Ultrasound imaging of the anterior section of the eye of five different snake species

BMC Veterinary Research

Michael Pedersen³  Tobias Wang¹  Mads Warming¹  Heidi M Jensen¹  Kasper Hansen³  Mari-Ann O Da Silva²  Henrik Lauridsen³ 

[1] Department of Biosciences, Zoophysiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DK-8000, Denmark;Eye Pathology Institute, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V’s Vej, Copenhagen, Denmark;Department of Clinical Medicine, Comparative Medicine Lab, Aarhus University, Brendstrupgaardsvej, Aarhus N, Denmark

关键词: Ultrasound;    Spectacle;    Snake;   

Others  :  1091359
DOI  :  10.1186/s12917-014-0313-5

 received in 2014-08-26, accepted in 2014-12-19,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Nineteen clinically normal snakes: six ball pythons (Python regius), six Burmese pythons (Python bivittatus), one Children’s python (Antaresia childreni), four Amazon tree boas (Corallus hortulanus), and two Malagasy ground boas (Acrantophis madagascariensis) were subjected to ultrasound imaging with 21 MHz (ball python) and 50 MHz (ball python, Burmese python, Children’s python, Amazon tree boa, Malagasy ground boa) transducers in order to measure the different structures of the anterior segment in clinically normal snake eyes with the aim to review baseline values for clinically important ophthalmic structures. The ultrasonographic measurements included horizontal spectacle diameter, spectacle thickness, depth of sub-spectacular space and corneal thickness. For comparative purposes, a formalin-fixed head of a Burmese python was subjected to micro computed tomography.

Results

In all snakes, the spectacle was thinner than the cornea. There was significant difference in spectacle diameter, and spectacle and corneal thickness between the Amazon tree boa and the Burmese and ball pythons. There was no difference in the depth of the sub-spectacular space. The results obtained in the Burmese python with the 50 MHz transducer were similar to the results obtained with micro computed tomography. Images acquired with the 21 MHz transducer included artifacts which may be misinterpreted as ocular structures.

Conclusions

Our measurements of the structures in the anterior segment of the eye can serve as orientative values for snakes examined for ocular diseases. In addition, we demonstrated that using a high frequency transducer minimizes the risk of misinterpreting artifacts as ocular structures.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Lauridsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Schwartz-Karsten H: Über Entwicklung und Bau der Brille bei Ophidiern und Lacertiliern und die Anatomie ihrer Tränenwege. Morph Jahrb 1933, 72:499-540.
• [2]Neher EM: The origin of the brille in Crotalus confluentus lutosus (Great Basin rattlesnake). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1935, 33:533-545.
• [3]Bellairs AD, Boyd JD: The lachrymal apparatus in lizards and snakes – 1. The brille, the orbital glands, lachrymal canaliculi and origin of the lachrymal duct. Proc Zoo Soc Lond 1947, 117:81-108.
• [4]Duke-Elder S: The eyes of reptiles. In Systems of Ophthalmology, Volume 1 - The Eye in Evolution. Henry Kimpton, London, England; 1958:353-395.
• [5]Walls GL: The spectacle. In The vertebrate eye and its adaptive radiation. Cranbrook Institute of Science, Michigan, USA; 1942:449-461.
• [6]Bellairs AD, Underwood G: The origin of snakes. Biol Rev 1951, 26:193-237.
• [7]Da Silva MA, Heegaard S, Wang T, Nyengaard JR, Bertelsen MF: The spectacle of the ball python (Python regius). J Morphol 2014, 275:489-496.
• [8]Maderson PFA: Histological changes in the epidermis of snakes during the sloughing cycle. J Zool 1965, 146:98-133.
• [9]Da Silva MA, Bertelsen MF, Wang T, Pedersen M, Lauridsen H, Heegaard S. Unilateral congenital microphthalmia/anophthalmia in eight pythons (Pythonidae).Vet Ophthalmol 2014 Aug 7. doi:10.1111/vop.12198. [Epub ahead of print].
• [10]Hollingsworth SR, Holmberg BJ, Strunk A, Oakley AD, Sickafoose LM, Kass PH: Comparison of ophthalmic measurements obtained via high-frequency ultrasound imaging in four species of snakes. Am J Vet Res 2007, 68:1111-1114.
• [11]Feldman MK, Katyal S, Blackwood MS: US Artifacts. Radiographics 2009, 29:1179-1189.
• [12]Leo M, Carmody K: Sonography assessment of acute ocular pathology. Ultrasound Clin 2011, 6:227-234.
• [13]Holdsworth DW, Thornton MM: Micro-CT in small animal and specimen imaging. Trends Biotechnol 2002, 20:34-39.
• [14]Kerns MJ, Darst MA, Olsen TG, Fenster M, Hall P, Grevey S: Shrinkage of cutaneous specimens: formalin or other factors involved? J Cutan Pathol 2008, 35:1093-1096.
• [15]Van Doorn K, Sivak J: Blood flow dynamics in the snake spectacle. J Exp Biol 2013, 216:4190-4195.