Effects of forest areas on air quality; Aras Basin and its environment

Journal of Environmental Health Science Engineering

Sevgi Yılmaz²  Turgay Dindaroğlu¹  Metin Demir² 

[1]Department of Forest, Sütçüimam University, 46100 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey

[2]Department of Landscape Architecture, Architecture and Design Faculty, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey

关键词: Planning;    Aras Basin;    Forest land;    Air control;    Air quality;   

Others  :  805241
DOI  :  10.1186/2052-336X-12-60

 received in 2013-04-14, accepted in 2014-02-26,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

In the study, the Aras Basin and its environment, one of the most important hydrological basins of Turkey, was evaluated. In survey area, to determine the change of air quality, it was benefited from 23,770 pieces of hourly measured SO₂ (Sulfur dioxide) and PM₁₀ (particulate matter) concentration values for the December, January and February of 2009–2010 in which the pollution is at peak, by forming database in geographical information system (GIS), spatial analyze maps were attained. By comparing; maps showing attained numeral air quality and maps showing the spread of forest lands in the region, it was tried to determine the relation and interaction between air quality and forest lands.

Results

The results indicated that the Air Quality Index (AQI) values were the lowest for the forest land in the months which mean that the forest land was the most convenient place for health. The increase the AQI, air pollution also increases. The results indicated that the air quality index changed from 1 to 4 within the region. In the forest areas, the AQI values for the months were the lowest. This indicated that the most suitable places for health are the places with a high forest coverage rates (76,50; 66,46 and 96,78%). There was no forest area within the region where the AQI values were the highest, so the risk was maximum, for the months.

