期刊论文详细信息
Implementation Science
Correctional nursing: a study protocol to develop an educational intervention to optimize nursing practice in a unique context
Mae Squires4  Don N Rose1  Crystal Miller3  Linda Ogilvie5  Diane Doran6  Wendy A Gifford2  Joan Almost7 
[1] Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada;Saint Elizabeth, 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 300, Markham, ON L3R 6H3, Canada;Toronto South Detention Center, Transition Unit, Etobicoke, ON M8Z 4X8, Canada;Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON K7L 2V6, Canada;Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, Government of Ontario, 25 Grosvenor Street, 16th Floor, Toronto, ON M7A 1Y6, Canada;Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H4, Canada;School of Nursing, Queen's University, 92 Barrie Street, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
关键词: Work environments;    Learning needs;    Education intervention;    Evidence-informed care;    Prisons;    Corrections;    Nursing;    Nurses;   
Others  :  813537
DOI  :  10.1186/1748-5908-8-71
 received in 2013-04-03, accepted in 2013-06-18,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Nurses are the primary healthcare providers in correctional facilities. A solid knowledge and expertise that includes the use of research evidence in clinical decision making is needed to optimize nursing practice and promote positive health outcomes within these settings. The institutional emphasis on custodial care within a heavily secured, regulated, and punitive environment presents unique contextual challenges for nursing practice. Subsequently, correctional nurses are not always able to obtain training or ongoing education that is required for broad scopes of practice. The purpose of the proposed study is to develop an educational intervention for correctional nurses to support the provision of evidence-informed care.

Methods

A two-phase mixed methods research design will be used. The setting will be three provincial correctional facilities. Phase one will focus on identifying nurses’ scope of practice and practice needs, describing work environment characteristics that support evidence-informed practice and developing the intervention. Semi-structured interviews will be completed with nurses and nurse managers. To facilitate priorities for the intervention, a Delphi process will be used to rank the learning needs identified by participants. Based on findings, an online intervention will be developed. Phase two will involve evaluating the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention to inform a future experimental design.

Discussion

The context of provincial correctional facilities presents unique challenges for nurses’ provision of care. This study will generate information to address practice and learning needs specific to correctional nurses. Interventions tailored to barriers and supports within specific contexts are important to enable nurses to provide evidence-informed care.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Almost et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140710005035871.pdf 196KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Smith S: Stepping through the looking glass: Professional autonomy in correctional nursing. Corrections Today 2005, 67(1):54-56.
  • [2]Geiman D, O’Brien P: Correctional nursing moves to the head of the class. Corrections Today 2008, 70(3):68-70.
  • [3]Almost J, Doran D, Ogilvie L, Miller C, Kennedy S, Timmings C, Rose DN, Squires M, Lee CT, Bookey-Bassett S: Exploring Worklife Issues in Correctional Settings. J Forensic Nurs 2013, 9(1):3-13.
  • [4]Schuiling K, Slager J: Scope of Practice: Freedom within limits. J Midwifery Wom Heal 2000, 45(6):465-471.
  • [5]Lundgren S, Segesten K: Nurses’ altered conceptions of work in a ward with all-RN staffing. J Clin Nurs 2002, 11:197-204.
  • [6]Ball C, McElligot M: Realizing the potential of critical care nurses: An exploratory study of the factors that affect and comprise the nursing contribution to the recovery of critically ill patients. Int Crit Car Nurs 2003, 19(4):226-238.
  • [7]Oelke N, White D, Besner J, Doran D, McGillis Hall L, Giovannetti P: Nursing workforce utilization: An examination of facilitators and barriers on scope of practice. Nurs Leadersh 2008, 21(11):58-71.
  • [8]Baranek P: A Review of Scopes of Practice of Health Professions in Canada: A Balancing Act. Toronto: Health Council of Canada; 2005.
  • [9]Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie LA, Turner LA: Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mix Method Res 2007, 1:112-133.
  • [10]Morse J, Richards L: Readme First for a User’s Guide to Qualitative Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
  • [11]Irvine D, Sidani S, McGillis Hall L: Linking outcomes to nurses’ roles in health care. Nurs Econ 1998, 16(2):58-87.
  • [12]Donabedian A: Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring: The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment, Volume 1. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press; 1980.
  • [13]Estabrooks C, Squires J, Cumming G, Birdsell J, Norton P: Development and assessment of the Alberta Context Tool. BMC Health Serv Res 2009, 9:234. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [14]Rycroft-Malone J: The PARIHS framework: A framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice. J Nurs Care Qual 2004, 19(4):297-304.
  • [15]Leatt P, Schneck R: Nursing subunit technology: A replication. Admin Sci Quart 1981, 26(2):225-236.
  • [16]Alexander JW: Organizational development strategies on nursing units. Nurs Connect 1996, 9:43-52.
  • [17]Alexander JW, Bauerschmidt AD: Implications for nursing administration of the relationship of technology and structure to quality of care. Nurs Admin Quart 1987, 11:1-10.
  • [18]Cumbey DA, Alexander JW: The relationship of job satisfaction with organizational variables in public health nursing. J Nurs Admin 1998, 28:39-46.
  • [19]Collins J: Educational techniques for lifelong learning; principles of adult learning. Radiographics 2004, 24:1483-1489.
  • [20]Kolb DA, Fry R: Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In Theories of Group Process. Edited by Cooper C. London: Wiley; 1975.
  • [21]Connolly T, Stansfield M: Developing Constructivist Learning Environments to Enhance e-Learning. In Principles of Effective Online Teaching. Edited by Buzzetto-More NA. Santa Rosa, California: Informing Science Press; 2007:19-38.
  • [22]Watkins R: Developing interactive e-learning activities. Perform Improv 2005, 44:5-7.
  • [23]Aiken L, Patrician P: Measuring organizational traits of hospitals: The revised nursing work index. Nurs Res 2000, 49:146-153.
  • [24]Aiken LH, Havens DS, Sloane DM: The magnet nursing services recognition program: A comparison of two groups of magnet hospitals. Am J Nurs 2000, 100(3):26-35.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:14次 浏览次数:17次