The caregiving relationship and quality of life among partners of stroke survivors: A cross-sectional study

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Charles Leclerc³  Livia Chyurlia¹  Keith G Wilson²  Christine J McPherson⁴ 

[1] School of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada;Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451, Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8M5, Canada;The Ottawa Hospital Rehabilitation Centre, 505 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, ON K1H 8M2, Canada;School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 451, Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8M5, Canada

关键词: burden;    family;    reciprocity;    quality of life;    caregiving;    Stroke;   

Others  :  826735
DOI  :  10.1186/1477-7525-9-29

 received in 2010-12-09, accepted in 2011-05-09,  发布年份 2011

【 摘 要 】

Background

Since the majority of stroke survivors return home following their stroke, families play a pivotal role in their care. Few studies have addressed both positive and negative aspects of this role or the broader construct of health-related quality of life (HRQL). Furthermore, little consideration has been given to the context of care in terms of relationship quality, and reciprocity. The present study examined the relationships between caregiver quality of life (HRQL), caregiver role, relationship satisfaction, balance and reciprocity in caregivers of partners who had experienced a stroke. Specific hypotheses were made based on equity theory in social relations.

Methods

Fifty-six partner caregivers completed a postal survey that included measures of HRQL (SF-36), caregiver role (negative and positive aspects), relationship satisfaction, reciprocity and balance. Data were also collected on the care recipients' quality of life (Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale).

Results

Compared to a normative sample, caregivers' HRQL was lower for all SF-36 domains. Care recipient and caregiver age, care recipient quality of life and caregiver role (negative) significantly predicted physical component summary scores on the SF-36, while care recipient quality of life and caregiver role (negative) significantly correlated with mental component summary scores. Relationship satisfaction and intrinsic rewards of caregiving were found to be important predictors of positive aspects of the caregiver role. Caregivers who viewed their relationship as less balanced in terms of give and take had significantly greater caregiver burden than those who viewed their relationship as more equitable.

Conclusions

The study highlights the importance of taking a broader approach to examining partner caregiving in the context of stroke, in terms of the caregiving relationship and their influence on the health and well-being of caregivers.

