Managing variability in decision making in swine growing-finishing units

Irish Veterinary Journal

Josep Gasa⁵  Caio Abercio da Silva²  Alan G. Fahey⁴  Carlos de Blas³  Edgar Garcia Manzanilla¹  Piero da Silva Agostini⁵ 

[1]Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland

[2]Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 86051-970, Brazil

[3]Departamento de Producción Animal, Escuela Técnica de Ingenieros Agrónomos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain

[4]School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Belfield, Ireland

[5]Grup de Nutrició, Maneig i Benestar Animal, Department de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain

关键词: Regression;    Mortality;    Management;    Finishing pig;    Facilities;   

Others  :  1224835
DOI  :  10.1186/s13620-015-0048-z

 received in 2015-03-03, accepted in 2015-08-28,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Analysis of data collected from pig farms may be useful to understand factors affecting pig health and productive performance. However, obtaining these data and drawing conclusions from them can be done at different levels and presents several challenges. In the present study, information from 688 batches of growing-finishing (GF) pigs (average initial and final body weight of 19.1 and 108.5 kg respectively) from 404 GF farms integrated in 7 companies was obtained between July 2008 and July 2010 in Spain by survey. Management and facility factors associated with feed conversion ratio (FCR) and mortality were studied by multiple linear regression analysis in each single company (A to G) and in an overall database (OD). Factors studied were geographic location of the farm, trimester the pigs entered the farm, breed of sire and sex segregation in pens (BREGENSEG), use of circovirus vaccine, number of origins the pigs were obtained from, age of the farm, percentage of slatted floor, type of feeder, drinker and ventilation, number of phases and form of feed, antibiotic administration system, water source, and number and initial weight of pigs.

Results

In two or more companies studied and/or in OD, the trimester when pigs were placed in the farm, BREGENSEG, number of origins of the pigs, age of the farm and initial body weight were factors associated with FCR. Regarding mortality, trimester of placement, number of origins of the pigs, water source in the farm, number of pigs placed and the initial body weight were relevant factors. Age of the farm, antibiotic administration system, and water source were only provided by some of the studied companies and were not included in the OD model, however, when analyzed in particular companies these three variables had an important effect and may be variables of interest in companies that do not record them.