Conclusions

Authorities should create new afforestation areas and rehabilitate degraded forest lands to limit air pollution by increasing the quality of urban life.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Demir et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Öner N, Ayan S, Sıvacıolu A, Mal B: Environmental impacts of urban forestry and urban forests. Kastamonu Univ Faculty For 2007, 2:1303-2399.
• [2]Fidan C, Duran C, Kırış R: Effect of Plant Formations of Water Resources. Ankara, Turkey: TMMOB 2 Water Policy Conference: 20–22 March 2008; 2007.
• [3]Keller T: The Possibilities of Using Plants to Alleviate the Effects of Motorvehicles. 1979.
• [4]Bridgman HA, Davies TD, Jickells T, Hunova J, Tovey K, Bridges K, Surapipith V: Air pollution in the Krusne Hory region, Czech Republic during the 1990s. Atmos Environ 2002, 36:3375-3389.
• [5]Afroz R, Hassan MN, Ibrahim NA: Review of air pollution and health impacts in Malaysia. Environ Res 2003, 92:71-77.
• [6]Bayram H, Dörtbudak Z, Evyapan F, Kargın M, Bülbül B: Human health effects of air pollution in the world, our country and our region, air pollution problem. Dicle Med J 2006, 2:105-112.
• [7]Anyanwu EC, Kanu I: The role of urban forest in the protection of human environmental health in geographically-prone unpredictable hostile weather conditions. Int J Environ Sci Tech 2006, 3:197-201.
• [8]Richards M, Ghanem M, Osmond M, Guo MY, Hassard J: Grid-based analysis of air pollution data. Ecol Model 2006, 194:274-286.
• [9]Aydın ME, Durduran SS, Özcan S, Bedük F: Evaluation changes in air quality using geographic information system (GIS) a in Konya. 7. İzmir, Turkey: National environmental engineering, environmental technology congress of life; 2007.
• [10]State Planning Organization: Air Pollution from the Energy Sector. Ankara: National Environmental Action Plan; 1997.
• [11]Elbir T, Muezzinoglu A, Bayram A: Evaluation of some air pollution indicators in Turkey. Environ Int J 2000, 26:5-10.
• [12]Yeşilyurt C, Akçan N: Criteria for Air pollution monitoring and sampling methodologies. Republic of Turkey ministry of health. Refik Saydam Hygiene Center Res Inst Environ Health 2005.
• [13]Ferreira F, Tente H, Torres P, Cardoso S, Palma-Oliveira JM: Air quality monitoring and management in Lizbon. Environ Monit Assess 2000, 65:443-450.
• [14]Tayanç M: An assessment of spatial and temporal variation of sulfur dioxide levels over Istanbul, Turkey. Environ Pollut 2000, 107:61-69.
• [15]Nas B, Berktay A: Using Geographic Information Systems for Environmental Problem Solving 2. İstanbul, Turkey: Geographical Information Systems Information Days 2002; 2006.
• [16]Puliafito E, Guevara M, Puliafito C: Characterization of urban air quality using GIS as a management system. Environ Pollut 2003, 122:105-117.
• [17]Alesheikh AA, Oskouei AK, Atabi F, Helali H: Providing interoperability for air quality in-situ sensors observations using GML technology. Int J Environ Sci Tech 2005, 2:133-140.
• [18]Eastern Anatolia Project Master Plan: Eastern Anatolia Project Master Plan, Prime Ministry State Planning Organization. Volume II edition. Ankara: Present Situation and Analysis; 2010.
• [19]Aydınlar B, Güven H, Kırksekiz S: What is air pollution. What are the methods of measurement and air quality modeling. Air pollution and modelling. Sakarya Univ Institute Sci Environ Eng 2009.
• [20]World health organization Air quality guidelines - global update 2005. http://www.who.int/phe/health_topics/outdoorair/outdoorair_aqg/en/index.html webcite
• [21]Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM: An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.
• [22]Johnston K, Hoef M, Krivoruchko K, Lucas N: Using ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst. New York: ESRI; 2001.
• [23]National air quality monitoring network Ministry of Forest and Water Affairs. http://www.havaizleme.gov.tr/Default.htm webcite
• [24]The Physical Science Basis: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York, USA: Summary for Policy Makers; 2007.
• [25]World Health Organization: WHO United Nations Environment Program. Urban Air Pollution in Megacities of the World. UK: Blackwell; 1992.
• [26]Elbir T, Muezzinoglu A: Estimation of emission strengths of primary air pollutants in the city of İzmir, Turkey. Atmospheric Environ 2004, 38:1851-1857.
• [27]Simkhada K, Murthy VK, Khanal SN: Assessment of ambient air quality in Bishnumati corridor, Kathmandu metropolis. Int J Environ Sci Tech 2005, 2:217-222.
• [28]Giri D, Murthy VK, Adhikary PR, Khanal SN: Ambient air quality of Kathmandu valley as reflected by atmospheric particulate matter concentrations (PM10). Int J Environ Sci Tech 2006, 3:403-410.
• [29]Özer U, Aydın R, Akçay H: Air pollution profile of Turkey. Chem Int 1997, 19:190-191.
• [30]Altıkat A, Torun FE, Bayram TT: Global pollution: an example of air pollution in the world, European Union and Turkey. Erciyes Univ J Institute Sci Technol 2011, 27:134-149.
• [31]The air quality of the statistical data Turkey Statistical Institute. http://www.tuik.gov.tr webcite
• [32]McPherson EG: Benefits of urban forest. J Soc Municipal Arborists 2003, 39:12-23.
• [33]Asan Ü, Destan S, Özkan Y: Role and Importance of Prevention of Global Warming on Forests. Symposium on Turkish Forestry. Antalya, Turkey: Immediate Action Required Topics and Legislation Effects on Structure during the Process of International Transformation; 2005.
• [34]Nowak DJ, McPherson EG: Quantifying the impact of trees. Unasylva: The Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project; 1993.
• [35]Nowak DJ: Air pollution removal by Chicago’s urban forest. In Chicago’s Urban forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban forest Climate Project. Edited by McPherson EG, Nowak DJ, Rowntree RA. Radnor, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experimental Station; 1994.
• [36]Acar C, Günay K, Acar H: Urban Ecosystem and its Functions, the Contribution of Urban Forestry, Landscape Ecology in Terms of Evaluation. Ankara, Turkey: I. Proceedings of the National Urban Forestry Congress; 2004.
• [37]Dirik H, Ata C: Urban forestry, benefits, planning and technical principles. İstanbul Univ J Faculty For 2005, 55:1-14.
• [38]Yang J, McRide J, Zhou J, Sun Z: The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban For Urban Greening 2005, 3:65-78.
• [39]Tilki F, Güner S, Tüfekçioğlu A: Urban forestry and urban forestry practices in artvin province Artvin Çoruh university. Faculty Forestry J 2008, 9:92-100.
• [40]Saraçoğlu N: The role of forests in global climate change slowing down. Sci Ed Mental Brightness 2011, 135:60-71.