Physical inactivity as a policy problem: applying a concept from policy analysis to a public health issue

Health Research Policy and Systems

Diana Schow¹  Peter Gelius¹  Karim Abu-Omar¹  Alfred Rütten¹ 

[1] Institute of Sport Science and Sport, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstr. 123b, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany

关键词: Public health;    Policy process;    Policy problem;    Physical activity;    Health promotion;    Context analysis;   

Others  :  809848
DOI  :  10.1186/1478-4505-11-9

 received in 2012-08-20, accepted in 2013-02-19,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Despite the recent rapid development of policies to counteract physical inactivity (PI), only a small number of systematic analyses on the evolution of these policies exists. In this article we analyze how PI, as a public health issue, “translates” into a policy-making issue. First, we discuss why PI has become an increasingly important public health issue during the last two decades. We then follow Guy Peters and conceptualize PI as a “policy problem” that has the potential to be linked to policy instruments and policy impact. Analysis indicates that PI is a policy problem that i) is chronic in nature; ii) involves a high degree of political complexity; iii) can be disaggregated into smaller scales; iv) is addressed through interventions that can be difficult to “sell” to the public when their benefits are not highly divisible; v) cannot be solved by government spending alone; vi) must be addressed through a broad scope of activities; and vii) involves interdependencies among both multiple sectors and levels of government.

