期刊论文详细信息
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
A confirmatory bifactor analysis of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in an Italian community sample
Massimo Costantini1  Marco Lauriola2  Luca Iani3 
[1] Palliative Care Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy;Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, University of Rome ‘Sapienza’, Rome, Italy;Department of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, Rome, Italy
关键词: Bifactor model;    Confirmatory factor analysis;    Hospital anxiety and depression scale;    Validity;    Measurement;   
Others  :  814696
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7525-12-84
 received in 2014-04-10, accepted in 2014-05-16,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a widely used self-report measure to assess emotional distress in clinical populations. As highlighted in recent review studies, the latent structure of the HADS is still an issue. The aim of this study was to analyze the factorial structure of the HADS in a large community sample in Italy, and to test the invariance of the best fitting model across age and gender groups.

Methods

Data analyses were carried out on a sample of 1.599 participants proportionally stratified according to the Italian census population pyramid. Participants aged 18 to 85 years (females = 51.8%), living in eight different regions of Italy, voluntarily participated in the study. The survey questionnaire contained the HADS, Health Status questions, and sociodemographic variables.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a bifactor model, with a general psychological distress factor and two orthogonal group factors with anxiety and depression, was the best fitting one compared to six alternative factor structures reported in the literature, with overall good fit indices [Non-normed Fit Index (NNFI) = .97; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = .98; Root Mean-Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = .04]. Multi-group analyses supported total invariance of the HADS measurement model for males and females, and for younger (i.e., 18–44 years old) and older (i.e., 45–85 years old) participants. Our descriptive analyses showed that females reported significant higher anxiety and general distress mean scores than males. Moreover, older participants reported significant higher HADS, anxiety and depression scores than younger participants.

