Comparing single-site with multisite rTMS for the treatment of chronic tinnitus – clinical effects and neuroscientific insights: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials

Berthold Langguth¹  Rainer Rupprecht¹  Timm B Poeppl¹  Peter M Kreuzer¹  Martin Schecklmann¹  Astrid Lehner¹ 

[1] Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Universitaetsstraße 84, Regensburg 93053, Germany

关键词: Network;    Neuromodulation;    Chronic tinnitus;    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation;   

Others  :  1093174
DOI  :  10.1186/1745-6215-14-269

 received in 2013-02-27, accepted in 2013-08-08,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Several years ago, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the auditory cortex has been introduced as a treatment approach for chronic tinnitus. Even if this treatment is beneficial for a subgroup of patients, the overall effects are limited. This limitation may be due to the fact that the auditory cortex is only one of several brain areas involved in tinnitus. Whereas auditory areas are considered to code for tinnitus loudness, conscious perception of and attention allocation to tinnitus is supposed to be reflected by network activity involving frontal and parietal cortical areas. The aim of the present study is to influence this frontoparietal network more efficiently by perturbing the most important nodes with rTMS.

Methods/design

This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients receive rTMS treatment on 10 consecutive working days using either the multisite rTMS protocol (left dorsolateral prefrontal, 1,000 stimuli, 20 Hz; left temporoparietal, 1,000 stimuli, 1 Hz; right temporoparietal stimulation, 1,000 stimuli, 1 Hz) or a single-site protocol (unilateral stimulation of the temporoparietal cortex, 3,000 stimuli, 1 Hz). Individuals aged 18 to 70 years with chronic tinnitus ≥6-month duration and a Tinnitus Handicap Inventory score ≥38 are recruited for the study. A total of 50 patients are needed to detect a clinical relevant change of tinnitus severity (α = 0.05; 1 – β = 0.80). Primary outcome measures are the change in the Tinnitus Questionnaire score from baseline to the end of treatment as well as the number of treatment responders as defined by a reduction in the Tinnitus Questionnaire score of ≥5 points. Furthermore, changes in brain structure and activity are assessed using (functional) magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography in the resting state. Those measurements are also performed in 25 healthy control subjects.

Discussion

This study is designed to reveal whether network stimulation is superior to single-site stimulation in the treatment of chronic tinnitus. Furthermore, the comparison between tinnitus patients and healthy controls and the longitudinal effects of both rTMS treatment protocols on brain structure and function allow inferences to be made about the neural correlates of tinnitus.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials:NCT01663324

