Implementation of personalized self-management support using the self-management screening questionnaire SeMaS; a study protocol for a cluster randomized trial

Trials

Annelies E Jacobs²  Ivo Smeele¹  Michel Wensing²  Jan van Lieshout²  Nathalie Eikelenboom¹ 

[1] DOH care group, P.O. Box 704, Eindhoven 5600, AS, The Netherlands;Radboud University Medical Centre, IQ healthcare, P.O. Box 9101, 114 6500 Nijmegen, HB, The Netherlands

关键词: Personalized medicine;    Chronic care;    Primary care;    Chronic diseases;    Personalization;    Self-management support;    Self-management;   

Others  :  1092891
DOI  :  10.1186/1745-6215-14-336

 received in 2013-05-24, accepted in 2013-10-02,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

The number of patients with one or more chronic diseases is rising. In several standards of care there is a focus on enhancing self-management. We applied the concept of personalization on self-management support and developed a self-management screening questionnaire (SeMaS). The main research objective is to assess the effectiveness of the SeMaS questionnaire and subsequent personalized self-management on patients’ self-management behaviors.

Methods/Design

A cluster randomized controlled trial will be set up in 15 general practices in the Netherlands. The practices are all group practices, and member of one care group. The practices will be assigned to the control or intervention arms by stratified randomization. The strata are determined by the participation of the practice nurses in a course for behavioral change, and the nurse’s workload. Patients can be included if they are over 18 years of age, have at least one chronic condition and have a checkup appointment with the practice nurse in the inclusion period. The intervention consists of screening patients with the SeMaS questionnaire, producing a graphic profile with the abilities or barriers for self-management. Patients will receive tailored feedback. Practice nurses are trained in using the profile to enhance self-management of the patient and provide personalized self-management support. The use of individual care plans and self-management interventions is stimulated. In the control arm patients will receive care as usual. Patients of both trial arms will be asked to fill in the SeMaS questionnaire and additional questionnaires at inclusion and after 6 months. The primary outcome is the difference in the level of patient activation (PAM-13) between baseline and 6 months. Secondary outcomes include patient measures for lifestyle factors (exercise, diet, smoking), and process measures from medical record data analysis.

Discussion

This manuscript presents the protocol for a cluster randomized clinical trial of personalized self-management support using the SeMaS questionnaire in chronically ill patients in primary care. By carrying out this study, scientific evidence is built for the effectiveness of personalized self-management support.

