Maternal death inquiry and response in India - the impact of contextual factors on defining an optimal model to help meet critical maternal health policy objectives

Health Research Policy and Systems

Marzio Babille³  Gaurav Arya²  Sudha Balakrishnan¹  Akhil B Biswas⁵  Narayan Gaonkar⁶  Archana Mishra⁴  Pavitra Mohan²  Henry D Kalter⁷ 

[1] UNICEF, 219/2, AJC Bose Road, Kolkata 700 017, West Bengal, India;UNICEF, B-9 Bhawani Singh Lane, C-Scheme, Opp. Nehru Sahkar Bhawan, Jaipur 302 001, Rajasthan, India;UNICEF, 73 Lodhi Estate, New Delhi 110 003, India;Maternal Health, Directorate of Health Services, 3rd floor, Bank of India Building, Arera Hills, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India;Department of Community Medicine, RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India;UNICEF, E-7/650 Arera Colony, Shahpura, Bhopal 462 016, Madhya Pradesh, India;Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA

关键词: community participation;    death inquiry;    verbal autopsy;    health policy;    Maternal mortality;   

Others  :  810074
DOI  :  10.1186/1478-4505-9-41

 received in 2009-10-16, accepted in 2011-11-30,  发布年份 2011

【 摘 要 】

Background

Maternal death reviews have been utilized in several countries as a means of identifying social and health care quality issues affecting maternal survival. From 2005 to 2009, a standardized community-based maternal death inquiry and response initiative was implemented in eight Indian states with the aim of addressing critical maternal health policy objectives. However, state-specific contextual factors strongly influenced the effort's success. This paper examines the impact and implications of the contextual factors.

Methods

We identified community, public health systems and governance related contextual factors thought to affect the implementation, utilization and up-scaling of the death inquiry process. Then, according to selected indicators, we documented the contextual factors' presence and their impact on the process' success in helping meet critical maternal health policy objectives in four districts of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and West Bengal. Based on this assessment, we propose an optimal model for conducting community-based maternal death inquiries in India and similar settings.

Results

The death inquiry process led to increases in maternal death notification and investigation whether civil society or government took charge of these tasks, stimulated sharing of the findings in multiple settings and contributed to the development of numerous evidence-based local, district and statewide maternal health interventions. NGO inputs were essential where communities, public health systems and governance were weak and boosted effectiveness in stronger settings. Public health systems participation was enabled by responsive and accountable governance. Communities participated most successfully through India's established local governance Panchayat Raj Institutions. In one instance this led to the development of a multi-faceted intervention well-integrated at multiple levels.

Conclusions

The impact of several contextual factors on the death inquiry process could be discerned, and suggested an optimal implementation model. District and state government must mandate and support the process, while the district health office should provide overall coordination, manage the death inquiry data as part of its routine surveillance programme, and organize a highly participatory means, preferably within an existing structure, of sharing the findings with the community and developing evidence-based maternal health interventions. NGO assistance and the support of a development partner may be needed, particularly in locales with weaker communities, public health systems or governance.