We conclude that the new perspective on PI proposed in this article might be useful and important for i) describing and mapping policies to counteract PI in different contexts; ii) evaluating whether or not existing policy instruments are appropriate to the policy problem of PI, and iii) explaining the factors and processes that underlie policy development and implementation. More research is warranted in all these areas. In particular, we propose to focus on comparative analyses of how the problem of PI is defined and tackled in different contexts, and on the identification of truly effective policy instruments that are designed to “solve” the PI policy problem.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Rütten et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U: Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 2012, 380:247-257.
• [2]Dumith SC, Hallal PC, Reis RS, Kohl HW: Worldwide prevalence of physical inactivity and its association with human development index in 76 countries. Prev Med 2011, 53:24-28.
• [3]United Nations: Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases. Report of the Secretary-General. UN General Assembly Document A/66/83. New York, NY: UN; 2011.
• [4]National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion: Obesity – Healing the Epidemic by Making Health Easier. Atlanta: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2011.
• [5]International Diabetes Federation: IDF Diabetes Atlas. 4th edition. Brussels: IDF; 2009.
• [6]World Health Organization: Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2004.
• [7]EU Working Group “Sport & Health”: EU Physical Activity Guidelines. Recommended Policy Actions in Support of Health-Enhancing Physical Activity. Brussels; 2008.
• [8]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Healthy People. 2020. http://www.healtypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020 webcite
• [9]Bull FC, Bellew B, Schöppe S, Bauman AE: Developments in National Physical Activity Policy: an international review and recommendations towards better practice. J Sci Med Sport/Sports Med Aust 2004, 7:93-104.
• [10]Bellew B, Schöppe S, Bull FC, Bauman A: The rise and fall of Australian physical activity policy 1996–2006: a national review framed in an international context. Aust New Zealand Health Policy 2008, 5:18. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Daugbjerg SB, Kahlmeier S, Racioppi F, Martin-Diener E, Martin B, Oja P, Bull F: Promotion of physical activity in the European region. Content analysis of 27 national policy documents. Phys Act Health 2009, 6:805-817.
• [12]Christiansen NV, Kahlmeier S, Racioppi F: Sport promotion policies in the European Union: results of a contents analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2012. [Ahead of print]
• [13]Nicholson M, Hoye R, Houlihan B (Eds): Participation in Sport: International Policy Perspectives. New York: Routledge; 2011.
• [14]Breton E, De Leeuw E: Theories of the policy process in health promotion research: a review. Health Promot Int 2011, 26:82-90.
• [15]Peters G: The problem of policy problems. J Comp Policy Anal 2005, 7:349-370.
• [16]Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee: Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.
• [17]Kickbusch I: Life-styles and health. Soc Sci Med 1986, 22:117-124.
• [18]Rütten A: The implementation of health promotion: A new structural perspective. Soc Sci Med 1995, 41:1627-1637.
• [19]World Health Organization: Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final report of the commission on social determinants of health. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
• [20]European Commission: Sport and physical activity. Special Eurobarometer 334. Brussels: TNS Opinion & Social; 2010.
• [21]National Center for Health Statistics: Percentage of adults aged >25 years who reported regular leisure-time physical activity, by education level — National Health Interview Survey, United States, 1997 and 2007. MMWR Weekly 2009, 58:261.
• [22]Baumann A, Schöppe S, Lewicka M: Review of Best Practice in Interventions to Promote Physical Activity in Developing Countries. Background Document prepared for the WHO Workshop on Physical Activity and Public Health, 24–27, October 2005 Beijing, People’s Republic of China. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
• [23]Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C, Buchner D, Ettinger W, Heath GW, King AC, Kriska A, Leon AS, Marcus BH, Morris J, Paffenbarger RS, Patrick K, Pollock ML, Rippe JM, Sallis J, Wilmore JH: Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995, 273:402-407.
• [24]Foster C: Guidelines for Health-Enhancing Physical Activity Promotion Programmes. Tampere: The European Network for the Promotion of Health-Enhancing Physical Activity; 2000.
• [25]Oja P, Borms J: Health Enhancing Physical Activity. Perspectives Vol. 6. London: Meyer & Meyer Sport; 2004.
• [26]Sallis JF, Owen N: Physical activity and behavioral medicine. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1999.
• [27]Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J: An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Publ Health 2006, 27:297-322.
• [28]Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, Heath GW, Howze EH, Powell KE, Stone EJ, Rajab MW, Corso P: The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002, 22:73-107.
• [29]Task Force on Community Preventive Services: The Guide to Community Preventive Services. What Works to Promote Health?. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
• [30]World Health Organization: Interventions on Diet and Physical Activity: What Works. Geneva: WHO; 2009.
• [31]Rütten A, Abu-Omar K, Frahsa A, Gelius P: Physical activity promotion: Evidence, theory and challenges for future research. In Global Handbook on Non-Communicable Diseases and Health Promotion. Edited by McQueen DV. New York: Springer; forthcoming
