Using infrared eye-tracking to explore ordinal numerical processing in toddlers with Fragile X Syndrome

Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Susan M Rivera¹  Heidi A Baumgartner²  Emily R Owen² 

[1] M.I.N.D. Institute, University of California Davis Medical Center, 2825 50th St., Sacramento, CA 95817, USA;University of California, Davis Center for Mind and Brain, 267 Cousteau Pl., Davis, CA 95618, USA

关键词: Magnitude;    Development;    Approximate number system;   

Others  :  811589
DOI  :  10.1186/1866-1955-5-1

 received in 2012-08-22, accepted in 2013-01-15,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common cause of inherited intellectual disability and non-idiopathic autism. Individuals with FXS present with a behavioral phenotype of specific and selective deficits in an array of cognitive skills. Disruption of number processing and arithmetic abilities in higher-functioning adults and female adolescents with FXS has been well established. Still, both numerical skills and developmentally antecedent cognitive processes have just begun to be investigated in toddlers with FXS. The goal of the current study was to assess how very young children with FXS respond to ordinal relationships among numerical magnitudes.

Methods

Infrared eye-tracking was used to explore infants’ novelty recognition during passive viewing of ordinal numerical sequences; t-tests were used to analyze group differences in looking time.

Results

Ordinal recognition of numerical magnitudes is significantly impaired in young toddlers with FXS.

