期刊论文详细信息
International Archives of Medicine
Predictive factors of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenosis: a retrospective study of 159 patients
Naima Elhaithem2  Konate Lassana2  El Mehdi Zbir1  Aatif Benyass1  Mohamed Sabry1  Najat Mouine1  Ahlam Ounsy2  Hicham Sabor1  Sanaa Drissi2 
[1] Department of Cardiology, Mohammed V Military Teaching Hospital, Rabat, Morocco;Department of Cardiology, Avicenne University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco
关键词: Anticoagulation;    Transesophageal echocardiography;    Left atrial spontaneous contrast;    Mitral stenosis;   
Others  :  800807
DOI  :  10.1186/1755-7682-7-32
 received in 2014-04-29, accepted in 2014-06-20,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Mitral valve stenosis is a common manifestation of chronic rheumatic heart disease. The presence of spontaneous echo contrast in the left atrium and left atrial appendage has been reported to be an independent predictor of thrombo-embolic risk in patients with mitral stenosis. The objective of this study was to retrospectively investigate various clinical and echocardiographic variables to predict the spontaneous echo contrast in these patients.

Methodology

This is a bicentric retrospective study which includes 159 cases of symptomatic mitral stenosis from January 2011 to June 2012. All of the patients had transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Patients who had significant mitral regurgitation (> Grade I), significant aortic valve disease, previous mitral valvulotomy and anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy were excluded from the study. Our study population was divided into two groups based on the presence (Group I) or absence (Group II) of spontaneous echo contrast.

Result

Left atrial spontaneous contrast was present in 34.6% of cases. Patients in this group have more frequent atrial fibrillation (P = 0.001), larger left atrial area (P = 0.027) and diameter (P=0.023), smaller mitral valve area (P = 0.025), and higher mean transmitral diastolic gradient (p = 0.003) as compared to patients without spontaneous echo contrast. There were no significant differences in the mean age (p = 0.38), duration of symptoms (p = 0.4) and left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.7) between patients with and without spontaneous echo contrast. On multivariate analysis, only mitral valve area and transmitral diastolic gradient (OR: 18.753, 1.21, CI [1,838-191,332], [1,064-1,376], p: 0.013, 0.004, respectively) were found to be independently associated to the presence of spontaneous echo contrast.