Conclusions

Analysing data collected from farms at different levels helps better understand factors associated with productive performance of pig herds. Out of the studied factors trimester of placement and number of origins of the pigs were the most relevant factors associated with FCR and mortality.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Agostini et al.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]MAGRAMA. El sector de la carne de cerdo en cifras, Principales indicadores económicos en 2013. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, y Medio Rural y Marino. 2014. http://www.eurocarne.com/daal?a1=informes&a2=indicadores_porcino_2014.pdf Accesed 28 Feb 2015.
• [2]Bahnson PB, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Ladely SR, Mateus-Pinilla NE. Herd-level risk factors for Salmonella enteric subsp. enterica in U.S. market pigs. Prev Vet Med. 2006; 76:249-62.
• [3]van der Fels-Klerx HJ, Puister-Jansen LF, van Asselt ED, Burgers SLGE. Farm factors associated with the use of antibiotics in pig production. J Anim Sci. 2011; 89:1922-29.
• [4]Fablet C, Dorenlor V, Eono F, Eveno E, Jolly JP, Portier F, Bidan F, Madec F, Rose N. Noninfectious factors associated with pneumonia and pleuritis in slaughtered pigs from 143 farrow-to-finish pig farms. Prev Vet Med. 2012; 104:271-80.
• [5]Losinger WC. Feed-conversion ratio of finisher pigs in the USA. Prev Vet Med. 1998; 36:287-305.
• [6]Maes D, Duchateau L, Larriestra AJ, Deen J, Morrison RB, de Kruif A. Risk factors for mortality in grow-finishing pigs in Belgium. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2004; 51:321-6.
• [7]Oliveira J, Yus E, Guitián J. Effects of management, environmental and temporal factors on mortality and feed consumptions in integrated swine fattening farms. Livest Prod Sci. 2009; 123:221-9.
• [8]Losinger WC, Bush EJ, Smith MA, Corso BA. An analysis of mortality in the grower/finisher phase of swine production in the United States. Prev Vet Med. 1998; 33:121-145.
• [9]Averós X, Brossard L, Dourmand JY, de Greef KH, Edge HL, Edwards SA, Meunier-Salaün MC. Quantitative assessment of the effects of space allowance, group size and floor characteristics on the lying behavior of growing-finishing pigs. Animal. 2010; 4:777-83.
• [10]Dohoo IR, Ducrot C, Fourichon C, Donald A, Hurnik D. An overview of techniques for dealing with large numbers of independent variables in epidemiologic studies. Prev Vet Med. 1996; 29:221-39.
• [11]Larriestra AJ, Maes DG, Deen J, Morrison RB. Mixed models applied to the study of variation of grower-finisher mortality and culling rates of a large swine production system. Can J Vet Res. 2005; 69:26-31.
• [12]Correa JA, Faucitano L, Laforest JP, Rivest J, Marcoux M, Gariépy C. Effects of slaughter weight on carcass composition and meat quality in pigs of two different growth rates. Meat Sci. 2006; 72:91-9.
• [13]Gispert M, Font i Furnols M, Gil M, Velarde A, Diestre A, Carrión D, Sosnicki AA, Plastow GS. Relationships between carcass quality parameters and genetic types. Meat Sci. 2007; 77:397-404.
• [14]Sibila M, Calsamiglia M, Segalés J, Blanchard P, Badiella L, Le Dimna M, Jestin A, Domingo M. Use of a polymerase chain reaction assay and an ELISA to monitor porcine circovirus type 2 infection in pigs from farms with and without postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome. Am J Vet Res. 2004; 65:88-92.
• [15]Fenaux M, Opriessnig T, Halbur PG, Elvinger F, Meng XJ. A chimeric porcine circovirus (PCV) with the immunogenic capsid gene of the pathogenic PCV type 2 (PCV2) cloned into the genomic backbone of the nonpathogenic PCV1 induces protective immunity against PCV2 infection in pigs. J Virol. 2004; 78:6297-303.
• [16]Segalés J, Urniza A, Alegre A, Bru T, Crisci E, Nofrarías M, López-Soria S, Balasch M, Sibila M, Xu Z, Chu HJ, Fraile L, Plana-Duran J. A genetically engineered chimeric vaccine against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) improves clinical, pathological and virological outcomes in postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome affected farms. Vaccine. 2009; 27:7313-21.
• [17]Jacela JY, Dritz SS, DeRouchey JM, Tokach MD, Goodband RD, Nelssen JL. Field evaluation of the effects of a porcine circovirus type 2 vaccine on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and mortality rate in a herd with a history of porcine circovirus-associated disease. J Swine Health Prod. 2011; 19:10-8.
• [18]Harris DL, Alexander TJ. Methods of disease control. In: Diseases of Swine. 8th ed. Straw BE, D’Allaire S, Mengling WL, Taylor DJ, editors. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA; 1999: p.1077-1110.
• [19]Maes D, Deluyker H, Verdonck M, Castryck F, Miry C, Vrijens B, de Kruif A. Herd factors associated with the seroprevalences of four major respiratory pathogens in slaughter pigs from farrow-to-finish pig herds. Vet Res. 2000; 31:313-27.
• [20]Hacker RR, Ogilvie JR, Morrison WD, Kains F. Factors affecting excretory behavior of pigs. J Anim Sci. 1994; 72:1455-60.
• [21]Sun G, Guo HQ, Peterson J, Predicala B, Lague C. Diurnal odor, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and carbon dioxide emission profiles of confined swine grower/finisher rooms. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2008; 58:1434-48.
• [22]Ye Z, Zhang G, Seo IH, Kai P, Saha CK, Wang C, Li B. Airflow characteristics at the surface of manure in a storage pit affected by ventilation rate, floor slat opening, and headspace height. Biosyst Eng. 2009; 104:97-105.
• [23]Choi HL, Song JI, Lee JH, Albright LD. Comparison of natural and forced ventilation systems in nursery pig houses. Appl Eng Agric. 2010; 26:1023-33.
• [24]Gonyou HW, Lou W. Effects of eating space and availability of water in feeders on productivity and eating behavior of grower/finisher pigs. J Anim Sci. 2000; 78:865-70.
• [25]Myers AJ, Goodband RD, Tokach MD, Dritz SS, Bergstrom JR, DeRouchey JM, Nelssen JL. The effects of feeder-trough space and gap setting on growth performance of finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2010; 93 Suppl. 1:562-3.
• [26]Miller GY, Algozin KA, McNamara P, Bush EJ. Productivity and economic impacts of feed grade antibiotic use in pork production. J Agr Appl Econ. 2003; 35:467-82.