lange UC, Ziegler-Birling C, Zeissler U, Lappe M, Schubeler D, Torres-Padilla ME, Schneider R: H3K64 trimethylation marks heterochromatin and is dynamically remodeled during developmental reprogramming. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009, 16(7):777-781.
• [32]Eriksson PR, Ganguli D, Nagarajavel V, Clark DJ: Regulation of histone gene expression in budding yeast. Genetics 2012, 191(1):7-20.
• [33]Talbert PB, Ahmad K, Almouzni G, Ausio J, Berger F, Bhalla PL, Bonner WM, Cande WZ, Chadwick BP, Chan SW, et al.: A unified phylogeny-based nomenclature for histone variants. Epigenetics Chromatin 2012, 5:7. BioMed Central Full Text
• [34]Paschka AG, Jönsson F, Maier V, Möllenbeck M, Paeschke K, Postberg J, Rupprecht S, Lipps HJ: The use of RNAi to analyze gene function in spirotrichous ciliates. Eur J Protistol 2003, 39(4):449-454.
• [35]Bulic A, Postberg J, Fischer A, Jonsson F, Reuter G, Lipps HJ: A permissive chromatin structure is adopted prior to site-specific DNA demethylation of developmentally expressed genes involved in macronuclear differentiation. Epigenetics Chromatin 2013, 6(1):5. BioMed Central Full Text
• [36]Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011, 28(10):2731-2739.