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Lehner et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Hoffman HJ, Reed GW: Epidemiology of tinnitus. In Tinnitus: Theory and Management. Edited by Snow JB. Lewiston, NY: BC Decker Inc; 2004:16-41.
• [2]Langguth B: A review of tinnitus symptoms beyond ‘ringing in the ears’: a call to action. Curr Med Res Opin 2011, 27:1635-1643.
• [3]Kaltenbach JA, Godfrey DA: Dorsal cochlear nucleus hyperactivity and tinnitus: are they related? Am J Audiol 2008, 17:148-161.
• [4]Melcher JR, Sigalovsky IS, Guinan JJ Jr, Levine RA: Lateralized tinnitus studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging: abnormal inferior colliculus activation. J Neurophysiol 2000, 83:1058-1072.
• [5]Arnold W, Bartenstein P, Oestreicher E, Romer W, Schwaiger M: Focal metabolic activation in the predominant left auditory cortex in patients suffering from tinnitus: a PET study with [18F]deoxyglucose. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1996, 58:195-199.
• [6]Adjamian P, Sereda M, Hall DA: The mechanisms of tinnitus: perspectives from human functional neuroimaging. Hear Res 2009, 253:15-31.
• [7]Lanting CP, de Kleine E, van Dijk P: Neural activity underlying tinnitus generation: results from PET and fMRI. Hear Res 2009, 255:1-13.
• [8]Roberts LE, Eggermont JJ, Caspary DM, Shore SE, Melcher JR, Kaltenbach JA: Ringing ears: the neuroscience of tinnitus. J Neurosci 2010, 30:14972-14979.
• [9]Weisz N, Dohrmann K, Elbert T: The relevance of spontaneous activity for the coding of the tinnitus sensation. Prog Brain Res 2007, 166:61-70.
• [10]Eichhammer P, Langguth B, Marienhagen J, Kleinjung T, Hajak G: Neuronavigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with tinnitus: a short case series. Biol Psychiatry 2003, 54:862-865.
• [11]Kleinjung T, Eichhammer P, Langguth B, Jacob P, Marienhagen J, Hajak G, Wolf SR, Strutz J: Long-term effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with chronic tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005, 132:566-569.
• [12]Plewnia C: Brain stimulation: new vistas for the exploration and treatment of tinnitus. CNS Neurosci Ther 2011, 17:449-461.
• [13]Plewnia C, Vonthein R, Wasserka B, Arfeller C, Naumann A, Schraven SP, Plontke SK: Treatment of chronic tinnitus with theta burst stimulation: a randomized controlled trial. Neurol 2012, 78:1628-1634.
• [14]Kleinjung T, Langguth B: Strategies for enhancement of transcranial magnetic stimulation effects in tinnitus patients. Int Tinnitus J 2009, 15:154-160.
• [15]Burton H, Wineland A, Bhattacharya M, Nicklaus J, Garcia KS, Piccirillo JF: Altered networks in bothersome tinnitus: a functional connectivity study. BMC Neurosci 2012, 13:3. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Maudoux A, Lefebvre P, Cabay JE, Demertzi A, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Laureys S, Soddu A: Auditory resting-state network connectivity in tinnitus: a functional MRI study. PLoS One 2012, 7:e36222.
• [17]Schlee W, Hartmann T, Langguth B, Weisz N: Abnormal resting-state cortical coupling in chronic tinnitus. BMC Neurosci 2009, 10:11. BioMed Central Full Text
• [18]Schlee W, Mueller N, Hartmann T, Keil J, Lorenz I, Weisz N: Mapping cortical hubs in tinnitus. BMC Biol 2009, 7:80. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Schlee W, Weisz N, Bertrand O, Hartmann T, Elbert T: Using auditory steady state responses to outline the functional connectivity in the tinnitus brain. PLoS One 2008, 3:e3720.
• [20]De Ridder D, Elgoyhen AB, Romo R, Langguth B: Phantom percepts: tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:8075-8080.
• [21]Lehner A, Schecklmann M, Poeppl TB, Kreuzer PM, Vielsmeier V, Rupprecht R, Landgrebe M, Langguth B: Multisite rTMS for the treatment of chronic tinnitus: stimulation of the cortical tinnitus network – a pilot study. Brain Topogr 2013, 26:501-510.
• [22]Goebel G, Hiller W: The tinnitus questionnaire. A standard instrument for grading the degree of tinnitus. Results of a multicenter study with the tinnitus questionnaire. HNO 1994, 42:166-172.
• [23]Langguth B, Goodey R, Azevedo A, Bjorne A, Cacace A, Crocetti A, Del Bo L, De Ridder D, Diges I, Elbert T, Flor H, Herraiz C, Ganz Sanchez T, Eichhammer P, Figueiredo R, Hajak G, Kleinjung T, Landgrebe M, Londero A, Lainez MJ, Mazzoli M, Meikle MB, Melcher J, Rauschecker JP, Sand PG, Struve M, Van de Heyning P, Van Dijk P, Vergara R: Consensus for tinnitus patient assessment and treatment outcome measurement: tinnitus research initiative meeting, Regensburg, July 2006. Prog Brain Res 2007, 166:525.
• [24]Hallam RS, Jakes SC, Hinchcliffe R: Cognitive variables in tinnitus annoyance. Br J Clin Psychol 1988, 27(Pt 3):213-222.
• [25]Nelting M, Finlayson NK: Geräuschüberempfindlichkeits-Fragebogen (GÜF). Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2004.
• [26]Khedr EM, Abo-Elfetoh N, Rothwell JC, El-Atar A, Sayed E, Khalifa H: Contralateral versus ipsilateral rTMS of temporoparietal cortex for the treatment of chronic unilateral tinnitus: comparative study. Eur J Neurol 2010, 17:976-983.
• [27]Rossi S, De Capua A, Ulivelli M, Bartalini S, Falzarano V, Filippone G, Passero S: Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on chronic tinnitus: a randomised, crossover, double blind, placebo controlled study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007, 78:857-863.
• [28]Hoffman RE, Boutros NN, Berman RM, Roessler E, Belger A, Krystal JH, Charney DS: Transcranial magnetic stimulation of left temporoparietal cortex in three patients reporting hallucinated ‘voices’. Biol Psychiatry 1999, 46:130-132.
• [29]Jasper HH: The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1958, 10:371-375.