【 授权许可】

   
2011 Kalter et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2008. Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, and the World Bank. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
• [2]Safe motherhood and The World Bank: lessons from ten years of experience. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 1999.
• [3]India's Family Welfare Program: Toward a Reproductive and Child Health Approach. In World Bank Report No. 14644-IN. Washington, DC: World Bank; 1995.
• [4]Pachauri S: Defining a Reproductive Health Package for India: A Proposed Framework. South and East Asia Regional Working Paper. New Delhi; 1995.
• [5]World Bank Project Appraisal Document (India): Reproductive and Child Health Project. In World Bank Report No. 1693-IN. Washington, DC: World Bank; 1997.
• [6]Government of India: National Population Policy. New Delhi: Government of India; 2002.
• [7]Government of India: National Health policy. New Delhi: Government of India; 2002a.
• [8]Government of India: Tenth Five Year Plan (2002-2007). New Delhi: Government of India; 2002b.
• [9]Government of India. Reproductive and Child Health Programme: The principles and evidence base for state RCH II Programme Implementation Plans (PIPs). In RCH II Programme Document; RCH II - Document 2. New Delhi: Government of India; 2005:33.
• [10]Government of India. Reproductive and Child Health Programme: The principles and evidence base for state RCH II Programme Implementation Plans (PIPs). In RCH II Programme Document; RCH II - Document 2. New Delhi: Government of India; 2005:30.
• [11]Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Department of Family Welfare: National Rural Healthcare Mission. New Delhi: Government of India; 2005.
• [12]Sample Registration System: Maternal Mortality in India: 1997-2003. Trends, Causes and Risk Factors. New Delhi: Registrar General, Government of India; 2006.
• [13]Thaddeus S, Maine D: Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 1994, 38:1091-1110.
• [14]Bhatia JC: New data on maternal mortality in India. Foro Mund Salud 1990, 11:187-191.
• [15]Gajalakshmi V, Peto R: Commentary: Verbal autopsy procedure for adult deaths. Int J Epidemiol 2006, 35:748-750.
• [16]Bhatia JC: Levels and causes of maternal mortality in southern India. Stud Fam Plann 1993, 24:310-318.
• [17]Campbell O, Ronsmans C: Verbal autopsies for maternal deaths. Report of a WHO workshop, London, 10-13 January 1994. WHO/FHE/MSM/95.15; Geneva: Division of Family Health, World Health Organization; 1995.
• [18]Supratikto G, Wirth ME, Achadi E, Cohen S, Ronsmans C: A district-based audit of the causes and circumstances of maternal deaths in South Kalimantan, Indonesia. Bull World Health Organ 2002, 80:228-235.
• [19]Beyond the Numbers: reviewing maternal deaths and complications to make pregnancy safer. [http://www.who.int/making_pregnancy_safer/documents/9241591838/en/index.html] webciteWorld Health Organization; 2004.
• [20]Karki C: Book review of Maternal Mortality Reduction in Sri Lanka, by Vidyasagara NW. In Kathmandu Univ Med J. Volume 2. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003::168-169.
• [21]Everybody's Business: Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes: WHO's Framework for Action [http://www.who.int/healthsystems/strategy/everybodys_business.pdf] webciteWorld Health Organization; 2007.
• [22]Murray CJL, Frenk J: A WHO Framework for Health System Performance Assessment. [http://www.who.int/healthinfo/paper06.pdf] webciteEvidence and Information for Policy, World Health Organization; 1999.
• [23]Arah OA, Klazinga NS, Delnoij DMJ, Ten Asbroek AHA, Custers T: Conceptual frameworks for health systems performance: a quest for effectiveness, quality, and improvement. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2003, 15:377-398.
• [24]Lavis J, Stoddart G: Social Cohesion and Health. [http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/econ/rsrch/papers/archive/99-10.pdf] webciteWorking paper: Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University; 2011.
• [25]Government of India: Census report 2001. New Delhi: Government of India; 2001.
• [26]Government of India: Poverty Estimates for 2004-05. New Delhi: Press Information Bureau, Government of India; 2007.
• [27]Government of India: Third National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06. [http://www.nfhsindia.org/] webciteNew Delhi: Government of India;
• [28]Government of India: Second National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998-99. [http://www.nfhsindia.org/] webciteNew Delhi: Government of India;
• [29]Government of India: Rural Health Services Bulletin. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2006.
• [30]Government of India: National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health: Financing and Delivery of Health Care Services in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2005.
• [31]Sadanandan A: Decentralization in India. [http://www.duke.edu/~ass21/DecentralizationinIndia.html] webcitePhD thesis work: Department of Political Science, Duke University; 2008.
• [32]Government of Rajasthan: National Rural Health Mission: Reproductive and Child Health Programme-II Project Implementation Plan. Jaipur: Government of Rajasthan; 2008-09.
• [33]Government of Madhya Pradesh: National Rural Health Mission: Reproductive and Child Health Programme-II Project Implementation Plan. Bhopal: Government of Madhya Pradesh; 2008-09.