Trial registration

The Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR3960.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Eikelenboom et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Bodenheimer T, Chen E, Bennett HD: Confronting the growing burden of chronic disease: can the U.S. Health care workforce do the job? Health Aff (Millwood) 2009, 28:64-74.
• [2]Hoeymans N, Schellevis F, Wolters I: Hoeveel mensen hebben één of meer chronische ziekten?. RIVM: Bilthoven; 2008.
• [3]Tacken MA, Opstelten W, Vossen I, Smeele IJ, Calsbeek H, Jacobs JE, Braspenning JC: Increased multimorbidity in patients in general practice in the period 2003–2009. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2011, 155:A3109.
• [4]Nederlandse Diabetes Federatie: Transparantie en kwaliteit van diabeteszorg voor mensen met diabetes type 2. Amersfoort: NDF: NDF zorgstandaard; 2007.
• [5]Funnell MM, Brown TL, Childs BP, Haas LB, Hosey GM, Jensen B, Maryniuk M, Peyrot M, Piette JD, Reader D, Siminerio LM, Weinger K, Weiss MA: National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care 2012, 35(Suppl 1):S101-S108.
• [6]American Diabetes A: Standards of medical care in diabetes–2012. Diabetes Care 2012, 35(Suppl 1):S11-S63.
• [7]Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von-Korff M: Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q 1996, 74:511-544.
• [8]Department of health: Self care - a real choice: self care support - a practical option. London: Department of Health; 2005.
• [9]Heinrich E, Schaper NC, De-Vries NK: Development of the web-based type 2 diabetes education programme: DIEP. Eur Diabet Nurs 2009, 6:51-56.
• [10]Thoolen B, De-Ridder D, Bensing J, Gorter K, Rutten G: Beyond good intentions: the development and evaluation of a proactive self-management course for patients recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Health Educ Res 2008, 23:53-61.
• [11]Bischoff EW, Akkermans R, Bourbeau J, Van-Weel C, Vercoulen JH, Schermer TR: Comprehensive self management and routine monitoring in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in general practice: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2012, 345:e7642.
• [12]Benzo R, Vickers K, Ernst D, Tucker S, McEvoy C, Lorig K: Development and feasibility of a self-management intervention for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease delivered with motivational interviewing strategies. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2013, 33:113-123.
• [13]Effing T, Monninkhof EM, van der-Valk PD, van der-Palen J, Van-Herwaarden CL, Partidge MR, Walters EH, Zielhuis GA, Effing T, Monninkhof EM, van der-Valk PD, van der-Palen J, Van-Herwaarden CL, Partidge MR, Walters EH, Zielhuis GA: Self-management education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007., 4CD002990
• [14]van der-Meer V, Bakker MJ, van den-Hout WB, Rabe KF, Sterk PJ, Kievit J, Assendelft WJ, Sont JK, SS Group: Internet-based self-management plus education compared with usual care in asthma: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151:110-120.
• [15]Orrow G, Kinmonth AL, Sanderson S, Sutton S: Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2012, 344:e1389.
• [16]Lu Z, Cao S, Chai Y, Liang Y, Bachmann M, Suhrcke M, Song F: Effectiveness of interventions for hypertension care in the community–a meta-analysis of controlled studies in china. BMC Health Serv Res 2012, 12:216. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Solomon M, Wagner SL, Goes J: Effects of a Web-based intervention for adults with chronic conditions on patient activation: online randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2012, 14:e32.
• [18]Thoolen B, De-Ridder D, Bensing J, Maas C, Griffin S, Gorter K, Rutten G: Effectiveness of a self-management intervention in patients with screen-detected type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007, 30:2832-2837.
• [19]Ziegler A, Koch A, Krockenberger K, Grosshennig A: Personalized medicine using DNA biomarkers: a review. Hum Genet 2012, 131:1627-1638.
• [20]Cuijpers P, Reynolds CF 3rd, Donker T, Li J, Andersson G, Beekman A: Personalized treatment of adult depression: medication, psychotherapy, or both? a systematic review. Depress Anxiety 2012, 29:855-864.
• [21]Siskind D, Harris M, Pirkis J, Whiteford H: Personalised support delivered by support workers for people with severe and persistent mental illness: a systematic review of patient outcomes. Epidemiol Psichiatr Sci 2012, 21:97-110.
• [22]Evers AW, Rovers MM, Kremer JA, Veltman JA, Schalken JA, Bloem BR, Van-Gool AJ: An integrated framework of personalized medicine: from individual genomes to participatory health care. Croat Med J 2012, 53:301-303.
• [23]Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M: Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res 2005, 40:1918-1930.
• [24]Osborne RH, Elsworth GR, Whitfield K: The health education impact questionnaire (heiQ): an outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns 2007, 66:192-201.
• [25]DOH, Vilans: Beleidsagenda DOH & zelfmanagement. Utrecht: Vilans; 2011.
• [26]McEwen A, West R, McRobbie H: Effectiveness of specialist group treatment for smoking cessation vs. one-to-one treatment in primary care. Addict Behav 2006, 31:1650-1660.
• [27]Heinrich E, De-Nooijer J, Schaper NC, Schoonus-Spit MH, Janssen MA, De-Vries NK: Evaluation of the web-based diabetes interactive education programme (DIEP) for patients with type 2 diabetes. Patient Educ Couns 2012, 86:172-178.
• [28]Hettema J, Steele J, Miller WR: Motivational interviewing. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2005, 1:91-111.
• [29]Burgt MV, Verhulst F: Doen en blijven doen. 4th edition. Houten: Springer; 2009.
• [30]Armstrong MJ, Mottershead TA, Ronksley PE, Sigal RJ, Campbell TS, Hemmelgarn BR: Motivational interviewing to improve weight loss in overweight and/or obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev 2011, 12:709-723.
• [31]Martins RK, McNeil DW: Review of motivational interviewing in promoting health behaviors. Clin Psychol Rev 2009, 29:283-293.
• [32]Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B: Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2005, 55:305-312.
• [33]Altman DG, Bland JM: How to randomise. BMJ 1999, 319:703-704.
• [34]Greene J, Hibbard JH: Why does patient activation matter? an examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 2012, 27:520-526.
• [35]Topolski TD, LoGerfo J, Patrick DL, Williams B, Walwick J, Patrick MB: The rapid assessment of physical activity (RAPA) among older adults. Prev Chronic Dis 2006, 3:A118.
• [36]Segal-Isaacson CJ, Wylie-Rosett J, Gans KM: Validation of a short dietary assessment questionnaire: the rapid eating and activity assessment for participants short version (REAP-S). Diabetes Educ 2004, 30:774-778.
• [37]Yaroch AL, Nebeling L, Thompson FE, Hurley TG, Hebert JR, Toobert DJ, Resnicow K, Greene GW, Williams GC, Elliot DL, Goldman Sher T, Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis M, Salkeld J, Rossi S, Domas A, Mcgregor H, Defrancesco C, Mccarty F, Costello RB, Peterson KE: Baseline design elements and sample characteristics for seven sites participating in the nutrition working group of the behavior change consortium. J Nutr 2008, 138:185S-192S.
• [38]Grol R, Wensing M: What drives change? barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust 2004, 180:S57-S60.
• [39]Shively MJ, Gardetto NJ, Kodiath MF, Kelly A, Smith TL, Stepnowsky C, Maynard C, Larson CB: Effect of patient activation on self-management in patients with heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2013, 28:20-34.
• [40]Campbell M, Grimshaw J, Steen N: Sample size calculations for cluster randomised trials. Changing professional practice in europe group (EU BIOMED II concerted action). J Health Serv Res Policy 2000, 5:12-16.
• [41]Chew LD, Bradley KA, Boyko EJ: Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Fam Med 2004, 36:588-594.
• [42]Fransen MP, Van-Schaik TM, Twickler TB, Essink-Bot ML: Applicability of internationally available health literacy measures in the netherlands. J Health Commun 2011, 16(Suppl 3):134-149.
• [43]Hibbard JH, Greene J, Overton V: Patients with lower activation associated with higher costs; delivery systems should know their patients’ ‘scores’. alth Aff (Millwood) 2013, 32:216-222.