Conclusions

This study is the first to experimentally evaluate early number sense and ordinal recognition in toddlers with FXS, and our findings reveal that ordinal recognition of numerical magnitudes is significantly impaired in young toddlers with FXS, suggesting that later arithmetic impairments associated with FXS may have their origins in a developmental impairment of this more basic aspect of numerical cognition.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Owen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Beckett L, Qilu Y, Long AN: The impact of fragile X: Prevalence, numbers affected, and economic impact. Davis, CA, USA: In A white paper prepared for the National Fragile X Foundation; 2005.
• [2]Fernandez-Carvajal I, Walichiewicz P, Xiaosen X, Pan R, Hagerman PJ, Tassone F: Screening for expanded alleles of the FMR1 gene in blood spots from newborn males in a Spanish population. J Mol Diagn 2009, 11(4):324-329.
• [3]Reddy KS: Cytogenic abnormalities and fragile X syndrome in autism spectrum disorder. BMC Med Genet 2005, 6:3.
• [4]Verkerk AJ, Pieretti M, Sutcliffe JS, Fu YH, Kuhl DPA, Pizzuti A, Reiner O, Richards S, Victoria MF, Zhang FP, Eussen BE, van Ommen GJB, Blonden LAJ, Riggins GJ, Chastain JL, Kunst CB, Galjaard H, Caskey CT, Nelson DL, Oostra BA, Warren ST: Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome. Cell 1991, 65:905-914.
• [5]Devys D, Lutz Y, Rouyer N, Bellocq JP, Mandel JL: The FMR-1 protein is cytoplasmic, most abundant in neurons and appears normal in carriers of a fragile X premutation. Nat Genet 1993, 4(4):335-340.
• [6]Bassell GJ, Warren ST: Fragile X syndrome: loss of local mRNA regulation alters synaptic development and function. Neuron 2008, 60:201-214.
• [7]Brown WT, Jenkins EC, Friedman E, Brooks J, Wisniewski K, Raguthu S, French J: Autism is associated with the fragile X syndrome. J Austism Dev Disord 1982, 12:303-308.
• [8]Irwin SA, Galvez R, Weiler IJ, Beckel-Mitchener A, Greenough W: Brain structure and functions of fMR1 protein. In Fragile X Syndrome: Diagnosis, Treatment. Edited by Hagerman RJ, Hagerman PJ. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2002.
• [9]Schneider A, Hagerman RJ, Hessl D: Fragile X syndrome - from genes to cognition. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2009, 15:333-342.
• [10]Farzin F, Rivera SM: Dynamic object representations in toddlers with and without fragile X syndrome. Front Hum Neurosci 2010, 12:1-9.
• [11]Scerif G, Karmiloff-Smith A, Campos R, Elsabbagh M, Driver J, Cornish K: To look or not to look? Typical and atypical development of oculomotor control. J Cogn Neurosci 2005, 17:591-604.
• [12]Scerif G, Cornish K, Wilding J, Driver J, Karmiloff-Smith A: Delineation of early attentional control difficulties in fragile X syndrome: focus on neurocomputational changes. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:1889-1898.
• [13]Tamm L, Menon V, Johnston CK, Hessl DR, Reiss AL: fMRI study of cognitive interference processing in females with fragile X syndrome. J Cogn Neurosci 2002, 14:160-171.
• [14]Rivera SM, Menon V, White CD, Glaser B, Reiss AL: Functional brain activation during arithmetic processing in females with fragile X syndrome is related to FMR1 protein expression. Hum Brain Mapp 2002, 16:206-218.
• [15]Brainard SS, Schreiner RA, Hagerman RJ: Cognitive profiles of the carrier fragile X woman. Am J Med Genet 1991, 38:505-508.
• [16]Grigsby JP, Kemper MB, Hagerman RJ, Myers CS: Neuropsychological dysfunction among affected heterozygous fragile X females. Am J Med Genet 1990, 35:28-35.
• [17]Mazzocco MM, Pennington BF, Hagerman RJ: The neurocognitive phenotype of female carriers of fragile X: additional evidence for specificity. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1993, 14:328-335.
• [18]Murphy MM, Mazzocco MM, Gerner G, Henry AE: Mathematics learning disability in girls with Turner syndrome or fragile X syndrome. Brain Cogn 2006, 61:195-210.
• [19]Murphy MM, Mazzocco MM: Rote mathematical skills may mask underlying mathematical disabilities in girls with fragile X syndrome. Dev Neuropsychol 2008, 33:345-364.
• [20]Brannon EM: The representation of numerical magnitude. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2006, 16(2):222-229.
• [21]Halberda J, Sires SF, Feigenson L: Multiple spatially overlapping sets can be enumerated in parallel. Psychol Sci 2006, 17:572-576.
• [22]Dehaene S, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Cohen L: Abstract representations numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends Neurosci 1998, 21:355-361.
• [23]Seigler RS, Opfer J: The development of numerical estimation: evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychol Sci 2003, 14:237-243.
• [24]Feigenson L, Dahaene S, Spelke E: Origins and endpoints of the core systems of number. Reply to Fias and Verguts. Trends Cogn Sci 2004, 8(10):448-449.
• [25]Xu F: Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations. Cognition 2003, 89(1):B15-B25.
• [26]Brannon EM: The development of ordinal numerical knowledge in infancy. Cognition 2002, 83:223-240.
• [27]Gelman R, Gallistel CR: The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge: Mass Harvard University Press; 1978.
• [28]Neider A: Prefrontal cortex and the evolution of symbolic reference. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2009, 19(1):99-108.
• [29]Lyons IM, Beilock SL: Beyond quantity: Individual differences in working memory and the ordinal understanding of numerical symbols. Cognition 2009, 113(2):189-204.
• [30]Halberda J, Mazzocco MMM, Feigenson L: Individual differences in nonverbal number acuity predict maths achievement. Nature 2008, 455:665-668.
• [31]Mullen EM: Mullen Scales of Early Learning. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service Inc; 1995.
• [32]Oakes LM: Using habituation of looking time to assess mental processes in infancy. J Cognit Dev 2010, 11:1-14.
• [33]Hunter MA, Ross HS, Ames EW: Preferences for familiar or novel toys. Effects of familiarization time in 1-year-olds. Dev Psychol 1982, 18:519-529.
• [34]Roder BJ, Bushnell EW, Sasseville AM: Toddlers’ preferences for familiarity and novelty during the course of visual processing. Infancy 2000, 1:491-507.
• [35]Le Corre M, Carey S: One, two three, four, nothing more: an investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. Cognition 2007, 105(2):395-438.
• [36]Rivera SM, Reiss AL, Eckert MA, Menon V: Developmental changes in mental arithmetic: evidence for increased functional specialization in the left inferior parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2005, 15:1779-1790.
• [37]Karmiloff-Smith A, D’Souza D, Dekker TM, Van Herwegen J, Xu F, Rodic M, Ansari D: Genetic and environmental vulnerabilities in children with neurodevelopmental disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012, 109(Suppl 2):17261-17265.
• [38]Scerif G, Cornish K, Wilding J, Driver J, Karmiloff-Smith A: Visual search in typically developing toddlers and toddlers with Fragile X or Williams syndrome. Dev Sci 2004, 7:116-130.
• [39]Farzin F, Whitney D, Hagerman RJ, Rivera SM: Contrast detection in infants with fragile X syndrome. Vision Res 2008, 48:1461-1478.
• [40]Cornish K, Cole V, Longhi E, Karmiloff-Smith A, Scerif G: Does attention constrain developmental trajectories in fragile X syndrome? A 3 year prospective longitudinal study. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil 2012, 117(2):103-120.
• [41]Scerif G, Longhi E, Cole V, Karmiloff-Smith A, Cornish K: Attention across modalities as a longitudinal predictor of early outcomes: the case of fragile X syndrome. J Child Psychol Pscyhiatry 2012, 53(6):641-650.
• [42]Steele A, Karmiloff-Smith A, Cornish K, Scerif G: The mulitple subfunctions of attention: differential developmental gateways to literacy and numeracy. Child Dev 2012, 83(6):2028-2041.
• [43]Roberts JE, Tonnsen B, Robinson A, Shinkareva SV: Heart activity and autistic behavior in infants and toddlers with fragile X syndrome. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil 2012, 117(2):90-102.