Conclusions

The results of the present study confirmed that the HADS has good psychometric properties in an Italian community sample, and that the HADS scores, especially the general psychological distress one, can be reliably used for assessing age and gender differences. In keeping with the most recent factorial studies, our analysis supported the superior fit of a bifactor model. However, the high factor loadings on the general factor also recommend caution in the use of the two subscales as independent measures.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Iani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140710043725367.pdf 421KB PDF download
Figure 1. 42KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Zigmond AS, Snaith RP: The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983, 67:361-370.
  • [2]Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D: The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002, 52:69-77.
  • [3]Brennan C, Worrall-Davies A, McMillan D, Gilbody S, House A: The hospital anxiety and depression scale: a diagnostic meta-analysis of case-finding ability. J Psychosom Res 2010, 69:371-378.
  • [4]Luckett T, Butow PN, King MT, Oguchi M, Heading G, Hackl NA, Rankin N, Price MA: A review and recommendations for optimal outcome measures of anxiety, depression and general distress in studies evaluating psychosocial interventions for English-speaking adults with heterogeneous cancer diagnoses. Support Care Cancer 2010, 18:1241-1262.
  • [5]Herrmann C: International experiences with the hospital anxiety and depression scale: a review of validation data and clinical results. J Psychosom Res 1997, 42:17-41.
  • [6]Cosco TD, Doyle F, Ward M, McGee H: Latent structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale: a 10-year systematic review. J Psychosom Res 2012, 72:180-184.
  • [7]Dunbar M, Ford G, Hunt K, Der G: A confirmatory factor analysis of the hospital anxiety and depression scale: comparing empirically and theoretically derived structures. Br J Clin Psychol 2000, 39:79-94.
  • [8]Martin CR, Tweed AE, Metcalfe MS: A psychometric evaluation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients diagnosed with end‒stage renal disease. Br J Clin Psychol 2004, 43:51-64.
  • [9]McCue P, Martin CR, Buchanan T, Rodgers J, Scholey AB: An investigation into the psychometric properties of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychol Health Med 2003, 8:425-439.
  • [10]Friedman S, Samuelian JC, Lancrenon S, Even C, Chiarelli P: Three-dimensional structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in a large French primary care population suffering from major depression. Psychiatry Res 2001, 104:247-257.
  • [11]Martin CR, Newell RJ: Factor structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in individuals with facial disfigurement. Psychol Health Med 2004, 9:327-336.
  • [12]Martin CR, Thompson DR, Barth J: Factor structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in coronary heart disease patients in three countries. J Eval Clin Pract 2008, 14:281-287.
  • [13]Caci H, Baylé FJ, Mattei V, Dossios C, Robert P, Boyer P: How does the hospital and anxiety and depression scale measure anxiety and depression in healthy subjects? Psychiatry Res 2003, 118:89-99.
  • [14]Jomeen J, Martin CR: Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) a reliable screening tool in early pregnancy? Psychol Health 2004, 19:787-800.
  • [15]Hunt‒Shanks T, Blanchard C, Reid R, Fortier M, Cappelli M: A psychometric evaluation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in cardiac patients: addressing factor structure and gender invariance. Br J Health Psychol 2010, 15:97-114.
  • [16]Matsudaira T, Igarashi H, Kikuchi H, Kano R, Mitoma H, Ohuchi K, Kitamura T: Factor structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in Japanese psychiatric outpatient and student populations. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009, 7:42. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [17]Pallant JF, Bailey CM: Assessment of the structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in musculoskeletal patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005, 3:82. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [18]Annunziata MA, Muzzatti B, Altoè G: Defining hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) structure by confirmatory factor analysis: a contribution to validation for oncological settings. Ann Oncol 2011, 22:2330-2333.
  • [19]Gale CR, Allerhand M, Sayer AA, Cooper C, Dennison EM, Starr JM, Ben-Shlomo Y, Gallacher JE, Kuh D, Deary IJ: The structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in four cohorts of community-based, healthy older people: the HALCyon program. Int Psychogeriatr 2010, 22:559-571.
  • [20]Chan YF, Leung DYP, Fong DYT, Leung CM, Lee AM: Psychometric evaluation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in a large community sample of adolescents in Hong Kong. Qual Life Res 2010, 19:865-873.
  • [21]Moorey S, Greer S, Watson M, Gorman C, Rowden L, Tunmore , Robertson B, Bliss J: The factor structure and factor stability of the hospital anxiety and depression Scale in patients with cancer. Br J Psychiatry 1991, 158:255-259.
  • [22]Martin CR, Bonner A, Brook A, Luscombe C: Factor structure and use of the hospital anxiety and depression Scale in the homeless and socially marginalized. Psychol Health Med 2006, 11:190-197.
  • [23]Norton S, Cosco TD, Doyle F, Done J, Sacker A: The hospital anxiety and depression scale: a meta confirmatory factor analysis. J Psychosom Res 2013, 74:74-81.
  • [24]Luciano JV, Barrada JR, Aguado J, Osma J, García-Campayo J: Bifactor analysis and construct validity of the HADS: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study in fibromyalgia patients. Psychol Assessaccepted for publication, in press
  • [25]Xie J, Bi Q, Shang W, Yan M, Yang Y, Miao D, Zhang H: Positive and negative relationship between anxiety and depression of patients in pain: a bifactor model analysis. PLoS One 2012, 7:e47577.
  • [26]Hinz A, Finck C, Gomez Y, Daig I, Glaesmer H, Singer S: Anxiety and depression in the general population in Colombia: reference values of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2014, 49:41-49.
  • [27]Iani L, Lauriola M, Layous K, Sirigatti S: Happiness in Italy: translation, factorial structure and norming of the subjective happiness scale in a large community sample. Soc Indic Resaccepted for publication, in press
  • [28]Costantini M, Musso M, Viterbori P, Bonci F, Del Mastro L, Garrone O, Venturini M, Morasso G: Detecting psychological in cancer patients: validity of the Italian version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Support Care Cancer 1999, 7:121-127.
  • [29]ISTAT: Indagine Statistica Multiscopo sulle Famiglie. Aspetti della vita quotidiana 2010. http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/4630 webcite
  • [30]ISTAT: Poverty in Italy. http://www.istat.it/en/archive/33543 webcite
  • [31]Razavi D, Delvaux N, Farvacques C, Robaye E: Screening for adjustment disorders and major depressive disorders in cancer in-patients. Br J Psychiatry 1990, 156:79-83.
  • [32]Bentler PM: EQS 6: Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino: Multivariate Software, Inc; 2005.
  • [33]Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR: Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods 2008, 6:53-60.
  • [34]Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H: Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online 2003, 8:23-74.
  • [35]Wild B, Herzog W, Schellberg D, Lechner S, Niehoff D, Brenner H, Rothenbacher D, Stegmaier C, Raum E: Association between the prevalence of depression and age in a large representative German sample of people aged 53 to 80 years. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012, 27:375-381.
  • [36]Crawford JR, Henry JD, Crombie C, Taylor EP: Normative data for the HADS from a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2001, 40:429-434.
  • [37]Hinz A, Brähler E: Normative values for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in the general German population. J Psychosom Res 2011, 71:74-78.
  • [38]Lisspers J, Nygren A, Söderman E: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD): some psychometric data for a Swedish sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1997, 96:281-286.
  • [39]Thompson B: Exploratory And Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts And Applications. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association; 2004.
  • [40]Byers AL, Yaffe K, Covinsky KE, Friedman MB, Bruce ML: High occurrence of mood and anxiety disorders among older adults: the national comorbidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010, 67:489-496.
  • [41]Garber J, Weersing VR: Comorbidity of anxiety and depression in youth: implications for treatment and prevention. Clin Psychol 2010, 17:293-306.
  • [42]Cheung GW, Rensvold RB: Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling 2002, 9:233-255.
  • [43]Stordal E, Bjartveit Krüger M, Dahl NH, Krüger Ø, Mykletun A, Dahl AA: Depression in relation to age and gender in the general population: the Nord‒Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT). Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001, 104:210-216.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:10次 浏览次数:30次