Conclusion

Patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis in atrial fibrillation or sinus rhythm have a higher risk of developing spontaneous echo contrast. These patients might benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation. The long-term outcomes can be ascertained in a study over a longer period and with periodic follow-up.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Drissi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140708000252867.pdf 215KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Mendis S, Puska P, Norrving B, World Health Organization; World Heart Federation; World Stroke Organization: Global Atlas On Cardiovascular Disease Prevention And Control 2011 pp. vi + 55 pp. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
  • [2]Santulli G: Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the 21st century: updated numbers and updated facts. JCvD 2013, 1(1):1-2.
  • [3]Merino A, Hauptman P, Badimon L, Cohen M, Fuster V, Goldman M: Echocardiographic “smoke” is produced by an interaction of erythrocytes and plasma proteins modulated byshear forces. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992, 20(7):1661-1668.
  • [4]Sigel B, Coelho JC, Spigos DG, Flanigan DP, Schuler JJ, Kasprisin DO, Nyhus LM, Capek V: Ultrasonography of blood during stasisand coagulation. Invest Radiol 1981, 16(1):71-76.
  • [5]Hwang JJ, Kuan P, Lin SC, Chen WJ, Lei MH, Ko YL, Cheng JJ, Lin JL, Chen JJ, Lien WP: Reappraisal by transesophageal echocardiography of the significance of left atrial clot in prediction of systemic embolization in rheumatic mitral valve disease. Am J Cardiol 1992, 70(7):769-773.
  • [6]Ozkan M, Kaymaz C, Kirma C, Civelek A, Cenal AR, Yakut C, Deligonul U: Predictors of left atrial clot and spontaneous echo contrast in rheumatic valve disease before and after mitral valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 1998, 82(9):1066-1070.
  • [7]Beppu S, Nimura Y, Sakakibara H, Nagata S, Park YD, Izumi S: Smoke like echo in the left atrial cavity in mitral valve disease, it’s features and significance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985, 6(4):744-749.
  • [8]Vigna C, de Rito V, Criconia GM, Russo A, Testa M, Fanelli R, Loperfido F: Left atrial clot and spontaneous echo contrast in nonanticoagulated mitral stenosis. A transesophageal echocardiography study. Chest 1993, 103(2):348-352.
  • [9]Acarturk E, Usal A, Demir M, Akgul F, Ozeren A: Thromboembolic risk in patients with mitral stenosis. Jpn Heart J 1997, 38(5):669-675.
  • [10]Chiag CW, Lo SK, Ko YS, Cheng NJ, Lin PJ, Chang CH: Predictor of systemic embolization in patients with mitral stenosis. A prospective study. Ann Intern Med 1998, 128(11):885-889.
  • [11]Wolf PA, Dawber TR, Thomas E, Kannel WB: Epidemiological assessment of chronic atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke: the Framingham study. Neurology 1978, 28(10):973-977.
  • [12]Rowe JC, Bland EF, Sprague HB, White PD: The course of mitral stenosis without surgery: ten years and twenty years perspectives. Ann Intern Med 1960, 52:741-749.
  • [13]Deverall PB, Olley PM, Smith DR, Watson DA, Whitaker W: Incidence of systemic embolism before and after mitral valvotomy. Thorax 1968, 23(5):530-536.
  • [14]Bernstein NE, Demopoulos LA, Tunick PA, Rosenzweig BP, Kronzon I: Correlates of spontaneous echo contrast in patients with mitral stenosis and normal sinus rhythm. Am Heart J 1994, 128(2):287-292.
  • [15]Gonzalez-Torrecilla E, Garcia-Frenandez MA, Perez-David E, Bermejo J, Moreno M, Delcan JL: Predictors of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast and thrombi in patients with mitral stenosis and atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2000, 86(5):529-534.
  • [16]Daniel WG, Nellessen U, Schroder E, Nonnast-Daniel B, Bednarski P, Nikutta P, Lichtlen PR: Left atrial contrast in mitral valve disease: an indicator for an increased thromboembolic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988, 11(6):1204-1211.
  • [17]Hwang JJ, Kuan P, Chan JJ, Ko YL, Cheng JJ, Lin JL, Tseng YZ, Lien WP: Significance of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in rehumatic mitral valve disease as a predictor of systemic arterial embolization: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. Am Heart J 1994, 127(4):880-885.
  • [18]Goswami KC, Yadav R, Rao MB, Bahl VK, Talwar KK, Manchanda SC: Clinical and echocardiographic predictors of left atrial clot and spontaneous echo contrast in patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis: a prospective study in 200 patients by transesophageal echocardiography. Int J Cardiol 2000, 73:273-279.
  • [19]Vincelj J, Sokol I, Jaksic O: Prevalence and clinical significance of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast detected by transesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography 2002, 19(4):319-324.
  • [20]Yuan YW, Shumg KK: Ultrasonic backscatter from flowing whole blood. II. dependence on frequency and fibrinogen concentrations. J Acoust Soc Am 1998, 84(4):1195-1200.
  • [21]Goswami KC, Narang R, BahlV K, Talwar KK, Manchanda SC: Comparative evaluation of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in the detection of left atrial clot before percutaneous transvenous mitrale commissurotomy: do all patients need transesophageal examination? Int J Cardiol 1997, 62:237-249.
  • [22]Kronzon I, Tunick PA, Glassman E, Slater J, Schwinger M, Freedberg RS: Transesophageal echocardiography to detect atrial clot in candidates for percutaneous transseptal mitral balloon valvuloplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990, 16(5):1320-1322.
  • [23]Black IW, Hopkins AP, Lee LC, Walsh WF: Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast: a clinical and echocardiographic analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991, 18(2):398-404.
  • [24]Fatkin D, Kelly RP, Feneley MP: Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994, 23(4):961-969.
  • [25]Kasliwal RR, Mittal S, Kanojia A, Singh RP, Prakash O, Bhatia ML, Trehan N: A study of spontaneous echo contrast in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis and normal sinus rhythm: an Indian perspective. Br Heart J 1995, 74(3):296-299.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:24次