Translating evidence-based interventions for implementation: Experiences from Project HEAL in African American churches

Implementation Science

Tony Whitehead²  Min Qi Wang³  Jimmie L Slade¹  Muhiuddin Haider⁴  Janice Bowie⁶  Sherie Lou Z Santos³  Mary Ann Scheirer⁵  Erin K Tagai³  Cheryl L Holt³ 

[1] Community Ministry of Prince George’s County, Upper Marlboro, USA;Department of Anthropology, University of Maryland, College Park, USA;Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland, School of Public Health, 2369 School of Public Health (Building 255), College Park, MD 20742, USA;Maryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland, School of Public Health, College Park, USA;Scheirer Consulting, Princeton, USA;Department of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA

关键词: Technology;    Health communication;    Cancer;    African American;    Faith-based;    Evidence-based;    Dissemination;    Implementation;   

Others  :  801148
DOI  :  10.1186/1748-5908-9-66

 received in 2013-06-12, accepted in 2014-05-22,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Community-based approaches have been increasing in the effort to raise awareness and early detection for cancer and other chronic disease. However, many times, such interventions are tested in randomized trials, become evidence-based, and then fail to reach further use in the community. Project HEAL (Health through Early Awareness and Learning) is an implementation trial that aims to compare two strategies of implementing evidence-based cancer communication interventions in African American faith-based organizations.

Method

This article describes the community-engaged process of transforming three evidence-based cancer communication interventions into a coherent, branded strategy for training community health advisors with two delivery mechanisms. Peer community health advisors receive training through either a traditional classroom approach (with high technical assistance/support) or a web-based training portal (with low technical assistance/support).

Results

We describe the process, outline the intervention components, report on the pilot test, and conclude with lessons learned from each of these phases. Though the pilot phase showed feasibility, it resulted in modifications to data collection protocols and team and community member roles and expectations.