• [32]Heath GW, Parra DC, Sarmiento OL, Andersen LB, Owen N, Goenka S, Montes F, Brownson RC: Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet 2012, 380:272-281.
• [33]Wood BD, Doan A: The politics of problem definition: applying and testing threshold models. Am J Polit Sci 2003, 47:640-653.
• [34]Stone DA: Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Polit Sci Quart 1989, 104:281-300.
• [35]Rochefort DA, Cobb RW: Problem definition, agenda access, and policy choice. Policy Stud J 1993, 21:56-71.
• [36]Dery D: Agenda setting and problem definition. Policy Studies 2000, 21:37-47.
• [37]Hanberger A: What is the policy problem? Methodological challenges in policy evaluation. Evaluation 2001, 7:45-62.
• [38]Weiss JA: The powers of problem definition: the case of government paperwork. Policy Sci 1989, 22:97-121.
• [39]Bellew B, Bauman A, Martin B, Bull F, Matsudo V: Public policy actions needed to promote physical activity. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep 2011, 5:340-349.
• [40]Shephard RJ, Lankenau B, Pratt M, Neiman A, Puska P, Benaziza H, Bauman A: Physical activity policy development: a synopsis of the WHO/CDC consultation, Sep 29 - Oct 2, 2002, Atlanta, Georgia. Pub Health Reports (1974) 2004, 119:346-351.
• [41]Rütten A, Abu-Omar K, Frahsa A, Morgan A: Assets for policy making in health promotion: overcoming political barriers inhibiting women in difficult life situations to access sport facilities. Soc Sci Med 2009, 69:1667-1673.
• [42]Rütten A, Gelius P: Building policy capacities: an interactive knowledge to action approach in health promotion. Health Promot Int 2013.
• [43]Bercovitz KL: Canada’s active living policy: a critical analysis. Health Promot Int 1998, 13:329-338.
• [44]Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services: Working Together for Physical Activity: The Action Plan on Physical Activity 2005–2009. Norway: Statens Forvaltningstjeneste; 2005.
• [45]National Heart Foundation of Australia: Blueprint for an Active Australia. Sydney: ; 2009.
• [46]Brazilian Ministry of Health: Strategic Action Plan to Tackle Non-communicable Diseases in Brazil 2011–2022. Brasilia: ; 2011.
• [47]German Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection, German Federal Ministry of Health [Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Bundesministerium für Gesundheit]: The national action plan for the prevention of malnutrition, physical inactivity, obesity and related diseases. [Der nationale Aktionsplan zur Prävention von Fehlernährung, Bewegungsmangel, Übergewicht und damit zusammenhängenden Krankheiten]. Bonn/Berlin: BMELV, BMG; 2008.
• [48]National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Promoting and creating built or natural environments that encourage and support physical activity. London: NICE Pub Health Guidance; 2008.
• [49]Brownson RC, Ballew P, Dieffenderfer B, Haire-Joshu D, Heath GW, Kreuter MW, Myers BA: Evidence-based interventions to promote physical activity: What contributes to dissemination by state health departments. Am J Prev Med 2007, 33:S66-S78.
• [50]National Physical Activity Plan for the United States. Columbia: National Physical Activity Plan; 2010.
• [51]Vista Analyse AS: Interaction without direction and funding? Who should enable whom? Evaluation of the Action Plan for Physical Activity 2005–2009. [Samspill uten retning og midler? Hvem skal aktivere hvem? Evaluering av Handlingsplan for fysisk aktivitet 2005–2009]. Oslo: Helsedirektoratet; 2009.
• [52]Kingdon JW: Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown; 1984.
• [53]Ostrom E: Institutional rational choice: an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In Theories of the Policy Process. Edited by Sabatier PA. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press; 2007:21-64.
• [54]Sabatier P (Ed): Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press; 2007.
• [55]Rütten A, Gelius P, Abu-Omar K: Policy development and implementation in health promotion – from theory to practice: the ADEPT model. Health Promot Int 2011, 26:322-329.
• [56]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Financing and Delivering Health Care: A Comparative Analysis of OECD Countries. Paris: OECD; 1987.
• [57]Esping-Andersen G: The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1989.
• [58]Geva-May I, Wildavsky A: An Operational Approach to Policy Analysis: The Craft–Prescriptions for Better Analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1997.
• [59]Geva-May I: Cultural theory: The neglected variable in the craft of policy analysis. J Com Policy Anal: Res Practice (Special Issue: Cultural Theory and Its Contribution to Policy Analysis) 2002, 4:243-265.
• [60]Rütten A: Evidence-based policy revisited: orientation towards the policy process and a public health policy science. Int J Pub Health 2012, 57(3):455-457.
• [61]Wildavsky A: Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. New York: Little Brown; 1979.
• [62]Weiss CH: The many meanings of research utilization. Pub Admin Rev 1979, 39:426-431.
• [63]Brownson RC, Chriqui JF, Stamatakis KA: Understanding evidence-based public health policy. Am J Pub Health 2009, 99:1576-1583.
• [64]Canadian Health Services Research Foundation: The theory and practice of knowledge brokering in Canada’s health system: a report based on a CHSRF national consultation and a literature review. Ottawa: CHSRF; 2003.
• [65]Van Kammen J, De Savigny D, Sewankambo N: Using knowledge brokering to promote evidence-based policy-making: The need for support structures. Bull World Health Organ 2006, 84:608-612.
• [66]Jansen MW, De Leeuw E, Hoeijmakers M, De Vries NK: Working at the nexus between public health policy, practice and research. Dynamics of knowledge sharing in the Netherlands. Health Res Policy Systems 2012, 10:33. BioMed Central Full Text