【 授权许可】

   
2011 McPherson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Greenwood N, Mackenzie A, Cloud GC, Wilson N: Informal carers of stroke survivors--factors influencing carers: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Disability & Rehabilitation 2008, 30(18):1329-1349.
• [2]Han B, Haley WE: Family caregiving for patients with stroke. Review and analysis. Stroke 1999, 30(7):1478-1485.
• [3]Low JT, Payne S, Roderick P: The impact of stroke on informal carers: a literature review. Soc Sci Med 1999, 49(6):711-725.
• [4]McKevitt C, Redfern J, Mold F, Wolfe C: Qualitative studies of stroke: A systematic review. Stroke 2004, 35:1499-1505.
• [5]Greenwood N, Mackenzie A, Cloud GC, Wilson N: Informal primary carers of stroke survivors living at home - challenges, satisfactions and coping: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Disability and Rehabilitation 2009, 31(5):337-351.
• [6]White CL, Lauzon S, Yaffe MJ, Wood-Dauphinee S: Toward a model of quality of life for family caregivers of stroke survivors. Quality of Life Research 2004, 13(3):625-638.
• [7]McCullagh E, Brigstocke G, Donaldson N, Kalra L: Determinants of caregiving burden and quality of life in caregivers of stroke patients. Stroke 2005, 36(10):2181-2186.
• [8]van den Heuvel ETP, de Witte LP, Schure LM, Sanderman R, Meyboomde Jong B: Risk factors for burn-out in caregivers of stroke patients, and possibilities for intervention. Clin Rehabil 2001, 15(6):669-677.
• [9]Schulz R, Hebert RS, Dew MA, Brow SL, Scheier MF, Beach SR, Czaja SJ, Martire LM, Coon D, Langa KM, Gitlin LN, Stevens AB, Nichols L: Patient suffering and caregiver compassion: New opportunities for research, practice, and policy. The Gerontologist 2007, 47:1-13.
• [10]Beach SR, Schulz R, Yee JL, Jackson S: Negative and positive health effects of caring for a disabled spouse: longitudinal findings from the caregiver health effects study. Psychology & Aging 2000, 15(2):259-271.
• [11]Cohen CA, Colantonio A, Vernich L: Positive aspects of caregiving: rounding out the caregiver experience. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002, 17(2):184-188.
• [12]Kinney JM, Stephens MAP, Franks MM, Norris VK: Stresses and satisfactions of family caregivers to older stroke patients. J App Gerontol 1995, 14:3-21.
• [13]Grant G, Ramcharan P, McGrath M, Nolan M, Keady J: Rewards and gratifications among family caregivers: Towards a refined model of caring and coping. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 1998, 42(1):58-71.
• [14]Cartwright JC, Archbold PG, Stewart BJ, Limandri B: Enrichment processes in family caregiving to frail elders. Advances in Nursing Science 1994, 17(1):31-43.
• [15]Robinson-Smith G, Mahoney C: Coping and marital equilibrium after stroke. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 1995, 27(2):83-89.
• [16]Evans RL, Connis RT, Bishop DS, Hendricks RD, Haselkorn JK: Stroke: A family dilemma. Disability & Rehabilitation 1994, 16(3):110-118.
• [17]Lu L, Argyle M: Receiving and giving support: Effects on relationships and well-being. Counselling Psychology Quarterly 1992, 5(2):123-133.
• [18]Carruth AK, Tate US, Moffett BS, Hill K: Reciprocity, emotional well-being, and family functioning as determinants of family satisfaction in caregivers of elderly parents. Nurs Res 1997, 46(2):93-100.
• [19]Williamson GM, Schulz R: Relationship orientation, quality of prior relationship, and distress among caregivers of Alzheimer's patients. Psychology & Aging 1990, 5(4):502-509.
• [20]Poulin MJ, Brown SL, Smith DM, Jankovic A, Langa KM: Does a helping hand mean a heavy heart? Helping behavior and well-being among spouse caregivers. Psychology and Aging 2010, 25(1):108-117.
• [21]Clark PC, Dunbar SB, Shields CG, Viswanathan B, Aycock DM, Wolf SL: Influence of stroke survivor characteristics and family conflict surrounding recovery on caregivers' mental and physical health. Nurs Res 2004, 53(6):406-413.
• [22]Epstein-Lubow GP, Beevers CG, Bishop DS, Miller IW: Family functioning is associated with depressive symptoms in caregivers of acute stroke survivors. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2009, 90(6):947-955.
• [23]Walker AJ, Pratt CC, Oppy NC: Perceived reciprocity in family caregiving. Family Relations 1992, 41(1):82-85.
• [24]Walster E, Berscheid E, Walster GW: New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973, 25:151-176.
• [25]Walster E, Berscheid E, Walster GW: Equity theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1978.
• [26]McPherson CJ, Wilson KG, Chyurlia L, Leclerc C: The balance of give and take in caregiver-partner relationships: An examination of self-perceived burden, relationship equity, and quality of life from the perspective of care recipients following stroke. Rehabilitation Psychology 2010, 55(2):194-203.
• [27]Gleason MEJ, Lida M, Shrout PE: Daily Supportive Equity in Close Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2003, 29(8):1036-1045.
• [28]Ybema JF, Kuijer RG, Hagedoorn M, Buunk BP: Caregiver burnout among intimate partners of patients with a severe illness: An equity perspective. Personal Relationships 2002, 9(1):73-88.
• [29]Reid C, Moss S, Hyman G: Caregiver Reciprocity: The effect of reciprocity, carer self-esteem and motivation on the experience of caregiver burden. Australian Journal of Psychology 2005, 57(3):186-196.
• [30]Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (including the FIM™ instrument) version 5.1. Buffalo, NY: Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation; 1997.
• [31]Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Biller J: Measuring quality of life in a way that is meaningful to stroke patients. Neurology 1999, 53(8):1839-1843.
• [32]Ware JE, Kosinski M, Gandek B: SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln (RI): Quality Metric Inc; 2000.
• [33]Jonsson AC, Lindgren I, Hallstrom B, Norrving B, Lindgren A: Determinants of quality of life in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers. Stroke 2005, 36(4):803-808.
• [34]Ware JE, Kosinski MA: SF-36 Physical and mental health Summary Scales: A manual for users of version 1. Manual and interpretation guide:. 2nd edition. Lincoln (RI): Quality Metric Inc; 2007.
• [35]Given CW, Given B, Stommel M, Collins C, King S, Franklin S: The caregiver reaction assessment (CRA) for caregivers to persons with chronic physical and mental impairments. Res Nurs Health 1992, 15(4):271-283.
• [36]Grant JS, Bartolucci AA, Elliot TR, Giger JN: Sociodemographic, physical, and psychosocial characteristics of depressed and non-depressed family caregivers of stroke survivors. Brain Injury 2000, 14(12):1089-1100.
• [37]Teel CS, Duncan P, Lai SM: Caregiving experiences after stroke. Nurs Res 2001, 50(1):53-60.
• [38]Carruth AK, Holland C, Larsen L: Development and psychometric evaluation of the Caregiver Reciprocity Scale II. J Nurs Meas 2000, 8(2):179-191.
• [39]Hatfield E, Traupmann J, Sprecher S, Utne M, Hay J: Equity and intimate relations: Recent research. In Compatible and incompatible relationships. Edited by Ickes W. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1984:91-118.
• [40]Kuijer RG, Buunk BP, Ybema JF: Justice of give-and-take in the intimate relationship: When one partner of a couple is diagnosed with cancer. Personal Relationships 2001, 8(1):75-92.
• [41]Norton R: Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage & the Family 1983, 45:141-151.
• [42]Heyman RE, Sayers SL, Bellack AS: Global marital satisfaction versus marital adjustment: An empirical comparison of three measures. Journal of Family Psychology 1994, 8(4):432-446.
• [43]Green SB: How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivariate Behavioral Research 1991, 26(3):499-510.
• [44]Van Yperen NW, Buunk BP: A longitudinal study of equity and satisfaction in intimate relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology 1990, 20(4):287-309.
• [45]Nolan M, Grant G: Regular respite: An evaluation of a hospital rota bed scheme for elderly people. London, UK: Ace Books, Age Concern Institute of Gerontology Research Papers; 1992.
• [46]Kuijer RG, Buunk BP, De Jong M, Ybema JF, Sanderman R: Effects of a brief intervention program for patients with cancer and their partners on feelings of inequity, relationship quality and psychological distress. Psycho-Oncology 2004, 13:321-334.
• [47]Gouldner AW: The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review 1960, 25(2):161-178.
• [48]Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, Sanderman R, van den Bos GA: Measuring both negative and positive reactions to giving care to cancer patients: psychometric qualities of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA). Soc Sci Med 1999, 48(9):1259-1269.