Conclusions

Project HEAL offers a promising strategy to implement evidence-based interventions in community settings through the use of technology. There could be wider implications for chronic disease prevention and control.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Holt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]World Health Organization: Cancer fact sheet. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/ webcite
• [2]Campbell MK, Hudson MA, Resnicow K, Blakeney N, Paxton A, Baskin M: Church-based health promotion interventions: evidence and lessons learned. Annu Rev Publ Health 2007, 28:213-234.
• [3]Husaini BA, Reece MC, Emerson JS, Scales S, Hull PC, Levine RS: A church-based program on prostate cancer screening for African American men: reducing health disparities. Ethnic Dis 2008, 18(2):S2-S179. 184
• [4]Zahuranec DB, Morgenstern LB, Garcia NM, Conley KM, Lisabeth LD, Rank GS, Smith MA, Meurer WJ, Resnicow K, Brown DL: Stroke health and risk education (SHARE) pilot project: feasibility and need for church-based stroke health promotion in a bi-ethnic community. Stroke 2008, 39:1583-1585.
• [5]Sauaia A, Sung-joon M, Byers T, Lack D, Apodaca C, Osuna D, Stowe A, McGinnis GF, Latts L: Church-based breast cancer screening education: impact of two approaches on Latinas enrolled in public and private health insurance plans. Prev Chronic Dis 2007, 4:A99.
• [6]Darnell JS, Chang CH, Calhoun EA: Knowledge about breast cancer and participation in a faith-based breast cancer program and other predictors of mammography screening among African American women and Latinas. Health Promot Pract 2006, 7(Suppl 3):201S-212S.
• [7]Glasgow RE, Marcus AC, Bull SS, Wilson KM: Disseminating effective cancer screening interventions. Cancer 2004, 101(Suppl 5):1239-1250.
• [8]Kerner JF: Integrating research, practice, and policy: what we see depends on where we stand. J Public Health Manag and Pract 2008, 14:193-198.
• [9]Diffusion and dissemination of evidence-based cancer control interventions http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/canconsum.htm webcite
• [10]Weiner BJ, Lewis MA, Linnan LA: Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs. Health Educ Res 2009, 24:292-305.
• [11]Ammerman A: Process evaluation of the church-based PRAISE! Project: partnership to reach African Americans to increase smart eating. 1st edition. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2002.
• [12]Kerner JF, Guirguis-Blake J, Hennessey KD, Brounstein PJ, Vinson C, Schwartz RH, Myers BA, Briss P: Translating research into improved outcomes in comprehensive cancer control. Cancer Cause Control 2005, 16(Suppl 1):27-40.
• [13]Witmer A, Seifer SD, Finocchio L, Leslie J, O’Neil EH: Community health workers: integral members of the health care work force. Am J Public Health 1995, 85:1055-1058.
• [14]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Community health advisors: models, research, and practice, selected annotations-United States. Volume 1. Atlanta; U.S: Department of Health and Human Services; 1994.
• [15]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Community health advisors: programs in the United States, health promotion and disease prevention. Atlanta; U.S: Department of Health and Human Services; 1994.
• [16]Fendall R: We expect too much from community health workers. World Health Forum 1984, 5:300-303.
• [17]Walt G: Community health workers in national programmes. Just another pair of hands?. Philadelphia: Open University Press; 1990.
• [18]Indian Health Service: Alaska community health aide program description. Washington: Government Printing Office; 1991.
• [19]Giblin PT: Effective utilization and evaluation of indigenous health care workers. Public Health Rep 1989, 104:361-368.
• [20]Richter RW, Bengen B, Alsup PA, Bruun B, Kilcoyne MM, Challenor BD: The community health worker: a resource for improved health care delivery. Am J Public Health 1974, 64:1056-1061.
• [21]Yu MY, Song L, Seetoo A, Cai C, Smith G, Oakley D: Culturally competent training program: a key to training lay health advisors for promoting breast cancer screening. Health Educ Behav 2007, 2007(34):928-941.
• [22]Maxwell AE, Danao LL, Cayetano RT, Crespi CM, Bastani R: Evaluating the training of Filipino American community health advisors to disseminate colorectal cancer screening. J Comm Health 2012, 37:1218-1225.
• [23]Navarro AM, Raman R, McNicholas LJ, Loza O: Diffusion of cancer education information through a Latino community health advisor program. Prev Med 2007, 45:135-138.
• [24]Lisovicz N, Johnson RE, Higginbotham J, Downey JA, Hardy CM, Fouad MN, Hinton AW, Partridge EE: The deep South network for cancer control: building a community infrastructure to reduce cancer health disparities. Cancer 2006, 107(Suppl 8):1971-1979.
• [25]Holt CL, Klem PR: As you go, spread the word: spiritually based breast cancer education for African American women. Gynecol Oncol 2005, 99(Suppl 1):S141-S142.
• [26]Holt CL, Wynn TA, Litaker MS, Southward P, Jeames S, Schulz E: A comparison of a spiritually-based and a non-spiritually based educational intervention for informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among church-attending African American men. Urol Nurs 2009, 29:249-258.
• [27]Holt CL, Litaker MS, Scarinci IC, Debnam KJ, McDavid C, McNeal SF, Eloubeidi MA, Crowther M, Bolland J, Martin MY: Spiritually-based intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans: screening and theory-based outcomes from a randomized trial. Health Educ Behav 2013, 40:458-468.
• [28]Eng TR: eHealth research and evaluation: challenges and opportunities. J Health Commun 2002, 7:267-272.
• [29]Strecher V: Internet methods for delivering behavioral and health-related interventions (eHealth). Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2007, 3:53-76.
• [30]Turner-Lee N, Smedley B, Miller J: Minorities, Mobile broadband and the management of chronic diseases. http://www.jointcenter.org/sites/default/files/upload/research/files/Minorities%20Mobile%20Broadband%20and%20the%20Management%20of%20Chronic%20Diseases_0.pdf webcite
• [31]Fox S, Duggan M: Health online 2013. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/PIP_HealthOnline.pdf webcite
• [32]Brownstein JN, Mirambeau AM, Roland KB: News from the CDC: using web-based training to translate evidence on the value of community health workers into public action. Transl Behav Med 2013, 3:229-230.
• [33]Chou WY, Prestin A, Lyons C, Wen KY: Web 2.0 for health promotion: reviewing the current evidence. Am J Public Health 2013, 103:e9-e18.
• [34]Griffiths F, Lindenmeyer A, Powell J, Lowe P, Thorogood M: Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? a systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res 2006, 8:e10.
• [35]Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH: Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Behav 1988, 15:175-183.
• [36]National Cancer Institute: Body & Soul: A celebration of healthy eating & living, a guide for your church. [http://rtips.cancer.gov/rtips/viewProduct.do?productId=257631&viewMode=product webcite]
• [37]Greenhalgh T, Robert G, MacFarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O: Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004, 82:581-629.
• [38]Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM: Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999, 89:1322-1327.
• [39]Arvey SR, Fernandez ME, LaRue DM, Bartholomew LK: When promotoras and technology meet: a qualitative analysis of promotoras’ use of small media to increase cancer screening among South Texas Latinos. Health Educ Behav 2012, 39:352-363.
• [40]Campbell MK, Resnicow K, Carr C, Wang T, Williams A: Process evaluation of an effective church-based diet intervention: body & soul. Health Educ Behav 2007, 34:864-880.
• [41]Allicock M, Campbell MK, Valle CG, Carr C, Resnicow K, Gizlice Z: Evaluating the dissemination of body & soul, an evidence-based fruit and vegetable intake intervention: challenges for dissemination and implementation research. J Nutr Educ Behav 2012, 44:530-538.
• [42]Baruth M, Wilcox S, Laken M, Bopp M, Saunders R: Implementation of a faith-based physical activity intervention: insights from church health directors. J Community Health 2008, 33:304-312.