A systematic map protocol: What evidence exists to link agricultural practices with ecological impacts for Irish waterbodies?

Environmental Evidence

Seamus Crosse¹  Paul JA Withers⁴  Cara A Augustenborg³  Donnacha G Doody² 

[1]Greenfield Dairy Solutions, Lissadell, Oak Park Road, Carlow, Ireland

[2]Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PQ, UK

[3]Impact Research Management, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland

[4]School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography

[5] Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK

关键词: Nitrates directive;    Water framework directive;    Ireland;    Water quality;    Ecology;    Agriculture;   

Others  :  1218951
DOI  :  10.1186/s13750-015-0040-9

 received in 2014-10-24, accepted in 2015-04-28,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Increasing world population, changing consumption patterns, and the agri-food industry ambition for expansion will drive an increase in outputs from future Irish agriculture. This must be achieved within the context of the targets established within E.U. environmental directives, such as the Nitrates (91/676/EEC) and Water Framework Directives (2000/60/EC). How and if sustainable intensification can be achieved is unclear, with climate change and competition for land (e.g. bioenergy crops) increasing pressures on agriculture and the environment. The Environmental Protection Agency’s report, Ireland’s Environment, investigated the status of water quality and concluded agricultural diffuse and small point sources of pollution were the main cause of 50 % and 13 % of river and groundwater pollution, respectively (EPA, 2012). As a result of significant investment in research, there is now an understanding of the factors controlling the impact of agriculture on water quality in Ireland. However, in facing the challenges of sustainable intensification, climate change, and increasing demand for delivery of ecosystem services from rural environments, there is a need to determine to what extent existing research can provide answers to these challenges and what further research is required to balance water quality protection and agricultural production in the future.

Design

The objective of this systematic map protocol is to plan development of an evidence-base to inform recommendations for further research on mitigating the impact of agriculture on water quality in Ireland under future climate change and sustainable intensification. The primary question for this systematic map is: What evidence exists to link agricultural practices with ecological impacts in Irishwaterbodies? This involves coding studies based on variables such as scale, methodology, chemical and ecological impacts, and location. Following an extensive search for relevant research documents, documents selected for inclusion in the systematic map will be implemented on a hierarchical basis, with documents first screened at title and abstract level and subsequently at full text level using predetermined selection criteria. Coding will include elements of critical appraisal (e.g. study length, study scale, and experimental design). A geographical map indicating where each study occurred will be linked to the database describing all studies included in the systematic map.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Doody et al.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Environmental Protection Agency. Ireland’s Environment: An Assessment. Environmental Protection Agency; 2012. (www.epa.ie).
• [2]Tunney H, Coulter B, Daly K, Kurz I, Coxon C, Jeffery, et al. Quantification of phosphorus losses from soil to water: Final Report and Literature Review. Environmental Protection Agency Ireland; 2000. (www.epa.ie).
• [3]Carton OT, Tunney H, Daly K, Ryan M, Kurz I, Doody DG, Bourke D, Kiely G, Morgan G, Moles R, Jordan P. Eutrophication from Agricultural Sources-Integration Report. Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland; 2008.
• [4]Agricultural Catchments Programme: Phase 1 Report. Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Wexford; 2013.
• [5]Archbold M, Bruen M, Deakin D, Doody D, Flynn R, Kelly-Quinn M, et al. Contaminant Movement and Attenuation along Pathways from the Land Surface to Aquatic Receptors – A Review. STRIVE Report. Environmental Protection Agency Ireland; 2010. (www.epa.ie).
• [6]Wall D, Jordan P, Melland A, Mellander P, Buckley C, Reaney SM et al.. Using the nutrient transfer continuum concept to evaluate the European Union Nitrates Directive National Action Programme. Environ Sci Policy. 2011; 14:664-74.
• [7]Donohue I, McGarrigle ML, Paul M. Linking catchment characteristics and water chemistry with the ecological status of Irish rivers. Water Res. 2006; 40:91-8.
• [8]Doody D, Withers PJA, Dils RM. Prioritizing Waterbodies to Balance Agricultural Production and Environmental Outcomes. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(14):7697-9.
• [9]Hamilton SK. Biogeochemical time lags may delay responses of streams to ecological restoration. Freshw Biol. 2012; 57 Suppl. 1:43-57.
• [10]Jarvie HP, Sharpley AN, Withers PJA, Scott JT, Haggard BE, Neal C. Phosphorus Mitigation to Control River Eutrophication: Murky Waters, Inconvenient Truths, and “Postnormal” Science. J Environ Qual. 2013; 42(2):295-304.
• [11]Page E, Heathwaite T, Moss AL, Reynolds B, Beven C, Pope KJL et al.. Managing the impacts of nutrient enrichment on river systems: dealing with complex uncertainties in risk analyses. Freshw Biol. 2012; 57:108-23.
• [12]Moss B. Water Pollution by Agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2008; 363:659-66.
• [13]Smith VH, Schindler DW. Eutrophication science: Where do we go from here? Trends Ecol Evol. 2009; 24:201-7.
• [14]Palmer M, Allan JD, Meyer J, Bernhardt ES. River restoration in the twenty-first century: Data and experiential knowledge to inform future efforts. Restor Ecol. 2007; 15:472-81.
• [15]Harris GP, Heathwaite L. Why is achieving good ecological outcomes in rivers so difficult? Freshw Biol. 2013; 57 Suppl. 1:97-107.
• [16]Withers PJA, Jarvie HP. Delivery and cycling of phosphorus in UK rivers: Implications for catchment management. Sci Total Environ. 2008; 400:379-95.
• [17]Jordan P, Melland AR, Mellander P, Shortle G, Wall D. The seasonality of phosphorus transfers from land to water: implications for trophic impacts and policy evaluation. Sci Total Environ. 2012; 434:101-9.
• [18]Thompson J, Cassidy R, Doody DG, Flynn R. Predicting critical source areas of sediment in headwater catchments. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2013; 179:41-52.
• [19]Schulte RPO, Doody DG, Byrne P, Cockerill C, Carton OT. Lough Melvin: developing cost effective measures to prevent phosphorus enrichment of a unique aquatic habitat. Tearmann: Irish J Agri-environ Res. 2009; 7:211-28.
• [20]Jeppesen E, Kronvang B, Meerhoff M, Søndergaard M, Hansen KM, Andersen HE et al.. Climate change effects on runoff, phosphorus and lake ecological state, and potential adaptations. J Environ Qual. 2009; 38:1930-41.
• [21]Dodds WK, Perkin JS, Gerken JE. Human impact on freshwater ecosystem services: a global perspective. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 47:9061-8.